Conslogion St Anselm Analysis

756 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on aristotle nicomachean ethics

In Saint Anselm’s Proslogion, Saint Anselm discusses his ideas and beliefs about God’s existence. In the opening chapter, Anselm defines what it means to contemplate God. In order to contemplate God we must want to unburden ourselves and allow God to be a part of our life. Once one can find faith in God, they can begin to start questioning God’s nature and his existence. Anselm’s purpose for writing The Proslogion was to inform God’s followers of his existence through reasoning, discussing contradictions, and re-evaluating our interpretations of scripture. Anselm’s first few chapters focus on discovering the existence of God through thought and reason. Saint Anselm defines God as ‘something which nothing greater can be thought’. Anselm claims …show more content…

A popular argument against the existence of God is the idea that God is both merciful and impassible. But how could this be possible if these words both mean the opposite? Anselm says the answer lies in how we view God as our savior. In our eyes, God is merciful because he forgives those who sin and saves us, but God is not merciful according to God’s experience because he shows the wretched no mercy, “You are merciful because You save [us] wretched [creatures] and spare [us] who have sinned against You; and You are not merciful, because You do not experience compassion for wretchedness” (Anselm, Proslogion 8). The same could be said about God’s existence as a just being who spares evil. How could you one be just if they spare evil? The answer is that he is justly merciful to them because he possesses the ability to turn bad men into good men, “Therefore, if You were not justly merciful to those who are evil, it would be the case that You ought not to be merciful [to them]; and if You ought not to be merciful, then You are unjustly merciful. Now, if it is blasphemous to say this, then it is right to believe that You are justly merciful to those who are evil.” (Anselm, Proslogion

Show More
Related

  • Aquinas versus Anselm

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Saint Thomas of Aquainas may have been one of the greatest thinkers who attempted to bridge the proverbial gap between faith and reason. His Sacred Doctrine which was the initial part of his Summa Theologica was the basis for his conclusion about the existence of God. Aquinas tended to align his beliefs close with Aristotle's supposition that there must be an eternal and imputrescible creator. In comparison, Anselm's impressions were influenced largely by Plato. In his text Proslogion he outlined his Ontological argument that regarding the existence of God. It was simply that God was the ultimate and most perfect being conceivable, and that his state of existing is greater than not existing therefore god, being perfect in every way, must exist. This is where their paths divide, and although they essentially reach the same determination they paint the picture quite differently.

    Read More

  • Gospel Essentials Essay

    1491 Words  | 3 Pages

    God is sinless, loving, forgiving and full of wisdom. God’s love is shown throughout the Old and New Testaments. Many times throughout the Old

    Read More

  • Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas were considered as some of the best in their period to represent philosophy. St. Anselm’s argument is known as the ontological argument; it revolves entirely around his statement, “God is that, than which no greater can be conceived” (The Great Conversation, Norman Melchert 260). St. Thomas Aquinas’ argument is known as the cosmological argument; it connects the effects of events to the cause for why they happened. Anselm’s ontological proof and Aquinas’ cosmological proof both argued for God’s existence, differed in the way they argued God’s existence, and had varying degrees of success using these proofs.

    Read More

  • A Philoshpical Approach to Proving the Existence of God

    4011 Words  | 9 Pages

    The Ontological Argument, which argues from a definition of God’s being to his existence, is the first type of argument we are going to examine. Since this argument was founded by Saint Anslem, we will be examining his writings. Saint Anslem starts by defining God as an all-perfect being, or rather as a being containing all conceivable perfections. Now if in addition of possessing all conceivable perfections t...

    Read More

  • John Hick And Richard Swinburne: The Problem Of Evil Argument

    1651 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.

    Read More

  • Anselm's Omnipotence

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Proslogion, Anselm tries to prove the existence of God and his powers through the ontological argument. This argument redirects the argument of God’s existence from science and observation to logic, where Anselm explains that there has to be a being that nothing greater can be thought of, and that is God. One of Anselm’s main topics of contention is God’s omnipotence and whether He is actually infinite. In the Proslogion, Anselm talks about God’s omnipotence and if it can be disavowed because of self-contradictory statements, how God’s non-action gives him more possibility and power, and how being all-powerful can lead to God being both merciful and yet not feel the pains of sinners.

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas 5 Argument To Demonstrate The Existence Of God Analysis

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents five arguments to demonstrate the existence of God. However, this paper focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is regarded as the Teleological Argument and states that things that lack intelligence act for some end or purpose. While the fifth argument satisfies God’s existence for Aquinas, some contemporary readers would argue that Aquinas neglects the laws of physics. Others argue that Aquinas allows a loophole in his argument so that the Catholic conception of God is not the only intelligent designer.

    Read More

  • Comparing God, Evil, And Suffering

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is evil. 3. So, God does not exist”. Since there is evil, then that means God does not exist. So there is no loving and powerful God. However, if there is a God then he is not all loving and powerful. Daniel Howard-Snyder states in his article “God, Evil, And Suffering,”: “We would have to say God lacks power and knowledge to such an extent that He can 't prevent evil. And there lies the trouble. For how could God have enough power and knowledge to create and sustain the physical universe if He can 't even prevent evil? How could He be the providential governor of the world if He is unable to do what even we frequently do, namely prevent evil?” (5). This statement argues that God is not all powerful because he is unable to prevent evil in the world. Daniel Howard-Snyder then argues that: “Would a perfectly good being always prevent evil as far as he can? Suppose he had a reason to permit evil, a reason that was compatible with his never doing wrong and his being perfect in love, what I 'll call a justifying reason. For example, suppose that if he prevented evil completely, then we would miss out on a greater good, a good whose goodness was so great that it far surpassed the badness of evil. In that case, he might not prevent evil as far as he can, for he would have a justifying reason to permit it” (5). Even if God had a reason to allow evil, he who is all loving and powerful would want the least amount of people to suffer and feel pain. Since God knows

    Read More

  • Essay On Anselm's Ontological Argument

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anselm was a stable believer in God, so he wanted to use logic and reason to confirm his forceful faith and clarify God’s existence. Anselm’s argument was given in chapter two of Proslogion. Its main focus was the meaning of God. Furthermore he claims that everyone, whether they trust in God or not agrees alongside this definition. Anselm approves there is a difference amid understanding that God exists and understanding him to be a concept. To clarify this extra, he gives the analogy of a painter. He states that, in advance a gifted painter makes a masterpiece; he can discern it visibly in his mind even nevertheless he knows it doesn’t exist. He comprehends it as an idea. Though, after the painting has been finished and can be perceived by the man in reality, the painter comprehends the believed of the painting and its existence. The upcoming period is the locale that an advocate of God who approves alongside Anselm’s argument will be at.

    Read More

  • St. Anselm's Ontological Argument

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another way that St. Anselm's argument differs from other arguments is that it requires that you look at a definition of the concept of God. As Sober says, the definition of an object does not, in itself, prove its existence. Some examples he gives are unicorns and golden...

    Read More

  • The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

    1544 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the words of Anselm, "Therefore, Lord, not only are You that than which nothing greater can be conceived but you are also something greater than can be conceived. Indeed, since it is possible to be conceived to be something of this kind, if you are not this very thing, something can be conceived greater than You, which cannot be done. " Anselm suggested a proof for God's existence, however, for God to be God there must be more to Him than that He simply 'exists'.

    Read More

  • Anselm And Descartes Argument

    904 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Anselm’s “Proslogion” and Descartes’ “ Meditations on First Philosophy,” Anselm and Descartes offer their own answers to one of the most important questions in life, which is whether God exists. I will point out similarities and differences in the two arguments, and I will argue why Descartes ‘proof’ is more persuasive.

    Read More

  • René Descartes Ontological Argument

    435 Words  | 1 Pages

    In René Descartes’ Fifth Meditation the French philosopher composed a revived version of St. Anslem’s ontological argument. Descartes’ argument is centered on his two Cartesian ideals: the first being the theory of innate ideas, and the second the belief in clear and distinct perception. In contrast to St. Anslem’s argument, in which he focused primarily on the meaning of the word “God,” Descartes’ argument centers on the innate idea of God which he believed every individual has been given. He argued that he knew himself to be an imperfect being, yet within his mind there is a concept of a higher being who is perfect and infinite. Since it is impossible for anything to create something greater from its own resources (perfection can only come

    Read More

  • St. Anselm of Canterbury

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    St. Anselm of Canterbury defined God as “that-than-which-a-greater-cannot-be-thought” (Bailey, 2002). The problem with this definition is that the term ‘greater’ is surely up for interpretation. The term ‘greater’ requires a comparison between itself and one or more things, which could pose a problem for Anselm’s argument; however Professor Thorp states that the only difference between these two things is that one exists in the mind, while the other exists in the mind and in reality. If we understand that a God that exists in the mind and in reality is greater than one that merely exists in the mind then we must understand that God exists. We need to examine this, however, much more closely to discover the problem with this statement; and I will do so using an example given to us by Professor Thorp.

    Read More

  • Good Versus Evil: Good Vs. Evil

    1141 Words  | 3 Pages

    Good versus evil is an eternal struggle, conflict, war, or a unification. Good exists while evil does as well, this is because without evil, there can be no such thing as good, and without good, there can also be no evil. The question exists that if there is an all-good & powerful God who is omniscient; omnipotent; omni-benevolent; then how can evil exist within such absolute terms?

    Read More

More about Conslogion St Anselm Analysis

Open Document