Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of ethics in the workplace
Ethical dilemmas in the workplace
Importance of ethics in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of ethics in the workplace
Our team chose to discuss a case written by Krista Barbrey. We will utilize resources set forth in the ethical decision-making process presented in our text, Corporate Social Responsibility: An Ethical Approach, by Mark Schwartz, and in the Santa Clara University website. Krista works at the City of Pine as a supervisor. Krista’s department is housed in a location with other departments and their supervisors. Employee time & attendance is solely based upon the honor system. Krista has a friend that works in the same building and consistently arrives to work tardy. Krista is now placed in a dilemma to say something to her friend Eve or report it directly to Eve’s supervisor. Our team discussed that this situation could be damaging not …show more content…
The Utilitarian Approach seems to be the best approach in this situation as it focuses on the option that produces the most good and do the least harm (A Framework for Thinking Ethically, n.d.). Krista made the decision to tell Eve 's boss about the situation and accompanied him to HR to gather the required information. This was done to ensure compliance of labor regulations before counseling Eve. However, we believe the greatest care and attention that Eve could have received is not having Krista present during the reprimanding. Krista was supposedly Eve 's friend and a supervisor, but not Eve 's supervisor. Although Krista witnessed the incident, we believe she should not have been present in the counseling session. We feel Eve 's supervisor should have handled everything and if a witness was needed during the reprimand then someone from HR would have sufficed. After a week at home without pay, Eve came back to work on time, and her punishment as well as her changed behavior set a good precedent for the other employees. Krista 's and Bob 's decision to send Eve home for one week without pay appears to be for the good of Eve as she could have been
Jones alleged that the governor made unwanted sexual advances towards her which she explicitly rejected (Motos, 1998). Consequently, Jones reported she suffered adverse employment action by her superiors, who “treated her rudely and changed her job responsibilities” (Motos, 1998).
At the end of the previous school year, Carol, and her daughter’s teachers noticed that Carol’s daughter was not progressing in her studies, and an evaluation conducted by the child study team revealed that she had a specific learning disability. An IEP meeting was scheduled, and conducted. The determination was made to place Carol’s daughter in the same resource room as Carol’s client Jody, for half of the day. Carol instantly realized that this decision put her in a predicament where a dual relationship would be created. She would then cross a clear boundary, and become a parent of a classmate, as well as the professional she has already established herself as to Jody and her parents. This would undoubtedly lead to instances in which both her client, and the client’s family would be interacting with her at both school functions and on class trips. She knew that allowing this to happen was against the BACB Guidelines for Responsible Conduct for Behavior Analysts. Carol voiced her opposition and explained the ethical quandary to those attending the IEP meeting, and what would occur if her daughter was placed in the same room with her client. Carol stated that she would speak with her supervisor, but it was probable that he would determine that she would not be able to continue working with Jody. Carol felt that having to become accustomed to another behavior analyst
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases: 2011 custom edition (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Therefore, even if the facts show that these employees where somehow providing professionally approved care, i.e. physically restraining her during an out of control incident, the patient’s perception that she was being physically and sexually assaulted remains to be the outcome. Therefore, according to the consequential theory of ethics, this behavior would not be considered ethical. Therefore, an alternative action, or one that is not perceived to be threatening and harmful, must be executed.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2003). The Miniature guide to understanding the foundations of ethical reasoning. Dillon Beach, CA.: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
As many of you have heard, an incident happened on our New Year Holiday Party, which I did not attend. One of our board member, Ms. Alexa Burnett, proposed unacceptable comments to a female radio host with discriminatory attitudes, while Alexa did not apologize to that radio host. Based on our code of diversity and inclusion, the comments are not acceptable, and any discriminatory statements will not be permitted in our community. Accordingly, based on the policy of conducts that “The employee should be responsible for one’s personal behaviors and comments
Fran Delaro is one of KSCL’s top camera operators and has worked for the organization for over 5 years. Fran is a number one-rated camera operator in the company.Fran had a choice of hours and shows as she was extremely competent. She and her supervisor, Alex, have become close over the years and Alex is proud to have Fran on the team. However, as of lately, Fran has not been performing up to standard. Fran’s tardiness, last minute cancellations, and drinking on the job, has left Alex with an unfavorable impression and requires immediate intervention. Alex, her supervisor, would attempt to address the issue by confronting and counseling Fran on the issue.
Shum, P. K., & Yam, S. L. 2011. Ethics and law: Guiding the invisible hand to correct corporate social responsibility externalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 549-571.
In response to the brief presented case study, Company Q has stores in high crime areas, and has chosen to close these stores citing above average losses because of shrinkage or theft by both customers and employees.
It is stated in an online article titled, “Preventing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace” that, “As an employer, you have a responsibility to maintain a workplace that is free of sexual harassment. This is your legal obligation, but it also makes good business sense. If you allow sexual harassment to flourish in your workplace, you will pay a high price in poor employee morale low productivity, and lawsuits.” (Barreiro, 2016). It is Lael’s obligation to have the best interest of her employees in mind. If she is being exposed to this unethical behavior that is taking place between an superior and an employee and she keeps quiet and refrains from stepping in to address the issue, then she is at fault just as much as Nikhil. By Lael stepping in and getting involved in the reporting would not only show loyalty to her peers, but loyalty to the organization that she holds a high regard
... rest of the jury to follow. Personal issues should never be brought into the workplace; it proves to be distracting and unproductive. In this case there would have been two tragic deaths in one family.
Scenario- Carol works at the local factory. She was docked for arriving to work five minutes late. Carol approaches her manager and states that she is filing a grievance to get her money back because she worked overtime the day before as a favor. In situations such as this that appear to be, “personal” may invite immediate dismissal by a manager. Indeed, if Carol feels that she is not being taken seriously and her union rights are ignored, this will most likely lead to possible increased aggressiveness by Carol and a want to ...
The problem that was investigated consisted of a question that Milton Friedman posed in one of his articles, which was featured in The New York Times Magazine in 1970. The question was, “What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities” (Friedman, 2007, p. 173)? Friedman (1970) elaborated on how businesses cannot have assigned responsibilities. Furthermore, he described how groups or individuals should be the only ones that can hold responsibilities, not businesses. He stated that associating responsibilities with the word business is too ambiguous. I will examine three discussion questions and three compare and contrast questions which Jennings (2009) posed in a case study that is related to Friedman’s (1970) article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.
code of conduct that should be followed by all employees. In confronting this employee; he needs to
Margaret was bullied by her partner, Dana, which they worked in the same department and share the same job title. For more than two weeks, Dana kept bossed her around and criticize her work, made nasty remarks on Margaret’s wardrobe. Margaret tried to be nice and keep up a peaceful working relationship with Dana, but the situation didn’t change at all and became worse than before. Therefore, Margaret tried to have a communication with her boss and peer to figure out a solution.