Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Confederate monument essays
Two notions of heritage
Confederate monument essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Confederate monument essays
I think believe that everybody has a hero in their life whether it is Goku or Vegeta or even a Police Officer or a FireFighter either way everyone will need assistance in some point in their life. Confederate monuments represent those heros. By tearing down confederate monuments, the govt. is causing people to forget the horrible acts in history that they represented.(Brophy) Furthermore,I believe that we should keep the confederate monuments up so that people around the United States don't forget our great acts in history,because if we forget our history it could repeat itself over and over again. We must acknowledge the good with the bad and not tear down the monuments.(Brophy) To continue,Monuments should also stay
...et the wrongs they’ve suffered, even if these tribulations were justified. But mostly forgetting history poses a serious threat to the future. Sometimes we do need to know where we’ve been in order to know where we’re going. However, remembering is also a sticky subject. Debates erupt about which history is correct, and which should be remembered. It’s also a matter of enthusiasm as much as anything else. Remembering the Civil War as many Northerners and Southerners remember the war, as a war that happened, had certain ramifications, and otherwise doesn’t affect contemporary life, is much easier to justify and deal with than a zealous attitude toward a "Lost Cause." It is just that great enthusiasm leads to reverence for ancestors that do not necessarily deserve it. Still, it is not as if any individual can decide for another which ancestors are worth revering.
...more overpowering and overwhelming than any general feeling of Southern pride. America has obtained a reputation to be an accepting and open minded country, welcoming all of any race, couture and religion. The Preamble states clearly that America will establish justice and insure domestic tranquility for all. Neither of these entities are accomplished in America as long as the Confederate flag remains raised. Our nation is furthermore divided by racism through a flag that is possibly being used as a degradation tool. This battle with racism has become far too large for American citizens and anything that is viewed as racist in such a manner as the Confederate flag is, should be censored from society, in only a helpful practice. A state flag should be capable of uniting its citizens, instead of dividing them. The Confederate flag should be lowered immediately.
In conclusion, people should not take down confederate memorials as they are part of the history. They remind us of the cost of freedom and equality; they force us to remember the ignominious truth of the past; they serve as a mighty tool to educate the racists. We need them to avoid recommitting the same
During winter months, basic huts were constructed from wood when it was available. During the civil war, most of the soldiers fought only 75 percent of the time. When they were not fighting, their day usually started at 5:00 in the morning during the summer and spring, and 6:00 in the morning during the fall and winter. Soldiers would be awakened by fifes and drums, then the first sergeant would take a roll call, and all the men sat down to eat breakfast. During the day, soldiers would be engaged in sometimes as many as five 2-hour long drill sessions on weaponry or maneuvers.
“The Confederate Flag: Controversy and Culture.” David Sarratt American Studies University of Virginia. Web. 22 Feb. 2014
Whether one believes in the historical importance of the flag or the negative symbolism of the flag, it is merely an opinion. However, even though there are many pros to the Confederate flag, the cons seem to outweigh the pros.
Lee, Jefferson Davis, and P.G.T. Beauregard statues were not erected just to honor these men, but are a part of the movement which became known as The Cult of the Lost Cause” (Landrieu 2017). Basically, Mayor Landrieu is emphasizing that the statues put up for those men were put there to honor them and support a cult that wanted slavery and believed that people of color were less than human. During his speech, Mayor Landrieu quotes Alexander Stephens and says “cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery -subordination to the superior race- is his natural and normal condition” (Landrieu 2017). In making this comment Landrieu urges us to realize that the confederate statues are not there to remember the people that fought in the civil war but to honor them. By keeping the statues, the people of New Orleans are reminded every day that thousands of people were sold and bought, they were raped and forced to work. These quotes support the claim because they are both about how the statues are atrocious and how they are on the wrong side of history. Both quotes establish that removing the confederate statues would benefit New Orleans because young children would not have to be exposed to hatred and racism. To the defenders of the confederate statues Mayor Landrieu says “There is a difference between remembrance of history and
Recently there has been news about people heavily wanting Confederate statutes to be taken down due to their relation with slavery. While many have their own views on the matter, one in particular stands out. The view of preserving them in a way that’ll keep both sides happy and to preserve the history behind them. This “contextualized” view, as discussed in Gary Shapiro’s “The Meaning of Our Confederate ‘Monuments’” I believe should not only be applied to the Confederate statutes but other monuments and memorials as well. Memorials being made in order to remember an event or person, while a monument is made in order to honor an event or person(Shapiro). While it is in fact very reasonable to want to take these statutes down due to evil background, they are still a part of history. Instead, we should follow the “contextualized” view and add context to all monuments and memorials as their meanings change throughout time.
Add in the fact that the neighboring countries are starting to threaten war on us because of slave dealers invading and kidnaping their people; along with the ever present threat of our own civil war; it makes me wonder if it is worth trying to keep this country going, and not just pardon it off to other countries. highly doubt that any one will want to take us though; with the amount of work and money they would need to put into us so that we would be fully incorporated into their own country.
In the south, in places such as Charlottesville, VA, there are monuments and statues up all over cities and towns, these are racist statues that illustrate a dark part of American history. These monuments were statues of confederate soldiers and confederate officers that fought to keep slavery alive. In the North in places like New York there are statues of a man that some believe is a great man, but overall he caused another bad part of American history. These statues of Christopher Columbus were put up to celebrate the man that “discovered America” but this man also took America away from its indigenous people, the Native Americans. Columbus monuments and Confederate monuments should both be taken down across the country. Some of these monuments should be destroyed and some should be removed and placed in history museums because they are a part of American history, but all of these statutes should be taken down.
The monuments have not created racism in America, and are not the reason that white supremacist groups exist. The removal of these monuments would not stop the KKK from holding rallies, recruiting members, and existing. If the statues are torn down, it would have no effect on the high school dropout rate. In an article on the website, nationalreview.com, Deroy Murdock says “…black Americans still would face a national unemployment rate 7.4%...” In this statistic, Murdock provides an argument in defense of the statues. Throughout the article he provides statistics and information that support the theory. Tearing down the Confederate monuments will in no way improve the lives of any person. Beyond the lack of improvement everyone won’t see in their day to day lives, there will be no improvement in the battle against racism and white supremacy. According to the website, nationalreview.com, Kyle Smith, the author, says, “If a statue that has been standing in your city for years suddenly sends you into paroxysms of destructive rage, you are really determined to create a problem for yourself, and you’ll create another problem when it’s gone.” This statement speaks to the argument that the statues are so offensive that people feel the need to vandalize and tear them down. Even if the statues would be torn down in an effort to console those few Americans who find
Recent headlines have reignited debates over the the Confederate Flag as protests against recurring police brutality have heightened awareness of enduring racism in America. Some have raised their eyes to the Confederate Monument on the Denton Square to wonder aloud why it remains. Read on to find some answers that are neither simple nor
Lee, Stonewall Jackson, or any other Confederate war heroes, the Confederate Monuments should remain in public places. Their image is typically tarnished because they fought for the South, it’s hard for people to look beyond that. Instead of seeing people who were fighting for a cause in what they believed in, they see them as symbols of hatred and racism. It may not have been the cause to fight for, but they were essentially fighting to maintain their source of income. Slavery was a huge part of the Souths income at the time, so once the idea abolishing slavery came about they felt they must take a stand to keep their source of income alive and well. “Abraham Lincoln made it clear that there would be no trials or punishments for the rebels who fought for the Confederacy, and that the national agenda would be reconciliation not retribution” (Herman, National Review). So why after all these years should we remove these monuments of prominent figures in our nation’s history, if the man who abolished slavery didn’t lay down any punishments? “They are monuments to timeless virtues, not to individuals” (Herman, National Review). Removing the monuments now would be a disservice to the men that lost their lives fighting for the virtues that they believed in. Ben Jones of the New York Times makes a great point as well as he used the Confederate flag as his talking point in the article “Does the Confederate
The Denton Confederate Monument, erected in 1918 by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, is hotly debated on the basis of what the monument represents. Advocates for the removal of the monument maintain that it is a glorification of slavery and racism that cannot be tolerated. Proponents for its retention argue that it is a tribute to the soldiers who died in the Civil War. The monument is in the style of a triumphal arch, with the Confederate soldier set atop it. These formal elements suggest both that the Confederacy won the war, and by extension that the racism of the Confederacy is still alive, and that the Confederate soldier is dominant over the viewer, similar to the way in which
This is no more so true than with Confederate Veterans, and the racial and political motivations that have, in some way, lived through the decades. Though the sesquicentennial over the conflict has just recently passed, many issues of contention and struggles over Confederate iconography in the American public still dominate certain realms within the historical discourse. Groups such as the Sons of Confederate Veterans still exist in some meaningful number in modern times, and still fight for what they view is the protection of their heritage. Memory – particularly when it comes to war – is a peculiar thing. The impact of this sort of historical memory seems deepened by the intense personal nature of civil rebellion, and widened by the physical access to so much of the history in lands, documents and artifacts. It is, indeed, a curiously American idea to -- in many places -- honor those who sought to break away from the nation. It is likely that these questions and observations cannot be fully answered by the historical record alone. Much of it, admittedly, is victim to interpretation, and the roles culture, upbringing and regionalism play in the way Americans recognize their heritage. That alone is a concept worth its own study. However, it seems true that Southern heritage cannot ever truly escape the racial and political problems of its past, if it is forthright in its presentation. Gregory P. Downs, writing on the way American’s memory of war is shaped, mentioned this in perfect summary. He wrote, “By severing the war’s conflict from the Reconstruction that followed, it drains meaning from the Civil War and turns it into a family feud, a fight that ended with regional reconciliation. It