More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflections on health care inequality
Inequalities that exist in healthcare and medicine
Reflections on health care inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflections on health care inequality
I thought the concierge healthcare was interesting since I had not heard of this type of healthcare. I agree with your point on how this will benefit the rich not the poor. I think this program would cause greater inequalities. Unequal access to health care would result in unnecessary costs. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation 30% of the total medical expenses for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians are due to health inequities (Artiga, 2016).
Health Care workers are constantly faced with legal and ethical issues every day during the course of their work. It is important that the health care workers have a clear understanding of these legal and ethical issues that they will face (1). In the case study analysed key legal and ethical issues arise during the initial decision-making of the incident, when the second ambulance crew arrived, throughout the treatment and during the transfer of patient to the hospital. The ethical issues in this case can be described as what the paramedic believes is the right thing to do for the patient and the legal issues control what the law describes that the paramedic should do in this situation (2, 3). It is therefore important that paramedics also
The cost of Medical equipment plays a significant role in the delivery of health care. The clinical engineering at Victoria Hospital is an important branch of the hospital team management that are working to strategies ways to improve quality of service and lower cost repairs of equipments. The team members from Biomedical and maintenance engineering’s roles are to ensure utilization of quality equipments such as endoscope and minimize length of repair time. All these issues are a major influence in the hospital’s project cost. For example, Victory hospital, which is located in Canada, is in the process of evaluating different options to decrease cost of its endoscope repair. This equipment is use in the endoscopy department for gastroenterological and surgical procedures. In 1993, 2,500 cases where approximately performed and extensive maintenance of the equipment where needed before and after each of those cases. Despite the appropriate care of the scope, repair requirement where still needed. The total cost of repair that year was $60,000 and the repair services where done by an original equipment manufacturers in Ontario.
By doing well in school, going to college, and receiving a high paying job it comes with good healthcare coverage. Without healthcare, hospitals are less likely to assist people. The reason is because of their uncertainty that the uninsured will be able to afford to pay for the service on time or even at all. Obama in his speech says, “This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don 't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.” Obama is saying that because of political influences on hospitals those who do not have insurance are forced to wait until there is a chance they might be treated. The reason that they are uninsured is because they cannot afford it. Since insurance is controlled by companies who will not provide fair rates to those who have medical conditions or do not have a job. Robert Pear a writer for The New York Times says, “From 2013 to 2014, the bureau said, the overall rate of insurance coverage increased for all racial groups and for Hispanics, who may be of any race. The increases were comparable for blacks, Asians and Hispanics (just over 4 percentage points) and lower for non-Hispanic whites (about 2 percentage points).” Even though this is 6 years after the speech by Obama it still shows that healthcare is still a problem in America, but
Staff nurses in many medical settings such as Skilled Nursing Facilities are at the forefront of patient care. Many patients in these particular settings are typically suffering from some type of cognitive impairment often related to dementia syndrome, behavioral disturbances or prior mental health conditions. Many mental health symptoms are managed by second generation antipsychotics. This class of medication placed the patients at risk for metabolic syndrome.
What is the context of the problem being analyzed (i. e., How does this specific policy fit with other policies seeking to manage a social problem)? According to the US Commission on Civil Rights (2004), per capita expenditures in the 2003 federal budget for AI/AN people receiving healthcare services from the IHS were $1,914. In contrast, the per capita medical expenditure for Medicaid recipients was $3,879, for Medicare recipients was $5,915, and, for Veterans Administration beneficiaries, the per capita expenditure was $5,214.
The first side to the health care system is the Single Payer system. Many European countries, and our neighboring country Canada, have this type of system. This system has every citizen put his or her money into a fund that would be controlled by a federal agency. That agency would then pay for the treatment. Private insurance companies would basically be die off. The difference from this and our current health care system...
These situations have many tough decision and opportunity costs to think about. With universal health care specifically, one must consider the pros and cons of potentially adopting a plan of this magnitude. Looking at the positive side, everyone in the U.S. would be guaranteed healthcare. No matter the amount of wealth or immigration status, everyone is covered by the U.S. government under a single payer system. Americans would be entitled to any medical necessity such as emergencies, check-ups, screenings, treatments, rehabs, and medications (“Bernie Sanders on Healthcare”). Now at what cost one may ask? Surely cost would increase right? Actually, medical cost would become overall cheaper for one to pay according to one proposed plan. Given that more Americans will be paying, less will be required to pay per person to cover the expenses (“Bernie Sanders on Healthcare”). Additionally, with more insured Americans, overall public health will improve and lead to more eligible working Americans. In the long term, this plan will help grow and stimulate the economic growth that the United States has been looking for so desperately. To add on to economic growth, this proposed plan will create jobs in the medical field and lift the financial burden off businesses. This means businesses would no longer be required to pay health benefits to their employees. Instead, businesses can focus on investing into their company’s growth and infrastructure (“Health Care for All”). Lastly, by adopting a universal health care system, Americans would no longer have to deal with medical bankruptcies. All expenses and bills would be covered by the U.S. government ("Right to Health Care ProCon.org”). This would leave the American people to focus on paying for other essential expenses and living costs. Now why hasn’t the U.S. adopted a similar plan already? First, one must consider the potential flaws in a
...health and their life expectancy is also higher than black, poor, and/or unemployment people since there are no accumulation of stresses, and they have enough resources to control their daily stress. To solve this problem, based on the documentary series, reduction of the gap between poor and rich people should be considered by educational long-term investment (providing free college education), making life better for families with young children, and eliminating racism (California Newsreel, 2008). In my opinion, the health insurance system should be controlled by the U.S. government, like the health insurance system in Europe, so everyone will have health insurance with an acceptable price.
This plan is to provide more security and stability for those who have health insurance as well as those who don’t. Obama believes that it will lower the cost of health care for American families, business and government (The Obama Plan: Stability & Security For All Americans). In general, 62 percent of the population supports the idea of the go... ... middle of paper ... ... diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/health_insurance_and_managed_care/health_care_reform/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=
The Affordable Care Act may be an expansion of Medicare that helps provide for needy United States citizens, but it negatively impacts members of the medical field. Many United States Citizens will receive medical care that they originally could not afford to receive, but not all citizens will be eligible for Medicare even with the program’s expansion. The Affordable Care Act could and will provide help to many United States citizens, but it will not perform its purpose efficiently without more thought and consideration of the act’s secondary effects. This act will prove to be both a tremendous help to those in poverty and a menace to those working in the healthcare setting.
which provides us with insurance and all you have to do is sign up for it. When you work for a company they provide you with insurance and if you are unemployed or in between jobs and something happens to you you won 't have insurance. Obama care provides people that are unemployed or their businesses don 't provide insurance helps them by giving them insurance in case of situations like this. It 's good that they at least provide people with some form of insurance even if it 's not the best insurance it still helps. The healthcare system isn 't completely bad that would be even better if it was free. Many people have tried to convince our government that free health care is beneficial for everyone, but as we can see they 're still hasn 't been a change. Yes there has been minor adjustments within our healthcare system that is beneficial for the middle to lower class individuals but I feel like we can do much better. The reason I believe that we don 't have free healthcare is because these insurance companies are making so much profit off of the people and it 's benefiting them in the end game. There are convincing the government that if we change our ways that it 's only going to harm our community versus helpless. I don 't see the harm in saving someone 's life but I guess the price of wealth is more important than a human life. If we are paying taxes I don 't see why we don 't get the
President Obama has made healthcare reform a priority since the beginning of his presidency. Obama wants to implement a system similar to Medicare. As defined by Dictionary.com Medicare is: “a U.S. government program of hospitalization insurance and voluntary medical insurance for persons aged 65 and over and for certain disabled persons under 65”. This government based health insurance would still allow private insurance companies to stay in business. Another way Obama wants to change the health insurance companies is to expand coverage and improve the care given. What this means is people with cancer could possibly get health insurance in a case where no one else would cover them. This will also help to lower insurance plan costs. There are pros and cons to Obamas healthcare plan, but it might not be worth the cost or the problems to try and enact it.
health care, only those who are “privileged” enough to afford health care can receive it. So is this what health care in the United States is and should be?Arnold Schwarzenegger the former Governor of California stated “Health care is not a right, but its cause is a government interference in the healthcare system. The solution is to leave doctors, patients and insurance companies free to deal with each other on whatever terms they choose, not to socialize American medicine” (Russo). Schwarzenegger then went on about how this would cost the government too much money and that this is not the answer to the healthcare improvement (Russo). Sen. Shelia Keuhl, the senator that wrote the bill stated in a press release “It’s important to understand that vetoes of health reform legislation have very serious consequences […] Because of these vetoes, there will continue to be very little regulation of the runaway health insurance market and no protections for consumers”
As previously stated it does not, however, mean that Healthcare is free, nor does it mean that everyone will get every type of testing available. Regardless of which type of healthcare system America has people have always been left behind. The “Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care act.” Is structured to incorporate an integrated system that would essentially be Universal Healthcare. That would also mean that an insured person 's rates would not be increased to cover the uninsured. Universal Healthcare is a moral and just obligation. By promoting the health of our citizens, we then promote our infrastructure as well. Although it is not free and it will take time and effort to implement. It is worth an extra tax and the extra effort to ensure a Healthy and prosperous
So the states somehow have to get this $370 million from somewhere in order to keep the current benefits, or millions of people will lose their health insurance.”(cite) Second of all, it messes the wealth distribution. When the very richest people get a tax break, they will have more amount of savings, while the middle and working class people will have to pay more taxes, or the state government cannot maintain the costs, middle class and working class people will likely to lose their health insurance. Lastly, it reduces government fundings. The federal government will have less budget to spend on public service. The current state of health care not only has impacts on individuals’ financial situation, but also affects the nation’s overall economy. If the hospitals stop charging people with the fake price, the cost of healthcare will definitely go down significantly, which will result in increasing amount of personal saving. Individuals will have more money to spend, which will increase the amount of money flows in the community. And less people will be struggling with their finances because of their illness or their medical