Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles of assessment in learning
Assessment in learning & development
Assessment in learning & development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles of assessment in learning
The reading selections for this week provide a historical perspective of comprehension instruction at various grade levels. The authors describe characteristics of learners at various grade levels, examine previous instructional goals and discuss the goals for the future, examine previous learning contexts and what learning contexts should become and how assessment strategies can be improved to meet the challenges of learners at various grade and proficiency levels. It is important to note the influence of multiple literacies and the challenges of integrating conventional discourses and nonconventional discourses in the learning context. Wharton-McDonald and Swiger (2009) said, “Instructional practices that repair the disconnect between students’ public and private literacies—practices that form connections between what is personally interesting to students and the material they are asked to read in school will support the development of comprehension processes” (Developing Higher Order Comprehension in the Middle Grades, 2009, p. 523). There are several differences in the charact...
Differentiated instruction caters to differences among students, how students learn, different learning styles, and the interest of each learner. Running records support differentiating lessons for each learner during guided reading. Running records are diagnostic tools designed to identify a student’s reading deficiencies and monitor progress. The implementation of running records allows the teacher to differentiate each child’s reading lesson and hone in on the child’s needs and abilities. It is the educator’s responsibility to fine-tune instructional needs so that classroom, small group, and one-to-one teaching occur when and for whom they are needed in a timely way and with the high quality every child deserves (Fountas & Pinnell, 2009). Each child enters a classroom with varying needs; differentiating guided reading lessons based on the results of running records will help meet the individual needs of each child. Kelly M. Anderson (2007) states, teachers who differentiate believe each child is unique, with differing learning styles and preferences. Teachers can differentiate based on students’ readiness by varying the level of difficulty of the material covered in class. Guided reading offers the opportunity to vary the children’s reading based on their reading level. Differentiating instruction is not lowering expectations for some students. Differentiating instruction is establishing high expectations for all students while varying the process to which each child learns the same concept. Differentiating involves addressing the individual needs of diverse learners. Watts-Taffe, et al. (2012) notes although differentiating instruction is not new; it has become increasingly i...
After, reviewing the vast amount of reading inventories that can be utilized to obtain a reading competency level for a student. I decided to utilize the Jennings Informal Reading Assessment, this assessment had all of the essential elements needed to analyze and evaluate the reading styles and comprehension level of a student. The unique qualities that assist me in selecting this strategy were that of the preprimary word list. The word list offers the student a chance to learn and observe terms that he/she may not have known prior to the assessment. This also provided me with a better understanding of the student usage of visual cues and ability to utilize prior knowledge to understand and recognize information. This is a cognitive ability
Ackley, Katherine Anne, ed. Perspectives on Contemporary Issues: Reading across the Disciplines. 6th ed. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage learning, 2009. Print.
...ed by most, and how dyslexia can cause problems with reading comprehension. It also discussed ways that we can mitigate these problems for dyslexic people, but these skills can and should be used by all learners. Reading comprehension is a perishable skill, one that if you don’t work on increasing your reading ability by building your vocabulary, learn to read effectively, or using the correct reading strategies for the type of reading material being studied will diminish. Even with the largest vocabulary, if the words are not understood literacy cannot be achieved. Literacy is the key to comprehensive reading. It also gave some of the tools for reading and understanding different types of literature and how to get the important information out of each one. Edmund Burk said “To read without reflecting is like eating without digesting” (Gallagher, 2003, p. 11).
Literacy embraces reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Integrating all of these into a literacy program is key. Teachers must provide endless and ongoing opportunities for their student to read, write, listen, and speak.
How well do standardized tests work as tools for obtaining information about children’s literacy strengths and needs? Standardized tests have both positive and negative uses as they pertain to obtaining information and what that information can be used for. The use of portfolios can also be used to guide instruction, and they can be used as informal or summative assessments. The use of both the standardized test as well as a student portfolio will give the teacher information that can be used to assess how well they are instructing as well as what areas they may still need more work in.
reading across the curriculum. Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. Eleventh Edition. Longman, 2011. 248-250. Print.
Harvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd Ed.). Portalnd, MA: Stenhouse Publishers.
At best, students may assume that the purpose for reading a passage is to understand it thoroughly. The latter is a good start, but it still misses the mark if we want students to understand the broad utility of reading in their lives inside and outside of school. Readers would benefit more from engagement in purposeful reading of high-quality children's literature across many genres. When Annotation Requirements Stand In for Strategic Reading
The assignment and over dependence on Lexile levels has turned teachers into gatekeepers instead of educators, turning students away from reading for enjoyment. (Pennington, 2013) The Kentucky MAP test is given at the beginning and end of each school year to assess student growth in several subjects. One of these subjects is reading level. Once children reach a certain literacy level they are given a Lexile score to coincide with how literate the MAP test shows them to be. These levels coincide with “grade levels” and are meant to show at what “grade level” each student is reading at. (Handsfield et al. 2012) Students are then told to read books +/-50 of their Lexile and are prohibited, by some educators, to read anything outside (generally
In our schools today, literacy should not just be a task for the English or Reading teacher. Instead, literacy should be a shared venture by all teachers within all content areas. Teaching literacy in all content areas is important because a teacher with a solid understanding of teaching literacy in his/her content area will tremendously help all students achieve greater success on class assignments and standardized assessments. There are three main points that surround the idea of teaching literacy in all content areas. Teachers need the necessary skills and knowledge to teach literacy, once the necessary skills and knowledge are gained then there is justification for teaching literacy across content areas, and
Whilst critical literacy skills are absolutely necessary in a holistic approach to learning in the 21st Century (MCEETYA, 2008), and considering the current global shift in seemingly focusing on the betterment of the immediate society rather than a global society, it would seem more prudent to encourage students into critically assessing the text presented to them. However, as this shift also suggests, a rapid progression for a more united, global society, and by extension a more intense modification of literacy education, and the education establishment itself, may require much more time, discretion and subtlety than a drastic shift of the traditional model (Bolstad et al., 2012). A more socially and politically charged approach to literacy learning may also deter from the practical skills and mere enjoyment of students learning literacy. The whole language model allows for students to choose subjects and ideas that interest them (Rose, 2016), without purposefully pushing the agenda of critical thinking. As it is a set of beliefs rather than a set method of teaching, there is also no specific way to apply the whole language model to a classroom debated (Seely Flint et al., 2014), thus critical analysis of text may still be touched on. For example, a lesson may entail reading an illustrated storybook, and students may be asked to write or say what they had gleaned from the story and how the images helped with the narration of the story. The lesson allows for an analysis of the story and a deeper reflection of the author’s intention without eliminating an appreciation of the story. As understanding language is central to the learning and development of students (ACARA, n.d.), the ability to enjoy learning literacy so as to engage and entice students’ interest in English is paramount in a 21st
In this information–driven age, preparing students to read a variety of texts with complete understanding should likely be one of our educational system’s highest priorities. Understanding is more than just the ability to produce information on demand (knowledge) or the ability to perform learned routines (skills). “Understanding is the ability to think and act flexibly with what one knows.” (Active Learning Practice for Schools, n. d.) A review of the literature in the area of reading comprehension of elementary-age students shows two principle areas of focus. There is a body of literature that examines the development of proficient vs. struggling comprehenders and another body of literature that compares methodologies for teaching reading comprehension.
Wright, S., Caputa, F., & Fugett, A. (2013).Using e-readers and internet resources to support comprehension. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 367-379. Retrieved from Scopus database
It is important that when selecting complex text educators look for specific factors that would meet each reader’s needs. These factors include language proficiency, background knowledge and experiences, and level of motivation. Depending on the factors mentioned, the educators can differentiate the instruction to meet the needs of the students where they could read a text and apply strategies learned. It is important to understand the text complexity because we do want readers to read text which are not challenging enough or that are extremely challenge that would make their self-efficacy low. Therefore, when Fisher & Frey (2012) stated the factors to take into consideration when selecting a text are established, readers would interact with the text. Moreover, the use of comprehension strategies like question and answer relationships (Reutzel & Cooter, 2016) would help the readers comprehend the text as they read