Many people feel that biology has become more advanced than physics. Biology has in fact become the new focus of the future as we tend to use it a lot in our daily lives. The study of Biotechnology is known as the branch of molecular biology that studies the use of microorganisms to perform specific industrial processes. This study shows that our lives can be transformed.
In Freeman Dyson’s “Our Biotech Future”, he focuses on a range of topics including how biology has grown and become bigger than physics. Dyson argued that over the next 50 years, biotechnology will revolutionize our lives in much the same way as computers have done over the previous 50 years (Dyson, para. 2, 2007). Freeman compared the way how computers have grown to the genetic engineering of food crops. He explained that people did not trust that poisonous pesticides were put into their food, the same way how they did not like the fact that Von Neumann used his computer for secretly
…show more content…
designing hydrogen bombs at night. When he compared the two, he was trying to say that even though Von Neumann’s use of computers was somewhat in the wrong, it still contributed to the development of computers. Overall, Dyson was trying to say that even though genetic engineering seems very bad right now, in the future it will turn out to change our lives in a good way. Although people frown upon the thought of genetically engineering food, Freeman believes that the path for biotechnology can succeed just like the computers. To back up this argument, the U.S Department of Agriculture has noticed that at least 90 percent of the soy, cotton, canola, corn and sugar beets sold in the United States have been genetically engineered (Lallanilla, para.7, 2016). This is proof that sales have gone up due to the modification of these foods. Potatoes that do not bruise and apples that do not brown have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, meaning that these changes are becoming more accepted in the world around us. According to the National Library of Medicine, genetically modified foods have potential benefits of being tastier, more nutritious and resistant to diseases (Lallanilla, para. 5, 2016). But even though the National Library of Medicine has stated that genetically modified food has many benefits, they also have potential risks such as causing harm, and the organisms could join with natural organisms which could lead to possible extinction of the original organism (Lallanilla, para. 6, 2016). The genetic modifications of animals have grown in many ways as geneticists have sampled experiments where they bred genetically modified pigs that can glow in the dark by inserting genes from a jellyfish. This indicates that geneticists have taken their experiments to many different levels as they swap genes, hypothesize about different outcomes, and put their potential theories to the test. Institutions that specialize in the management of different animals such as fish, can genetically modified animals which would enable merchants to sell in a new variety of colours (Dyson, para.4, 2007). Dyson reasons that creating new breeds of plants and animals has largely been restricted to specialist breeders. Similar to personal computers, biotechnology will become available to the private buyer, where all sorts of unique and different plants and animals will begin to appear in our very homes. Dyson paints a bright picture of favorable creativity, I am not sure we can assume that all of these homemade creations, whether created accidentally or intentionally, will be uncomplicated or even tolerate humans.
In the article, Dyson would ask himself “If domestication of biotechnology is the wave of the future, five important questions need to be answered. First, can it be stopped? Second, ought it to be stopped? Third, if stopping it is either impossible or undesirable, what are the appropriate limits that our society must impose on it? Fourth, how should the limits be decided? Fifth, how should the limits be enforced, nationally and internationally? I do not attempt to answer these questions here. I leave it to our children and grandchildren to supply the answers” (Dyson, para. 9, 2007). Here, Dyson is proposing questions for his future plans, as he predicted that the study of biotechnology will transform our lives. He felt that he should share his ideas with others so that they can help support his
beliefs. In my opinion, Freeman Dyson writes a good and interesting article, the main summary of which delivers his certainty for a better future, with the step-by-step abandonment of weak technology in favour of better results. The joint grip over technology which now exists will never be abandoned in my opinion. This biocultural transformation may have some difficulty in creating stable enough for its long-term survival however, if there are enough natural thinkers with acceptable support and evidence to affect the changes Dyson believes could take place. I agree with Dyson’s concept of genetic modification being standardized in the near future.
In the late twentieth century, the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering has positioned itself to become one of the great technological revolutions of human history. Yet, things changed when Herber Boyer, a biochemist at the University of California, founded the company Genentech in 1976 to exploit the commercial potential of his research. Since then the field has exploded into a global amalgam of private research firms developing frivolous, profit-hungry products, such as square trees tailor-made for lumber, without any sort of government regulation.
...In doing so, society will fail to appreciate the wonders that nature provides. While the basis of Sandel’s case is hypothetical and dependent on future innovations, he provides interesting ethical insight that may not normally be contemplated when questions of genetic engineering are at hand.
With the progression of modern biotechnology, there is much contentious debate affecting ongoing developmental affairs. Controversy aligns itself with cautious thoughts on the appropriate amount of enhancement that can be applied before it undermines the “gifted character of human power and achievement (Sandel).” Michael Sandel, author of The Case Against Perfection argues through political discourse that the passion to master all of the science dominion through the use of such technology is largely flawed by our interpretations of perfection.
Fukuyama, Francis. Our Post-Human Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 2002
The ubiquitous and incalculable benefits of biotechnology as a whole and the specific issues involved in Gattaca successfully mute the alarmist calls for moratoriums and bans on these technological breakthroughs. With utmost caution and consideration these studies will ultimately lead humanity to limitless heights.
Science and technology are rapidly advancing everyday; in some ways for the better, and in some, for worse. One extremely controversial advance is genetic engineering. As this technology has high potential to do great things, I believe the power genetic engineering is growing out of control. Although society wants to see this concept used to fight disease and illness, enhance people 's lives, and make agriculture more sustainable, there needs to be a point where a line is drawn.
Genetic engineering has been around for many years and is widely used all over the planet. Many people don’t realize that genetic engineering is part of their daily lives and diet. Today, almost 70 percent of processed foods from a grocery store were genetically engineered. Genetic engineering can be in plants, foods, animals, and even humans. Although debates about genetic engineering still exist, many people have accepted due to the health benefits of gene therapy. The lack of knowledge has always tricked people because they only focused on the negative perspective of genetic engineering and not the positive perspective. In this paper, I will be talking about how Genetic engineering is connected to Brave New World, how the history of genetic engineering impacts the world, how genetic engineering works, how people opinions are influenced, how the side effects can be devastating, how the genetic engineering can be beneficial for the society and also how the ethical issues affect people’s perspective.
Rifkin, Jeremy. “Biotech Century: Playing Ecological Roulette with Mother Nature’s Design.” The Presence of Others. 3rd ed. Ed. Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000. 244-254.
Technology is changing the way the world works in profound ways at an unprecedented rate. As we speak, scientists in labs around the world are decoding the remaining portion of the genome map. One day (even now), with the information compiled in GenBank, scientists can discover new drugs, new methods of gene therapy, and other preventive measures which will vastly improve the quality of life (NCBI ¶1). David Smith, previously a director of the Department of Energy, said, "These are exciting and challenging times for biological researchers. The wealth of information and capabilities now being generated by the various genome projects and other biological endeavors will lead over the next two decades to more insights into living systems than have been amassed in the past two millennia. Biology is truly undergoing a revolution" (Walters 545).
Coker, Jeffrey Scott. "Genetic Engineering Is Natural and Should Be Pursued." Genetic Engineering, edited by Noël Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,
Synthetic biology, also known as synbio, is a new form of research that began in the year 2000. The Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group) says that synthetic biology is bringing together “engineering and the life sciences in order to design and construct new biological parts, devices and systems that do not currently exist in the natural world’ (Synthetic Biology). Synthetic biology is aiming to create safer medicines, clean energy, and help the environment through synthetically engineered medicines, biofuels, and food. Because synthetic biology has only existed for fourteen years, there is controversy involving its engineering ethics. In this literature review, I am going to summarize and correlate the International Association for Synthetic Biology (IASB) Code of Conduct for Gene Synthesis, the impact of synthetic biology on people and the environment, and the philosophical debates.
The field of biotechnology is absolutely huge. There is the medical area and agriculture area of development. The agriculture area concentrates on developing hybrid crops and manipulating genes so that the plants natural defenses activate. Although this is interesting and has an effect on our lives, I have chosen to concentrate on the medical aspect of biotechnology. I have also decided not to comment on the ethics of the new developments, since I believe that the reader should decide for oneself. More specifically, the concentration will be on the Human Genome Project, artificial organs, and companies that are involved in the biotech industry.
Biotechnology is a group of technologies that work together with living cells and their molecules to prolong life (Keener and Hoban et al., 2014). Today biotechnology can be used in a variety of ways such as in an industrial setting where they use it to create enzymes to synthesize chemicals, in an environmental setting where they use it for waste and pollution prevention and lastly it can be used in medical applications such as in pharmaceuticals, genetic engineering, DNA fingerprinting and lastly it can be used in stem cell therapy (Keener and Hoban et al., 2014). Everyone in today’s society depends on and uses biotechnology in one form or another, biotechnology is essential for our health and wellbeing. Vaccines are also manufactured using biotechnology which consist of three main ways, it aids scientists to separate pure antigen using specific monoclonal antibody, aids in synthesis of an antigen with the help of a cloned gene and lastly it also aids in the synthesis of peptides to be used as vaccines (Alam 2014). A vaccine can protect you from specific diseases that can make you sick or even kill you.
processes of biotechnology, that are striving to make our world a better place to exist in.
Since school days the terms like cell, genes, DNA, protein intrigued me a lot and helped me in realizing the dream of pursuing a career in Biotechnology field that has been making many remarkable achievements. The passion towards biological sciences made me to take B.TECH in Biotechnology in Dr. M.G.R. University.