Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of citizenship
Aristotle's view on citizenship
Citizenship meaning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of citizenship
Citizenship: An Introduction The concept of citizenship is an old as Greek city states. Here citizenship was limited to those few persons who were residents of a city and actually participated in the work of the government. Women, manual workers and slaves, even, though resident in cities, were not considered as citizens because they were not considered capable of taking part in the administration of their country. The concept of citizenship was developed by Aristotle in his book politics. The population of Greek city states was divided into citizens, slaves, women, foreign residents. He heldthe view that man is a political animal and he could reach the full potential off his life and personality only by participation in the affairs of the …show more content…
Similarly, in Rome, citizenship was not determined by residence, but by the possession of certain rights. Those who were living away, the citizenship were conferred upon them by emperor. The ancient concept is not in practice today. Now citizenship is conferred on all residents, men or women, of particular age whether they participate in the political life of the state or not. Citizenship implies membership of a political community called the state. We, as members of the community or society, are social beings; we became political beings only having acquired membership of the state, or having born in a state. Our membership of the state, if we extend the meaning of citizenship, grants us a legal status, a status behind which there are set and well-defined rights and duties. This is not to say that as social being, we are without rights or are absolved of our social …show more content…
Citizen as right-holders: Whereas citizenship as tax payers and soldier are burdens involved in the citizenship relationships, the liberal concept of citizenship emphasized another aspect, citizen as holders of rights. This has been brilliantly conceptualised by T.H. Marshall. He suggests that the citizen/state relationship is an inter subjective one, that an entity possessing interests, resources and capacities of its own on lies at end of the relationship and is accepted and recognized by the other. Every citizen, for example, in India, was granted the fundamental rights and their civil, political and socio-economic rights are safeguarded under Indian
In reference to Rome, Athens’s citizenship system was less accepting by only allowing free, native born males to nationalize. While this aspect was considered a drawback by the Romans, truthfully it is actually a major tradeoff by Athens. As shown in Document A, Rome was more lenient to upcoming citizens. Although this adds to the power and development of the empire, it also creates holes in its security. Citizens with non-native origins are free to express their hatred and idea of change to the Roman government, by creating a negative cultural diffusion, and contributing to the downfall of Rome. On the other hand, Athens was free from any possible revolts and riots from any non-native Athenians.
The three types of Citizenships are what form the community. Each type of citizenship is
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of United States addressed the issues related to citizenship of the country and their fundamental rights for equality. This amendment is regarded as one of the most significant clauses in the US constitution since it provides the definition for citizenship, deals with the rights of the US citizens, and defines the state’s obligations to protect the rights of its citizens. This amendment was passed in the year 1866 by the Congress following the Civil War. The primary goal of this amendment was to provide equal civil and legal rights to all US citizens, including the African Americans. The citizenship clause in this amendment attracted lot of attention and debates owing to its far-reaching impacts on the citizenship status of various communities and immigrants who are staying in the country. This amendment was an important part of the reconstruction program (NALEO, 1).
Citizenship, a virtue that many humans have, however not every person has the qualities that further them as a citizen within today’s society. I display citizenship by participating in a number of
Marshall, is still active within society. The key to full citizenship is that in order to engage in positive cultural, political and civic citizenship, it is to be understood that all are linked to social citizenship. The three social policies implemented by the government are for the benefit of the citizens, and also led to major changes from the government to support permanent change. In conclusion, social citizenship is still an impactful part of the way citizens are formed, because unhealthy culture and communities develop unfit citizens within a society who will deal with a difficult time of finding their place in a changing
Good Citizenship is something that is valued by a country. Although not normally noticed or recognized, good citizenship can come in many forms and can be very beneficial to a specified area. Good Citizenship could mean many different things but ultimately good citizenship promotes prosperity, and increases the well-being of said region. In this country we do have government officials, but they only can do so much, and reach so far, in this country you need to focus on "...Not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" (Kennedy). This means pulling your own weight and not relying solely on these officials and their policies, to get out and try to make this country the best it can be. Which is why through the use of the educatory school system in the United States and through obeying laws of their city/state or nation, and also through the practice of Volunteer work/charity the average American citizen can become above-average and awesome (in every sense of the word) and can also develop into a righteous, upstanding, convivial citizen.
Athenian democracy includes participation of all adult, free, male, citizen, made possible for all. If at the beginning and during the thriving period of the Athens democracy the occupations of a state position was considered to be an worthy duty for the citizens, the taking in of ...
For instance, during Augustus’s reign – at the beginning of the Pax Romana – only men who were in charge of provincials, high-ranking military officers, or city council members could become Roman citizens. Later, however, Marcus Aurelius – the last of the Good Emperors – had changed the laws regarding what it meant to become a Roman citizen. A philosopher and a politician, Marcus Aurelius called himself a “citizen of the world-city… under its laws equal treatment s meted out to all” (Mathinsen 1012). The meaning behind Marcus’s words have been interpreted many ways, but what many scholars have agreed upon is that he applied this philosophy to his policies in regards to Roman citizenship. There are many advantages in regards to being viewed a Roman citizen and so that there was less conflict between the patricians, the plebeians, and the barbarians being assimilated into the new Roman culture. As Roman citizens, those who were once considered barbarians could now own land, open businesses, write wills, and defend themselves in court (Mathinsen 1025-26). Becoming a Roman citizen was made easier than before and by the end of the 200 year Roman Peace period, it was believed that any one barbarian need only be a part of the army to become a Roman citizen (Mathinsen 1022-23) and thus earning the perks that came with identifying as a
Citizenship in America is important because no matter where you come from, you will be accepted. America is a country filled with hundreds of heritages that form its unique and colorful background. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, birthright citizenship grants citizenship to every person born in the United States (Rawlins). While this seems to be in-line with the 14th amendment, which states “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” (Congress), the true intention of this part of the constitution is hotly debated, particularly in light of the current economic downfall in the United States. Automatic birthright
...very day citizens. This is drastically different from the means currently used in the United States. Lastly, the fact that only male citizens were allowed to participate in government throughout the duration of the democratic existence in Athens.
This type of exclusion comes under the political bracket, as it includes the rejection of citizen rights, such as the right to vote, freedom of speech and equal opportunities. Bhalla and Lapeyre (1997) argue that political exclusion ‘involves the notion that the State, which grants basic rights and civil liberties, is not a neutral agency but a vehicle of the dominant classes’, thus, exclude some social groups and include others. However, one must note that citizenship is not only political, as social citizenship refers to ‘the rights and obligations that determine the identity of members of a social and political community and which as a result regulates access to the benefits and privileges of members’ (Turner, 1997). Thus, citizenship is centred on the capacity of using individual and collective rights, and inequalities which can cause a social hierarchy, created of first class and second class citizens. When individuals are made unequal before the they do not have access to public goods, which consequently leads to alienation from society, and lack of opportunities freedom. T H Marshall divided citizenship into three aspects; civil (the right to certain freedoms), political (right to take part in elections) and social (the right to some economic welfare and to ‘share to the full of the social heritage and to live the life of a civilized being accorded to the standards prevailing in the society’(Marshall,1963). Citizenship should be a status enjoyed by the members of a political and social community which is attached to rights and obligations, without these one is excluded from society and isolated from society and oneself. The exclusion of ethnic minorities comes under the bracket of the problem of citizenship. In Britain, the Social Exclusion Unit of the government stated in 2000, that ‘In comparison to their representation in the population, people
In the fifth-century BC, Athens emerged as one of the most advanced state or polis in all of Greece. This formation of Athenian ‘democracy’ holds the main principle that citizens should enjoy political equality in order to be free to rule and be ruled in turn. The word ‘democracy’ originates from the Greek words demos (meaning people) and kratos (meaning power) therefore demokratia means “the power of the people.” The famous funeral speech of Pericles states that “Our constitution is called democracy because power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people.” However, only citizens (free adult men of Athenian descent) could participate in political matters. Women and slaves held no political rights, although they were essential in order to free up time for the citizens to participate in the matters of the state. The development of Athenian democracy has been fundamental for the basis of modern political thinking, although many in modern society UK would be sceptical to call it a democracy. Plato and Aristotle in The Republic and The Politics respectively were critical of the Athenian democracy, by examining the culture and ideology present the limitations and possible downfalls of a democratic way of life. Within this essay I will outline these limitations and evaluate their validity.
Starting off in colonial Virginia, those were allowed to have say in any election or legislation would have to be a white, male owning property owner. Shudson then explains that being a white, property owning and tax paying male votes in order to “reaffirm the social hierarchy of the community in which no one but a local notable would think of standing for office” (Shudson 4). During the beginning to citizenship, many people would be left out that did not fit the mold of the male patriarchy. Women along with women and men of color would not be considered to be a part of citizenship in the early colonial era of the United States. The New England model of this kind of citizenship, is represented by, “an organic view that the polity has a single common good and that the leaders of locally prominent, wealthy and well-established families can be trusted to represent (Shudson 5). Shudson then claims that this is what the founding fathers thought of citizenship, hostile to political parties but interested in getting citizens involved in their town
Ancient Greece was made up of individual city states, known as a Polis, which relied heavily on citizen participation in politics. The idea of self-rule was an entirely new way of governing. Citizenship was unheard of at the time. Although still considered citizens not everybody was allowed to participate. In Athens only adult males who had military training were allowed to vote. The majority of the population, namely slaves, children, metics (free noncitizens) and women were excluded from participation in politics. “[Metics] and women were not citizens and did not enjoy any of the privileges of citizenship.”(Sayre, 137) Athenian citizens had to be descended from citizens, excluding the children of Athenian men and foreign women. Individuals could be granted citizenship in to Athens by the assembly this was usually as a reward for some service to the state. Ancient Greece paved the way for the representative democratic style of government that is practiced by many countries today. Much like how voting rights started out in America, originally only the wealthy land owners were allowed to vote and call themselves citizens, but soon all men were allowed to have a vote and a voice in their states politics. Essentially the Greeks were the first to introduce citizen rights and freedom similar to what’s seen today.
Cultural citizenship refers to an original and brilliant treatise on consumerism and citizenship. In essence, cultural citizenship provides compelling and original perspectives on citizenship, as well as a strong review of how obsession, particularly with consumption, has significantly displaced concern for citizenship and politics in a certain country. Ideally, it insists on the fundamental right to communication, as well as the different cultural representation. In addition, there are three major zones of citizenship, which include the cultural zone, the economic zone, and the political zone. Hence, the political zone confers the right to vote and reside while the economic zone denotes the fundamental right to prosper and work. On the other hand, the cultural zone depicts the right to speak and know. It is paramount to note that citizenship has continuously and will always be cultural. Hence, the cultural citizenship concept responds effectively to the multicultural framework of contemporary societies. Thus, the interest with equality is