Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of beauty standards
Sociology imagination
Sociology imagination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of beauty standards
The majority of individuals have acquired their own ideas surrounding what the social structure of a family is. Yet, whilst each individual experiences family life in a variety of ways, we as people cannot fathom how our experiences exist, without obtaining a broad understanding of how our personal relationships integrate into a more prodigious social context. C. Wright Mills has demonstrated this idea by inventing the sociological imagination, defined as "the ability to recognize how apparently personal issues reflect broader social structures, at least partly" (Mills 1959, 15) (Brinkerhoff 2). This concept allows us to recognize that a handful of our personal hardships are conventional instances that occur regularly within a functioning society. …show more content…
When analyzing my family from a sociological lens in reference to the conflict theory, the question of who benefits is present throughout. Although conflict arises from stressful instances of rivaling interests, the conceptual ideas of conflict aid sociologists in determining how the presence of conflict is beneficial to a society overall. The core make-up of my family is designed through the use of competing interests. My father was born into a family where wealth is a promise; this is a part of his ascribed statuses in society. On the other hand, my mother was spawn from people who have to fight to make ends meet. Upon meeting one another, both my mother and my father had to assimilate to the major differences in their status sets in society. Conflict theorists would assume that the competing statuses amongst both families are helpful in determining who will benefit from this conjunction, and how each member will preserve their position in their personal lives and in society (Brinkerhoff …show more content…
For instance, due to many bumps and bruises, I currently suffer from a severely broken nose. How can a broken nose possibly relate to conflict in a household? One day my sister came home from school devastated by the actions of her peers; they made fun of her perfectly sufficient nose. With no hesitation, my mother acquired with a plastic surgeon and had my sister 's nose fixed. In contrast, when the doctor ordered my mother to have my nose fixed for breathing function, she responded with, "no thank you, she will be just fine". This example is one, among many instances where my mother has discrimanted between my sister and I. My mother 's actions contribute to the structural inequality of my family, which causes tension between not only my mother and I, but with my sister as well. Conflict theorists would assume that the competition over scarce resources (money, plastic surgery, etc.) is beneficial for my sister 's success. The structural inequality based on reward in this circumstance is, my sister 's beauty accelerating from plastic surgery, as my nose remains aesthetically and internally damaged. As a result, social change bolsters through the competeing interests of my sister, my mother, and I (Brinkerhoff
It’s not easy to build an ideal family. In the article “The American Family” by Stephanie Coontz, she argued that during this century families succeed more when they discuss problems openly, and when social institutions are flexible in meeting families’ needs. When women have more choices to make their own decisions. She also argued that to have an ideal family women can expect a lot from men especially when it comes to his involvement in the house. Raymond Carver, the author of “Where He Was: Memories of My Father”, argued how his upbringing and lack of social institutions prevented him from building an ideal family. He showed the readers that his mother hide all the problems instead of solving them. She also didn’t have any choice but to stay with his drunk father, who was barely involved in the house. Carvers’ memoir is relevant to Coontz argument about what is needed to have an ideal family.
The book displays two social concepts, conflict theory and structural-functionalism. Conflict theory is defined as “a theory propounded by Karl Marx that claims society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition
The conflict approach is one that puts an emphasis on inequality and competition between social groups that leads to problems. Throughout the course of the Poor Kids documentary the conflict approach can be implemented to help explain why childhood poverty is caused. Conflict theorist can point to Brittany’s family as an example of how competition between social classes can cause poverty. Brittany’s father was working for a company that decided to scale down in order to better sustain itself during tough economic times. As a result, Brittany’s father lost his job with the company since he did not hold a high position within the company. Brittany’s family when her father had his job was not considered a high class family as far as income and luxury goes. The video did not specifically state what class family they were, but it can be inferred that they were probably a low middle class or low class family. So, because her father was not holding a high position and was not considered of high social importance, he was let go as if he was almost expendable. If he was of high social class and held a higher or more important position within the company than he probably would not have been let go. This refers back to competition between social classes (Turner). The old cliché, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer can be thought relevant in this situation. Also, the conflict approach can be applied to the part of the video in which Brittany’s dad was unsuccessful in finding a job. Her dad went online and submitted an array of applications to a multitude of different companies in hopes to get hired. Unfortunately, he didn’t hear anything back from any of the companies and was not offered a job. His lack of success in finding a job can be explained in various ways. The conflict approach would point to his social status as a key reason in why he was unsuccessful. It can said that because Brittany’s father was not of a high social class or group he wasn’t given as
In understanding others, one must first understand our own family background and how it affects our understanding of the world. Conversely, family systems draw on the view of the family as an emotional unit. Under system thinking, one evaluates the parts of the systems in relation to the whole meaning behavior becomes informed by and inseparable from the functioning of one’s family of origin. These ideas show that individuals have a hard time separating from the family and the network of relationships. With a deeper comprehension of the family of origin helps with the challenges and awareness of normalized human behaviors. When interviewing and analyzing the family of origin, allow one to look at their own family of origin
The conflict as a whole is the individual dream of each member verses the actual responsibility each member should contribute. The obvious on is that Walter wants to own a business. He wants to help his family, as an individual, to change the environment. His son sleeps in the front room of the house because there are already three rooms taken up. However, Walter's sister is trying to do the same this, but invest money in education where she can become a doctor.
By definition, conflict theory basically sees the society as a pitch in which inequality thrives in order to generate conflict and change. For instance, this theory emphasizes on the purpose of coercion in generating a social order that’s often ch...
Interpersonal conflict is. Every relationship has conflict and determining on how the conflict is resolved or handled can make the relationship stronger or weaker. If someone is more easily to come up with a compromise rather than always getting their own way, they may have stronger relationships (Bevan and Sole, 2014). Television shows also use interpersonal conflict between their characters to find a solution or compromise in the end. Interpersonal conflict is all around us, it is how we handle that conflict that makes or breaks our relationships.
Looking at this from the different perspectives of a functionalist, symbolic interactionist, and conflict helps to show other points of view. If you were to look at this book from a functionalist’s perspective you would be looking at it from an extremely greedy aspect. A functionalist would say that their parents and society told them that only people with money were good and successful. Thus, causing you to feel like “trash” or class if you did not make a huge salary, and live a wealthy life. A symbolic interactionist would tell you that they grew up where all of their peers drove nice cars, and had large homes, so to fit in, you need to be able to buy those things. However, a person with a conflict point of view would say that it was her ongoing struggle with society, and having to defend her class, that has made her who she is today.
Conflict theory is recognized as the inequalities within capitalist society. Having resources such as money, power, material items and certain social relationships can improve an individual’s chance of excelling in society and determines where they are placed in the social hierarchy. By holding a relatively high position in the social hierarchy, it becomes much easier to move progress upwards. An individual’s position within the hierarchy was originally defined by Karl Marx.
Bidwell, Lee D. Millar, and Brenda J. Vander Mey. Sociology of the Family: Investigating Family Issues. MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
One can think of sociological perspective as our own personal choice and how the society plays a role in shaping our individual lives. Sociological perspective or imagination focuses not on individuals but their group, or society, and attempts to explain human social structures, including cultural and governmental institutions and forms of activity and interpersonal relations using social facts or social forces. Sociological Imagination is the ability to connect seemingly impersonal and remote historical forces to the most basic incidents of an individual’s life. It suggests that people look at their own personal
Conflict theories are perspectives that focus on the inequality of classes and the power struggle for scarce resources. This macro-analysis theory focuses on constant conflict and change in society unlike functionalists. It is comprised of multiple theories involving gender, race, and economic inequalities. These theories support the idea of a ruling elite enforces social order on the weak and poor. The constant conflict and competition between classes cause society to keep changing.
Mills’ framework introduced the notion that humans function as both individuals and as members of the larger social group context. This overlap of form and function of individual role expectations created a notion that “the sociological imagination is a quality of mind that turns personal troubles into public issues”, and thereby contextualizing the self-representation championed within the realm of sociological research and study (Burawoy, 2008, 363). Through the expansion of sociological examination and thought processes, attention was brought to the interconnected nature of the individual to the greater social context. Within his conceptual framework, Mills demonstrated that individual experiences were not the product of individual idiosyncrasy, but were the product of the influence of social forces upon the individual. This increased understanding of the influences of social forces upon a person in both an individual sense and as a member of a group was intended to create empathy and a desire to motivate positive social changes that benefitted all levels of the current and future social
‘Sociological Imagination' as explained by C. Wright Mills is an individual's ability to recognize the connection between the course of their own lives and the role that historical and societal changes play in the personal decisions they make (Mills, 1959). Unaware of the effect of this connection on the kind of people they are becoming, they are unable to solve personal troubles as they look for solutions within themselves as a biographical entity (Mills, 1959). They fail to identify the structural transformation that is responsible for their private troubles. Dilemmas that individuals face within themselves or amongst direct relations with others are known as personal troubles (Mills, 1959). In contrast, public issues, are troubles that
The conflict theory explains the social division amongst our society, and amongst our society we have the higher class and lower class. Relatively, social division originated for both groups to create automatic conflict of interest. Because of the conflict theory wouldn’t the simplest thing to do is rise workers- consciousness and awareness of different of oppression. According to the conflict theory those with more resources exercise negative power by the use of power struggle results. Ultimately power struggles can be involved with class, race, and gender. Ideally, the other perspectives deal with the positive aspects of society, whereas, the conflict theory focus on the negative and ever changing