Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self-defeating behaviors
Rwandan genocide society
Rwandan genocide society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self-defeating behaviors
Bitter irritation and having a feeling of being treated unfairly is more common than ever before. Those who actually try to deal with the matter however, are more than desperate to force their way and their solution down other's throats. Still, resentment has a very killing impact towards all, and yet people still chose resentment over much more superior options. Noticing, that becoming clearly realizable, we acknowledge the best of choices… Most of the time. Not only do we make the wrong choices at times, we may think that our choice is the best action to carry out. But the meaning of this quote refers to resentment. Hurting yourself, it would be that same as wishing that resentment would be the answer, and deal with your problems. Using the word “poison” that known as a deadly substance of some sort that may injure or kill someone, we have the understanding that resentment would be equivalent to drinking the poison and hoping, just hoping that it would take care of our issues for us. Closely, connecting my school year, I have seen …show more content…
Without holding someone down cannot be possible, without holding yourself down as well. Bringing someone else to be incapable of some things can also impact yourself to be incapable of doing things also. Not only is this not realized, but it can damage a relationship, or even both of the victim's all together. Though we are not perfect, we can still see some mistakes made by us, and fellow others. The reason most are blind to reality is why we can be clueless as to why we are presenting, and holding eachother down. This is commonly, showed in companies, governments, and even between countries. During the Rwandan Genocide, the Hutu Interahamwe Militia were planning on killing the Tutsi in Rwanda. The horrific chain of events led to no benefit to anyone. Some were left emotionally and physically scarred for the rest of their lives. Not even the Hutu benefitted from this terrible
“…we are uncharitable to ourselves; every man is his (own) greatest enemy, and as it were, his own executioner.” Sir Thomas Brown in Religion Medici. To me this analogue reminds me of how teenage girls and boys act. Hormonal, confused adolescents are mean to each other to gain popularity, however they are being mean to themselves by acting as someone they are not and losing their true friends. In other words, people’s inner enemy and hatred is hurting the people around them, which is losing the innocence and good inside someone. One’s inner enemy is caused by their sins and jealousy for another’s possessions and personality. Having jealousy for another person destroys the true love and friendship for the so-called enemy. The inner enemy
This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2
“Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.” -Siddartha Guatama. An act of anger is only spent on yourself. These two poems are one in the same, where “A poison Tree” tells the affect of holding onto anger, “The Most Vital Thing in Life” gives an idea as to how to fix it. There are a lot of fruitlessly upset people in this world, and the realization that you only hurt yourself should be enough to take these poets advice. While they come from two different backgrounds, with two different ways of dealing with the anger they carry, the message is the same, letting the anger manifest itself through you will only poison your mind, and your happiness, which is truely the most vital thing in life.
The state - sponsored genocide perpetrated by Nazi Germany is an example of what happens when people who hate gain power. Hitler's extermination took the lives of six million human beings for no other reason than they were Jewish. It started in little ways, an ethnic joke, stereotyping that was never challenged, then restrictions, loss of jobs, loss of civil rights, loss of voting rights, and the loss of life.
Rawls states that you cannot reimburse for the sufferings of the distressed by enhancing the joys of the successful. Fairness according to him occurs when the society makes sure that every individual is treated equally before the law and given a c...
The NSW Criminal Justice System is adequate when dealing with young offenders; however, like any legal system it does have its limitations. The NSW Criminal justice system does uphold the rights of the young offender by providing juveniles with special courts under the Childrens Court Act 1987 (NSW) by providing special protections under the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child; the recognising of culpability in regards to the age of the young offender by implementing doli incapax and by arranging a variety of diversionary programs and alternative punishments. However, the limitations of the NSW Criminal justice system in relation to young offenders is Doli Incapax in the The Childrens (Criminal Proceedings Act 1987) NSW which fails to recognise more serious offenders and The Young Offenders Act allowance for youth justice conferencing is not being cultivated for a wide enough range of offenders, leading the exclusion of some young offenders from the benefits that conferencing can offer.
Nowadays, the reaction of individuals toward certain facts or situations of our days is considered as deviants. However, it is important to notice that not all individuals reacted the same way in different situations. As individuals, we react differently when facing same as well as different situations,
Sexual assault is defined as a type of behaviour that occurs without explicit consent from the recipient and under sexual assault come various categories such as sexual activities as forces sexual intercourse, incest, fondling, attempted rape and more (Justice.gov. 2017). People often become victims of sexual assault by someone they know and trust (Mason & Lodrick, 2013) which is conflicting to the public’s perception and beliefs that offenders are strangers. Women are the main victims for sexual assault and are 5 times more likely to have been a victim of sexual assault from a male (Wright, 2017, p. 93). Men are victims of sexual assault however only 0.7% of men, compared to 3.2% of women, experience some form of sexual assault which highlights how vulnerable women are compared to men. Sexual assault is publicised and exposed in the media, however is often
This sense of difference provides a motive or rationale for using our power advantage to threaten the ethnoracial Other in ways that we would regard as cruel or unjust if applied to members of our own group. The possible consequences of this nexus of attitude. and action range from unofficial but pervasive social discrimination at one end. of the spectrum to genocide at the other. . .
Sexual assault is a worldwide epidemic that has long lasting and devastating effects on the victims. The terms sexual abuse and sexual assault are often used interchangeably. Most often the term “sexual abuse” is used when the victim is under the age of 18 and “sexual assault” is used when the victim is over the age of 18. For the purposes of this paper, “sexual assault” will be most often used as this provides a better description of the impact it has on the victims. Women are more often the victim than men; however, all races, cultures, and societies are affected by sexual assault and child sexual abuse (Davies and Jones, 2013). It is nearly impossible to determine exactly how many women have been victimized. There are two primary reasons that make such estimates difficult. First, there are so many different definitions and terms used to describe sexual abuse and assault and definitions vary from state to state (Holcomb and Holcomb, 2011). According to Holcomb and Holcomb (2011, p 27), sexual assault is used as an overarching term, encompassing a large number of sexual behaviors – physical, verbal, and psychological – that violate the health and well-being of an individual. Holcomb and Holcomb (2011) provides their own definition of sexual assault as “any type of sexual behavior or contact where consent is not freely given or obtained and is accomplished through force, intimidation, violence, coercion, manipulation, threat, deception, or abuse of authority” (p. 28). In contrast to Holcomb and Holcomb’s broad definition of sexual assault, many researchers advocate for a more narrow interpretation to prevent over reporting, thus inflating statistics (Holcomb and Holcomb, 2011). The Lancashire Sexu...
It has been known for decades that substantial numbers of people have experience sexual assault it is one of the most offensive crimes committed in our society. The different types of sexual assault are rape, statutory rape, gang rape, rape in concert which is by stander behavior, sodomy, penetration with foreign object, child molestation, and spousal / martial rape/intimate partner sexual assault. Many people believe sexual assault is done by strangers but that is not true. In most cases the perpetrators is someone close to the victim or family. According to the Bureau of Justice in 2005-2010 78% of sexual assault violence was done by a family member, friend, acquaintance, or intimate partner. Berzofsky (2013). Many victims feel guilty or responsible for being victimized, the trauma caused by sexual assault often results in emotional stress that may be long lasting. Every victim reacts differently and it is helpful to have a support group to interact with people that have experienced the same things, somewhere where the victim can feel safe.
...self-interest contradicts humanity and one fails to protect the latter, then it is the unforgivable crime against humanity, and should be punished.
The human psyche frequently experiences the phenomena of internal contradiction, followed by an internal struggle for some semblance of balance or consistency (Hall, 1998). Cognitive dissonance acts as motivation for people to behave in a manner that effectively reduces said dissonance and restores balance. Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance explores this occurrence and the subsequent actions that people take in order to create a balance between their ideals.
Reaching for justice throughout human history has been one of the primordial dreams chased by most humans while at the same time, hunted as a mere fugitive by others in order to satisfy their appalling thirst for injustice. “Injustice anywhere is at threat to justice everywhere” as stated by Martin lather King, if one doesn’t fight for justice he/she might end up having to face the sad reality of injustice taking over everywhere. In order to not let such a thing take place we need to fight against injustice as one. Two literature works which embrace this idea are Common Sense by Thomas Pain and Letter to Any Would-be Terrorists by Naomi Shihab Nye. These two literature works as example of protest literature were very important in illustrating how crucial it was to fight against injustice because both works were effective in encouraging and helping the authors and their audiences share their ideas about a preoccupying topic while hoping at the same time to someday bring about an important social or political change.
The New South Wales Criminal trial and sentencing process is adequate in balancing the rights of the victims, offenders and society however like any legal system is does have its faults. The options in the trial and sentencing process are stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, the Crimes (Sentencing Legislation) Amendment (Intensive Correction Orders) Act 2010 and the Crimes (sentencing procedure) Act 1999 which features the use of charge negotiation, rehabilitation, mitigating factors and intensive corrective orders.