Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harry potter character analysis
Harry potter character analysis
Harry potter character development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Harry potter character analysis
The Transforming Journey of Two Unlikely Heroes In the Harry Potter and Lord of the rings series, both Neville Longbottom and Samwise Gamgee start their journey as undervalued people that undergo metamorphosis evolving into heroes. At the beginning of their respective journeys, Neville and Sam are viewed as ordinary people. Both are everyday characters who rise to fulfill heroic roles, motivated by loyalty, integrity and the love for friends. When the story begins, Sam is a simple gardener, born into a family of no significance who has never stepped foot outside of his homeland, the Shire. On the other hand Neville, is introduced to the readers as the definition of ineptitude. Neville, is best described as clumsy, shy that has very low-self confidence that changes into a leader, hero and a major reason for Harry's defeat of Voldemort. Although, Sam and Neville undergo two different routes on their path to heroism; but, share similar experiences that shed light on their transformation. Both Samwise and Neville, start their journey very docile and unsure of what is to come. …show more content…
As Sam is by no means articulate, but is bumbling, apologetic, and skeptical, mostly because of his limited geographic knowledge.
Neville is the chubby, clumsy and is known for forgetting the most simplest things. Neville’s first test of character was a simple circumstance everyone comes to but many avoid, he decided to confront his friends with a difference of opinion. They wished to break the rules he wished them not to. His opinion nearly became a fact when Neville attempted to barricade the exit with his body to prevent the others from disappearing into a midnight corridor in violation of the house rules. By contrast, Sam feeling of insecurity creeps up for a moment when
they Neville and Sam, both wrestle with the burden of hesitance and insecurity when starting their road to heroism. For Neville, the sorting hat took a long time to choose Neville’s fate and decided to put him in Gryffindor. Neville was intimidated by his perceived ineptitude of the bravery that was predicted for the members of Gryffindor. And even tried to argue the case that he should be placed for the Hufflepuff house. In Marion Zimmer Bradley’s “Men Halflings and Hero Worship”, points out how Sam felt when he calls himself, “luggage in a boat” (Bradley 84). This reveals how, Sam reduce himself as the dead weight of the baggage in the boat. This show his reluctance and the unsurety of what’s to come. For both Neville and Sam, felt hesitance of what was ahead and if they were up for the challenge. By contrast, the aspect that makes Sam and Neville different is the relationship they develop to the central figure of the story, Harry Potter and Frodo Baggins. In the beginning, Harry has little interest in interacting with Neville. For the first couple of books, Neville is seen as the stuttering, bullied kid that is accident-prone. Overtime, their friendship develops into a mutual respect for each other. Also, Neville has small, integral part in the series that have a huge impact. Nevertheless, Neville doesn’t go on all of the endeavors that Harry Potter does. Unlike, Sam who sticks with frodo every step of the way through unbearable times. Sam relationship with Frodo, is the master and servant type. It is through this mission where they are constantly on the brink of death. Their friendship becomes so deep that not even Sauron could tear it apart. Harry Potter and Neville Longbottom never had that dynamic with Harry. Throughout both of the series, Neville and Sam, display unfaltering loyalty toward the main character. Sam immense loyalty for Frodo is clear, when he “never considers leaving Frodo alone and going back to his dear country” (Gracia 67). When Frodo decides to go to Mordor alone, Sam nearly drowns to accompany him. In Peter Jackson’s movie, Sam attempts to swim, and Frodo pulls Sam out of the water onto the boat and Sam exclaims: "I made a promise, Mister Frodo. A promise!” (Jackson, 30) Sam shows just how loyal he is by putting his life on the line for a promise. Marion Zimmer Bradley argues that Sam doesn’t see his friendship to Frodo as an “attachment is not to an object, but to a person” ( 67). This shows that Sam doesn’t have ulterior motive but to finish the journey with his friend. This shows how much he cares about the fellowship and Frodo and his “love translates into loyalty”(67). Neville’s most apparent display of loyalty is when the survivors of Hogwarts, see Hagrid holding a dead Harry Potter and a sea of hopelessness washes over the people of Hogwarts. Neville risks his life and breaks from the crowd and attempt to charge at Voldemort. He shows how faithful he is, even after Harry’s presumable death. Neville even stands up to Voldemort, when he tries to recruit him to be a death eater by saying, “I’ll join you when hell freezes over” and shouts, “Dumbledore’s Army!”(Rowling, Deathly 731) Both characters and the choices they make, accept the possibility of death for the purpose of the greater good. They show resilience and strength in the moments that are the most strenuous. Sam’s metamorphosis is evident, when Shelob presumably kills Frodo and the fate and future of middle earth is in his hands. Sam is the embodiment of bravery when he takes on Frodo’s task as ring bearer. When he thinks Frodo has died, he is plagued with the choices of what to do next: So compelling is that only in retrospect has it become apparent how Sam choices here foreshadow his final status. One by one he forsakes the other possibilities; vengeance, suicide...return for wiser counsel; take the Ring and complete the Quest. Although knowing its full terrible power, Sam chooses the last possibility. Even Aragorn and Gandalf had feared this test. (Bradley 86) Sam takes up the ring when he hears the orcs coming, and in full knowledge of his own choice. Thinking that his master is dead, Sam resolves to continue the quest in the face of all the odds. This, I think, is a mark of his character: he does not allow himself to be overwhelmed with grief, as he has full right to, but stands up to do the deed at hand. Sam is truly prepared to give his life to a quest he never really wanted to go on, one that he simply followed his master in footing. Not to mention without Sam, Sauron would have attained the ring essentially ending Middle Earth. It is potency of courageousness in dire times that sparks Sam’s transformation. He is no longer the “submissive watchdog” but molts the sidekick persona into a blooming dauntless hero. When Sam feels that he is on his own for this journey, he shatters the subservient role into an equal role in the eyes of the reader. Like Sam Gamgee, Neville experiences a complete metamorphosis when It looks like the battle is lost. Neville stands alone and unarmed against Lord Voldemort himself. As punishment for his defiance he is forced into wearing the Sorting Hat, which Voldemort sets ablaze. But Neville breaks free, pulling forth the sword of Godric Gryffindor and kills Nagini “with a single stroke, Neville sliced off the great snake’s head, which spun high into the air… and Voldemort’s mouth was open in a scream of fury that nobody could hear” (Rowling, Deathly 733). Nevill’s destruction of the final horcrux saves the day. Without, Harry believing Neville could take on Nagini, the outcome of the Battle of Hogwarts would be drastically different. Neville’s bravery and heroism, wasn’t triggered in a single moment, it evolved throughout the series. He is fully transformed when he goes from being fearful of Snape to standing up to the most nefarious villains of them all. Then kills the feared snake, Nagini in a single stroke. Neville is not the same stuttering and fumbling kid in the beginning that he is now. Neville and Sam, took on the role of sidekick or supporter of the main heroin of the series. At first, they are both viewed as less than or subservient. Both Neville and Sam prove beyond doubt that they are just as heroic as their peers. It is through the evolution of their character that they . Sam Gamgee and Neville Longbottom both know that there fight for justice is bigger than them and that main character's heroism doesn’t diminish their own. By the end of both series, Neville and Sam both displays characteristics that every hero should have: humble, solemn, loyal and true. Without them, the outcome of the prevailing evil would be definite.
He has maintained who he is and allowed it to become apparent through his actions. Samady challenges people that do not acknowledge that he is more than his appearance to “ look at his effect on the world” (13). He was the father that cared for his children, respected his wife, and put the needs of his family before his own. Samady is proud of her father for his selflessness and for possessing this important characteristic even after the war. He was the man that was able to retain so much of himself when loss was inevitable. He might have given up on his chances of becoming an engineering; however, he refused to lose sight of what it took to take care of his
Sam Woods is a very important character in the novel In the Heat of the Night. He is a racist, and throughout the novel you will notice many changes in his attitude towards Negros.
Watching a film, one can easily recognize plot, theme, characterization, etc., but not many realize what basic principle lies behind nearly every story conceived: the hero’s journey. This concept allows for a comprehensive, logical flow throughout a movie. Once the hero’s journey is thoroughly understood, anyone can pick out the elements in nearly every piece. The hero’s journey follows a simple outline. First the hero in question must have a disadvantaged childhood. Next the hero will find a mentor who wisely lays out his/her prophecy. Third the hero will go on a journey, either literal or figurative, to find him/herself. On this journey the hero will be discouraged and nearly quit his/her quest. Finally, the hero will fulfill the prophecy and find his/herself, realizing his/her full potential. This rubric may be easy to spot in epic action films, but if upon close inspection is found in a wide array of genres, some of which are fully surprising.
Joseph Campbell made himself one of the chief authorities on how mythology works when he published his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces. In this book, Campbell describes what he believes to be the monomyth, known as “The Hero’s Journey.” Campbell wrote that this monomyth, the basic structure of all heroic myth, has three basic stages, which in turn have subcategories themselves. The heroic story of Katniss Everdeen, told in the movie Hunger Games, follows Campbell’s monomyth outline quite well.
“The journey of the hero is about the courage to seek the depths; the image of creative rebirth; the eternal cycle of change within us; the uncanny discovery that the seeker is the mystery which the seeker seeks to know. The hero journey is a symbol that binds, in the original sense of the word, two distant ideas, and the spiritual quest of the ancients with the modern search for identity always the one, shape-shifting yet marvelously constant story that we find.” (Phil Cousineau) The Hero's Journey has been engaged in stories for an immemorial amount of time. These stories target typical connections that help us relate to ourselves as well as the “real world”.
Joseph Campbell defines a hero as “someone who has given his or her life to something bigger than oneself ” (Moyers 1). The Hero’s Journey consists of three major parts: the separation, the initiation and the return. Throughout a character’s journey, they must complete a physical or spiritual deed. A physical deed involves performing a daunting and courageous act that preserves the well-being of another person. A spiritual deed calls for action that improves another individual’s state of mind. While fulfilling their journey, a hero must undergo a psychological change that involves experiencing a transformation from immaturity into independence and sophistication.Campbell states that these events are what ultimately guides a hero into completing
Both characters transformed by the end of the novel and movie. They became fuller characters through the experiences they had in their strange environments. In the beginning they both took on typical society views where they thought mostly of themselves and question anything different. However, in the end of their journey they were able to see other views. They also grew as characters from within, becoming stronger individuals.
When things are at their best prepare for the worst. That’s something I always told myself since I was young boy. Joseph Campbell was no stranger to this concept which he described as the hero’s journey. This journey had three stages: leaving the everyday world, overcoming trials and tribulations, and finally going back to the everyday world with newfound knowledge that you can share with people. I traveled through all three of these stages myself. This is my hero’s journey.
The Hero’s Journey is a pattern of narrative that appears in novels, storytelling, myth, and religious ritual. It was first identified by the American scholar Joseph Campbell in his book A Hero with Thousand Faces. Campbell also discussed this pattern in his interview to Bill Moyers which was later published as a book The Power of Myths. This pattern describes the typical adventure of the archetype known as The Hero, the person who goes out and achieves great deeds. Campbell detailed many stages in the Hero’s Journey, but he also summarized the pattern in three fundamental phases: Separation, Ordeal, and Return that all heroes, in spite of their sex, age, culture, or religion, have to overcome in order to reach the goal. Alice in Wonderland, written by Lewis Carroll, provides a good example of the Hero's Journey. This story describes the adventures of Alice, a young English girl, in Wonderland. Although she lacks some of the stages identified by Campbell, she still possesses many of them that are necessary for a Hero to be considered a Hero.
Neville believed he did a great thing for society - he always felt that way regardless of what he thought, whether it was a good idea or a bad thing he was involved in, people needed help to have a better life. Neville wanted to help Aboriginal people but he did it in the wrong way that led to breeding out the
of a single character. The center of attention is mainly focused on Sam, the narrator (337). The
In "I Am Legend," Robert Neville heroically displays committed to doing justice when he protects Anna and Ethan from a darkseeker, and when he stays in Manhattan to fight the darkseekers. As the darkseekers invade Dr. Robert Neville’s home to attack him, Anna and Ethan are trapped
People often act impulsively based on what they believe in, despite the consequences. For literary characters, their impulsiveness creates conflicting sides to their personalities which could help develop their character or undermine their roles in their novels. In the novel, The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins, the characters, Rachel Verinder and Godfrey Ablewhite, contain two different sides to their personality which develop their roles in the novel.
In George Eliot’s Silas Marner, the reader is introduced to a number of characters that possess the elements of selfishness. Silas Marner, Godfrey Cass, and Dunstan Cass exhibit this trait numerous times during novel. Even though these characters all exhibit selfishness during this story, by the end their characteristics are not similar at all. This schism of development is one of the themes of the story that will be analyzed. Regardless of the similar characteristics characters may possess in the beginning of the story, they can become very different people by the end. These characteristics are not limiting and do not hinder the development of a character.
After being discovered by Gandalf listening outside the window, Gandalf insists that Sam go with Frodo on his perilous journey. Sam agrees quite joyously. At the time, he is partially inspired due to the elves, but it also required courage on his part. He agrees to giving up a life of peace, leaving the only home he has ever known, and journeying across Middle-Earth. This, to me, is obviously an act of