Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Five generic forces of porter essay
Michael Porter’s diamond model
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Does Porter’s ‘Diamond’ concept convincingly explain the achievements of major national business systems, or are their weaknesses, theoretically and empirically, in his arguments? In The Competitive Advantage of Nations, which was published in 1990, Michael Porter – who has dedicated most of his career to studying businesses and how they can develop a competitive advantage (Competitive Strategy, 1985) – the author offers a theoretical framework, which outlines the underlining factors that contribute to national competitiveness. Michael Porter’s work was met with contrasted views. While some academics praised the model for its wealth of information and the convenient framework it generated (Greenway, 1993), many other academics in international business criticized the model for its theoretical flaws and lack of empirical evidence. After offering a brief overview of Porter’s Diamond concept, this essay will examine the academic criticism that this model has attracted since its publication in 1990. Porter’s Diamond Model Theory furthers foundational work laid out much earlier by Adam Smith (1776) and Ricardo (1817), which sought to explain the success of certain Nations based on these countries’ factors of production. Although these theories functioned well at the time they were published, they failed to accurately reflect the radically different economic landscape of the 20th century, one characterized by relentlessly evolving technologies and deeply interconnected nations. At the core of Porter’s theory is the idea that in order to be successful in the global marketplace, firms must first have a strong ‘home base’ to start launch from. Once this condition is established the firm will be able to engage in exports and FDIs ... ... middle of paper ... .... Lécuyer C. (2006) Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930–1970 MIT Press Ohmae, K., & Le Seac'h, M. (1996). De l'État-nation aux États-régions. Dunod, 1996. Porter, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Palgrave. New York Reich, R (1990). ‘Who is us?’. Harvard Business Review, 68, 1, Jan/Feb, 53-64 Reich, R. (1991). "The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for twenty-first century capitalism." New York: Alfred Knopf Rugman, A. M. and D’Cruz, J. R. (1993). The ‘double diamond’ model of international competitiveness: the Canadian experience’. Management International Review, 2, 17-39. Volkswagen AG. (2012). VW Key & Figures. Available: http://www.volkswagenag.com/content/vwcorp/info_center/en/publications/2013/03/leaflet_2012.bin.html/binarystorageitem/file/2013_Y_Leporello_4_2012_engl_WEB.pdf. Last accessed 20/3/14.
He mentions that Diamond’s argument was insufficient because he kept on arguing that the reason for the development of societies was due to their geographical location and their ease of domestication. And therefore, his statements lacked the important discussion about the role the culture played in the pace of progress and the development of societies. So let's look at Diamond’s weak points more carefully, as he said that development occurred because of plants and domestication but what is the idea behind that all these animals and plants were just there sitting around and waiting for the humans to come and make use of it? This sounds so ridiculous but that’s what Diamond’s is
The prologue of the book clearly lays out Diamond thesis. He explains that past societies have collapsed based on five factors: human induced environmental damage, climate change, hostile neighbors, friendly trade partners, and society’s response to environmental problems. He also explains how is wrote this book in a scientific manner using the “comparative method”, comparing natural situations differing with respect to the variable of interest. There is a slight flaw in this though. Showing these correlations between different societies,...
Polanyi, Karl. "Societies and Economic Systems," "The Self Regulating Market and Fictitious Commodities: Labour, Land, and Money." "The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 1957. pp. 43-55, 68-75
Dennis Pirages and Christine Sylvester (eds.), Transformations in the Global Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1989).
Porters model is based on the insight that a corporate strategy should meet the opportunities and threats in the organizations external environment. Especially, competitive strategy should base on and understanding of industry structures and the way they change.
There are two reasons why a firm may perform well in an industry, either 1) the industry is attractive to any firm 2) the firm is better and outperforms it’s rivals. Porter’s theory therefore can be used to discover the markets that are attractive to firms or, in those which aren’t breaking down the five forces so a strategy for success can be developed. In general the firm with be more profitable if each of the forces is low, that is to say there is a low threat of new firms entering, if buyers and suppliers have little power over the firm, if there is a low threat from substitute products and if competitive rivalry is low.
Hendersern and Stern 2000, ‘Untangling the origins of competitive advantage’,Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1123-1145.
Firms exist with the purpose of create and deliver economic value (Bensaco et al 2010, p. 365); therefore, business that create better economic value than its competitors will attain an advantage position in market place. Companies might try to improve its sales (profit) through domestic expansion, product diversification or by internationalisation; this report will focus on the reasons of espressamente Illy to expand internationally; additionally, its sources of competitive advantage and, the analysis of three markets in which company want to participate.
In a world of free trade, growing competition and accessibility to foreign markets, the need for methodical market analysis and assumptions is steadily rising in today’s business environment. It is just a normal way of thinking to primarily intent to eliminate the financial before entering a new and foreign market. This suggests that enterprises have to develop an overall strategy for their business in order to gain competitive advantage and consequently market share. With the words of Michael E. Porter, professor at Harvard University and leading authority on competitive strategy, this desirable market success is indirectly linked to the individual structure of a market. The unique structure of a single market influences the strategic behaviour and the development of a competitive strategy within a firm. The competitive strategy finally decides whether a company performs successfully on the market or not. Referring to this interpretation of business success, M. E. Porter established his five forces framework that enables directives to gather useful information about the business environment and the competitive forces in industries.
15. Hill, Charles W.L. International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. New York : McGraw-Hill, 2007.
Kaleka, A., & Morgan, N. A. (2017). Which Competitive Advantage(s)? Competitive Advantage-Market Performance Relationships in International Markets. Journal Of International Marketing, 25(4), 25-49.
Michael Porter introduced a model that allows analysing why some nations are more competitive than others are, and why some industries within nations are more competitive than others are, in his book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This model of determining factors of national advantage has become known as Porters Diamond. It suggests that the national home base of an organization plays an important role in shaping the extent to which it is likely to achieve advantage on a global scale. This home base provides basic factors, which support or hinder organizations from building advantages in global competition. Porter distinguishes four determinants: Factor Conditions The situation in a country regarding production factors, like skilled labour, infrastructure, etc., which are relevant for competition in particular industries.
Smith, M. H. (2006). The natural advantage of nations: business opportunities, innovation and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan.
JSTOR. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Apr. 2014. First article when you search “The Competitiveness Conundrum:
Stonehouse, G., Campbell, D., Hamill, J. & Purdie, T. (2004). Global and Transnational Business (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.