Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And The Lottery Research Paper

1559 Words4 Pages

The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell, and The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, are both post-war short stories that use death and destruction to illustrate their themes. In the Most Dangerous Game we are introduced to a hunter, General Zaroff, who grows bored of hunting animals and begins to hunt the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, on a remote island. Through Rainsfords tribulations, Connell examines the themes of the hunter becoming the hunted, and how it affects human condition. On the other hand, The Lottery hosts a traditional raffle yearly where the chosen gets stoned to death by their peers, showing the dangers of blindly following tradition. In both of these compelling stories, the authors show the dark side of humanity, our potential for violence, and the …show more content…

Connell wrote this not only to entertain, but also to portray his time in WWI. Rainsford goes through a lot of struggles in the story that represent the hardships Connell faced in the war. In the story, Rainsford falls off a yacht and is forced to swim to an island, which he learns to be Ship-Trap Island. This relates to Connell and how he was forced to serve in WWI due to being drafted (Ariffin, 9). The act of war is so mentally damaging to many soldiers that it could be described as feeling hunted by the other side, much as Rainsford was Harsh 2 hunted in The Most Dangerous Game. Connell’s experiences in WWI seem to be in line with some of the experiences that Rainsford had on that island. The Lottery was published in 1948, a couple of years after World War II. This story may not be written directly about the war, but it does have some thematic connections that are important. One of the thematic connections that links the war and The Lottery is how people do bad things under certain circumstances because everyone is doing it, rather than thinking of how ethical it actually

Open Document