Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes and effects of corporal punishment in schools
Corporal punishment as physical punishment in school
Corporal punishment as physical punishment in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes and effects of corporal punishment in schools
In a recent controversy concerning corporal punishment in schools, a physical education instructor in Albany, Georgia was recently suspended, but not fired after physically punishing and abusing her student. Surveillance cameras caught Tracy Drayton in the act of dragging a kindergarten pupil across the gymnasium (“Tracy Drayton, Georgia”). This is a prime example of how corporal punishment can result in extreme consequences. Corporal punishment, an outdated and ineffective consequence, should be illegal across the United States.
Corporal punishment, also known as physical punishment, is any rebuking in which physical power is employed and expected to cause some extent of pain or distress to the victim. This can also include beating with any object, especially “belts, cords, and brushes.” Human rights-law also classifies corporal punishment as squeezing, hitting with hands and feet, slapping, yanking, jostling, flicking or pushing with enough power to harm the victim (Stephey 1). These definitions are quite controversial, considering there is no set of guidelines dictating what could cause injury or what qualifies as “too powerful” (“Global Progress”).
There is currently no national ban on corporal punishment in schools. Corporal punishment is illegal on the state level in public schools in 39 states and Washington D.C., with Illinois included. Corporal punishment is illegal in public and private schools in Iowa and New Jersey (“Global Progress”).
Through corporal punishment, children experience an incorrect representation of how the world works. They are taught that violence is the answer to all problems (Rochman). Educators that employ corporal punishment often hit a child for striking their peers. By doing this, the teacher...
... middle of paper ...
...oral-punishment-policy/>.
Rochman, Bonnie. "Why Spanking Doesn't Work." 6 February 2012. Time Magazine. 27 February 2013 .
Stephey, M.J. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Schools." 12 August 2009. Time Magazine. 27 February 2013 .
"Tracy Drayton, Georgia Physical Education Teacher, Suspended But Keeps Job After Slapping Kindergarten Student." 31 October 2012. Huffington Post. 27 February 2013 .
"U.S.: Corporal Punishment and Paddling Statistics by State and Race." 1 July 2010. The Center for Effective Discipline. 27 February 2013 .
Weiten, Wayne. Psychology: Themes and Variations. 8th. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2010.
Dupper, David R. , and Amy E. Montgomery Dingus. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools : A Continuing Challenge for School Social Workers." Schools and Children 30.4 (2008): 243-250. Print.
The idea of physical punishment has been visible throughout our nation’s history. The 30’s, 40’, 50’s all encouraged the use of strong physical discipline towards children, it wasn’t until the 60’s and 70’s that this idea became taboo. “Many of us in the room had been smacked, whipped, or beaten as children...
Darcia begins her writing by first defining spanking as “hitting a child on the bottom with an open hand.” She then illustrates situations in which many parents may warrant the need for spanking. She follows with multiple examples of the negative effects of corporal punishment on the developing children ranging from increased aggression in retaliation to lack of trust
When describing a physical altercation between two adults, the term is assault and battery. Assault on an individual has more than immediate effects; the effects can last a lifetime in severe cases. In all fifty states, it is a crime to hit, strike or use corporal punishment in any deliberate manner towards any person over the age of eighteen. However, this law does not apply to physical force being used on minors. Spanking, whipping, and paddling are among a few common references to this form of punishment. Physically disciplining children has had many names over the years. No matter which term is used, corporal punishment has a negative impact on every party involved. It is a widely used, socially accepted method of discipline. “Approximately 94% of three and four-year old children have been spanked in the past year (Slade & Winssow 1321). Although spanking is a widespread practice, it is becoming more controversial. The negative effects of spanking greatly outweigh the benefits. Spanking is a socially tolerated view promoting abusive patterns, and has a negative psychological impact in teaching children that pain, fear, and confusion promote conformability.
Contrary to popular belief, corporal punishment is still an accepted form of punishment in some countries. In these countries, many see this kind of punishment for children as normal, natural and harmless. Yet, human rights activists believe that it is damaging and must be stopped. For example, Gambian teachers are working to end corporal punishment. The Gambia Teachers' Union has been training teachers on alternative...
Reading, Richard. "Speak softly - and forget the stick: corporal punishment and physical abuse." Child: care, health and development (2009): 286-287. Academic Search Premier. Web. 23 April 2011.
[3] Lansford, Jennifer E. "The Special Problem of Cultural Differences in Effects of Corporal Punishment." Law & Contemporary Problems 73.2 (2010): 89-106. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Nov. 2013.
The deciding factor in the future of corporal punishment is seen in the Ingraham v. Wright Supreme Court case. In 1970, James Ingraham, an eighth grade student of Drew Junior High School was one of the many beneficiaries of corporal punishment distributed by Willie Wright, the principal of the high school. The rationality behind Ingraham’s punishment was that he was slow to respond to his teacher instructions. As a result, his teacher sent him to the principal office where he bent over the table was given twenty licks with a paddle. The paddling was so severe, according to the Ingraham’s doctor, he needed to miss weeks of school due to hematoma on his buttocks. Defined by Merriam-Webster, a hematoma is clotted blood that forms in a tissue by broken blood vessels. Subsequently, a ninth grade student at the same school, Roosevelt Andrews, also suffered egregious attacks for minor offenses. Principal Wright on two occasions punished Andrews for anticipating a late arrival to a class he was in route to. During the first attack, Andrews was hit with a wooded paddle on the buttocks and over the arm. This beating deprived him of full access from his injured arm for weeks. The second punishment, though, more vicious due to carelessness and a lack of official oversight, Andrews was hit from his neck to legs. According to Newell (1972) in referencing The Children’s petition of 1669, teachers and administrators have taken up an office they are unable to manage; the evidence of mismanagement is seen in corporal punishment.
According to Miller, Cindy, and Robin, the primary advantage with corporal punishment is that it is the only practical approach to discipline the unruly children (68). Apparently, the opponents of corporal punishment argue that the power of physical punishment does not instill behaviors or manners, but provokes further misbehavior and resentment. However, centuries have proved that spanking kids have produced more civilized and reliable young people. A practical example is during the American Occupation in the Philippines, where spanking and any other form of corporal punishment were applied to all the students who disobeyed the school rules, to be particular, the English-only rule. The approach led to the production of more disciplined Filipino students, who turned to be multilingual and academically competent (Miller, Cindy, and Robin 69). Nevertheless, in the current world, with the prohibition and restrictions of corporal punishment under the human right laws, there is a rapid rise in the number of juvenile delinquents every year. Consequently, the infliction of physical pain by spanking or whipping is associated with disciplining the wrongdoing kids, where they can realize their mistakes, and end up not repeating them. Therefore, corporal punishment is the most practical form of punishing the unruly kids than any other means (Engulu
The mass media and government of our society still supports this idea of a parent according dominance over their children. As long as large social structures like the media and government support the pro side of corporal punishment, it will take time to change the masses opinions on it. Stacks, Oshio, Gerard, and Roe found in there 2009 study that once corporal punishment is used, it becomes a cycle which each new generation learns from the
Even though Toth didn’t touch on one of the issues brought up in the Cuddy and Reeves article, they would both still agree that corporal punishment causes mental issues, increased aggression, and parental distant Clearly, both authors have stated the same issues that are caused by usage of corporal punishment on children. But, both authors define physical discipline differently. Toth sees the use of corporal punishment as having long-term, life-altering effects. “Among scientists,” she states, “there is a consensus that actual physical abuse damages children, directly and over the course of a life.”
According to a poll by ABC News, “sixty-five percent of Americans approve of spanking children, a rate that has been steady since 1990.” The majority is shown to favor corporal punishment. However, the popularity of corporal punishment does not justify it. Many are miseducated about the negative long-term effects that oftentimes come with spanking children. In support of spanking, some studies show that spanking a child, if done “properly”, can yield positive results.
Corporal punishment has been a part of family life for thousands of years, taking its place in societies all over the globe. From wood switches to thick leather belts, all sorts of tools have been used to discipline naughty children. No one has ever really examined the question of whether or not this form of punishment is productive or counterproductive. In examining the situation of whether or not this form of punishment is warranted or even what one might consider proper, a sample situation must be examined. Let’s say, for argument’s sake that a little boy named Johnny just threw a temper tantrum and threw his bowl of Coco CrispiesÓ all over the kitchen floor. Now there are two things his mother could do at this point to correct him. She could either use corporal punishment, taking it’s form in nearly abusive words or a few backhand’s across his face, or she could simply have a talk with him and explain why his behavior was wrong and why he should not do it again. Now which one would accomplish more? Obviously, simply talking to little Johnny would ac...
Corporal punishment is defined as “an infliction of punishment to the body.” My primary reason for not approving corporal punishment would be that corporal punishment creates a negative reaction from the student’s perspective plus additional problems in the end. To discipline students in a way that will harm them into non-misbehavior is not the way to go. I claim that corporal punishment in public schools should not be permitted because it is barbaric, harmful, and in no way a method to solve personal problems.
Corporal punishment means to educate by implement of physical pain on learners in order to enhance their ability of studying. As we know, students will often follow the instructions which given by their instructor. However, if they don’t, many instructors are likely to introduce the corporal punishment such as hitting, slapping, spanking and kicking rather than promotes the oral education method to force their students to have a better performance. Gradually, corporal punishment have become a widely known phenomenon all over the world. According to the Department of Education’s 2006 Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC), it clearly showed that a total of 223,190 students without disabilities received corporal punishment in that year around the