Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about the victorian era in literature
Essay about the victorian era in literature
Essay about the victorian era in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about the victorian era in literature
When an author writes a novel that is infused with years of hard work and personal experiences, it is usually well received. After being commended as thoughtful, thorough, and awe-inspiring, it disappears off the shelves as flocks of interested readers swoop it up. Of course, Herman Melville expected that his masterpiece, Moby-Dick, would be wildly successful. The novel, which Melville based on the daring voyages he took himself, is immersed in lush imagery from the time period, abundant details about the whaling industry, and perplexing themes that were previously unexplored. Never did he imagine that it would ever be a point of controversy. When critics condemned the novel upon its release, Melville, shocked and disheartened, stopped writing …show more content…
Victorian England was highly conservative in its values, with straightforward novels tending to focus on appropriate, non-provocative topics; Moby-Dick strayed far from this ideal. For instance, when Ishmael, the novel’s protagonist, meets a cannibal, he thinks about how “wild he was; a very sight of sights to see; yet [he] began to feel myself mysteriously drawn towards him” (Melville 94). In Victorian England, cannibals would have been seen as repulsive, and authors would have described them as unruly and dangerous. This sympathetic and affectionate description of a savage human being, in addition to other similar instances in the text, was far outside the boundaries of what was considered appropriate at the time. Naturally, many critics despised the novel, and “most recoiled from what one reviewer called its strange ‘horrors and … heroics’” (Delbanco 430). Most other reviews echoed the same tune, as critics found the plot and writing style much too unconventional and horrendous for the time. In fact, before the first edition was released in England, the nineteenth-century publishers felt the need to “remove content they deemed vulgar and/or politically suspect” (Garber). Removing this content significantly lowered the quality of Melville’s
Analysis: Melville's Great American Novel draws on both Biblical and Shakespearean myths. Captain Ahab is "a grand, ungodly, god-like man … above the common" whose pursuit of the great white whale is a fable about obsession and over-reaching. Just as Macbeth and Lear subvert the natural order of things, Ahab takes on Nature in his
Despite being a worldwide best seller, J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye has been on the banned books list since 1961 ( (Baldassarro). The Catcher in the Rye tells the short journey, of anti-hero Holden Caulfield, between the end of the fall semester and Christmas break (Salinger). The story begins when Holden is expelled from his school, Pency Prep, for failing a majority of his classes (Salinger). Holden knows he must return home, so he attempts to prolong the scolding he will receive from his parents, for being expelled, by venturing around Manhattan until it becomes necessary to return to his home (Salinger). Holden tells his story in the most vulgar way possible. Holden accounts being offered a prostitute by an elevator operator when he asks, “Innarested a little tail t’night?” (Salinger 91). Offensive language is also used throughout the book, for example, “You’re a dirty stupid sonuvabitch of a moron” (Salinger 44). Underage drinking is also one of Holden’s favorite passtimes as evident in the quote, “I ordered a scotch and soda, and told him not to mix it- I said it fast as hell, because if you hem and haw, they think you’re under twenty-one and won’t sell you any intoxicating liquor” (Salinger 69). These three quotes express the precise justifications for banning books: sexually explicit content, offensive language, and underage drug use (Association). Although, many consider The Catcher in the Rye to be morally wrong, it should not ...
...n that the book is ban-worthy. If people are so concerned with vulgar words then they should try banning the dictionary! Another reason people want to ban this book is because of the racism towards the African-American stable buck named Crooks. Steinbeck wanted his story to be true to history and seem realistic to the time period.
All through the book, Holden, as well as his "friends", uses vulgar language. Because of this, Longstreth feels the book is "not fit for children." Although vulgar language is used in the real world, it was very rarely encountered in literature. Other critics agreed with Longstreth, Peterson said the book was "obscene," while Smith warned readers "be advised to let the book alone" if they are bothered by this language. It is Jones' feeling that this language could only be mouthed by a "disturbed adolescent," and that Holden is "immoral and perverted" (Longstreth).
In conclusion, this essay analyzes the similarities and differences of the two stories written by Herman Melville, Billy Budd and Bartleby. The settings, characters, and endings in the two stories reveal very interesting comparisons and contrasts. The comparison and contrast also includes the interpretation of the symbolism that Melville used in his two stories. The characters, Billy and Bartleby, could even be considered autobiographical representatives of Herman Melville.
Steinbeck himself worried about its weaknesses. In a letter to his editor, he said, "It's kind of a sloppy sounding book, but it's not sloppy, really."
well as claiming that it was "explicitly pornographic" and "immoral." After months of controversy, the board ruled that the novel could be read
Stillinger, Jack, Deidre Lynch, Stephen Greenblatt, and M H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: Volume D. New York, N.Y: W.W. Norton & Co, 2006. Print.
“Ishmael’s discourse is often calculated to undercut the myth of white supremacy, asserting that society’s survival may ultimately depend on the acceptance of Ishmael’s democratic vision (seeing equality in diversity) and a rejection of Ahab’s tyrannical one (seeing only white).”
It was censored in many states because of the inappropriate behaviors in the book. The public schools and libraries wanted to deter the teenagers from trying drugs and to act upon sexual activities. In 1974, Michigan schools removed the novel because of the language and sexual content. It was unsuitable for students under the age, and for students whose parents weren’t okay with the vocabulary and plot of this novel. Underage individuals could participate in the acts presented in the novel, and could cause serious harm to others. It was censored to prevent the repetition of the plot of the story.
Before exploring Ishmael, Ahab, and Moby Dick and their Biblical counterparts, it is important to understand Melville's background. He grew up as a baptized Calvinist in the Dutch Reformed Church. His parents trained him to obey God at all times, even if God’s commands seem unjust and cruel. However, he quickly turned against his faith after his father died. During his travels, he witnessed diseases, catastrophes, and hatred throughou...
Laskowski, Gene L. Masculine Sentimentality in the Early Novels of Herman Melville. Diss. University of Michigan, 1993. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International, 1993. Print.
Herman Melville’s stories of Moby Dick and Bartleby share a stark number of similarities and differences. Certain aspects of each piece seem to compliment each other, giving the reader insight to the underlying themes and images. There are three concepts that pervade the two stories making them build upon each other. In both Moby Dick and Bartleby the main characters must learn how to deal with an antagonist, decide how involved they are in their professions, and come to terms with a lack of resolution.
At first glance, Herman Melville’s novel Moby Dick, appears to be the story of a man, his captain, and the whale that they quest to destroy. But a closer look reveals the author’s intense look at several metaphysical ideologies. He explores some of the most ponderous quandaries of his time, among these being the existence of evil, knowledge of the self and the existential, and the possibility of a determined fate. All of these were questions which philosophers had dealt with and written about, but Melville took it to a new level: not only writing about these things, but also doing so in a lovely poetic language backed by a tale packed with intrigue. He explores the general existence of evil in his antagonist, the white whale, and through the general malice that nature presents to humans throughout the novel. The narrator, Ishmael, gains a lot of knowledge about himself through his experiences on the whaling voyage, where he also is able to learn much about the phenomenon of existence itself. Also, through Captain Ahab, he sees more about the existence of man and the things that exist within man’s heart. Especially through Ahab and his ongoing quest for the white whale, and also in general conversation amongst the whalers, the issue of fate and whether one’s destiny is predetermined are addressed in great detail, with much thought and insight interpolated from the author’s own viewpoints on the subject.
Melville applied immense resourcefulness and ingenuity in writing Moby Dick. Melville strikingly brought zoology into comparison and unison with poetry (Arwin). One common critique of Melville's style in writing Moby Dick is that there were hundred of digressions from the plot. The applied metaphors that seem to stray from the storyline and the meticulously documented chapters on cetology actually add to the overall effect of Moby Dick. These digressions along with those which intricately detail the lore of the white whale all lead to the same tragic outcome and is what distinguishes Melville as a brilliant author (Boynton).