Counterculture Green

778 Words2 Pages

Environmentalism is not just a simple word, with a specific definition, in order to understand the complications of this word, it is important to look back at the history. The concerns for wilderness, the global warming and other natural concerns first opened the door to preservation, which would be considered the first form of environmentalism, most of the preservationists were religious, that even suggested the none use of resources in order to protect them. The other movements like conservationists, which wanted to use natural resource while protecting them, through following certain rules and regulations. Furthermore the rule claimed by environmentalists or environmentalism is to protect and sustain life for the next generations, to make the earth a better place to live in, but when it come to how to do it, there is always a difference, like any other human issue.
Counterculture Green book by professor Andrew Kirk discuss one of those differences, the pragmatic environmentalism. The pragmatic view that Stewart Brand and his colleagues presented focus on the individual ability to change. When Stewart brand say "we are the gods and we might as well get good at it" (kirk 1), he made the human, as the sole power that can determine his future, so he would better make the choices that would allow him to continue to survive and not be defeated by any of the environmental concerns. The counterculture green think that a national change can only start with an individual change. It is more useful to instal a new solar water heater or a less energy using equipment, than protesting and trying to make policy making change, by profiting from the new alternative technology the possibility to create a sustainable economy is achievable (kirk 6...

... middle of paper ...

...apitalistic agriculture is a progress in the art, not only of robbing the laborer, but of rubbing the soil”.
All in all, the most important credit for the counterculture green was the optimism, which professor Kirk clearly mention in his book “optimism was one of the things that made the Whole Earth such a success” (Kirk 167). Whither it was, Stewart Brand, the soft-tech proponents (Kirk 105), Bill English (Kirk 128), the New Alchemy founders (Kirk 144), and other mentioned in Kirk's book, they all were optimistic who tried to solve problems or showed people how to do so. A change does not come by just thinking, that everything is getting worse, everyone is trying to cheat you, the government is trying to control you, the capitalism is the enemy, the new world order, and all of the other conspiracy theories. However a change can only start with an individual change.

Open Document