Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of leadership is complex
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of leadership is complex
Sports organizations are dependent upon their employee’s attitude as well as work ethic. This is influenced by leadership and how employees view their leaders and coaches. In a recent article entitled “The complexity of leading in sport: Examining the role of domain expertise in assessing leader credibility and prototypicality”, Steve Swanson and Aubrey Kent propose that employee’s evaluations of their leaders are dependent on their perceived level of credibility as well as theories of leadership. They propose that simply being in a managerial position does not necessarily make that person a leader. A true leader comes from the respect they receive from employees. Swanson and Kent propose that employees’ opinions of a manager’s credibility …show more content…
This means that the more credible the leader is perceived to be by their employee, the more likely the employee will be to accept information from them. Credible leaders are often more believable, have more experience, and an increased level of training. These factors add to the manager’s expertise. However, Swanson and Kent state that credibility also is also gained through trustworthiness. Managers must follow through with promises as well as act with goodwill and …show more content…
They propose that sports leaders in particular must have an extra amount of domain specific expertise that is separate from functional expertise in order to have the same amount of influence over their employees. Functional expertise deals more with knowledge about the organization itself and includes knowledge that is specific to industry and profit. Domain specific expertise on the other hand deals with knowledge and experience that is specifically related to the sport. This in particular plays a more important role in the employee’s perceptions of credibility and prototypically of its leaders. In order to test this theory, Swanson and Kent set up two different experiments including samples of professional sport employees and managers. A survey was given to employees and asked them to rank sports managers based on functional area expertise and sport domain expertise. The second study wished to examine the perceived importance of the specific aspects of the sport domain expertise such as sport knowledge, experience, and skill. A separate survey was given to participants in order to determine the importance of leadership attributes including sport domain
Denisco & Barker, (2016) discusses the foundation of leadership and the four conceptual pillars that comprise it. Understanding the leadership is a responsibility of an APN, the following final question was posed to Ms. Gordner. “Of the four pillars of leadership; professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills, do you feel that one is more important than another, and why?” She responded,
“In the present study, the author evaluated this contention among 245 male intercollegiate athletic directors by assessing the combined influence of leadership style and program goals on occupational stress”(Ryska,2000). The psychological demands for the athletic director position have increased by a big margin over the past twenty years. People in these positions often see symptoms such as burnout, fatigue, aggression, low productivity, and physical withdraws. In the article the study they did had two hundred fifty male participants. Each got a questionnaire packet that they filled out. The results from the study were that they found directive style administrators low stress in job situations. The conclusion from the article was that if stress is there it tends to cause blockage to the goals these administrators try to achieve. From this article you go to see how stress affects athletic
The theme of leadership in the ward does not mirror the outside world very accurately, as in contemporary society a leader of a society or an organisation is almost always accountable to a person senior to him. This is not seen in the novel, as Big Nurse seems to be answerable to no one, in fact, it is arguable that everyone answers to her. A hierarchy or class system operates inside the ward which can be clearly seen throughout the course of the novel. Patients living within the ward are ‘classed’ according to the state of their mental health or to the condition of which they suffer from. Chief describes the method of discriminating patients from one another:
However, this is not really a direct correlation to the coach’s effectiveness in a particular sport, being that there are many other factors in coaching a team other than game records. The coach’s job is to enhance the athlete physically, socially, and psychologically, winning is only considered a by-product of that job (Gillham, Burton, & Gillham, 2013). Gillham, Burton, and Gillham (2013) focused on developing a Coaching Success Questionnaire-2 to allow a means of evaluating other aspects of a coach’s interaction with their athletes as both a research and coach development tool. A sample group of athletes at the varsity and club level ranging from ages 18 to 25 was used to develop the questionnaire by asking their perceptions of their coaches.
Captains of sports teams are given the stereotype that they are the most athletic player on the team, scoring the most goals and handling the ball best. In truth, captains have a lot of work they have to do that doesn’t even involve playing the sport. Captains are the most looked at player of the game; other players, younger kids and coaches look to them to set examples. They have to set examples in every aspect of the game; athleticism might be part of their job but it is not limited to it. The captain of any sports team must set the leadership standard for commitment, confidence, intelligence, and attitude.
Lastly, the key to successful leadership is getting all of one’s followers on their side. In order to achieve this, leaders must gain all their followers trust. Bennis outlines four key elements to gain this trust. Primarily, constancy must be enforced. Leaders must stay the course. Second, congruity is essential. This is so the leaders can “walk the talk.” Third, reliability is needed so that leaders are present when it matters most. Lastly, leaders honor their commitments through integrity. All of these important, aspects gain the trust of their followers by their side.
Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2008). When your boss says no! The effects of leadership style and trust on employee reactions to managerial explanations. Journal Of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 777-802. doi:10.1348/096317907X251569
Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner. Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
“Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes” (Rost, 1931). But in today’s time, the styles of leadership are changed every time a new technology is invented or discovered so there is lack of persistency. The only thing which manages to stay constant is the principles of carrying out business activities. There are philosophies and ideologies on leadership which can be used in any time period as they are mostly a reflection of the principles of leadership. Theorists and authors like Hobbes (1679), Lewin (1947) and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), in their time have produced enough material which can be put into use by modern day leaders and managers. Philosophers like Aristotle, who was known to be one of the most business-oriented and practical philosopher of his time, his work is still used by businesses today because of their relevance as he is interested in defining principles in terms of the ethics of leadership (Santa Clara University). In the essay I have tried to show how leadership has adapted to the changes around them and compared to the past and what circumstances caused need to change it. As a layman, anyone would think that the principles centuries ago will be very different to what we follow now but after studying on Hobbes, Lewin and Aristotle it has made a big impact on my way of thinking because the work produced by them still has more relevance compared to some of the work produced now. I have tried to explain the evolvement of leadership through three aspects which are psychology, sociology and philosophy.
Credibility holds significance in a leadership position. According to Kouzes and Posner, the foundation of leadership is the act of credibility (2012). Without credibility, organizations can deteriorate. The lack of credibility in a leadership role creates mistrust and ill feelings towards leaders. These burdens constituents carry, disrupts the organization of being successful. Leaders should full understand credibility. Credibility is earned when leaders set example and commit to their words (Kouzes & Posner, 2012). When credible is present within an organization, constituents are more motivated, committed, and feel a strong sense of team spirit for their company (Kouzes & Posner, 2012).
In this style, the authority is in the hand of the Sports Coordinator. However, he or she cares more about the athlete than outcomes or performance. That means the sports coordinator will be more like a parent rather than a leader. In such a management style, the athletes are the heart of the organization. "athlete satisfaction" holds a higher priority than performance.
He states, “The essential thrust of the model is that effectiveness of leadership is a function of the extent to which the leader builds a unique relationship with each of the members. The relationship between a member and the leader is based on the interpersonal exchanges between the two. The quality of such a relationship is characterized by mutual trust, respect, and support,” (Chelladurai, 2014, p. 307). This theory helps lay the groundwork for those that are in leadership positions. It helps us understand how some leaders behave, why some coach-athlete relationships are more invested with one group over another.
...adership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale." In D. Cartwright and A. Zander, Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. (Elmsford, NY: Row, Paterson, 1960)
I. Introductions Background of the Study Introduction Coach’s leadership has become a major topic within sports organization which can ultimately lead to success. Leadership has been consistently defined, developed and cultivated over the last several decades explaining exactly what leadership is when the sports industry. Through different theories dating back over 70 years there has been six main schools of leadership theories (Turner & Muller, 2005). This list includes trait, behavioral, contingency, visionary, emotional, and competency all defining leadership in different ways.