Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Supply chain management of square pharmaceuticals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Supply chain management of square pharmaceuticals
For the threat of substitute products, it is still very low due to the patents protection but in case of the expired patents, it is medium. A pharmaceutical company has lots of way to fight back against generic drugs such as obtaining patents on component chemicals, manufacturing methods, product extension/formula modifications or improving drug-delivery methods. Rivalry among existing firms is medium. Each pharmaceutical company has to fight in order to take an advantage of the first one who obtains patents. Moreover they are competing to bring their drugs to doctors' mind by hiring reps. There are several alternatives to make a company less venerable. For the bargaining power of customers, in US, the MCOs are becoming stronger and stronger while the battle in prices against the purchaser outside the US is not decreasing so pharmaceutical companies cannot avoid reducing the prices of drugs. A pharmaceutical company can move its R&D centers to... Strengths 1. Low cost of production. 2. Large pool of installed capacities 3. Efficient technologies for large number of Generics. 4. Large pool of skilled technical manpower. 5. Increasing liberalization of government policies. Opportunities 1. Aging of the world population. 2. Growing incomes. 3. Growing attention for health. 4. New diagnoses and new social diseases. 5. Spreading prophylactic approaches. 6. Saturation point of market is far away. 7. New therapy approaches. 8. New delivery systems. 9. Spreading attitude for soft medication (OTC drugs). 10. Spreading use of Generic Drugs. 11. Globalization 12. Easier international trading. 13. New markets are opening. Weakness 1. Fragmentation of installed capacities. 2. Low technology level of Capital Goods of this section. 3. Non-availability of major intermediaries for bulk drugs. 4. Lack of experience to exploit efficiently the new patent regime. 5. Very low key R&D. 6. Low share of India in World Pharmaceutical Production (1.2% of world production but having 16.1% of world''s population). 7. Very low level of Biotechnology in India and also for New Drug Discovery Systems. 8. Lack of experience in International Trade. 9. Low level of strategic planning for future and also for technology forecasting. Threats 1. Containment of rising health-care cost. 2. High Cost of discovering new products and fewer discoveries. 3. Stricter registration procedures. 4. High entry cost in newer markets. 5. High cost of sales and marketing. 6. Competition, particularly from generic products. 7. More potential new drugs and more efficient therapies. 8. Switching over form process patent to product patent. Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Report India Independent 5-year pharmaceutical and healthcare industry forecasts for India. Original pharmaceutical and healthcare market research and pharmaceutical and healthcare sector trend analysis for the Indian pharmaceutical and healthcare industry. Competitive intelligence, Indian pharmaceutical and healthcare company rankings and SWOT analyses on international and domestic pharmaceutical and healthcare companies in the Indian market.
Many people feel that biology has become more advanced than physics. Biology has in fact become the new focus of the future as we tend to use it a lot in our daily lives. The study of Biotechnology is known as the branch of molecular biology that studies the use of microorganisms to perform specific industrial processes. This study shows that our lives can be transformed.
Why do consumers purchase specific drugs for various ailments, sicknesses or diseases they might have? Why do physicians prescribe certain drugs over competitive drugs that may be available to the public? Why is it that most of us can easily name specific drugs that fit the many ailments of today’s society? On the surface the answer might be as simple as good TV advertising or radio commercials or even internet adds. The truth of matter is the major pharmaceutical manufacturers own the patents on these drugs and this gives them all of the marketing budget and muscle they need to promote the drug and control the pricing. The incentives for larger pharmaceutical companies are very enticing and as a result, they don’t mind spending the time in clinical trials and patent courts to get their drugs approved. Some will even get patents on the process by which the drug is manufactured, ensuring that no competitor can steal the drug or the process. This protects their large financial investment and nearly guarantees a large return for their investors. Many consumer rights groups claim this is nothing more than legalizing monopolies for the biggest manufacturers.
Why are the prices so high? Some critics of the drug companies argue that the larger firms are ripping off the American public, are dishonest and, in some cases, unsafe. On the other hand, there are health care workers such as doctors and their supporters who claim that research and testing for drugs costs money. This supposedly justifies their prices for their products. Also, as an argument to their side, they say that their practice is a benefit to the improvement to mankind. It is a life saving business, but are these prices justified? As one can see, this is a very important issue in medicine today. It affects everyone involved with medicine, which is much of the American public. It also affects the physicians and drug makers.
An Analysis of GlaxoSmithKline The business that I have done research into is GlaxoSmithKline. This company is a globalised research-based pharmaceutical public limited company. Its ownership structure has changed a great deal since the original company was first established in 1715. Originally a pharmacy, the company has expanded, merged with and taken over other companies over the decades.
Threat of new entrants is relatively high. Companies forming alliances are potential rivals. Even if earlier such company was not considered to be a threat, after merging with some research and development company or forming alliance with another pharmaceutical company it would become a rival to Eli Lilly. The threat is however weakened by significant research and development costs necessary to successfully enter the business. Eli Lilly’s focus on a relatively narrow market of sedatives and antidepressants weakens the threat of new entrants, but other products that form lesser part of company’s sales such as insulin and others are exposed to high threat of new entrants. The need of obtaining certificates and licenses also weakens the threat of new entrants. Discussed above leads to the conclusion that threat of new entrants is medium.
This paper analyzes the main economic indicators related specifically to one of the largest pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer, Inc., such as overall performance, revenue, net income, research and development, cost and expenses. There are certain economic indicators that do not apply to individual companies, but influence their economic forecasts. Such factors as inflation and unemployment rate pertain to an industry or region and such factors as political instability or any major economic conditions will affect the market analyses even if they are not economic indicators. There are many more factors that affect economic predictions and their detailed analyses are presented at http://www.economic-indicators.com, a web site for tracking the US economy. Overall performance is always one of the most important indicators of economic activity and every financial report starts with results of annual performance.
Although monopolies appear damaging at times, there are arguments that they are an advantage to society. Monopolies in the pharmaceutical industry drive companies to pursue research and development (R&D) efforts to gain new patents. According to a 1992 study, among the 24 US. Industry groups, pharmaceuticals dedicated 16.6% of their amounts to basic research, while all other industries averaged at 5.3% (Sherer 1307). This fact validates the incentive pharmaceutical companies have to get a patent and acquire more power. Pfizer encourages R&D because of the incentives and a want to obtain patents to receive more profit. Pfizer has to promote itself to be successful, creating a good brand image that consumers will trust. If the company can advertise successfully, more consumers will purc...
Pharmaceutical patents are patents for inventions within the pharmaceutical industry. Patents give exclusive rights for an invention for a product or a process of making a product [1]. There are many aspects to patents in the pharmaceutical industry that are both pros and cons; it just depends on what industry you are in. Pharmaceutical companies take out patents so they can regulate the market and restrict competition from other companies. By obtaining patents pharmaceutical companies also attract investment. In addition to this pharmaceutical companies can also regulate the price of the drug as they will be the only company selling that drug. However these aspects of patents can adversely affect the generics industry. The generics industry cannot make or sell drugs that are patented but once a patent licence expires, both the generics industry and the WHO see increased benefits as drugs become more widely available around the world (i.e. developing countries) at a lower price. Here we will discuss the pros and cons of patents from the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, generics industry and the WHO.
For commodity generic drugs, Teva has an opportunity to expand its core business into emerging markets, but there it will have to face institutional voids because such markets are driven by physicians and both physician and other people are not aware about the effectiveness of generic drugs. To cope with the challenge of institutional voids Teva have to look for some competent small pharmaceutical firms for acquisition and some big firms for the joint venture. For changing the perceptions of people and physicians, Teva will require to run marketing campaigns and direct approaches to physicians to develop a market for their products.
Due to longer life expectancy and the rapid increase of the world’s population, the pharmaceutical industry is becoming increasingly important. The problem of aging population and high healthcare cost is particularly serious in Japan. This essay will focus on a Japanese drug maker – Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda, the company). First, in order to provide background information, the current business model and relevant information of Takeda will be outlined and analysed based on financial data and the company’s annual reports. Second, the essay will examine the most significant challenges that the company has faced over the past five years, including the cause and effect behind this challenges. Finally, the discussion will be looking at the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, exploring the merger and acquisition activities of large pharmaceutical firms in the world, i.e. Big Pharma.
10. Collis, David, and Troy Smith. "Strategy in the Twenty-First Century Pharmaceutical Industry:Merck&Co. and Pfizer Inc." Harvard Business School, 2007: 8-12.
The original case was about Chiron, a biotechnology company, in the United States. Chiron was acquired in 2006 by Novartis, a Swedish company formed by the merger of Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz Laborites. Since Chiron itself no longer exists, we have focused our case around Novartis as of 2013. Novartis specializes in diagnostic services, generic and name brand medications, ophthalmological tools, as well as a small segment in pet health. The business prides itself in producing the latest drugs, hiring the best talent, and being a global leader in the pharmaceutical industry. Over the years the company has survived by focusing on its internal development in addition to a series of mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings. Being a pharmaceutical company, the entire population is impacted: patients, physicians, employees, hospitals, and investors are some of the most important stakeholders.
manpower and a large base of FDA approved plants, positions India high on the outsourcing
Nicklin, D. S. 2001. Medical Issues: The Future Impact of Biotechnology on Human Factors. [e-book] United Kingdom: pp. 1-2. Available through: science and technology organisation collaboration support centre http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public/PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-077/MP-077-19.pdf [Accessed: 11 Apr 2014].
Whereas, China’s annual herbal drug production is about US $48 billion with export of US $3.6 billion. Currently, United States has the largest share for Indian botanical products which accounts for about 50% of its total export. The major importers of herbal medicine from China are Japan, Hong Kong, Korea and Singapore which accounts for 66%. WHO includes phytotherapy in its health programmes and gives basic procedures for the validation of herbal drugs in developing countries. Eastern countries like India and China have well-established herbal industries and Latin American countries have been carrying out research programs in medicinal plants and their standardisation procedures. In Germany, 50% of phytomedicinal products are sold on medical prescription and the cost being refunded by health insurance companies. In North American countries, phytomedicinal products are sold as .health foods. Consumers and professionals have struggled to change this by gathering information about the efficacy and safety of these products and new guidelines for their registration are now part of FDA policy. In 1997, the North American market for products of plant origin reached US$ 2