Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important of copyright law
The importance of intellectual property
The importance of intellectual property
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Copyright is one of the most important laws in the writing industry. Whether you are the writer or you are just a marketer, you should be able to understand the copyright law. “Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works,” (L. 2012). We might understand what the act is, but the question is, whether the Copyright Act of 1976 is useful or not.
The history of copyright all started when the printing press came into play. People started to produce more and more writings, but there was a problem. There was no copyright law, which meant anyone could claim the writing. Since there
…show more content…
For example, you can have an amazing idea, but if someone beats you to the punch then you are out of luck because you did not express your idea before they did. “I believe in copyright, within limited precincts. But I also believe in fair use, public domain, and especially transformation,” author David Shields says. As Shields said, he believes in copyright, but he also believes in fair use. The main purpose behind the Copyright Act of 1976 was to allow Congress to address issues in American copyright law that had arisen in reference to the technological and societal changes. The last major changes happened in 1909, making the 1976 act an important revision because of the technology advance. Another reason was to insure authors that their work would be protected by the government. The act wanted to promote the intellectual and artistic activity for the good of the society as a whole. Therefore, the act was created in purpose of helping the authors out and to encourage others to become writers. This act also gave Congress permission to regulate applications and use enforcement. The act allows them to see more of what was going on and it let them be more in control. With this act a “fixed” work could now be accessible, meaning instead of going public domain, they just had to make sure the work could be found in one media source. This was making it easier for the authors that didn’t want their work out in the media world, but still wanted some credit. The ultimate goal …show more content…
Back in the day it was hard for people to copy because they had to of have an expensive printing press and expensive ink for the press. Nowadays all copiers need is copy machine and now quarters (New Media Rights. 2011). It has gotten so easy to copies things due to the internet and having the act makes it harder for those to copy other writers work. When an author creates their work, it is their creative mind and their hearts that are being poured onto paper. They don’t want someone else claiming it as their own and the act protects them from that hurt. Another reason why we need the act is if we didn’t have it, there would be mad chaos. People would be copying left and right trying to get money out of others people work. Also, kids in school would not learn because they would be able to copy whatever they want and not have to use their brains to think. For example, if someone was writing an essay on Abraham Lincoln, they could go online and copy everything on the website and use it as their own. Their essay would be done in five minutes and there would be no original work. The act restricts that and helps writers keep their credit, but it also helps others learn. This act is one of the most important laws in the writing industry and that is why it is very
Putting concrete limitations and rules on what an artist can and cannot use when expressing their opinion of another artist’s work is unconstitutional. If we put a price on the freedom of speech, we place a fine on our liberties.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 can be termed as a major overhaul of the communications law in the past sixty-two years. The main aim of this Act is to enable any communications firm to enter the market and compete against one another based on fair and just practices (“The Telecommunications Act 1996,” The Federal Communications Commission). This Act has the potential to radically change the lives of the people in a number of different ways. For instance it has affected the telephone services both local and long distance, cable programming and other video services, broadcast services and services provided to schools. The Federal Communications Commission has actively endorsed this Act and has worked towards the enforcement and implementation of the various clauses listed in the document. The Act was basically brought into existence in order to promote competition and reduce regulation so that lower prices and higher quality services for the Americans consumers may be secured.
On May 31st, 1790, the Copyright Act of 1790, was signed by Washington into law. ““An act for the encouragement of learning by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned,” the legislation was the first law protecting copyright in the United States. Ten facts about Washington's presidency. n.d.) ”
...entertainment industry is saying that intellectual property is just as real as physical property. The digital age faces a true balancing act a digital dilemma if you will- the right to freedom of expression while protecting intellectual property.
Copyright is the set of significant exclusive rights that have been conferred on the authors of works or copyright owners. It is used to protect their work from unauthorised transmission or copying and to the protection of their moral rights. These moral rights include the right of integrity of authorship, the right against false attribution of authorship and the right of attribution of authorship.
Emerson writes about how people should speak their thoughts before it’s too late, before someone speaks it for them. This is still relevant today, many times a person will have a good answer to a question, or a good idea but won’t speak up and then they realize they should have when someone else speaks up with the same thought and gets a round of applause for having a great answer or idea. I myself have experienced this before. One day my professor asked the class a question and in my head I answered it, but didn’t want to speak up because I figured it was not a good answer. Moments later another student answered with the exact same answer I had in my head and the professor replied “that is correct” and the whole time I thought to myself “Wow, I should have spoken up.” This is one of many examples as to how Emerson’s idea of self-trust is still relevant today, people including myself should start having more confidence within themselves and not worry about what others may
“Copyright is a fundamental right of ownership and protection common to all of the arts” (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 8). “It is a form of intellectual Property (IP)” and it gives the owner exclusive rights to the copyright (O’Hara & Beard, 2006, p. 11).
Over the past decade the societal view of creative society has greatly changed due to advances in computer technology and the Internet. In 1995, aware of the beginning of this change, two authors wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing diametrically opposed views on how this technological change would take form, and how it would affect copyright law. In the article "The Emperor's Clothes Still Fit Just Fine" Lance Rose hypothesized that the criminal nature of copyright infringement would prevent it from developing into a socially acceptable practice. Thus, he wrote, we would not need to revise copyright law to prevent copyright infringement. In another article, Entitled "Intellectual Value", Esther Dyson presented a completely different view of the copyright issue. She based many her arguments on the belief that mainstream copyright infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
...ts new and old artist from having their original forms of expression stolen. A performing artist or songwriter should have a good understanding of the factors of the copyright law. An artist always wants to protect their work so the wrong people can not abuse it. By having a deep knowledge about the copyright law, the artists can save themselves from paying endless unnecessary legal fees.
Copyright, in its first form, was first introduced in 1710 with a British statute of Anne. Since this time copyright laws have changed to remain current, and have grown into an international agreement by many countries around the globe.
In the present day, Americans have had to realize what the word “freedom” means. Whether it is recognizing our freedom as American citizens and defending ourselves against a growing threat of terrorism, or protesting war as we attempt to protect another country’s plea for freedom, all Americans have looked closer at the definition of freedom. In this heightened age of freedom and evaluating our constitutional rights, it is interesting that censorship is still a controversial issue. Perhaps the most significant examples of censorship take place in the arts. While the First Amendment considers censorship illegal, there are many ways that censorship still occurs in visual art, theatre, television, and film. Perhaps film has the most organized system of censorship found in the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America). Chris Roth writes in his article “Three Decades of Film Censorship…right before your eyes”, that censorship by ratings is a serious First Amendment issue that deserves debate and action. The article poses many questions about the MPAA and the restrictions it places on director’s creativity. However, the most important issue it addresses is our freedom as American citizens to promote, protect, and view a diverse mosaic of ideas on screen.
All of us know about the crimes committed every day by people all over the world. Theft, assault, grand theft auto, underage drinking, fraud, prostitution, and rape. But what about crimes on the internet? Last year, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) was introduced to the world. If this bill was passed, many sites would have to censor certain pieces of information, as well as remove a lot of the content already uploaded. SOPA would also crack down on terminating torrent sites, which are used to share files such as music, movies, video games, e-books, and whatever else is a digital file. In my opinion, SOPA should not be passed due to the fact that censoring information on the internet is an act against the first amendment. SOPA should not be passed due to the fact that it goes against the first amendment and will lead to a corrupt information sharing system.
Copyright is a protection for authors, composers or artists and other creators who create innovative idea base work. Copyright law is important because of its role to protect the interests of the creator, while allowing others to gain access to it legally. It designed to make sure that creators receive appropriate rights for their own ideas and creativity, and to promote artistic creativity by protecting the creator.
A copyright is a legal means that gives the creator of mythical, imaginative, musical, or other creative work the solitary right to publish and sell that work. Copyright owners have the right to manage the reproduction of their work, including the right to receive imbursement for that reproduction. An author may contribute or sell those rights to others, including publishers or recording corporations. Breach of a copyright is called copyright