Consequentialism: Principia Ethics by G.E. Moore

1567 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical decision making moral judgment

People have opinions and ideas when it comes to ethical dilemmas. There are many examples: The debate on abortion, the trolley problem, and moral absolutism, to name just a few. In all of these examples it appears that emotion and feelings will, at some point, override an important ethical decision that needs to be made. An important factor of an ethical dilemma is how and when it might appear. Some dilemma's, like the debate on abortion, can appear in a way that there is time to talk through all options and available ethical concepts. In this type of dilemma it is possible to see how moral rules and ethical theories can be discussed and a decision made through compromise. In contrast, when a situation that poses dire ethical consequences calls for a moral action there must be a solution that is grounded in moral principle and that can be accessed quickly and efficiently producing the most desirable results. The principal that would seem the best candidate in these situations is consequentialism.
To best define consequentialism the famous English philosopher G.E. Moore declared in his book Principia Ethics that “Acts are morally right just because they maximize the amount of goodness in the world.” Moore believed that if you failed to accept the idea that it was right to maximize good, you did not know what you were talking about (297). What is unique about consequentialism is that it asks us to act in a way where the greatest benefit is made for the greatest number of people. Consequentialism asks us to look at the consequences of our actions. If the result will produce the most good, then the end justifies the means. The direct opposite of consequentialism is the ethical theory of deontology. Deontology suggests that no matter ...

... middle of paper ...

...t or wrong in any situation. By using the principles of consequentialism the guess work of deciding what to do in a dilemma can easily be solved by doing what creates the best overall result.

Works Cited

Aquinas, Thomas Summa Theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Sacred- texts.com, n.d. Web. 07 July 2013. .
Foot, Philippa. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002. Print.
Moore, G. E., and Thomas Baldwin. "VI: The Ideal." Principia Ethica. Cambridge [England: Cambridge UP, 1993. 297. Print.
Moore, Ronald D. "Battlestar Galactica (TV Miniseries)." Battlestar Galactica. Dir. Michael Rymer. The Sci Fi Channel. SyFy, 08 Dec. 2003. Television.
Unger, Peter K. Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Agent Alienation in Consequentialism

    1437 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the above paper, I have explored Williams’s criticism of negative responsibility and consequentialism’s attack on integrity. I then moved on to Railton’s solution of sophisticated consequentialism as a reconciliation of consequentialism and integrity; I then proposed an objection to Railton on the grounds that embracing sophisticated consequentialism is a move away from consequentialism. Finally, I considered Railton’s probable response to that objection. The decision is now left to the reader as to the fruitfulness of my endeavor.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism In Training Day

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequentialism is a term used by the philosophers to simplify what is right and what is wrong. Consequentialist ethical theory suggests that right and wrong are the consequences of our actions. It is only the consequences that determine whether our actions are right or wrong. Standard consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that is discussed the most. It states that “the morally right action for an agent to perform is the one that has the best consequences or that results in the most good.” It means that an action is morally correct if it has little to no negative consequences, or the one that has the most positive results.

    Read More

  • Homeless Hotspots Case Study

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    moral decisions, we will be analyzing why this scenario poses a dilemma, possible actions that

    Read More

  • Deontology in Jim and the Indians

    891 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequentialism is ordinarily distinct from deontology, as deontology offers rightness or wrongness of an act, rather than the outcome of the action. In this essay we are going to explore the differences of consequentialism and deontology and apply them to the quandary that Bernard Williams and J.J.C Smart put forward in their original analogy of “Jim and the Indians” in their book , Utilitarianism: for and against (J.J.C Smart & Bernard Williams, 1973, p.78-79.).

    Read More

  • Theme Of Consequentialism In Macbeth

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    When thinking about ethics the most common definition would be the behavior for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable actions. Ethics refer more to rules from an outside source, morals however, are a test of one's individual principles regarding right and wrong. When judging morality, consequentialism is the belief that the goodness of an action should only be determined by the end result. Consequentialism is a good test of one's moral compass by viewing how one sees their personal gain versus the steps took achieve the goal. The most common saying relating to consequentialism is “the ends justify the means” saying that it does not matter how one would achieve his goals as long as he gets there eventually. This statement

    Read More

  • Consequentialism Research Paper

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequentialism is the view that, according to FoE, the morality of actions, policies, motives, or rules depends on their producing the best actual or expected results. In other words, do as much good as you can. Act utilitarianism, a sub-group of consequentialism, claims that well-being is the only thing that is intrinsically valuable, and that an action is morally required just because it does more to improve overall well-being than any other action you could have done in the circumstances. Basically, Act utilitarianism agrees completely with consequentialism, but ensure that those actual or expected results end up improving well-being. Consequentialism, as a whole, while extremely similar to other moral theories, such as hedonism and the desire theory, are, in fact, slightly different. Hedonism claims that a life is good to the extent that it is filled with pleasure and free from pain, and consequentialists, while not disagreeing with hedonism, would say that the pleasure and freedom from pain depends entirely on the actual or expected results. The desire theory claims that something is good for you if, and only if, it satisfies your desires and because it satisfies your desires, while consequentialists would say that those desires should improve overall well-being, and not to be selfish about it.

    Read More

  • Doing the Right Thing in Hamlet

    1739 Words  | 4 Pages

    As Stephen J. Freeman explains, consequentialism is the belief that "actions and/or rules are right as long as they produce the most favorable consequences for those affected by the actions or rules" (Freeman 63). Consequentialists view the morality of a consequence in two aspects. One aspect is what is called ethical egoism. Ethical egoism is "the idea that morality is defined as acting in one's own interest and in such a way as to maximize the consequences of good over bad" (Freeman 49). In contrast to ethical egoism is utilitarianism. Utilitarianists view morality as when an action promotes the greatest balance of good over bad for all people. "Utilitarianism is a teleological, goal-directed theory emphasizing happiness as the end result of human action" (Freeman 49).

    Read More

  • Consequentialism, Non- Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics

    1745 Words  | 4 Pages

    Consequentialism is an ethical perspective that primarily focuses upon the consequences resulting from an action and aims to eliminate the negative consequences. Within this framework there are three sub-categories: Egoism, Altruism and Utilitarianism.

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma Assignment

    2679 Words  | 6 Pages

    An ethical dilemma is only examined in a situation which has the following conditions; the first condition takes place in a situation, when an individual has to make a decision on which course of action is best. The second condition is there must be more than one course of action to choose from. The third action is no matter what course of action is taken, certain ethical principles are conceded. In other terms, there is no perfect result. When defining what forms an ethical dilemma, it is important to make a division between ethics, morals, values, laws and policies.

    Read More

  • John Locke's Theory Of Ethical Egoism

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moreover, in consequentialist normative principles " it require us that we first tally both the good and bad consequences of an action." Then, identify if the "total good consequences outweigh the total bad consequences." If based in our analysis the good "consequences are greater," then "the action is morally proper. In the given situation, stealing for food for a hungry child suggest plenty of good consequences when we try to focus on the true and good intention of the agent. We may think that he is good because he/she is trying to save only the boy from hunger or even from tragic death. Thus, millions of children around the world had died because of

    Read More

  • The Steam Train Case Study

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    The teachings of Teleological - Consequentialism is to do whatever you need to do no matter the cost to benefit the most or the majority of people.

    Read More

  • Rule Consequentialism Essay

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1950s, Rule Consequentialism was developed, and served as an alternative to Classical Act Utilitarianism. Rule Consequentialism seemed to avoid the seemingly incorrect moral conclusions that Classical Act Utilitarianism brought in difficult moral situations. I will evaluate this idea by applying both Rule Consequentialism and Classical Utilitarianism to a difficult moral dilemma. Then I will determine the validity of the conclusions, and see if either theory gives the intuitively appealing conclusion.

    Read More

  • The Three Classical Ethical Theories

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    A natural way to see whether an act is the right thing to do (or the wrong thing to do) is to look at its results, or consequences. Utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice.

    Read More

  • The Consequentialist Theories Of Abortion

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequentialism is a theory of regulating morals. It holds that a demonstration is just good or moral on the off chance that it brings about a decent conclusion. For example, “What do are actions tell us about what we want. “This is instead of the hypothesis or examination of good obligation, which demonstrates huge quality is in light of obligation; uprightness ethics, which holds that discriminating quality is in setting of a respectable character.

    Read More

  • Deontology Vs Utilitarianism

    2165 Words  | 5 Pages

    Our moral emotions are important to how individuals behave in a social environment. According to Greene (2001), when we are confronted with a moral dilemma where an individual has to be harmed to save a group of people, there is an immediate negative reaction, this negative reaction, if strong enough, can override our decision making process. On the other hand Utilitarianism is a subject of ethics that is fundamentally concerned with the great happiness for the greatest number of people (Boss, 2008). The way utilitarianism evaluates whether something provides the greatest happiness to the greatest number is through Consequentialism. Consequentialism holds that the outcome of our action is more important than our intention, meaning that actions are not intrinsically wrong or right. Instead the wrong or right is established by the consequence of having performed an action (Boss, 2008). Consequentialism is a theory of moral philosophy established from utilitarianism. Proposed by Mill, Sidgwick, and Bentham consequentialism argues that the consequence, or the result of an action is what determines if an action is moral, not the action itself. The ideal rooted in consequentialism is the enhancement of human experience (Greene, 2013). The human experience is comprised of external environmental

    Read More

More about Consequentialism: Principia Ethics by G.E. Moore

Open Document