Controversy Of William Shakespeare

1979 Words4 Pages

The Shakespeare authorship debate has captivated scholars and enthusiasts alike for centuries, with multiple intriguing alternative theories suggesting that William Shakespeare may not have been the true author of the “Shakespeare plays.” While William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon is traditionally credited as the sole author, proponents of different theories argue that other scholars with greater intellect and schooling are better candidates. This essay delves into the reasons why if Shakespeare is not the true author of his plays, then the people at hand are most likely Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere, Christopher Marlowe, or a combination of the three. Francis Bacon's intellect and erudition are widely acknowledged by the writer community. …show more content…

Aside from Bacon and de Vere, there is one more potential candidate for the authorship of Shakespeare's plays. Christopher Marlowe has all of the required attributes of a writer to be able to write Shakespeare’s plays. One of the most intriguing theories regarding the authorship of Shakespearean plays is the proposition that Christopher Marlowe, the illustrious playwright of the Elizabethan era, may have been the true creative mastermind behind the works attributed to William Shakespeare. While William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon is conventionally credited as the sole author, proponents of the Marlovian theory present compelling arguments suggesting that Marlowe's untimely demise makes him a plausible candidate. Christopher Marlowe is renowned for his groundbreaking contributions to Elizabethan drama, revolutionizing the theatrical landscape with his daring themes, poetic brilliance, and vivid …show more content…

Evidence of textual similarities and shared literary techniques between Marlowe and Shakespeare further supports this theory, suggesting a possible influence or collaboration (Bakeless, 2001). The Renaissance era witnessed a flourishing of theatrical activity in England, with playwrights often working in close collaboration to produce plays for the public theaters of London. Advocates of the theory of group authorship argue that the collaborative nature of Renaissance drama provides a viable explanation for the diversity of styles, themes, and voices found within Shakespeare's plays (Wells & Taylor, 2005). One of the key arguments supporting the theory of group authorship is the evidence suggesting collaboration and adaptation in the composition of Shakespeare's plays. Scholars have identified uses of textual variation, inconsistencies in style, and theme overlap across different works attributed to Shakespeare (Wells & Taylor, 2005). This suggests the involvement of multiple authors. Moreover, historical records indicate that playwrights of the period frequently collaborated on

Open Document