Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on forms of government in ancient greece
Chivalry in the knights tale
Chivalry in the knights tale
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on forms of government in ancient greece
Roman emperor Julian the Apostate and Christian leader Antony both exhibited many qualities of character during their existence. Both of them led very distinctive lives although shared several ethical values. Book 25 of “The Later Roman Empire” and the book “Early Christian Lives” show concrete evidence of this. In the following essay, I will argue how both leaders’ lives were devoted to their religious beliefs and their mutual cardinal virtues.
Regardless of the fact that Julian and Anthony did not practice the same religion, they both shared a particular devotion to their beliefs. From a very young age, Antony was exceptionally religious. As a child, he delighted in going to church to be closer to God unlike other children that would prefer playing outside. The entirety of his life was devoted to God’s word. God told him to sell all of his possessions and move away from home, consequently he did. Every time he would be asked to do something by God, he would never hesitate. Antony was an extremely devoted man. For numerous years, he was alone in the deserts of Egypt, spending his days praying. Frequently, the devil endeavored to tempt him with many methods although Antony would resist his attacks by constantly praying and fasting. With time the attacks became more severe and after resisting one of the attacks, Antony questioned if God was really looking out for him and God said,
“Antony, I was here, but I was waiting to watch your struggle. But now, since you have bravely held your own in this fight, I will always help you and I will make you famous the world” (Early Christian lives, p.16).
Antony was heartened by this news. He continued following his religious path, and as God had promised, he became Saint Anthony, the...
... middle of paper ...
... above were unmistakably shared with both of the leaders.
Antony and Julian both had very different realities. One was a humble saint and the other a victorious warrior. They could even be compared to the political philosophers Plato and Machiavelli. Plato’s ideology on embracing the goods of the soul over the goods of the body is very similar to Antony’s way of life. Machiavelli’s thoughts on how a prince should be feared rather than loved echoes Julian’s leadership style. Both Antony and Julian had very strong moral virtues that many leaders after them have and will aspire to have also.
Works Cited
Gregory, et al. Early Christian Lives. Penguin Books, 1998.
Marcellinus, Ammianus. The Later Roman Empire (A.D. 354-378). Penguin Books, 1986.
Woolf, Greg. Cambridge Illustrated History of The Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
In the story Julius Ceaser, Antony was a more honorable and trusting man which stated to
The life of Jesus is one that is often discussed and debated among scholars and authors since the time Jesus walked this earth. Gerd Theissen’ s work, Shadow of the Galilean, takes the unique perspective of a grain merchant who has been enlisted by Pilate to find out information on various religious sects and report back to him. After Andreas, the grain merchant’s, first report he is given the task of finding out more about this Jesus who is gaining quite a following. Pilate and the Romans want to know if he is a threat to them. This book follows Andreas as he goes on a journey to find out more about Jesus from various sources for his report to the Romans.
By saying this, Antony is showing how he was as a friend To Caesar and is showing his loyalty and faith to him to tell the audience how great Caesar was.
This paper will outline specific points in Saint Augustine’s Confessions that highlight religious views following the fall of Rome. Though Augustines views on religion may not reflect that of most people in his time period, it still gives valuable insight into how many, namely Neoplatonists,, viewed God and his teachings.
Antony is the trusted lietenant who is popular with Caesar because he follows Julius Caesar by his heart instead of getting wealthy. You disagree with the argument of killing Antony or not because you don’t want to make bloody. However, after Caesar’s death, Antony will be the best speaker to take the chance to speak toward the crowd in public, and he will make a great speech that make people love Caesar more than you, and it causes people to make revenge for Caesar.
When thinking of famous oration, one speech in literature is a classic example that contains persuasive techniques. The speech given by Marc Antony to mourn Caesar in Shakespeare’s work Julius Caesar has been referenced for ages as an example of a convincing argument. Everyone recalls the opening line, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears,” and all know what follows the speech – war leading to the establishment of the final triumvirate (Shakespeare 3.2.82). However, in praising Antony’s words, audiences tend to forget the other convincing orations that make appearances in Julius Caesar. Aristotle first described these in his discourse on types of rhetoric in Ancient Greece. They are pathos, logos, and ethos and all are found in the
When in Seminary I did a research paper on the Roman Emperor Julian. He became known as “Julian the Apostate.” Although he had been reared Christian, and was assumed to be Christian, when he became Emperor he attempted to re-introduce “paganism,” or better put, the Traditional religion with its temples, sacrifices, priests, and priestesses. I reasoned in the paper that it was easy for Christians to revert to paganism because I was not sure how deep the Christian faith had taken root. I also reasoned that if Julian had not been defeated in battle by the Sassanians, the Roman Empire could have possibly reverted to paganism, and modern Europe might have a religious face of modern India with its Hinduism and many Temples with many gods.
Mr. Kiaga, the translator and negotiator for the Christian missionary can be matched most easily to Antony. Both men had great oratory skills which they put to good use. Kiaga used his skills to convert and had won many converts to the new faith. Antony used his oratory skills to convince the crowd at Caesar's funeral that Brutus and the conspirators had killed Caesar unjustly. Both men had very loyal qualities. Antony was loyal to Caesar and wanted to avenge Caesar's death. Mr Kiaga was loyal to the church and Mr Brown, the priest and head of the missionary. Even though they are similar in many ways, they have differe...
The Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was born Marcus Annius Verus on April 26, 121 A.D.. He was of a noble family originally Spanish, Aurelius grew up close to the center of power. His father was Annius Verus, his mother Domitia Lucilla. When he was a child the emperor Hadrian took interest in him because he embraced both rhetoric and philosophy; his manner was serious, his intellectual pursuits deep and devoted, so that the emperor punned on his name and called him “Verissimus”, ‘Most Truthful”. It is this quality of Aurelius character which made him a unique figure in Roman history, since he was the first emperor whose life was molded by devotion to philosophy. He received public honors from an early age and seemed to be Hadrian potential successo...
In conclusion, Caesar?s arrogant, calculating, unemotional character is opposed to Antony?s forgiving, generous, responsible one. Though Caesar is a great military leader, his success is achieved through deliberate cold-hearted scheming and manipulation of others while Antony displays true nobility through his incomparably great human qualities. Thus, in our minds, Antony is the greater of the two.
plotting to seek revenge so he can take over Rome. Antony is also able to
In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Antony remarks at the end of the play as he reflects on the play's events, ‘“All the conspirators save only he / Did that they did in envy of great Caesar; / He only, in a general honest thought”. A main theme throughout the play is nobility, as a Roman strived to be noble and honorable. Antony’s quote explains how Brutus became the most honorable man, while still reflecting on the play's events. Brutus struggles with this decision to murder Caesar, even if it is to end tyranny, and his emotion and conflict allow us to connect with him on a human level.
Shakespeare’s presentation of Antony as a tragic hero is superb, we are told of his highs and taken through his lows, we see him loving others and being selfish. He dies as a better person than the man we met at the beginning of the play and this is an important aspect of the tragic hero: that he has learnt something at the end of all his suffering.
In order to determine whether Antony is a tragic hero in Antony and Cleopatra, we must first define exactly what a tragic hero is, before being able to analyse whether Antony is portrayed as such. It is generally accepted that a tragic hero is a “man of noble stature”, who falls from a place grace, who exhibits many extraordinary qualities that set him apart from other men and who is a remarkable example of someone in his position. A key element of a tragic hero is that the audience must feel pity for the character’s death or downfall and there are several reasons both why the audience would feel pity for and why they wouldn’t feel pity for Antony upon his death.
I believe that the fall of Antony is just part of the love story. Antony has a great deal of affection toward Cleopatra, evident throughout the ...