Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis on transcendentalism
Thesis on transcendentalism
Thesis on transcendentalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thesis on transcendentalism
In transcendentalist readings, such as "Nature" by Ralph Waldo Emerson and "Walden" by Henry David Thoreau, the idea of nonconformity presents itself as a large part of the Transcendentalist belief. Transcendentalism encompasses the ideas of living in the moment, being at one with nature, living as simply as possible, and not conforming to social norms. Ralph Waldo Emerson was a Transcendentalist who lived in the woods, and found peace and comfort in nature. He had no problem in standing up for his beliefs. In Emerson's "Self-reliance" he addresses ideas of deviating from other's ways of doing things. He states that a man can only truly be happy "when he has put his heart in to his work" (Emerson 186). If he has not "put his heart into his …show more content…
He was fascinated with nature and the idea of living separately from others. In his story "Walden" he talks about his days of living in nature. Thoreau presents the idea "if one advances confidently in the direction of their dreams" then eventually will be "met with a success" (Thoreau 204). Instead of following the crowd, we should be working to our personal goals, not the goals of someone else. It is important to live our own lives and not in someone else's shadow, that would be a waste of talents. Thoreau introduced ideas that one could not be "keeping pace" with others "because he hears a different drummer" (Thoreau 204). Those who have separate ideas and beliefs are following their hearts and what is right for them. Thoreau argues, what may be truth to one person, may not apply to another. Therefore, we must always follow what we believe to be correct. In the poem "A Psalm of Life" by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow the theme of nonconformity is very apparent. In the poem he explores the ideas of seizing the day and deviating from being normal. He also explores the idea of not complying to the normal standards. Lowell challenges the reader to "Be not like dumb, driven cattle" (Lowell 19). We should not follow every action of the crowd. Instead, we should make our own decisions and not feel bad about what others think because we are only following our
Ralph Waldo Emerson is considered the Father of Transcendentalism because he first introduced the idea of a simplistic and intuitive way of life. He claims, “Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist . . . Nothing is at least sacred but the integrity of your own mind” (“Self-Reliance” 392). Nonconformity is an essential part of Emerson’s definition of a transcendentalist. To be able to live a truly boundless and accomplished life, one must not fall into the daily, busy life of society. He or she must stand out and follow their intuition, even it is not considered the norm. The only way to be content is to trust one’s instinct, not be jaded by the pressures society.
Thoreau conveys many points in his writing and a large recurring one is the state of society. As stated before, he believed that people are too focused on physical gain and modernization which leads them into desperation. He adds on to this belief later in the book asking that above all else whether it be money or fame he be given honesty (Thoreau 246). To Thoreau, the truth is more important than anything measurable in status. Thoreau believes that a minimalist lifestyle is a good lifestyle, similar to Mccandless. He speaks of how it is good that he can put all of his belonging in one pile in his yard because it removes the clutter from his life (Thoreau 85). He also says that his best quality in life is to want very little, because it keeps himself true to himself and keeps him from distraction. Thoreau also believes that every man should be one in himself not oppressed by the government. He says that everyone should be able to be themselves whether is is in accord with the government or not (Thoreau 240). He is essentially saying that the government should not be a part of people's life decisions only to maintain the
Transcendentalists Thoreau and Emerson conveyed strong, specific viewpoints on the world through their writing. The transcendentalist ideals differ vastly with the lives lived by most of the modern world today. Firstly, the two differ on views of self-reliance. Secondly, they have different outlooks on the government and organized groups. Lastly, transcendentalist and modern American views vary by the way they view nature. These differences between transcendentalism and life today are essential in understanding life then, as well as life now.
To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.
In conclusion, by temporarily removing himself from society and thrusting himself into nature, we are better able to understand how Thoreau conveys his attitude towards life. He believes that in order to enjoy it one must free himself or herself from the high-tempo nature of society, live life more simplistically, and experience the reality that is hidden by all the things that are irrelevant in our
“Spoke not what men but what they thought.” This quote is saying that people have the freedom to speak for themselves and they don’t have to conform into what society wants them to be/do. Civil Disobedience Analysis Questions 1. Consider the historical context of Thoreau’s essay Civil Disobedience. Would it be easier or harder to practice non-conformity today?
Finding myself copying the styles and mind sets of those around me, I realize I need to start being an individual. The pressures of society are very heavy on any teenage girl, and I surely feel the strain of conformity. Out of fear of being judged, I often shy away from sharing my opinions and values to others. When these beliefs are the keystone of my life, it seems nonsensical to hide them. I believe that this quote has more meaning to us now then it did in Thoreau's time. Being a consumerist society has created a plague of wastefulness that has influenced our homes and cities. We can all learn to have more simple lives and use what we
In Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience," he uses a hyperbole to support his belief that "one person can make a change," an idea still relevant today. Thoreau uses many forms of literary techniques such as multiple hyperbole, emotional appeals, and paradoxes. Thoreau uses these to sustain his ideas on civil disobedience. He believes if you believe in something, and support something you should do whatever it takes to help the cause. Many people in today's society believe to just go with the flow, rather than living like Thoreau has, and supporting his own beliefs no matter what the consequence. Henry David Thoreau had a lot of personal authority, he was all about his own independence. Many different people believed in being a non-conformist, and Thoreau was one of them, and he very well showed how much he supported it. Thoreau was not the only nonconformist, they're many people who followed his beliefs and they refused to be bound by anybody, or anything they did not support. Other non-conformists were Gandhi, Galileo, Malcom X and many more.
While Emerson never truly factored his transcendentalist ideals into his daily life, Thoreau made a point out of living out his days as a man free from society and connected to nature. In 1846, he refused to pay his poll tax to the government because he believed the war was unjust and did not want to support the government. In doing this, he showed that he remains strong in his own beliefs and will not agree with something just to conform to society. He also showcases Emerson’s philosophy on learning by forming beliefs based on his own life and morals, which were based in nature, receiving instruction from Emerson’s ideas on self-reliance, and taking action against something he believes is unjust. In an excerpt from one of Thoreau’s books, he says, “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived” (Thoreau 16). What he is saying through this is that he wants to evaluate himself in the context of nature and understand what life is like in its purest and fundamental form. He hoped to gain a knowledge of the world and explore what nature had to offer and learn from his experience. Also, Thoreau is letting his readers know that connecting with nature is essential in finding yourself and
While Emerson and Thoreau certainly have difference of opinions, they recognize the need for public discussion and discourse. Emerson declares “a foolish consistency” to be “the hobgoblin of little minds” (Emerson 367). This is shown in their essays “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience” in which they support individuality and personal expression. Despite their contrasting views of society and government, the two most prominent transcendentalists in literary history share a passionate belief in the necessity that every American must exercise their constitutional rights and make known their views even and especially if it challenges the status quo.
According to the statement, “Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate,” Thoreau believes that the basis for the success of any person is his/her own individual opinion of himself/herself. Thoreau is the perfect example of his own opinion, based on his time spent living a simple life at Walden Pond. The public had varied opinions of Thoreau’s lifestyle, and Thoreau even addresses some critics in his essay. However, Thoreau himself was very content with his lifestyle, and he believed that his simple lifestyle was far superior compared to the seemingly luxurious lifestyle of men, who actually are in debt and bound to a la...
Emerson uses cause and effect to prove that being consistent and conforming brings about no progress. Emerson writes, “With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do,” (Emerson, 4). Consistency causes someone with great potential to have no successes. Cause and effect is used to conclude the theme by describing that if a great soul remains uniform to their surroundings nothing will be achieved. By concluding nonconformity on the previously stated idea, Emerson allows the reader to walk away with the powerful idea that consistency is a restriction. Although, ending on a powerful idea still does not help the reader to further visualize Emerson’s claim due to the lack of anything that the reader can relate back to. Alternatively, Thoreau again uses description to give a specific example of conformity in his daily life. He states, “I am sure that I have never read any memorable news,” (Thoreau, 7). By saying he has never read any memorable news, Thoreau suggests that all the news is consistent, so he finds no reason to continue reading it. Unlike Emerson, description is used to conclude the ideology of diminishing conformity by giving a direct example of what conformity looks like and how it affects people. By ending the theme of nonconformity with an example of its effects in daily life, Thoreau leaves the reader with an insight of how conformity negatively affects everyone which provides the reader with a strong notion of Thoreau’s ideas. Lastly, cause and effect and description are both used by Emerson and Thoreau to conclude the principle of not conforming to society by proving that no progress comes with conformity and by giving an example of how consistency affects people’s daily
To trace the origin of the Transcendental movement one needs to go back to the city of Concord, Massachusetts. There during the early 19th century many well-known and world-renowned authors were following the practices of one man, Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson, who was considered America's first philosopher, had earlier traveled to Europe and became fascinated by the concepts of one German philosopher known as Kant. According to Emerson's understanding of Kant, there were two pure objects in the world in which are the bases of everything, nature and soul. He took this philosophy and brought it back to America where it later, with the help of Henry David Thoreau, revolutionized American literature.
Thoreau writes that we should simplify our lives as much as possible, and that we should only worry about our own affairs. He then closes the paper by writing that he does not want to work any harder than he has to, but that he wants to use his mind to work through life. One of the many ways Thoreau keeps his life simple is he only imagines buying a farm, however, he never actually does so. Instead, he uses the land only to observe and write about the landscape. By not ever actually buying the farm, Thoreau illustrates his belief that everyone should live free of commitments for as long as possible.
Meanwhile, Thoreau actually practiced what Emerson preached. Thoreau strongly believed in Emerson’s philosophy, so admired nature, relied only on himself, and did not commit to conformity. Transcendentalism is the belief of divine