Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the government in media
Bias in the news essay
Corporate ownership of the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of the government in media
The information through any media holds importance as it affects the today’s society and individuals in different ways. It shapes the view and the thinking of people. We can say that the concentration of media in Canada is doing harm than good in the society, as it is tapering the view of the people on different issues. Media concentration is also resulting in more unemployment and job loss. For the past few years, the media concentration has been a growing concern globally especially it has become a serious concern for Canadians. It has undesired results such as showing the only content which gets the higher ratings which include celebrity gossips rather than giving information on consisting issues this limits public awareness …show more content…
Thinking of concentration of media ownership, it is the process in which fewer individuals or organizations control the majority of shares of mass media. This process of concentration of media ownership is also called media consolidation. The information we see and hear is shown on the TV, which has different sources and channels like CBC, CNN or BBC. These sources make people believe that the information they are displaying is correct, and it can never be wrong, but the fact is that media shapes the attitude and opinion of the people (Morreale, 2011). People think that these sources of information keep them up to date on the current issue, but the fact is that they show us the content through which they can achieve higher ratings, which pleases sponsors of the advertisements and as a result media companies earn revenue by selling ads (Edge,2013), This shows that media companies focus at what sells rather than what is important ignoring the real news(Morreale,2011). Similarly, In Canada, none of the media companies is administered by private organizations (Gasher, Lorimer, and Skinner, 254). Except the income tax act …show more content…
Although foreign companies would have the direct investment in the media and opening new media outlets as a source of information, that it will be no difference than it is now, as they would be having the majority of market shares so they would work in the same way as local companies do for profit motives. Secondly, the news on media can be politically biased. Foreign media means American dominance, it will be a threat to Canadian culture and the local industry (Skinner, 2005). However, on other hand people would argue that giving relaxation to foreign companies to work can increase the opportunities and there would be new content due to more sources of information as well as this will also encourage the competition among the media companies (blidook, 2009). However, I would argue that in the long term the solution for concentrated media ownership in Canada would be to allow foreign companies in Canada to open their media outlets as this will not only benefit government with more taxes but also it provide people with new content as well as people would be to develop views on different issue etc. At the same time government should make some regulation to protect the local industry as well, so that people can enjoy their cultural product as
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
Miller, P. J. (2014, January 13). What is Canadian About Canadian Media? Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Michael Parenti (2002) declares media in the United States is no longer “free, independent, neutral and objective.” (p. 60). Throughout his statement, Parenti expresses that media is controlled by large corporations, leaving smaller conglomerates unable to compete. The Telecommunications Act, passed in 1996, restricted “a single company to own television stations serving more than one-third of the U.S. public,” but is now overruled by greater corporations. (p. 61). In his opinion, Parenti reveals that media owners do not allow the publishing of stories that are not beneficial and advantageous. Parenti supports his argument very thoroughly by stating how the plutocracy takes control over media in multiple ways: television, magazines, news/radio broadcasting, and other sources.
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
The mass media are undoubtedly one of the most popular platforms through which people are able to learn about what is happening around them and across the globe (Woodrow and Reimer, 2014). This communication tool has managed to change the manner in which people receive and sieve information as well as disseminate it to others. In as much as the benefits of the mass media are numerous, its disastrous consequences cannot be ignored. In Canada, television is one of the most common outlets of media stations and it is used to air both local and international programming.
Taras examines the commitments and values of CBC with the Canadian government and the citizens. He looked at a particular case of when CBC clashed with the government, and how CBC struggled to keep their TV programs running (Taras, pp.4-5). Next he talked about how the media industry is being taken controlled by powerful corporation and claims that PSB have the responsibility to protect the minorities (Taras, p.6). Subsequently, Taras discussed the ups and downs CBC had gone through until this day. Lastly, Taras explores the complex and intimate relationship between public broadcasters and the government; how they take advantage of each other to accomplish their goals. Ultimately, Taras believes that PSB will continue to have an impact in society despite living in a generation of digital media.
Quebec's and Canada's main interest is the promotion and maintenance of their "cultural identity" and their main fear is too much American influence, especially within the media (Tremblay, 1992). In accordance with this need of protection, the Canadian broadcasting policy within the Broadcasting Act of 1991 strictly adheres to th...
Tremblay tackles this issue by comparing the broadcasting policies by authorities in Canada , Quebec and United States . The policies in Canada clearly exist to maintain their national identity and cultural sovereignty. It is encouraged to use the “Canadian ways” to carry out functions which would be Canadian a...
Conflict theory claims that advertising does not sufficiently address issues of inequality in society. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.462) There are five major media outlets that form a monopoly of the media industry in Canada: CTVglobalmedia Inc. owned by Bell Canada, Rogers Communications Inc. Controlled by the Rogers family, Shaw Communications controlled by the Shaw family, CBC/Radio Canada, and Quebecor Inc. Controlled by the Péladeau family. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.462-463) CBC/Radio Canada is the only publicly owned media company in Canada, whereas, approximately 90% of the media in Canada is privately owned. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013, p.464) This allows for 90% of advertising content to be chosen by wealthy corporations. In an American study, 93% of newspaper editors admitted to advertisers attempting to influence news stories and 37% admitted that advertisers have influenced their stories. (Brime, Roberts, Lie, Rytina 2013,
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
The state-controlled media and the private wealthy individuals owned media decide the content that the public can get. The strict laws and regulations in China not only affect the domestic media but also influence the attitude towards foreign media. Even though China has a very different way to manage the media system, it already starts to approach media freedom, like the CNC reform and reforms document in 2013. In the future, the Chinese government would find its own way to free media industry with its social conditions.
Media is the most powerful sector of an economy. It is a tool to maintain a balanced society which is characterized by well informed people, effective democracy and social justice. In fact, media has unparallel influence on all aspects of human life in modern times.
When we choose a channel on the television, when we choose a newspaper, there are hundreds of options. Sometimes it is hard to choose one thing because there are too many options. However, is each station belongs to each media company? No, in case of United States, the companies called “Big six”; Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, News Corporation, Time Warner, CBS Corporation, Viacom owns most of mass media including broadcast, cable tv, newspaper, and various online entities. “The fact of one organization owning more than one type of public communications business.” This is a definition of Cross-Media Ownership from Cambridge Dictionary Online and this is what exactly media industry looks like in the United States.
Inevitably we have found significant evidence of Western (particularly US) media influences. More specific examples include Pan-Latin American television networks include the US-based CNN en Espanol, Univision, and MundoVision, as well as Spain’s Canal 24 Horas. Some part of their media is a commercial media market which is controlled by a small number of wealthy individuals (e.g. Mexican media Remigio Angel Gonzalalez’ Albavision encompasses 26 TV stations and 82 radio stations, and includes La Red (Chile), ATV (Peru), SNT (Paraguay) and Canal 9
There is always need for self-regulation. It is key to a democracy, media that controls and evaluates themselves means that there is no censorship from the government. The problem arises in the fact that because they regulate themselves; the councils put in place to regulate the media may be lenient towards the media. And also, because media are first and foremost corporations they are most likely to be self-serving rather than self-deprecating. Another important problem that arises in the debate of media self-regulation is marginalization of the poor. Because the media are more likely to be self-serving, they may favour the elites over the poor.