Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on principles of corporate governance
Essay on principles of corporate governance
Essay on principles of corporate governance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on principles of corporate governance
Corporate governance is mainly about how an organization should be managed or governed. It hold more relevance in case of companies which have grown using equity capital taken from investors. Public company stocks using investor equity capital brings them under closer regulatory scrutiny. All affairs pertaining to an organization where the shareholders/stakeholders interests are foremost, should be managed per the relevant regulatory framework. Free flow of information amongst the shareholders is critical as they can measure the performance, growth and strategies of the organization. Since people have invested their money on the company, it is important for them to be aware of company’s performance, hence the right to choose the management …show more content…
Regulatory governing bodies include the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or 2002 (SOX), SEC, and guidelines of the stock exchanges like NASDAQ, etc. Also, court judgements from different states are important as US companies are registered in their respective states. There is clear separation between ownership and management to the extent that managers could run the affairs of the organization without any fear. The Board is a single tier structure which provides strategic direction to the organization with collective decisions by both Executive and Non-Executive directors. Independent director’s main role is to perform oversight of all activities of the Management board. On the other note, directors and responsible managers pay are tied with good performances along with stock options. There are some mechanisms created to factor the impact of these stock options on the P&L …show more content…
Neighboring country, Finland, had GDP per capita which is 30 times higher and technological advancements were at the highest level. Government in Estonia was committed to open markets with limited state intervention in the economy and a competitive market economy with high FDI rates, and strong economic growth. This market oriented approach led to a strong political and economic integration with Europe, though only 14 companies were listed on the Tallinn Stock Exchange’s main listing section. Privatization of companies were at its peak where 80% of its GDP as contributed by the private sector, one of the highest in Eastern Europe. Key feature of the privatization process was the usage of the tender method which resulted in the large scales to foreign investors. The Estonian Privatization Agency, created in 1993 found out that 70% of the sale of companies privatized went to foreign owners.
Estonia Board Structure:
Much like Europe, Estonia has a two-tier board structure comprising of a supervisory and management board. The role of supervisory board is to plan activities, organize management and supervise activities of the management board whereas the management board’s role is to direct the company which is the executive body as well. Management board must follow the instructions of the supervisory board and get its approval
The corporation’s business is carried out by its management, under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board, and each committee of the Board, has complete access to management. Also, the Board and committee member’s has access to independent advisors as each considers necessary or appropriate. Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt (2010) state that the Board of Directors also, issues shares, Adopts articles of merger or sha...
First, forming an audit committee to reinforce a high road accounting measure. Segment wise reports for restaurant and retail operations are recommended. Second, establishing a compensation committee to review CEO goals, evaluate performance and determine compensations. Current executive compensation plan was based on 1994 standard and need update. Third, the threshold of poison pill should be raised to 20%. The 10% trigger might restrict investors without hostile intent in ISS’s perspective. However, activating poison pill is not recommended. At last, a nomination committee should be established to nominate independent directors. This committee would also recommend appropriate service tenure for independent board
Bibliography: Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate governance: its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5 (4), pp. 180--205.
There are at least three areas that encompass ‘weak corporate governance’, 1. Multiple Prime Ministers from different parties 2. Inconsistent and ineffective policies and 3. Leadership.
Corporate gorverance as a system are directed and controlld by companies. Initially, their board of directors should take responsible for the gorverance of companies, which include setting strategic aims of companies , guarantee an effective leadership, supervising the proformance of business management and reporting on it to shareholders. The board's action should comply with the law, regulations and shareholders. In addition, the shareholders also play an important role in gorverance and they have right to decide who can be employed as the companies' directors and auditors to provide good governance structure for them. Therefore, corporate goverance can be regarded as what the board of a company does and how it sets the values of the company.
There is much debate about the role of outside directors as effective monitors of the firm. Two early studies that address this issue are Fama (1980) and Fama and Jensen (1983). Fama (1980) in their seminal work show that board of directors can be efficient monitors of an organization. Fama and Jensen (1983) argue that outside directors have the incentives to develop reputation and signal the markets as efficient monitors of the firm . The crux of the argument on outside directors are whether the outside directors, support the shareholders or are likely to be aligned with the interests of the management. Studies such as Mace (1986), Patton and Baker (1987), and Jensen (1993) argue that since top management can influence the appointment of an
This report gives the brief overview of the concept of corporate governance, its evolution and its significance in the corporate sector. The report highlights various key issues and concerns that are faced by the organizations while effectively implementing and promoting Corporate Governance.
Nottingham Trent University. (2013). Lecture 1 - An Introduction to Corporate Governance. Available: https://now.ntu.ac.uk/d2l/le/content/248250/viewContent/1053845/View. Last accessed 16th Dec 2013.
The Board of Directors is the highest governing authority in a professional management structure. It is made up of two tiers of individual members who are elected by the shareholders of the corporation to establish corporate management related policies. These two tiers include individuals chosen from within the company such as manager, CEO or other daily worker of the company. The next tier involves chosen individuals that are outside of the company and considered to be independent. These individuals are also elected to make decisions on behalf of the corporations, more importantly public companies must have a Board of Directors in place. The Board of Directors mission is to set a fair representation of management and interests of shareholders for the corporation. The responsibility of the Corporate Director is to act on behalf of the corporation and make sure he/she is presenting its best interests at all times, participating in regular meetings of the Board of Directors, amending the Corporation’s bylaws or articles of incorporation, acting with the loyalty to the corporation and its members, approving some corporate activities which include contracts and agreements, asset purchases, and the election of new corporate officers. When electing personnel into these positions there is an invisible line that needs to be addressed regarding who will serve as a member on the Board. If you have too many internal representatives for the company serving as Directors, the Board will tend to make decisions more beneficial to management. On the other side, having too many external Directors may mean management can be left out of the decision-making process that in turn, will cause managers to feel alienated and leave, instead of a fai...
Sarbanes-Oxley act was passed in 2002 in reaction to several scandals and the dot com bubble involving major corporations. Eron, Tyco and Worldcom were the prime scandals. In the light of those scandals, Sarbanes- Oxley was passed with an intention to make corporate governance more rigorous, protect investors from fraudulent activities performed by the corporation by making financial practises more transparent, strengthen corporate oversight and promote/improve internal corporate control. In short it was meant to enhance corporate governance and restore faith in investors.
The global landscape for business has become increasingly complex. Flexible governance is needed to operate in many markets. US impose a rigid governance model whereas many EU jurisdictions like Netherland offers corporate law that allows flexible governance models. As a result, businesses have the flexibility of setting it up. One such example is flexibility to operate management and supervisory board as a whole or
Organizations that only have top management as the board members are more susceptible to accounting malpractices. Members of the board should preferably own shares in the company to ensure diligence when it comes to the interests of the company. Apart from the Board of Governors, there should also be an audit committee in place to oversee the financial dealings of the bank. Members of the board and the audit committee should have basic financial knowledge. Some of the members should also be experts in finances so that they can detect any anomaly that may take place in terms of financial reporting. An overhaul of the regulatory framework is required to empower authorities to intervene immediately, and make improvements. New technology is required. Manual antiquated processes should be eliminated because this causes greater human error and poor
...eve efficient resource allocation. Failure to achieve appropriate and efficient corporate governance could result in sub-optimal allocation of resources, abuses and theft by management, expropriation of outside shareholders and creditors, financial distress and even bankruptcy. While evaluating the role of corporate governance, it is imperative to also consider the levels of development of market institutions and other legal infrastructure including laws and enforcement that provide good standard for investor protection as well as ownership structures.
The board of directors has both executive and non executive directors. Executive directors have both executive and board duties to perform while non executive directors have only board responsibilities. Therefore both types of directors vary in the responsibilities and authority they have in the company affairs. Thus the non executive directors devote very little time to company affairs ( only attend board meetings, committee meetings of which they are members or sometimes pay a visit to the company premises for getting knowledge of how things are done).
According to Carol Padgett (2012, 1), “companies are important part of our daily lives…in today’s economy, we are bound together through a myriad of relationships with companies”. The board of directors remain the highest echelon of management in any company. It is the “group of executive and non-executive directors which forms corporate strategy and is responsible for monitoring performance on the behalf of shareholders” (Padgett, 2012:1). Boards are clearly critical to the operation of companies and they are endowed with substantial power in the statute (Companies Act, 2014). The board is responsible for directing and steering the company. The board accomplishes this by business planning and risk management through proper corporate governance.