Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau's philosophy of simplicity
Thoreau simplicity essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau's philosophy of simplicity
The minimalists are a movement that advocates for the removal of excess in our lives in order to gain more time to live fuller. They argue for not only getting rid of material possessions, but also to get rid of bad relationships, electronic clutter, and even sentimental items. The Minimalists argue to reduce the excess in your life, which echoes Thoreau; however, their true purpose is to argue for living life with purpose.
The Minimalists argue for ridding your life of excess things, in a similar way to Thoreau, so that you may free your life of ties to material objects in order to focus on more important things. The Minimalists contend that “by clearing the clutter from life’s path, we can all make room for the most important aspects of life: health, relationships, passion, growth, and contribution.” The Minimalists argue that having material possessions only holds you back. They do not allow you to truly experience life. Similarly, Thoreau proposes that “the more you have of such things the poorer you are.” Both Thoreau and the Minimalists
…show more content…
The Minimalists say that being busy is a curse. That being busy to be busy does not allow you to do anything of real value. On the other hand, “being focused... involves attention, awareness, and intentionality.” All of these things indicate that the work that is accomplished while focused are done for a reason beyond simply doing work. The Minimalists go on to say that, even though they do less now that they are focused and not busy, “the significance of each undertaking has gone up.” Thoreau also belittles busyness when he writes “it is not enough to be busy. The question is: what are we busy about?” Thoreau concurs with the Minimalists that being busy by itself is a bad thing; spending time on something that matters, however, is true
The principle of the Tiny House Movement, less equals more, applies not only to monetary benefits, but also to simplified living. One philosophy of the Tiny House Movement is to "design life to include more money, health, and happiness with less stuff, space, and energy" (Maglalang 30). Likewise, the founders of the Transcendental Movement believed in this theory; they believed that to be content, one must eliminate materialistic attachments to focus on the significant circumstances that life has to exhibit. The Tiny House Movement accosts the popular ideology of procuring large investments to be content (Maglalang 30). This consortium obliges a cleanse of superfluous components that are gratuitous, absolving one from trivial attachments.
In the modern world, people posses more than what they can actually keep tract of physically and mentally. Everyone wants to live the “good life” where they can have no limits to the things they want. Whether it is clothes, cars, jewelry, or houses, the need to buy things that are affordable and are in style preoccupies the minds of many people. The argument for necessity goes against this way of modern living, but agrees with Thoreau's view on it. The argument is that people should have enough of each just ...
Both Thoreau and McCandless were against materialism. Thoreau feels that “Most of the luxuries and many of the so-called comforts of life are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind” (Thoreau, Walden 28). He thinks that dependance of worldly possessions hidera ones chance of finding their true self. McCandless had a similar mentality, and acted upon that belief. An example of this is when “…he saw the flash flood as an opportunity to shed unnecessary baggage. He concealed the car as best he could beneath a brown tarp, stripped it of its Virginia plates, and hid them” (Krakauer 29). McCandless was not tied to his own possessions, he was happy to leave them in the middle of no where. Through reduction of worldly possessions and materials, the message that both McCandless and Thoreau throw at the readers is to have a simplistic life without the concerns coming from worldly possessions. These possessions deter one from the true meaning of life.
Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “Remember always that you not only have the right to be an individual, you have an obligation to be one.” In this quote, Eleanor is expressing that you should always take advantage of the universal human right to be an individual. From time immemorial, many of those who have led meaningful and enjoyable lives have shared one particular trait in common: individualism. Chris McCandless and Thoreau were no different, they both embodied individualism and as a result they have unknowingly inspired generations.
It is of no surprise to anyone that people in general, particularly Americans, tend to be overly-enticed by materialistic things and ridiculous ideals, placing more emphasis on them than things of sentiment. In “On Dumpster Diving,” author Lars Eighner develops on his experiences as a homeless man not in an attempt to defend the art of Dumpster diving, but instead to build upon the idea that a majority of people spend too much time and money on things that will not matter in a few years—they should instead focus on things that will never lose their value. Throughout the essay, he is attempting to persuade his audience that they should change their regular way of thinking and let go of materialistic things in order to live a better, more sound, and overall healthier life. To develop this purpose, Eighner utilizes juxtaposition, exemplification, and definition.
Thoreau and Socrates start Civil Disobedience and Crito with basically the same premise. They both believe that humans are essentially moral beings. Thoreau says that people if left to their own ends will act justly, and should be treated accordingly by the law. Socrates says essentially the same thing, he says that "no one wants to commit injustice" for its own sake, many people end up doing so anyway. Socrates says that the citizens of a government have entered into an agreement to abide by its laws in exchange for protection. He also says that if one believes these laws to be unjust, one can always leave, but if one agrees to abide by the laws they have a duty to be subjected to punishment if they break these laws. Thoreau on the other hand says that it is the duty of the people not to abide by a law if they perceive it to be unjust, and if they claim to be opposed to it and nevertheless abide by it, they are a hypocrite.
know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my
Maycroft, Neil. "Not Moving Things Along: Hoarding, Clutter and Other Ambiguous Matter." Journal of Consumer Behaviour 8.6 (2009): 354-64. ProQuest. 28 Apr. 2014 .
symbolic statements like, "No, when I go to sea, I go as a simple sailor… I have
Graham Hill presented his speech “Less stuff, more happiness” in March 2011. He explains how Americans have many belongings, but these belongings are unnecessary. The speaker, Hill, explains that by “editing out” these belongings, people will be happier, save money, and help the environment. Hill started the website lifeedited.org and has already minimized his living space. He presented his findings at a TED Talk to highly educated, wealthy people and businessmen. His goal was to encourage people to minimize waste, and thus live better lives. Hill’s speech on editing out unnecessary belongings best utilized ethos and strong diction through repetition to persuade his audience.
While hoarding ranges from mild to severe, only the worst cases make it into the news. After viewing pictures of such homes, one wonders why no one intervened to throw a few things out. Where is the logic in keeping so many things that they start to overpower you and trap you inside your home? Hoarders however, lack the ability to simply throw away a possession. The motivation behind retaining such an encumbrance of items lies in the fear of wasting and losing important information. Hoarders attach emotional meanings to each item, giving it personal and special characteristics.
Henry David Thoreau once said, “It is not enough to be busy. So are the ants. The question is: what are we busy about?” This questions has become even more relevant in today’s society, people wear busyness like it is a badge of honor.
In Walden, Thoreau wrote about simplicity. He simplified his life to such an extent that there were no details to ¨fritter¨ away his life. All he had to do was
In the year 1854, the famous writer and poet Henry David Thoreau wrote about his experience at Walden. His secluded pond allowed for him to reflect on nature and its impact on community in a passage he named, “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For”. He also wrote two short but important proposals for land preservation around 1858. In the year 1963, famous writer and theologian Thomas Merton wrote a letter to Rachel Carson discussing her book Silent Spring in which she exposed the danger of DDT which was previously thought harmless. In 1967 in the time of the cold war and the space race, Merton wrote a letter to Barbra Hubbard about human ecological responsibility in space. Merton and Thoreau
Sometimes, when relatives and friends say “go big or go home” it’s not always in sports-related situation.. Graham Hill and Jessi Arrington both address the theme of minimalist in their videos during a Ted Talk. They both are very relevant to this theme as is the article “The Realities of Hedonistic Consumerism” in Rereading America. Although they all have their distinct characteristics and reasons for being relevant, Graham Hills video Less Stuff, More Happiness does a better job of explaining and giving examples. The two videos and the one article explain how as the years go by the normal American expands the storage they have to fit everything they desire.