Controversy Of Monopolies

399 Words1 Page

Monopoly A monopoly is a situation where a company owns all or nearly the market for providing the services/ product. A market situation where one producer (or a group of producer performing in concert) controls supply of goods and service, and where the entry of new producer is not permitted or highly limited. Monopoly free to set the prices of the products if the government intervention is absence.
Some it is considered bad thing even when it leads to a fair share of business opportunities amongst competitors. Because a monopoly is bad because it gives total control to only one company. Monopoly bad for the customer, since monopolies are the primary provider, they can set practically any price they choose. That is known as price-fixing. They can do this, paying little respect to demand, since they know the consumer must choose between limited options. Not just can monopolies raise costs, they can likewise supply inferior products. That has happened in some urban areas, where supermarkets realize that the poor urban occupant has fewer alternatives. Monopolies are additionally awful for an economy because the …show more content…

Be that as it may, problematic innovation is the most noticeably bad adversary of Monopolies. Dish TV, iPads, and Netflix has made another kind of excitement services that doesn't depend on cable to convey motion pictures and TV programming. The same thing happened with land-line telephones. They can make inflation. Since they can set any price they want, they will raise costs to customers. That is known as cost-push inflation. So we can say that the monopoly is a bad thing even when it leads to a fair share of business opportunities amongst competitors. Means if the monopoly gives the equal chances for compete but so many others negatives effects as discuss above. Overall the monopoly is very bad thing for the customers and

More about Controversy Of Monopolies

Open Document