Comparing The Works Of James Baldwin And Montaigne

2344 Words5 Pages

Belle Lettres. Beautiful letters. There isn't a much more apt moniker to describe the modus operandi that Baldwin and Montaigne both took, in their positions as literary giants during their respective eras. Michel Eyquem, a French aristocrat and renowned essayist, born in the sixteenth century, sought to expound upon some of life’s most challenging topics, such as life and death, gender, etc. in his series of personal essays (Screech, 1). At the time of the creation of his essays, he found himself morally opposed to the series of cruelties launched in the region during the numerous religious conflicts of the period. James Baldwin, a Harlem-bred American essayist tackled the contentious topics that marked much of the twentieth century - including …show more content…

This isn’t just a retelling of the case of argumentation, rather Baldwin shares more intimate detail to connect with the reader. As a recipient of this memory of Baldwin’s “hidden” life, the reader develops trust in him – here Baldwin presents the reader with an extremely vulnerable moment. Further, his honesty invites the reader to consider their shameful past – times when we weren’t fortified against our challenges. Through this cathartic sharing of vulnerability, a kinship is cultivated between author and reader – a trust that Baldwin, regardless of his notoriety, is just like you and me: human. An exploration into the belletristic form is similarly achievable in Montaigne’s work. To begin, we first explore Montaigne’s essay “Of Cruelty”. He starts his essay with a general discussion of virtue, virtue within himself, before transitioning into discussing cruelty (specifically about …show more content…

Again, we have a more present narrator who doesn’t shirk away from revealing a vulnerable aspect of their life – considering his noble background, it is hard to imagine Montaigne, and other nobles, taking on a hubristic and slightly self-defamatory approach without feeling the vulnerability of the importance of image for nobility at the time. But Montaigne writes as if speaking directly to the friends – only this time he writes to the audience. Further, in this scene, we see some anadiplosis whose effect is a beautiful continuity and cyclism that stresses how “normal” Montaigne is. Similarly, this is understood through Montaigne’s usage of I throughout the essay: after making a brief reference to Diana and Cupid, Montaigne resumes his discussion of virtue through the usage of the phrase “I have a most tender compassion for the affliction of others” (Montaigne 47). In his piece, “On Experience,” we can identify the typical Montaigne literary chatter where amid a conversation on death, Montaigne interjects that “I am not excessively fond either of salads or fruits, except melons” (Widgner

Open Document