Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes and effects of corporal punishment in schools
Corporal punishment as physical punishment in school
Corporal punishment as physical punishment in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes and effects of corporal punishment in schools
In a recent controversy concerning corporal punishment in schools, a physical education instructor in Albany, Georgia was recently suspended, but not fired after physically punishing and abusing her student. Surveillance cameras caught Tracy Drayton in the act of dragging a kindergarten pupil across the gymnasium (“Tracy Drayton, Georgia”). This is a prime example of how corporal punishment can result in extreme consequences. Corporal punishment, an outdated and ineffective consequence, should be illegal across the United States. Corporal punishment, also known as physical punishment, is any rebuking in which physical power is employed and expected to cause some extent of pain or distress to the victim. This can also include beating with any object, especially “belts, cords, and brushes.” Human rights-law also classifies corporal punishment as squeezing, hitting with hands and feet, slapping, yanking, jostling, flicking or pushing with enough power to harm the victim (Stephey 1). These definitions are quite controversial, considering there is no set of guidelines dictating what could cause injury or what qualifies as “too powerful” (“Global Progress”). There is currently no national ban on corporal punishment in schools. Corporal punishment is illegal on the state level in public schools in 39 states and Washington D.C., with Illinois included. Corporal punishment is illegal in public and private schools in Iowa and New Jersey (“Global Progress”). Through corporal punishment, children experience an incorrect representation of how the world works. They are taught that violence is the answer to all problems (Rochman). Educators that employ corporal punishment often hit a child for striking their peers. By doing this, the teacher... ... middle of paper ... ...oral-punishment-policy/>. Rochman, Bonnie. "Why Spanking Doesn't Work." 6 February 2012. Time Magazine. 27 February 2013 . Stephey, M.J. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Schools." 12 August 2009. Time Magazine. 27 February 2013 . "Tracy Drayton, Georgia Physical Education Teacher, Suspended But Keeps Job After Slapping Kindergarten Student." 31 October 2012. Huffington Post. 27 February 2013 . "U.S.: Corporal Punishment and Paddling Statistics by State and Race." 1 July 2010. The Center for Effective Discipline. 27 February 2013 . Weiten, Wayne. Psychology: Themes and Variations. 8th. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2010.
Dupper, David R. , and Amy E. Montgomery Dingus. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools : A Continuing Challenge for School Social Workers." Schools and Children 30.4 (2008): 243-250. Print.
The idea of physical punishment has been visible throughout our nation’s history. The 30’s, 40’, 50’s all encouraged the use of strong physical discipline towards children, it wasn’t until the 60’s and 70’s that this idea became taboo. “Many of us in the room had been smacked, whipped, or beaten as children...
Proponents of spanking bans have a tendency to label spanking as corporal punishment. They then categorize it along with many abusive activities. Psychologist Kerby Alvy explains corporal punishment as, “pinching, pulling ears and hair, shaking, slapping, smacking, spanking, swatting, hitting, kicking, punching, paddling, using switches, hair brushes, belts and ironing cords, and having children kneel on gravel or ...
Darcia begins her writing by first defining spanking as “hitting a child on the bottom with an open hand.” She then illustrates situations in which many parents may warrant the need for spanking. She follows with multiple examples of the negative effects of corporal punishment on the developing children ranging from increased aggression in retaliation to lack of trust
Social tolerance of spanking has been the norm for thousands of years. The most widely accepted source coming from the bible. He who spares the rod hates the son, but he who loves him is careful to discipline (New International Version, Proverbs 13:24). Religion and culture have been a very common excuse for the spanking of children world-wide. “Hitting children is intertwined with religious beliefs, cultural views, and social policy… (Kazden & Benjet). However, the world has changed and evolved into a much more civilized society. In this country alo...
[2] By the 1970s, a number of states had abolished the use of corporal punishment in school. In the 1980s, anti-spanking advocates began pushing localities and states to make the corporal punishment of children by their parents illegal, as Sweden had done in 1979. Many feminist activists saw protecting children’s physical rights as a natural extension of the laws protecting women from spousal abuse.
...Arkansas, the majority of the children being physically punished are minorities. Other than Texas, where there is a large Hispanic make-up with higher numbers than any other state, African American students show increasingly high numbers with being paddled. These pro corporal punishment states have granted leniency to districts that disagrees with this form of discipline. According to Durrant and Smith (2011) states are giving parents the option to opt-in or opt-out of allowing their children to submit to physical punishment. Albeit the 1980s and 1990s saw a decrease in pro corporal punishment states, only five states have banned it since then, Rhode Island in 220, Delaware in 2003, Pennsylvania in 2005, Ohio in 2009 and New Mexico in 2011. Donnelly and Straus (2005) suggest that the majority of the states left are in south and southwest areas of the country.
Spanking. It is a hotly debated topic, and everyone who has an opinion seems to have a strong one. It is either child abuse or it is a fundamental form of discipline. It is traumatizing or it is character-building. It is repugnant or it is commendable. Many have difficulty removing their emotions from such a controversial topic. I, myself, struggle to consider objectively a situation I’ve always deemed moral and paramount to a child’s development, but with the cruciality of raising the next generation, objectivity is imperative. Because children are wayward and often misunderstand instructions, parents must decide early on how they will discipline their child. This raises the controversial question: Should parents use corporal punishment
According to Miller, Cindy, and Robin, the primary advantage with corporal punishment is that it is the only practical approach to discipline the unruly children (68). Apparently, the opponents of corporal punishment argue that the power of physical punishment does not instill behaviors or manners, but provokes further misbehavior and resentment. However, centuries have proved that spanking kids have produced more civilized and reliable young people. A practical example is during the American Occupation in the Philippines, where spanking and any other form of corporal punishment were applied to all the students who disobeyed the school rules, to be particular, the English-only rule. The approach led to the production of more disciplined Filipino students, who turned to be multilingual and academically competent (Miller, Cindy, and Robin 69). Nevertheless, in the current world, with the prohibition and restrictions of corporal punishment under the human right laws, there is a rapid rise in the number of juvenile delinquents every year. Consequently, the infliction of physical pain by spanking or whipping is associated with disciplining the wrongdoing kids, where they can realize their mistakes, and end up not repeating them. Therefore, corporal punishment is the most practical form of punishing the unruly kids than any other means (Engulu
The mass media and government of our society still supports this idea of a parent according dominance over their children. As long as large social structures like the media and government support the pro side of corporal punishment, it will take time to change the masses opinions on it. Stacks, Oshio, Gerard, and Roe found in there 2009 study that once corporal punishment is used, it becomes a cycle which each new generation learns from the
Even though Toth didn’t touch on one of the issues brought up in the Cuddy and Reeves article, they would both still agree that corporal punishment causes mental issues, increased aggression, and parental distant Clearly, both authors have stated the same issues that are caused by usage of corporal punishment on children. But, both authors define physical discipline differently. Toth sees the use of corporal punishment as having long-term, life-altering effects. “Among scientists,” she states, “there is a consensus that actual physical abuse damages children, directly and over the course of a life.”
According to a poll by ABC News, “sixty-five percent of Americans approve of spanking children, a rate that has been steady since 1990.” The majority is shown to favor corporal punishment. However, the popularity of corporal punishment does not justify it. Many are miseducated about the negative long-term effects that oftentimes come with spanking children. In support of spanking, some studies show that spanking a child, if done “properly”, can yield positive results.
Smith, B. L. (2012). The case against spanking. American Psychological Association, 43(4), 60. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking.aspx
Corporal punishment has been a part of family life for thousands of years, taking its place in societies all over the globe. From wood switches to thick leather belts, all sorts of tools have been used to discipline naughty children. No one has ever really examined the question of whether or not this form of punishment is productive or counterproductive. In examining the situation of whether or not this form of punishment is warranted or even what one might consider proper, a sample situation must be examined. Let’s say, for argument’s sake that a little boy named Johnny just threw a temper tantrum and threw his bowl of Coco CrispiesÓ all over the kitchen floor. Now there are two things his mother could do at this point to correct him. She could either use corporal punishment, taking it’s form in nearly abusive words or a few backhand’s across his face, or she could simply have a talk with him and explain why his behavior was wrong and why he should not do it again. Now which one would accomplish more? Obviously, simply talking to little Johnny would ac...
Allen: I do not think so. As I already mentioned, our teachers can use other methods to promote studies. Corporal punishment may hurt student’s dignity, which may cause lots of potential mental problems that will affect their future life.