Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How language affects communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How language affects communication
I have always been fascinated by how we use language. Words are so vastly complex that what should be a simple task of communicating seems to be one of the most difficult tasks human beings ever endeavor to undertake. I write songs. Nothing professional. Most of them are more of a personal journaling process and only for my own ears. I only mention it because, as a song writer I play around with words quite often to make them fit with a previous line, a specific rhythm or to convey just the right thought or emotion. The concept of connotation versus denotation was not a new one for me. However, I did not realize how powerful connotations could be in the process of argumentation. The idea of a semantic differential gave me a new way of viewing …show more content…
The denotative meaning of a word is certainly much easier to understand than the connotative. Yet, the difficulty arises in being able to distinguish when someone is using the denotative or the connotative meaning. Words can also be misunderstood or misconstrued based on the context in which they are used, the person to whom the words are directed, or potential language or culture barriers. With all that can get in the way of understanding just by happenstance, I never gave much thought to the way people use connotation in deliberately calculating, or even misleading, …show more content…
The semantic differential assumes that words fall along a continuum of extremes in regard to connotative meaning. This differential is used often by advertisers and public relations firms. I try to find a balance in my life of not being gullible and naïve but also not being overly cynical. This kind of information makes it difficult. I find it staggering the lengths to which advertisers will go to try and use the perfect combination of words to promote a product, service, or even a person. Groups of people are brought together and they are given a list of words and they are asked to rank them on a spectrum of things such as powerful to powerless, strong to weak, or superior to inferior. By using this meter, anyone who wants to put their best foot forward can figure out which words are best to use and which words to avoid. In a way it is incredibly useful. Now that I am aware of it, I cannot help but feel a little bit manipulated. I know that I will be paying more attention now to words that ads, and arguments, specifically avoid, words they choose to use and any significance of the relationship between the words they
In the text “The Meaning of a Word” by Gloria Naylor, the author discloses on how her personal experiences altered her life and presented another perspective on how words can have different effects depending on its context or the situation. She emphasizes and outlines how a racial term can adopt a positive connotation by those whom it is being used against. The second text “Being a Chink” is about a woman who _____. The anecdote also provides experiences where the narrator focused on the existence of a racial term that remained effective throughout her childhood. The meaning of the word varies from ____. Naylor’s story shares similarities with “Being a Chink” by Christine Leong in regards to discussing the essence of a racial term. Both individuals demonstrate how racial acts can ________. Yes, racist language can be
... A metaphor, used as a communication skill, is best described in a political way. Think of Reagan’s Voodoo economics, or Bill Clinton building a bridge to the 21st century. Politicians can easily scam an ignorant voter, should one not understand a metaphor. For example: Clinton refers to building a bridge, but does not tell us with which tools he intends to build it with. This particular concept is valid alone for the above reason. Whether you are talking to a teacher or watching television, metaphors need to understand.
Words hold great power and when used correctly can influence what people believe and how they act.
...Giver” that hide their true meaning. Release distorts its true meaning of death. Assignment conceals its true implication of job and stirrings actually mean puberty. All three words in some way or another affect people’s behaviour and how they may view a situation. Even a world where precise language is viewed as very important, there still are words that are used to promote the ideals of the government and keep the truth from people. In a world where people are pressured into using precise language to prevent any misconceptions and misunderstandings, the government makes words that cloak the true definition so the public does not find out their true intentions, which is to control their behaviour. Language may be used as a tool to help communicate with others, but when used improperly, people will be deceived and ultimately be living a life of lies and illusion.
The denotation is generally defined as the literal meaning of a word. The connotation refers to the meaning that is implied by a word apart from the thing that it describes explicitly. Diction is the distinctive tone or tenor of an author’s writings (Literary Devices). In I Wandered
Whenever people see a name they recognize, they associate it with either a good connotation or a bad connotation. That is what causes a person or a business to either lose money or turn profit. The other example used is that of the name catfish.
Birk and Genevieve B. Birk discuss how our way with words can put a huge effect on people just by either saying it a certain way or adding emphasis to the word itself. As Birk and Birk points out, words that are extremely charged to one person can be less charged to another person (230). Adding affect to a word when describing someone’s ethnicity, people can easily take it as rude or as a joke. If a Caucasian person calls another Caucasian person the n word, to them it is a friendly gesture, but to an African American it can be harsh. Miscommunication often occurs when using slanted or charged language because nowadays one word can have different meanings (230). Ethnic discrimination plays a huge role in Birk and Birk
Studying language reveals one aspect of culture which is organized systematically. The relationship between categories, cognition, language, culture, and truth can be analytically examined in Metaphors We Live By. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson argue that dictionary definitions do not adequately describe concepts, especially ambiguous concepts. Rather, we use concepts from a source domain (which are more basic and empirically real) to make sense of concepts within the target domain (which are less tangible and clearly defined ex: emotions, time, and morality). An experiential basis for both domains links the two together. Experiential bases include our bodies, our interaction with the physical environment, and interactions with other people and institutions.
Connotation- Vocab book- An idea or feeling that a word invokes in addition to its literal or
Albert Einstein once proclaimed, “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.” Kenneth Burke’s theory of rhetoric derives from the principle that language is the methods by which we create reality. The only way to perceive and give meaning to an event is through language. Through a binary approach of classification, Burke is able to make a distinction when it comes to the nature of language. Additionally, Burke relates the terministic screens to symbols and the notion of reality. Finally, Burke’s example of perception is relatable to John Locke’s concept of language being imperfect. In Language as Symbolic Action, Burke relies on the use of terministic screens to define
George Orwell, an English novelist, had once warned the world that our “language will certainly become muddled with sayings that have lost their meaning”. Doublespeak is a language that can be disguise and can reverse the meaning of words. This language can make negative effects seem like they are positive by changing how we see the meaning. It can be used to lie, or even mislead someone while trying to tell the truth about something. There are different types of Doublespeak and how they touch the world’s meanings to words.
Rapid development of film has brought the film industry in its heyday. In modern era, as the people’s interest to watch the film increases, many film producers are competing to produce high-quality movies. Starting from the genre of romance, action, to horror, even animated films also proved much loved by moviegoers. Not only American-made animated film which gets a lot of attention from movie lovers, Japanese’s animation production, which more so-called anime, also begins to compete a lot in the film industry (Linsenmaier, 2008; Gan, 2009).
Semantic connectives have long been a focus of research in cognitive and language development. Suchconnectives as so, because, and but encode causal and adversative relations among events and create textual cohesion (Halliday and Hasan, 1976). Recently, however, researchers have been examining other types of relations that need to be encoded in discourse. Deborah Schiffrin (1987), for example, has focused on 'discourse markers (DMs)', a broader category of connective or relational forms than semantic connectives. Discourse markers are "linguistic, paralinguistic, or nonverbal elements that signal relations between units of talk by virtue of their syntactic and semantic properties and by virtue of their sequential relations as initial or terminal brackets demarcating discourse units" (Schiffrin, 1987: 40). During everyday communication, speakers use discourse
This paper will explain the process we, as humans usually follow to understand a certain text or utterance. This explanation would be achieved through the analysis of two journal articles from semantics and pragmatics perspective, taking into account a range of techniques associated with each of the two concepts including:
Besides that, it was contended that the distinctions between connotation and denotation do not settle but simply restating the issue with regards to the definition of a term, and that the response provided ‘sometimes descend to mere dogmatism’. This was also supported by Professor Goldsworthy, suggesting that in the use of connotation/denotation approach, the Courts’ actions were often contradictory. They often claimed that the constitutional terms have fixed meaning while conflicting their actions by giving a term meaning that it did not originally contain when it seemed appropriate to do so. It induces confusion because an unchanging concept should not denote different meanings. This negative stand towards the connotation/denotation distinction can be seen in the