Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver analysis
Analysis of the giver
The giver book summary and analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver analysis
All people are entitled to human rights including the right to choose their own path in life. The government in America lets you choose what you want to be when you grow up, what you are going to look like, and who you want to spend it with. In the novel, The Giver, by Lois Lowry and the article “How Do You Get a Job in North Korea?” they both show how the government has total control over those who live there. It also shows that those who live there do not have the freedoms that should be entitled to every human being. These governments have an overall effect on individual choice and freedom, because the people do not have any. The effect of government on choice and freedom in The Giver and “How Do You Get a Job in North Korea?” is completely however the government pictures it to be. …show more content…
“It was a secret election, made by the leaders of the community, the Committee of Elders, who took the responsibility so seriously that there were never even any jokes about the Assignments” (Lowry 15). This explains that the Committee of Elders, which in their communities government, chooses who is going to be working where based on their academics and volunteer work. “Once you’re assigned a job from the government, it is your lifelong job. … the government researches how many people are needed in each industry and location, an assigns people accordingly” (“How Do You Get a Job in North Korea?”). This shows that people of all ages do not get a say in what they want to do in the future. They do not have dreams or goals in life because they know that they will never come true (“How Do You Get a Job in North Korea?”). Even their parents know do not worry about their children’s future because there is nothing they can do about it, it is all up to the
1. Dolores Huerta was a member of Community Service Organization (“CSO”), a grass roots organization. The CSO confronted segregation and police brutality, led voter registration drives, pushed for improved public services and fought to enact new legislation. Dolores Huerta wanted to form an organization that fought of the interests of the farm workers. While continuing to work at CSO Dolores Huerta founded and organized the Agricultural Workers Association in 1960. Dolores Huerta was key in organizing citizenship requirements removed from pension, and public assistance programs. She also was instrumental in passage of legislation allowing voters the right to vote in Spanish, and the right of individuals to take the driver’s license examination in their native language. Dolores Huerta moved on to working with Cesar Chavez. Dolores was the main person at National Farm Workers Association (“NFWA”) who negotiated with employers and organized boycotts, strikes, demonstrations and marches for the farm workers.
Have you ever wondered about a “perfect” world? What if the world wasn’t so “perfect” after all? Jonas lives in a “perfect” world but wants to get out. Truman lives in a “perfect” worls also, and wants to escape too. Both doesn’t understand what is going on because there worlds control everything, but then the crushing truth comes out. You’ll now find out the simularites of the giver and the truman show.
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
There are many differences and similarities. The book The Giver and the movie The Truman Show are somewhat alike and somewhat different. Both characters have complicated, yet “perfect” lifestyles.
The Giver is about a boy named Jonas who was chosen to be the community’s next Receiver of Memory. He lived in a community where everything was chosen for the citizens, and everything was perfect. During Jonas' training, he realized that the community was missing something and that there was more in the world. Jonas wanted everybody to know that. The Giver book was then made into a movie. Though the two were based with the same story plot, there are three important differences that results with two different takes on the same story. The three main differences between the book and the movie are Asher and Fiona's Assignments, the similarity all Receivers had, and the Chief Elder's role.
Modern-Day America is far from a utopia, but still not to be considerd a dystopia.America cannot be compatable to the futuristic society of The Giver by Lois Lowry. They both have bad qualities, such as America has a problem with racism, while in The Giver the goverment eliminates choices. In additionto that both societies have a problems with birth controll. Modern-Day America and The Giver has their ups and downs.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
"North Korea: Human rights concerns." Amnesty Australia. Amnesty International, 28 Nov. 2006. Web. 2 May 2014. .
In 1984 the people are always watched by telescreens, which plays propaganda for the party and big brother 24/7”The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously” page 3. In North Korea the citizens can look out a window and see instant propaganda about their infamous leaders Kim Jun Un and his relatives. In North Korea, if someone expresses hatred or rebellion towards the government, then they get privileges taken away like being able to eat or murdered in the cruelest ways possible. These punishments are similar to George Orwell’s interpretation of a controlling government, for example, if someone shows resentment towards the party and Big Brother then they “vanish” and no one knows what happens to them until they turn up in society again as seen in page 75” As often happened, they had vanished for a year or more, so that one did not know if they were dead or alive”. North Korea also takes away individuality by limiting the freedoms of by people, by only legalizing 25- 30 types of haircuts and making the people wear certain clothes or uniforms. In 1984 individuality is also limited by the party. The subjects are not allowed to choose who they marry, but instead are given a random partner. They also lowered standards of craftsmanship to eliminate beauty which drive individualism to grow. Both North Korea and 1984 governments provide the people with false news making
(migrationinformation, 2008). Citizens of North Korea do not attain the freedom to leave and experience other states. North Korea’s lack of freedom not only affects their citizens but also individuals from other countries in a negative sense, cutting off social bonds as a result. Not having mobility rights is an infringement on their negative liberty on account of the option of immigrating or emigrating not being available to them due to the laws placed by the government. In actuality, citizens “caught emigrating or helping others cross the border illegally are detained” (migrationinformation, 2008).
No one would ever think that a small country could create a controversy known the world over, but North Korea has achieved this goal. The North Korean genocide has claimed 2000 people a day and these killings are from starvation and beating. Many people think communism is better than democracy, but it has its faults. For example, North Korea is Communist and whatever the leader’s beliefs, the Communist citizen has to believe. What is happening and what happened is genocide.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
In North Korea life was incredibly different, and is still different, from life in America. The residents of North Korea live in extreme poverty, while Kim Jong Il and any member of Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea live as if they were kings; their meals filled with delicacies the citizens of North Korea can only dream of. Although it’s found strange to most in "normal" society, Kim Jong Il is revered as a God, because it is he who gave them all the “luxuries” in North Korea. When in actuality, he is the sole culprit of North Korea’s extreme poverty.
In Lois Lowry’s novel, The Giver, the author reveals that choices are not to be underestimated, for each choice comes with its own pros and cons. An example of this is when the Giver is teaching Jonas about the community’s past in the Annex, and the Giver lectures, “We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others”(Lowry 95). This reveals in the community’s past that they had to choose to make sacrifices in order to gain benefits. Even as the community makes choices that gives them desired results, they have to suffer some losses.
Would you like to choose your own job when you are older? A democratic society allows you to choose your own job like you can choose to be a firefighter, or a cop, or even a cook. But, when you get to that age where you need a job don’t you want to do what you love to do or