Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of foreign direct investment
The importance of foreign direct investment
Cost and benefits of fdi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of foreign direct investment
Introduction Over the years, foreign direct investment (FDI) has become a popular way for countries to move capital flows from one country to the other. Basically, foreign direct investment simply refers to an instant when a business entity for a particular country invests in an income generating asset in another country with a hope of return on the investment. Foreign direct investment has its benefits to the foreign investor, the home country and the host country (Froot 1993, 60). However, it should be noted that the benefits that come about as a result of FDI can only be possible if all the three parties follow the right regulations and the ethical ways of doing business is strictly adhered to. This paper sheds some light on the costs and benefits of FDIs to the investors, the home country and the host country. In addition, it will also review how the country and the firms’ level of development and growth play a role in determining the costs and benefits accrued from the FDIs (Weigel, Wagal & Gregory 1997, 56). Benefits and costs for host country One of the core benefits of global foreign direct investment is that it creates an opportunity for money to freely flow to any business around the world that shows any signs of potential growth in the future. This is in light of the fact that when investors choose to invest their money, the main logic behind this is that they expect some form of return from the investment. Additionally, the home country’s capital account will benefit from the inward flow from the returns on the investment. There are no standard criteria on who deserves the investment and who doesn’t. This ensures that all the businesses get equal competitive advantage and no one business is favored over the others. Su... ... middle of paper ... ...hat the workers in the company and fully capable of taking advantage of the investment towards attaining the companies goals and objectives and hence a high return on investment. For the underdeveloped company however, there will be even more costs that come with FDI as the investors will be forced to hire new skilled and competent employees or to train the employees in order to improve their level of competence. In conclusion, it is clear that there is a tradeoff between the benefits and costs related to foreign direct investment. It is therefore means that it would be up to the country’s government to decide which foreign direct investments will fully benefit the country’s economy and which ones would not. Although it may take a while for foreign direct investment to be fully set up in a country, it will in the long run leave a permanent imprint (Moran 2011, 45)
In conclusion, policy makers and practitioners often try to assist in the formation of new firms but do not always succeed. Many firms fail despite all the assistance however the important factor is that the government continues to promote their creation so that new jobs and industries can be created. (Storey 1994) Both policy makers and practitioners need to ensure a level playing field so that the economy can grow, develop and compete with other economies around the world.
Harvard Business School case 274-116. Cooper Industries, Inc. Retrieved on August 31, 2008, from University of Phoenix, Resource, FIN/545 web site: https://mycampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource
As GDP per capita grows, the country’s standard of living rises with it. This newfound wealthiness allows for nations to invest in infrastructure, such as roads and education, and establish socially-conscious institutions, such as the American EPA, FDA, and CDC. In addition to further increasing quality of life and working conditions, establishment of such infrastructre allows foreign investment to be absorbed even easier: “Findings in literature indicate that a country’s capacity to take advantage of FDI externalities might be limited by local conditions, such as the development of local financial markets or the educational level of the country, i.e., absorptive capacities.” As the citizens become more productive, the government has more funds to invest in its own economy, which further improves the productivity of its citizens. This positive feedback loop eventually produces the necessary infrastructure of the nation begins to support itself. It can then afford to employ more effective and safer means of production, and sweatshops are phased out, no longer necessary. From here, the downsides of sweatshops will be completely gone, and replaced with only net social
I found this article "Foreign direct investment: Companies rush in with the cash" on the financial times website (www.FT.com) published December 11, 2002 written by John Thornhill. The reason for choosing this article is my personal interest in the Chinese economy and its attractiveness to the foreign investors. Apart from the foreign direct investment this topic has also helped me in understanding the impact of Chinese economy on the global market.
One of the most well accepted models of FDI is Buckley and Casson’s (1976) internalisation theory, who developed a model of MNCs and FDIs centered around the interrelationship between market imperfections, knowledge and the internalisation of production and consumption (Buckley and Casson, 2009). Specifically, the theory recognized that multinational corporations are both horizontally and vertically organized, and that the “the vertically integrated firm internalises a market for an intermediate product, just as the horizontal MNE [multinational enterprise] internalises markets for proprietary assets” (Caves, 1996: p.13). In addition, internalisation will occur, and multinational corporations will expand only as far as the advantages, including barriers to entry, are not offset by the costs of control, communi...
The paper first compared the broad categories of aid to physical capital with aid to complementary factors of production. It was found that aid to physical capital produces a crowding out effect for private investment but that aid to complementary inputs attracts private investment. Within the category of complementary inputs was social aid and economic aid. Though development in both human capital and infrastructure is important in promoting FDI, foreign aid was found to be relatively unsuccessful in fostering growth in human capital. Therefore, aid to infrastructure was shown to be the most effective form of ODA in attracting FDI.
...al for the companies to have all of their resources be independent, rather than relying on other aid through outsourcing.
If competitors offer equally attractive products and services, then one will most likely have little power in the situation, because suppliers and buyers will...
The science of business has been studied for years, specifically about different markets and how they work and interact. Figuring out the way it lives and breathes can create a lot of success for a person. The key is to find the right market to enter, each market comes with its ups and downs, but all markets have explicit limitations and trends. Today, modern capitalist societies tend to let the market take over the production, maintenance, and distribution of goods that were previously non-market. While this is occurring, there’s also a disagreement on which goods are properly subject to market transactions and which are not.
In the year 2007, China and India ranked first and second respectively in the list of ideal foreign direct investment (FDI) destinations, according to A T Kearney, a global strategic management consulting firm (The Press Trust of India Limited, 2007a). The two nations, because of their similarities in geopolitical, economic and demographic aspects, are often compared with each other. To determine which one is more attractive for businesses to expand to, this essay will examine the business environment of both countries from the following perspectives: political/legal, economic, socio-cultural and technological.
Foreign direct investment policies in different countries influence the investment into business in a nation by a company of an alternative country.
After the financial crisis of 2008 there has been a dramatic decrease of foreign direct investment (FDI) around the world. Particularly the rapid decline in inflows has affected the recovery speed of FDI around the world. Inflows into Europe contracted by 42% and to North America by 21%, inflows to Australia and New Zealand together declined by 14% 1. However there are few exceptions to the trend, such as the United Kingdom who have managed to keep its FDI attraction. UNCTAD has confirmed that FDI inflows into the UK have risen by 22% 2 over the past year.
When deciding to engage in international trade an enterprise must make a choice of mode of entry into a foreign market. Depending on their resources, commitments, and long-term goals, the enterprise may select exporting (direct or indirect) or equity investment (foreign direct investment (FDI) or licensing/franchising) as a mode of entry (Peng, 2014). Exporting requires the least commitment, has the lowest investment of resources (and resulting risk), and capitalizes on use of home country capital – economy of scale. However, the tradeoff is higher transportation costs, potential loss of profit from local distribution, and liability of foreignness compared to equity based modes of entry. At the other end of the spectrum, FDI requires the most commitment, highest investment (and risk), and presents the necessity of managing a satellite facility in a foreign country. Conversely, it reduces transportation costs, greater access to local knowledge and profits, and counter liability of foreignness (Quick, 2010; Carter, 1997). Therefore, analysis of a business, the industry, and the environment of home and host country is necessary to determine the best mode of entry.
By definition foreign direct investment is the acquisition of tangible assets such as machinery, land and factories; this type of investment are often between two companies- usually multinationals from different countries. FDI is one of the benefits of globalisation as it has a direct impact on aggregate demand having a follow on effect on technology, job opportunities and increased intellectual property owned by countries. In this essay I will discuss some of the factors that affect a country’s disposition to gaining foreign direct investment.
However, on the other hand, as much as the world trade organization has been committed and determined to form the CNS of trade and commerce for its member countries through policies, it has been exceedingly hard as national interests and policies override the organizations’. This has subsequently hampered the organization’s pursuit to equal development between member states. The concept of FDI has not been fully harnessed due to the complexity found within the concept. It has been felt that host countries have been the key beneficiaries of FDI at the expense of the investor’s country. Profits are ploughed back within the host country’s economy as investors pay licensing fees and other charges to the authorities of the host country with little to plough back to their mother countries. This has hugely compromised the concept of FDI (Helpman, 54).