A thief stealing as simple as purse is, by far, nothing short of a petty crime, and for the same thief to plan an elaborate bank heist could at the very least be considered a respectable effort, but what of a thief who is capable of stealing, for all intents and purposes, an immovable object? Absurd… perhaps, but that is essentially what the Czechoslovakian con-man Count Victor Lustig accomplished by selling Paris’s one and only Eiffel Tower; though to elaborate the tower was fraudulently sold not physically stolen. Lustig’s plan was a fairly simple one that involved selecting a target, disguising as a government official and claiming the money, but it was the specific decisions that he executed that allowed his operation to be successful. …show more content…
The most crucial part of Lustig’s plan was without a doubt the selecting of an appropriate mark (target) for his scam.
Selling the tower to any mere fool willing to accept Lustig’s offer at face value would have likely required minimal effort, but that would have most definitely resulted in very little gain as well; in order to truly profit from this bold endeavor a much more substantial victim is required. Lustig did indeed “[draw] up a shortlist of five [suitable] candidates” (ProQuest citation) but he ultimately set his eyes on Andre Poisson, “A French businessman and scrap-metal merchant hoping to make something of a reputation for himself” (Prague citation), and he did so for good reason to. Poisson possessed three crucial traits that made him Lustig’s ideal target, for one he was wealthy, which of course meant Lustig had a lot to gain from duping him, but he was also a scrap dealer which meant that he himself could be motivated by the profit from purchasing such a huge towering mass of steel. But in addition to that, Poisson was “anxious to make a name for himself in Paris” (ProQuest Citation) and what better way to do so than to claim ownership of the city’s iconic tower? The tower was originally built as an entrance to the 1889 World’s Fair and was never intended to be a permanent structure; a businessman such as Possion would have been more than aware of such fact and, if presented to him, would leap at an offer to buy the
tower. As a result of Lustig now having his ideal target, the next step of his plan would have involved fooling them into willfully handing over their money. Acting aside, Lustig pulled this off by having several measures to not only remove doubt from his victim but also to ensure that his efforts would have a greater chance of being rewarded. Though Lustig desired to direct his scam towards the previously mentioned Andre Poisson, he nonetheless invited five top members of the scrap metal industry to join in a secret meeting hosted at Hotel de Crillon (Smithsonian Citation). Lustig’s decision to invite more candidates than needed would essentially have accounted for Poisson declining his offer by having multiple potential victims to select from, but it also would have decreased suspicion by presenting the somewhat outlandish offer to multiple men rather than just one in private. Another benefit from having multiple men attend the meeting is that rather than selling the tower at a fixed price Lustig could pin these powerful men against each other and offer the tower to the highest bidder (Smithsonian citation), not only allowing himself to gain more for the operation but also encouraging the so called winner to go through with their offer in fear of losing to another. Additionally Lustig made sure to cover the blatant secrecy of the meeting and lack of any other official presence by choosing to claim it was to avoid causing a political uproar, and only the most trustworthy businessmen would be aware of the arrangement which, for fear that the offer would be lost, would encourage the men to maintain secrecy (Prague Citation). Nevertheless, of course Lustig contacted only Poisson in private declaring him the winning bidder out of all five men. Although Poisson still had doubts about the entire affair, Lustig quickly cleared them by expanding upon his present deceit and claiming to be a corrupt official in need of a bribe (Prague Citation). While at first glance this may appear counter intuitive and generally odd due to him basically requesting more money, just by claiming to be a corrupted government agent Lustig not only increased his own monetary gain, but also eliminated any sensation within Poisson of the deal being “too good to be true”, and succeeded in guaranteeing the transaction’s continuation. With the target successfully convinced, and the money in Lustig’s possession the operation had concluded. Furthermore, demonstrating the importance of a proper target in regards to Lustig’s scam, due to Poisson’s pride the entire incident went unreported (ProQuest Citation) allow Lustig to flee without a trace. Despite the core simplicity of Lustig’s plan it was the specific choices he made along the way that allowed him to succeed throughout all steps. Lustig made certain to direct the scam towards Andre Possion, a wealthy business man with a high likelihood of falling for the scam due to their desire, and awareness of the tower’s plausible demise, in addition to pride that would allow the scam to go unreported. Lustig also held a well-organized private meeting that served to remove participant doubt, prevent word of the scam getting loose, and encourage Possion to follow through with his bid. Not only that, even after Possion had won, Lustig cleverly choose to present himself as a corrupt official, which miraculously eliminated any lingering suspicion Possion would have held.
This incident involved Victim Athena Marie Herbert being a victim of an attempt rape at Suspect Gayk Chuldzhyan’s residence.
Mr. Cockburn concluded that the evidence presented in this case was misinterpret and misapprehend, the leading investigation was “unscientific and slipshod” which lead to the sentence of Edward splatt. Many questions were raised, whether police officers should collect trace elements from the crime scene? The involvemet of police officers collecting samples rather than scientific experts which could lead to wrong and misleading evidence? The scientific procedure undertaking in this investigation. And these collected samples collected from officers and tested would lead to unvaluable piece of evidence.After Edward splatt conviction, anattorney- general by the name of Mr Griffin keeped a close eye on the case and examined the moran report and
Another cash larceny scheme that could have been committed was reversing transactions or revering entries. By stealing funds, Sachdeva and Mulvaney could have gone back into...
Pauley Perrette barely escaped with her life after a brutal attack from a psychotic homeless man who police believe to be David Merck. Radar Online, Nov. 19, 2015 reports that David was arrested about an hour later, but denies doing anything to Pauley. Melissa Merck believes her cousin David is innocent, because the scenario does not fit him at all.
Robert Baltovich was wrongly convicted of the murder of his girlfriend, Elizabeth Bain, in Scarborough, Canada. He was arrested on November 19, 1990, and charged for first-degree murder. On March 31, 1992, he was convicted of second-degree murder. Finally, on April 22, 2008, he was found not guilty of the murder.
Is Steve Harmon innocent or guilty you decide. Steve Harmon is put on trial of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt and the robbery of his drug store. During the trail Steve Harmon is seen as guilty by the prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli. The witness Allen Forbes testimony proves that the gun used in the murder was registered under Mr. Nesbitt. This helps prove that the gun was used in the murder and the robbery and the gun was later found in the store. This witness helped me prove that Steve Harmon could have used the gun to kill Mr. Nesbitt or had taken part in the robbery at some point in the crime. “I went around behind the counter and I saw Mr. Nesbitt on the floor—there was blood everywhere and the cash register was open. A lot of cigarettes were
During the 1800’s, business leaders who built their affluence by stealing and bribing public officials to propose laws in their favor were known as “robber barons”. J.P. Morgan, a banker, financed the restructuring of railroads, insurance companies, and banks. In addition, Andrew Carnegie, the steel king, disliked monopolistic trusts. Nonetheless, ruthlessly destroying the businesses and lives of many people merely for personal profit; Carnegie attained a level of dominance and wealth never before seen in American history, but was only able to obtain this through acts that were dishonest and oftentimes, illicit.
The Looting Machine has detailed cases and stories. It is evident that this book was well-researched and Tom Burgis was dedicated to getting information and persistent in his search, even when he ran into unanswered questions and emails. Such persistence is shown when Burgis visited Sino Zim’s office to find Masimba Ignatius Kamba, or when he went to 88 Queensway in order to find CIF’s office. He was turned away by receptionists multiple times, but eventually got ahold of Sam Pa’s personal information (Burgis,
Jordan Belfort’s exploitation of individuals and the financial system was for solely the purpose of financial gain. Rational choice theory dictates that individuals are of rational minds and will calculate the costs and benefits and choose actions where the benefits outweigh the punishment for committing it. This theory explains why Belfort turned to criminal actions, such as market manipulation, fraud, and money laundering over normative actions to achieve his goal of wealth when his greed outweighed any fear of punishment from the justice system.
The nature and damage of white-collar crime can result in a variety of punishments for the offender. Some sanctions being time in prison, some being fines, and others being a combination of both. For example, Chalana McFarland who was a real estate attorney and was accused of fraud, money laundering and other crimes costing investors $20 million. She was charged with $12 million in restitution and thirty years in prison (Haury, 2012). Another example would be Bernie Madoff, who owned Madoff Securities, was involved in a Ponzi scheme. It is believed that investors lost $50 billion dollars. Curently Madoff is serving a 150-year sentence in a prison in Butner, N.C (Haury, 2012). As these white-collar crime cases show, the costs of these crimes can be quite serve and earn life sentences as well as very hefty fines. Moreover, white-collar crimes have huge economic effects on victims, often causing life altering losses. Under consideration white-collar crimes are quite high-cost actions that hold large possible punishments and large ethical issues. In a research experiment done by Christian Seipel and Stefanie Eifler, a theory branching from rational choice theory was tested in relation to crime. The theory they explored was referred to as high- and low- cost theory. This theory discusses the factors that influence low cost crime and high cost crime. Low cost being defined as crimes that have low
Today in criminal convictions, it is prevalent and necessary that there is evidence collected in order to hopefully find and put away the people who committed the crimes. Serology is an important factor that allows this to occur. Serology is the study and identification of bodily fluids such as blood salvia and semen in order to proceed in criminal investigations and legal processes. Blood, saliva, and semen can be readily found in sexual assault and homicide cases. In the case of Dennis Maher, serology is something that should have been considered in order to make a conviction. Instead, none of the evidence that was collected was tested to exclude him, and he was put away in jail based on eyewitness identifications. The crimes that occurred in 1983 ended with Dennis Maher, a solider for the United States, being charged and convicted for rape, assault with intent to rape, assault & battery, and aggravated rape in the year of 1984 based on Eyewitness testimony (NEIP, 2011).
For instance, any financial crime can leave individuals without shelter, money, or any reasonable quality of life due to the white collar offense. Therefore, white collar crime may not involve force, they still may affect people physically. As a matter of fact, white collar crime may result in a greater impact than street crimes. Nevertheless, we continue to operate on a dichotomy of beliefs regarding violent and non-violent crimes. In this paper, we will explore white collar crime as a non-violent crime. Those crimes under discussion are blackmail, bribery, embezzlement, and forgery. In addition, we will discuss violent crimes such as first degree, second degree, and manslaughter (Verstein,
Crime comes in different ways, shapes, and forms. From corruption to murder, the seriousness and blameworthiness varies from crime to crime. The most common factor of all crime is that it is illegal. The problem with prosecution is that some crimes can find loopholes around the rigidity of the laws created. This is the hardest for white collar crimes. With so many types of white collar crimes, it is hard to understand where it belongs on the scale on seriousness and blameworthiness and how to prosecute. With white collar crimes, they are most commonly seen as “victimless” or “paper” crimes, since they do not involve physical harm to the people included. With so many types available to analyze, the purpose of this paper is to focus on bribery, perjury, and fraud. When it comes to white collar crimes, or any crime for that matter, we do not only need to focus on what causes it and society’s reaction to it. We need to look into prevention of it and being able to stop it before it even starts.
Property crime was the highest committed offence and the one brought to court the most often during the industrial revolution. The biggest underlying factor of this crime was poverty and people's desperation for more money and more goods. Theft of clothing and food were the most common types ...
White-collar crimes and organizational structure are related because white collar-crimes thrive in organizations that have weak structures. According to Price and Norris (2009), the elites who commit white collar-crimes usually exploit weaknesses in organizational structure and formulate rules and regulations that favor their crimes. Makansi (2010) examines case studies to prove that white-collar crime is dependent on organizational structure. For example, the financial crisis that Merchant Energy Business faced in 2001-2002 occurred due to the liberal Financial Accounting Board, which failed to provide a standard model of valuing natural gas and fuel. Moreover, a financial crisis that rocked the securitization market in 2008 was due to fraudulence in the pricing of securitization products. These examples ...