Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of impact of agriculture on environment
Eating meat ethics essay
Ethical eating meat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of impact of agriculture on environment
Have you ever thought about the meat we eat? What is it? Where did it come from? How was is prepared? I personally never thought of these questions; my only concern was if the meat is halal or not. However after reading the articles: Consider the Lobster, The LIves of animals, The meat Guzzler, and Flesh of your Flesh I changed my whole mind. I admit have loved meat since I was a little girl, but unfortunately it took me almost 20 years to realize that eating meat is more than it just being a meal, in fact it is a relationship of honesty and humanity too.
When I look back, it’s hard to understand why it took me mylife time to realized that i was a baby serial killer. I was capable to indicate what's right and wrong about eating animals but
…show more content…
instead in our society we pretend that the truth doesn't exist. We believed our lies so we can hide the truth and the unpleasant fact about the meat we eat. However, when questions like “Do you know where that meat came from? or Do you know how your meat was prepared? are asked the most common answers are, I don't want to know, I don’t care, or Don’t tell me now. That makes us all baby serial killers because that means that we don’t care. Last week, I went shopping for grounded chicken, so i asked the butcher is the chicken labeled organic from a family farm and he replied, “I don’t know” Then I asked about the meat he had on display does he know where it came from. His answer again was I don't know and gave me a bad look. I was disappointed and left. As long as we choose to avoid and ignore the truth we are going to remain baby serial killers. My earliest memories with my family are our family feast gatherings. Each year us muslims celebrate Eid al-Adha which means the "Festival of the sacrifice" it is the second of two religious holidays celebrated by Muslims worldwide each year. It honors the willingness of Abraham to sacrifice his promised son, Ishmael, as an act of submission to God's command, before God then intervened to provide Abraham with a lamb to sacrifice instead. My family each year sacrifice a lamb. I once celebrated Eid Al-adha in Palestine and over there they actually slaughtered the lamp in front of me which made me not eat any beef meat ever again and its been almost three years. The meat from the sacrificed animal is preferred to be divided into three parts. The family retains one third of the share; another third is given to relatives, friends and neighbors; and the remaining third is given to the poor and needy. However, in Islam we are allowed to eat any animal except pork are long as it is slaughtered the halal way which means it means food that is permissible according to Islamic law, for a meat to be certified Halal, it cannot be a forbidden cut such as meat from hindquarters. The lamb they slaughter is usually bought from farmers who often only raise sheep and lamb. In Palestine that's often how lamb is sold from farmers who live in small villages. There are major ethical problems with the ways animals are treated on factory farms. Factory farming is a process of which animals and products are generated as mass production. The animals don't seem to be seen as individual, rather its seen as a crowd. Therefore, as a result of factory farming its goal is to maximize production and, consequently, profit. Since the animals are seen as mere commodities, they're bred, fed, confined, and drugged to put a lot of eggs, birth a lot of offspring, and die with a lot of meat on their bones. For example, cows are fed corn which is unhealthy in order for them to grow fast. Pigs tails are cut off because the room they are held in is too small. Male piglets also have their testicles removed. Also, the workers work in an unsafe dangerous conditions. All of these examples are unethical treatments and we insist on ignoring these facts and say yes its ok by buying meat without knowing where it came from. In the story “The Lives of animals” the author J.M. Coetzee uses the main character Elizabeth Costello who plays the role of a mad lady that is against people eating meat because of their inhuman thinking of killing animals and eating them, to prove his point of view about how we should care about the animals we eat. Costello’s point of being against people eating and killing animals is that they don’t consider how the animals were treated or in what conditions the animals were in, or how we don’t care to ask and ignore the fact the animals suffer. Humans are just like animals both have the right to be treated well. “To be alive is to be a living soul. An animal-and we are all animals-are an embodied souls” (Costello). Here she means that animals are not things, animals have souls and if we are fully humans, we must be fully alive and realize what is going around us. In the article Consider the Lobster, the author David Foster Wallace alerts everyone about the issues of torturing animals just for the sake of our humanistic pleasure of eating. At his arrival at the Maine Lobster Festival, he found that there is no honest way to avoid certain moral questions about how animals are being killed alive his stay in the Maine Lobster Festival made him realized how cruel and unethical boiling an alive lobster is . Some people claim the lobsters don’t feel pain, but later on in the article Wallace describes how lobsters actually try to crawl out and he also mentions that lobsters are one of the most sensitive animals. We do not have direct access to anyone or anything’s pain but our own (Wallace). Wallace is trying to alert and make the people to think not only humans feel pains and suffer but anything else could too, we don’t don't know and must not assume that we do. We as a society should have a healthy relationship with the animals we eat. People need to rise and see what's right and wrong about how we treat animals it took me 20 years to open my eyes, but I know now I will not close them and try to make a change. Eating meat has a big impact on the environment.
For the past years the global demand for meat has multiplied and with that the world meat consumption is expected to double and double which is a crisis. Meat factories have consumed huge amounts of energy, contaminated water and generated lots of greenhouse gases. Therefore if you eat less meat there is less demand for it and fewer animals are killed which means less greenhouse gases pumped into the atmosphere. In the article Mark Bittman who is an American food journalist talks about how animals have a big effect on the environment and public health by giving an example on how cattles are fed and raised, “cattle are meant to digest grass, not grain, cattle raised industrially thrive only in the sense that they gain weight quickly. This diet made it possible to remove cattle from their natural environment and encourage the efficiency of mass confinement and slaughter. But it causes enough health problems that administration of antibiotics is routine, so much so that it can result in antibiotic-resistant bacteria that threaten the usefulness of medicines that treat people.” Here Bittman gives only one example out of millions examples on how animals are treated in an unethical way which affects our environment and our health too. In the article Flesh of your Flesh the author Elizabeth Kolbert considers many issues on how we humans live in a two face guide on how we look at animals versus meat. America consumes roughly thirty-eight billion pounds of poultry, twenty-seven billion pounds of beef, and nine billion birds and numerous more of the animals that are slaughtered annually to provide meats for American people for food (Kolbert). We americans are meat eaters. We consume a lot of meat and at the end of the day we face huge health problems such as obesity. Meat is not the only source to rely on for protein. Whoever says that eating meat means survival that is not true because of the large amount of resources
and cost it takes to produce meat. People in poorer countries live almost exclusively on a veggie diet. It is people in richer countries, like in the US and europe, who have the luxury of eating meat. In Flesh of your Flesh Elithabeth also commits on the book Eating Animals by Jonathan Foer. He explores topics about factory farming. Foer writes, if “every man, woman, and child in every city and town in all of California and all of Texas crapped and pissed in a huge open-air pit for a day. Now imagine that they don’t do this for just a day, but all year round, in perpetuity.” Wow, that is gross but is happening Raising many animals for meat creates a lot of animal waste. Therefore, unfortunately some thirty-five thousand miles of American waterways have been contaminated by animal excrement. America is seen as one of the perfect countries in the world No! That is not true. We need to open our eyes and hearts to see what is really happening around us and face the truth. We need to stop because we are destroying the environment our selves. People need to be open to hear the truth about where the majority of our meat comes from, and the effects it has on the world, including the land, the people, and the animals. Recently I have found it a difficult conversation some people won’t accept the fact and choose to ignore. What we eat says a lot about who we are and the things we want. No one wants to be accused being immoral. No one wants to feel ashamed of what they eat, yet we are all remain baby serial killers if we don’t realized the truth and act on solving this issue. The more we talk about it and the more we listen, the more we can understand how our daily choices affect the greater world, and ask ourselves where did this meat come from; we are participating in changing this factory farm system and as a result we will have a relationship of honesty and humanity not only with the animal but with the environment and our healths too.
Jonathan Safran Foer wrote “Eating Animals” for his son; although, when he started writing it was not meant to be a book (Foer). More specifically to decide whether he would raise his son as a vegetarian or meat eater and to decide what stories to tell his son (Foer). The book was meant to answer his question of what meat is and how we get it s well as many other questions. Since the book is a quest for knowledge about the meat we eat, the audience for this book is anyone that consumes food. This is book is filled with research that allows the audience to question if we wish to continue to eat meat or not and provide answers as to why. Throughout the book Foer uses healthy doses of logos and pathos to effectively cause his readers to question if they will eat meat at their next meal and meals that follow. Foer ends his book with a call to action that states “Consistency is not required, but engagement with the problem is.” when dealing with the problem of factory farming (Foer).
Millions of animals are consumed everyday; humans are creating a mass animal holocaust, but is this animal holocaust changing the climate? In the essay “ The Carnivores Dilemma,” written by Nicolette Hahn Niman, a lawyer and livestock rancher, asserts that food production, most importantly beef production, is a global contributor to climate change. Nicolette Niman has reports by United Nations and the University of Chicago and the reports “condemn meat-eating,” and the reports also say that beef production is closely related to global warming. Niman highlights, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides are the leading greenhouses gases involved in increasing global warming. A vast majority of people across the world consumes meat and very little people are vegetarian, or the people that don’t eat meat, but are there connections between people and meat production industry when it comes to eating food and the effect it has on the climate? The greenhouse gases, methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxides are not only to blame, but we should be looking at people and industrialized farming for the leading cause of greenhouse gases in agriculture and the arm-twisting dilemma we have been lured into, which is meat production itself.
In the article,Rethinking the Meat-Guzzler, Mark Bittman discusses the devastating effects the meat diet has on the planet. As the population continues to increase, the consumption of meat also increases. According to the article, it states that “Americans are downing close to 200 pounds of meat, poultry and fish per capita per
Christopher McCandless, a young American who was found dead in summer of 1992 in wild land in Alaska, wrote in his diary about his moral struggle regarding killing a moose for survival. According to Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris had to abandon most of the meat since he lacked the knowledge of how to dismantle and preserve it (166-168). Not only did he have a moral dilemma to kill a moose, but also had a deep regret that a life he had taken was wasted because of his own fault. He then started recognizing what he ate as a precious gift from the nature and called it “Holy Food” (Krakauer 168). Exploring relationships between human beings and other animals arouses many difficult questions: Which animals are humans allowed to eat and which ones are not? To which extent can humans govern other animals? For what purposes and on which principles can we kill other animals? Above all, what does it mean for humans to eat other animals? The answer may lie in its context. Since meat-eating has been included and remained in almost every food culture in the world throughout history and is more likely to increase in the future due to the mass production of meat, there is a very small chance for vegetarianism to become a mainstream food choice and it will remain that way.
As a child I related to Charlotte’s Web and I still do. One thing that has always concerned me is the beauty, treatment, and protection of animals. When asked why I’m a vegetarian, the words seem to flow almost from instinct: “Because I don’t believe in killing animals for our pleasure.” Being a vegetarian is particularly hard, especially when the menus in most restaurants are 90% meat.
Henning, B. (2011). Standing in Livestock's ''Long Shadow'': The Ethics of Eating Meat on a
Though, It's not all about how much meat we consume, It's about how the animals are treated before being slaughtered and put into packages for our dinner plates. For example when Pollan states, "Half of the dogs in America will receive Christmas presents this year, yet few of
Meat has become a part of our culture in our country, where it is expected as part of each meal of the day. But the production of the meat raises questions on whether eating meat is ethical in people’s eyes. Studies in recent years have shown that the growing impact of our meat eating culture, has negatively affected different aspects around us. The problem is not about whether people should or should not eat meat, but that we should focus on how the production of meat can have negative affects and how we can limit those problems.
Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.
“The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that their treatment has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."(Schopenhauer). I always wondered why some people are not so drawn to the consumption of meat and fed up with only one thought about it. Why so many people loathe of blood, and why so few people can easily kill and be slaughter animal, until they just get used to it? This reaction should say something about the most important moments in the code, which was programmed in the human psyche. Realization the necessity of refraining from meat is especially difficult because people consume it for a long time, and in addition, there is a certain attitude to the meat as to the product that is useful, nourishing and even prestigious. On the other hand, the constant consumption of meat has made the vast majority of people completely emotionless towards it. However, there must be some real and strong reasons for refusal of consumption of meat and as I noticed they were always completely different. So, even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to resemble that of its roots, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not merely a matter of personal health.
Many people don’t believe think anything of what they eat or how it got there. But the harsh truth is the meat that you eat was once a living, breathing creature that had feeling and emotions. Maybe next time you order a steak or chicken nuggets you should think about the animals that went through extreme pain and conditions for you to eat. Not only is it inhumane to put animals through such pain, not eating meat and having a vegetarian lifestyle can have huge benefits to animals, the environment, and your health.
We all eat meat almost every day, besides those who are vegetarians or vegan, meat has become
For several years the issue of eating meat has been a great concern to all types of people all over the world. In many different societies controversy has began to arise over the morality of eating meat from animals. A lot of the reasons for not eating meat have to deal with religious affiliations, personal health, animal rights, and concern about the environment. Vegetarians have a greater way of expressing meats negative effects on the human body whereas meat eaters have close to no evidence of meat eating being a positive effect on the human body. Being a vegetarian is more beneficial for human beings because of health reasons, environmental issues, and animal rights.
Every person has the ability to make their own choice of whether to eat meat or not. However, eating meat is directly tied to negative health effects, pollution leading to a depletion of ozone, and the depletion of hundreds of thousands of acres of land “wasted” on animal production when they could be used to solve the hunger crisis or lower emission levels. What humans eat is no longer a matter of choice; it has become a matter of life and death. Literally, the future of the whole planet rests on the decision of whether or not to eat meat. If humans chose to eat less meat the world that wouldn’t have to suffer the consequences (outlined above.) Vegetarianism is one possibility, as is Veganism; however the world would be
Let me begin with the words by George Bernard Shaw: ‘Animals are my friends and I don’t eat my friends’. This indicates the ethic aspect of meat consumption. In fact, people often don’t realize how animals are treated, but they can see commercial spots in their TV showing smiling pigs, cows or chickens, happy and ready to be eaten. My impression is that there can’t be anything more cruel and senseless. It is no secret that animals suffer ...