Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research paper on kate chopins life
Research papers about kate chopin biography
Research papers about kate chopin biography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A perfect world where people accept everyone seems like a nice idea. Unfortunately, most people have no filter and will judge others. While the narrator from “Cathedral” and Armand from “Désirée’s Baby” are both extremely judgmental, the narrator soon comes to realize that there is more to a person than physical appearance, whereas Armand is left unsatisfied with himself due to his judgments about skin color. Through the use of the two opinionated men, Kate Chopin and Raymond Carver demonstrate how people who are too judgmental will mourn in their loneliness, whereas those who overcome prejudice find joy.
Chopin and Carver reveal through the narrator and Armand how making quick judgments creates faulty relationships. In "Cathedral" Robert,
…show more content…
a blind man that will soon visit the narrator and his wife, is a victim of the narrator’s rude remarks: “‘Maybe I can take him bowling’” (Carver 61). The rude comment, stating how the narrator will take Robert bowling despite his blindness, shows how cruel and cold hearted the narrator is toward someone who is different than him. In addition, the narrator also attacks Robert’s wife asking if she “‘was…a negro’” just because her name is Beulah (61). The narrator questions her race not because he is actually curious, but because he is not too fond of Robert. The narrator also questions whether Robert can fulfill the needs of a woman who has her sight. With the judgments made by the narrator about a blind man, Armand is no different than the narrator. Armand is confronted with the question on what the baby's skin color means and responds with, “‘that the child is not white; it means that you are not white’” (Chopin 660). Armand, after having already shown great love for his baby, suddenly disproves of him, because the baby is not white. Armand lets his judgments take control which causes him to care less for his own child. Désirée is upset about the situation and asks Armand “‘do you want me to go?’” to which he responds, “‘Yes, I want you to go’” (661). Because Armand is not happy with his black baby, he is willing to lose Désirée, his wife, which does not seem to bother him that he will. Armand is ashamed because his child and decides it would be best for him to be alone and not bothered. Both the narrator and Armand express themselves openly which leads to problems within themselves. Chopin and Carver depict how unnecessary judgments and remarks can be the building blocks for disaster. Carver exposes how making judgments according to stereotypes makes the narrator overlook the truth.
At the beginning of the story the narrator states how “My idea of blindness came from the movies… the blind moved so slowly and never laughed” (Carver 60). Because the narrator makes all his assumptions from movies, Carver shows how ignorant he is be about someone he has never met. People who are quick to judge tend to be caught off guard by the unexpected truths of the person they judged. The narrator hears how Robert’s wife has passed and says, "'I found myself thinking what a pitiful life this woman must have led. Imagine a woman who could never see herself as she was seen in the eyes of her loved one’” (62). What the narrator does not understand is that there is more to love than appearance. Robert can see his wife, but in a different way; Robert sees his wife’s beauty by touch. The narrator is makes too many assumptions based on stereotypes: “‘I’d always thought dark glasses were a must for the blind’” (63). The narrators thought of the blind, to his surprise, proves to be wrong. The narrator, though a unimportant discovery, finds out about how he was wrong about Robert leading him closer the finding the truth. Both the narrator and Armand are eventually exposed to the truth, but make different …show more content…
choices. Just like the narrator, Armand fails to understand the truth, which causes a failing relationship because he is so blindly racist.
When Armand was younger, his "rule was a strict one... and under it his negroes had forgotten how to be gay" (659). The fact that Armand's rules are harsh enough to restrict his slaves from being happy shows how cruel his mindset is as well as how strong his racism is; which later advances how he reacts to the race of his own child. Armand goes through a pile of papers and reads through a letter that says, “‘…I thank the good God for having so arranged our lives that...Armand will never know his mother...belongs to the race that is cursed with the brand of slavery’” (Chopin 661). Before Armand finds evidence that it he is black, he is quick to put the blame on his wife for being the one who carries the black race in her blood. Désirée comes to Armand asking questions about the baby to which he replies, “‘It means… that the child is not white; it means you are not white’” (660). Before coming to any other conclusion, Armand stays with the idea that it is not him who is black and leaves the blame on his loved one causing her to feel ashamed about herself. Chopin and Carver present the idea that people who cannot put aside their own selfish assumptions tend to destroy anything that means something to them, leaving them to face the ultimate
consequences. Both characters are driven by their ideas of others, but the narrator soon overcomes his flawed attitude while Armand is trapped within his judgments. Long after Robert arrives, the narrator states, “‘I’m glad for your company’” (Carver 66). The narrator has time to spend with the blind man doing whatever the narrator desires. Robert goes along with everything the narrator does and finds that Robert’s company is enjoyable and Robert says, “‘We’ll do something. We’ll draw one together’” (68). By spending the short amount of time with Robert, the narrator starts to see like a blind person sees. The fact that the narrator is allowing Robert to join in activities without making a rude remark or gesture, proves that once the narrator passes the judgmental stage, it allows him to find the goodness in Robert. The Armand, on the other hand, is still trapped in his life of judgments. Armand “thought Almighty God had dealt cruelly and unjustly with him” because of the fact that he was given a black child (Chopin 661). Armand did everything to himself because of his unjust racism, being the reason for his imperfect son and fails to get past what is stopping him from being happy, thus making his own life a disaster. Désirée tells Armand, “‘Good-by…’” as Armand sits there and says nothing (661). Failing to chase after Désirée because of how strong his racism is, Armand struggles to get past the obstacle in his life. If Armand had said something about his love or even simply apologized, he would still have his family there with him. Unfortunately, it is too late for him and his judgments lead to the corruption of his life. Both authors make clear that assumptions or judgments are bad for keeping something good in your life but the way people deal with them determines everything. Chopin shows that letting go of those judgments create strong and healthy friendships and how being stubborn is unhealthy to keep such relationships. Chopin and Carver help expose, through the narrator and Armand, that judgmental people can either stay reminiscing over things they once had or they can be strong enough to bypass their own judgments and find joy. Individuals are caught in between the worst trait of all, being too judgmental. The trouble with being too opinionated is that it has potential to destroy any type of relationship. Even if people state that their judgments will never rule them, those judgments can find way to expose itself. Someone being able to control their thoughts has an advantage over those who fail to hold them back. If judgments are able to be controlled and kept to a minimum, people who are open-minded can allow others into their lives resulting in the possibility of successful and strong relationships.
Carver provides an easy, visual outlook of the protagonist throughout the short story, which helps keep a better understanding during the simple yet intense experience. As the story continues, the protagonist enhances his mood as he aids Robert to visualizing a cathedral. This experience creates an impact on others because it is a great reason to why one should never judge someone of something beyond their controls. Also, helping someone, as Robert does for Bub can be a life changing experience. Despite the blind man being physically blind, the husband is the one with the disability to see from someone else’s perspective. This is proven through his epiphany during his portrayal of being blind. Although Bub is not physically blind, he interprets a shortage of observations. This shows that in many ways he is blinder than Robert. Robert is more open minded and willing to experience things, in contrast to Bub, who is narrow minded and has problems opening up his mind throughout the short story. Because the protagonist does not fully try to understand his wife, it makes him look like the blind person ironically though he can visually recognize her, proving that he does not truly know her inside and out. Knowing her personally is more of reality and the husband is blind to reality. Carver definitely analyzes the protagonist’s emotions through diction and visual aid throughout the story, providing great understanding of the meaning as a
The close outside friendship between the narrator’s wife and Robert, the blind man, provokes the narrator’s insecurities. This friendship has lasted for ten long years. During those years, they have exchanged countless voice tapes wherein they both tell each other what has happened in their respective lives. Because of this, the narrator feels that his wife has told Robert more than Robert needs to know. The narrator laments, "she told him everything or so it seemed to me" (1054). The narrator’s fear is somehow confirmed when Robert arrives and says that he feels like they have already met (1055). The narrator is left wondering what his wife has disclosed. This murky situation leaves the narrator feeling insecure, especially when he sees the warm interaction between his wife and Robert.
Carver writes about three different characters with a focus on the development of the narrator himself. Although the reader never know her name, the narrator’s wife plays a small role in the story. She introduces the reader to the blind man. When the wife is in the room with both of the men, things seem to go wrong between the two men. The narrator seems to be almost nervous and upset with the wife for paying so much attention to the blind
The narrator's insensitivity reveals itself early in the story when his wife's blind friend, Robert, comes for a visit after the death of his wife. Almost immediately in the beginning of the story the narrator admits "A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to." [Carver 2368] He even goes so far as to suggest to his wife that he take the man bowling. He hears the story of Robert's dead wife and can not even imagine " what a pitiful life this woman must have led." [Carver 2370] The narrator is superficial, only recognizing the external part of people and not recognizing the value of a person on the inside.
The narrator’s prejudice makes him emotionally blind. His inability to see past Robert’s disability stops him from seeing the reality of any relationship or person in the story. And while he admits some things are simply beyond his understanding, he is unaware he is so completely blind to the reality of the world.
The usage of first person point of view traps the reader within the mind of a character who is closed off and narrow-minded for the duration of the story in such a way that it “tell 's nothing, but shows everything (Messer)” at the same time. In this way, the reader goes through the series of realizations with the narrator which convey the message of blindness in correlation with true sight and a spiritual awakening. For instance, the narrator can only feel pity for Robert’s wife, Beulah, because he was never able to see her. He imagined that Robert 's wife “could, if she wanted, wear green eye-shadow around one eye, a straight pin in her nostril, yellow slacks, and purple shoes” (Mays). However, none of this really matted to Robert, and the narrator finds it utterly pathetic. Yet, the narrator never really understands the fact that he does not really know his own wife, regardless of the fact that he can physically see her. Additionally, within the first paragraph, Carver uses demonstratives and possessives to draw the reader close to the Narrator of the story while also constructing a psychological distance between the narrator and other characters in the story (Peterson). In this paragraph, Carver uses the demonstrative “this” as a word to indicate distance, metaphorically, between the narrator and Robert (Peterson). In particular the sentence, “This blind man, an old friend of my wife 's, he was on his way to spend the night (Mays 33)” demonstrates the use of this as a specific person while showing the distance and dislike the narrator has of Robert. As a result, the narrators prejudice is presented to the reader in a way that shows his blindness as
In Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," the husband's view of blind men is changed when he encounters his wife's long time friend, Robert. His narrow minded views and prejudice thoughts of one stereotype are altered by a single experience he has with Robert. The husband is changed when he thinks he personally sees the blind man's world. Somehow, the blind man breaks through all of the husband's jealousy, incompetence for discernment, and prejudgments in a single moment of understanding.
His, "idea of blindness came from the movies", where, "...the blind move slowly and never laughed" (Carver 98). These misconceptions of blindness form barriers between the blind and the sighted. Carver breaks down these barriers as he brings the vastly different lives of these two men together. Those of us with sight find it difficult to identify with the blind. This man, like most of us, can only try to imagine what life is like for Robert.
In Raymond Carver’s story “Cathedral” the narrator learns what it means to “see” through someone who cannot. To see is to be able to view the things around us while putting aside preconceived notions or fear about these objects or people. In order for this to occur once must overcome what they feel is out of the ordinary and learn to accept things as they are. At first the narrator is doesn’t accept the man and uncomfortable around Robert. The narrator soon comes to understand this when he puts aside his fears, and judgments that he can see more than what meets the eye, and the freedom that comes along with this seeing.
He constantly complains that “a blind man in my house was not something [he looked] forward to” (362). The close friendship between the narrator’s wife and Robert provokes his insecurities. This friendship has lasted for ten years and during those years, they have exchanged countless tapes regarding experiences they have gone through. Because of this, her husband feels “she [has] told him everything or it seems” (363) about their relationship. Upon the arrival of his wife’s friend, the husband is ultimately uncomfortable around Robert because he does not know how to communicate with or act around him.
The narrator also feels intimidated by his wife?s relationship with the blind man. When he is telling of her friendship with Robert h...
This theme goes hand in hand with the theme portrayed in Hills Like White Elephants. In the story the narrator, whose name is never mentioned, has something against his wife’s blind friend, Robert, due to the fact that he cannot see. Robert visits the narrator and the narrator’s wife for company. It seems that the narrator had a preconceived idea that all blind people are boring, depressed, stupid, and are barely even human at all based on the fact that they cannot see the world. Robert, although he is blind, is a caring and outgoing person who is extremely close with the narrator’s wife. The fact that Robert is extremely close with the narrator’s wife should be reason enough for the narrator to accept him as a person, but he is a cold and shallow person with no friends. His relationship with his wife is lacking good communication and seems very bland. Robert’s wife recently passed away, but their relationship was deep and they were truly in love with each other. The narrator was blind to how a woman could work with, sleep with, be intimate with, and marry Robert as has he talks about how he felt sorry for her. The narrator is superficial and does not understand true love or
The husband in Raymond Carvers “Cathedral” wasn’t enthusiastic about his wife’s old friend, whom was a blind man coming over to spend the night with them. His wife had kept in touch with the blind man since she worked for him in Seattle years ago. He didn’t know the blind man; he only heard tapes and stories about him. The man being blind bothered him, “My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed. Sometimes they were led by seeing-eye dogs. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to. (Carver 137)” The husband doesn’t suspect his ideas of blind people to be anything else. The husband is already judging what the blind man will be like without even getting to actually know him. It seems he has judged too soon as his ideas of the blind man change and he gets a better understanding of not only the blind man, but his self as well.
...h it emotionally detached without the pleasure of living. In the end, when the narrator has his eyes closed drawing the cathedral, he is the most open he has even been to the world. The narrator’s limited point of view in the story was crucial in showing the reader that what will hold you back the most in life are your biases and judgments. If the story was told in Robert’s point of view, it would have been a joyful story about visiting a long time friend, even with the tragedy of his wife’s death. We would have never known of the prejudices that were held inside the husband, and no true theme would have come from the story. The limited point of view was used in a way that expanded upon the theme even more, and made for a stronger story structure.
In the story of “Desiree’s Baby” by Kate Chopin, there are many literary themes that can be analyzed such as love, racism, gender inequality, and miscegenation. What this analysis will focus on is primarily on the central male character, Armand Aubigny, and on his views towards racism. More specifically, what this essay will aim to prove is that Armand Aubigny looked down upon the African race to the point where he hated them. One of the biggest driving points to aid this idea is how his family name shaped his behavior and actions according to the societal normalities of his time period. Another important aspect that will be considered is his very relationship towards his slaves in how he treated them cruelly even to the point where he is described as “having the spirit of Satan” (Chopin 3). In addition to this, the reader will also see Armand’s negative reaction to being aware of the implications of his son and wife having mixed blood in where he practically disowns them. With all this culminating to Armand finding out the ugly truth that the race he had treated so horribly is actually a part of his very own blood as well.