Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The outsiders middle of book theme society and class
The relationship between poverty and inequality
The relationship between poverty and inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The outsiders middle of book theme society and class
“When all is over and done, now which of these men was the richer one?” This line from the poem “Poverty and Wealth” states how no matter how much money you own, the person who is happy with themselves is truly rich. The novel “The Outsiders” is a great example of this theme. The poor man in this poem represents the greasers, the rich man represents the socs, and the final line of the poem represents how the socs have more privileges and money but the greasers enjoy themselves much more.
In the poem “Poverty and Wealth” the poor man and the greasers are very similar. The poor man works on a farm and lives in poverty. While the greasers don’t work on farms, they certainly don’t make a lot of money. A lot of greasers make their money by gambling, or jumping people. The greasers live in a town where everyone is very poor, doesn’t get treated very nicely, and where everyone smokes because of propaganda. Everyone in their neighborhood has to carry around a weapon in fear of being jumped. The greasers like it where they live, they have their gangs and friends and are contempt. Both the poor man and the greasers live in poverty and are poor, but they are both ok with where and how they live.
…show more content…
Both the socs and the rich man are wealthy. As it says in the poem “And proud with the pride of a millionair.” The socs clearly have a lot of money with their nice clothes, their fancy cars, and even the way they act. Another similarity is that the rich man is very aloof, sure he traveled the world and bought friends and possessions, but he was very lonely. This is like the socs who have everything in their advantage and are still looking for happiness. As Cherry says in the novel “The Outsiders”, “You greasers have a different set of values. You’re more emotional.” This is how the rich man and the socs are
For example, Dally is one of the poor greasers from the east side of the city, and Bob is a very rich Soc from the west side of the city. Dally, being a greaser from the east side of the city, has very little material wealth. Ponyboy states about all the greasers, “We’re poorer than the Socs and the middle class” (3). What little money Dally has he earns riding in local rodeos. He does not even own a car, but borrows Buck Merill’s when he needs one. In fact, Dally does not even have a permanent home. Ponyboy states that Dally “lived anywhere he could” (105). Therefore, Dally is an underprivileged greaser with little money and few possessions. On the contrary, Bob Sheldon is one of the extremely rich Socs from the west side of the city. Bob has no reason to work because everything he wants is handed to him by his affluent parents. Ponyboy describes the Socs, Bob’s click, as “the jet set, the West-side rich kids” (2). The Socs all seem to drive around in expensive sports cars and wear costly madras clothing, and Bob is no exception. Randy states that Bob’s parents “‘spoiled him rotten’” (116). Unlike Dally, Bob has everything he wants. Money and material things are not a concern. Clearly, financial circumstances set these two
Tobias Wolff’s “The Rich Brother” is a story of two brothers, Donald and Pete. These brothers have very contrasting lifestyles; Pete is a successful businessman with a wife and kids. Donald, on the other hand, is an outcast. He’s unemployed and irresponsible. He lives his life as a vagabond. Despite these facts, the successful brother, Pete, still lacks the self-esteem he desperately craves. Therefore he tries to make his brother, Donald, feel foolish with every chance he gets.
The notion of poverty has a very expanded meaning. Although all three stories use poverty as their theme, each interprets it differently. Consequently, it does not necessarily mean the state of extreme misery that has been described in ?Everyday Use?. As Carver points out, poverty may refer to poverty of one?s mind, which is caused primarily by the lack of education and stereotyped personality. Finally, poverty may reflect the hopelessness of one?s mind. Realizing that no bright future awaits them, Harlem kids find no sense in their lives. Unfortunately, the satisfaction of realizing their full potential does not derive from achieving standards that are unachievable by others. Instead, it arises uniquely from denigrating others, as the only way to be higher than someone is to put this person lower than you.
Sam makes the wrong choice, and subsequently, makes the rest of his life more difficult, as he admits that he must live his life under another class of people, the wealthy, as though he is less than them. By admitting that he is less than them, Sam has started to live his life not for the happiness he can obtain, but for the wealth he can obtain.
Researchers have proven that people with a lot of paraphernalia are normally not as cheery than less privileged people. There are many statements with a theme in these two writings. The poor man and greasers have simple needs which helps them be more joyful. The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton and the poem “Poverty and Wealth”, have similar themes. One of the themes in the poem and the Outsiders is, money can't buy happiness.
Greasers were the lowest among the society. The society had negative thoughts towards Greasers, because there were not many things people expected from the Greasers other than doing bad things such as stealing, having rumble, and other bad things that happened around the society. Not every Greaser does bad things, however, the Greasers took the blame for anything bad even if it was the Socs fault. It is because everyone expected the Greasers to do bad things instead of the Socs. Even though the Greasers had a bad reputation, they didn’t care, but instead they enjoyed their lives. Sometimes the Greasers do bad things but only for fun and because it was the society’s expectations. If the Greasers did something good, no one would expect or believe the Greasers did it. No one would ever expect the Greasers to be heroes, just like the man whose kids were saved by Johnny, Ponyboy, and Dallas. “’Mrs. O’Briant and I think you were sent straight from heaven. Or are you just professional heroes or something?’ Sent from heaven? Had he gotten look at Dallas? ‘No, we’re greasers.’” (Page...
The author juxtaposes the rich and poor with those in between in order to convince the audience, the middle class, that they should follow in the footsteps of both those richer and poorer than them in order to cease their materialistic attitudes. Near the end of the essay, Eighner states, “I think this is an attitude I share with the very wealthy—we both know there is plenty more where what we have came from. Between us are the rat-race millions who have confounded their selves with the objects they grasp and who nightly scavenge the cable channels looking for they know not what.” The author is stating that the wealthy and the homeless are both aware that there are things more important in life than tangible objects. Everyone else, however, has not made this connection yet and still searches, meaninglessly, for something of value. The middle class is often known to aspire to...
After all, they are the “out” group— the clique that society condones. Ponyboy, the protagonist, also identifies himself as part of them. While reading Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, he felt Pip, the main character reminded him of the greasers–”the way he felt marked lousy because he wasn’t a gentleman or anything, and the way that girl kept looking down on him” (Doc B). Greasers are lookeed down opon in society becuase they aren’t rich, and the image associated with them is negative. They are believed to be a general menace to society; people think they all steal stuff for kicks, attack innocent bystanders for no reason, and are uneducated hoodlums. They are outsiders to society as a whole. Pony, no matter how smart or talented he may be, will always be treated as an outsider by the Socs just because he’s a
The fisherman states, “I am not rich or poor, but I am happy” (29). The fisherman believes that Allah determines if someone is rich or poor. This man brings in only enough money just to keep himself from not being hungry and his boat running, and is okay with every aspect of his life. Even though the poor might are tight on funds, they have their own meaning of what it is to be rich. Vollmann encounters a prostitute named Angelica in Mexicali and asks why some people poor are and why some people are rich, she states “that there is no such thing as being rich or poor, are just humans” (Vollmann 43). She also points out that to see yourself as rich you must have a precise goal. Angelica does not believe that she is poor because she is able to work and make money. She also brings up that individuals should spend their money on beneficial things and not on things they truly do not need or require. Vollmann’s encounters an elderly Japanese man at a camp who responds that his description of poverty was not because religion or predestined life, but instead the absence of his capability to work because of old age. Concurring to Vollmann, concludes for the reason that he is a bystander, he relates to their everyday life to his personal, as well as the city he lives
The heart of the whole notion of wealth lies in the setting of the novel, the east and west eggs of New York City. The west egg was a clustering of the "Nouveau riche" or the newly acquired rich, and the east egg was where the people who inherited their riches resided. The eggs divided the people rich in two with the poor being limited to the middle, the "valley of ashes". Even the way the narrator, Nick Carraway, describes the two communities' gives off a feeling of superiority. Nick describes the east as " the less fashionable of the two, through this is a most superficial tag to express the bizarre and not a little sinister contrast between them" (...
In the story “The Rich Brother,” written by Tobias Wolff, a teacher of creative writing at Stanford, a Vietnam veteran, and winner of the Los Angeles Times Book Award, he writes about two brothers. The two brothers, Pete and Donald, are having a conversations on the trip back to Pete’s house. Rich can foremost be defined as having a great deal of of money or assets, this definition can lead the reader to claim that Pete is the rich brother, however rich can also be defined as pure or nearly pure, so by definition both brothers can be rich in different ways. Likewise the main two questions that the story creates are: what does it mean to be rich, and who is the rich brother, Pete or Donald. The word rich is a versatile word with many definitions.
Society today is split in many different ways: the smart and the dumb, the pretty and the ugly, the popular and the awkward, and of course the rich and the poor. This key difference has led to many areas of conflict among the population. The rich and the poor often have different views on issues, and have different problems within their lives. Moral decay and materialism are two issues prevalent among the wealthy, while things such as socio-economic class conflict and the American dream may be more important to those without money. Ethics and responsibilities are an area of thought for both classes, with noblesse oblige leaning more towards the wealthy.
One thing I like about this book is how the authors demonstrate wealth as what one accumulates not what one spends. They also share that most wealthy people do not live in luminous upscale houses and neighborhoods, instead live in middle class. Wealthy people tend to live in middle class areas to save their money, even though they can afford to live in upper class areas. Living middle class saves money they can invest. Another thing I like about this book, it describes an average millionaire.
John Barton remarks on the rich knowing “nothing of the trials of the poor” (I). He continues, adding a religious dimension, “we pile up their fortunes with the sweat of our brows, and yet we are to live as separate as if we were in two worlds; ay as Dives and Lazarus”
..., a person who earns $25,000 is happier than a person who makes $125,000 and an employee who makes $500,000 is only slightly happier than someone who makes $55,000. Lastly, there are more important things in life that and make you happy, for example, friends. They don’t come with a price tag, and if they do, you definitely need new friends. Money won’t make you happy since good times can’t be bought. You don’t need a fancy vacation to have a good time; it’s just a matter of who you spend it with. Over the years, humans have blown the value of money way out of proportion. People make it seem like if you’re not filthy rich, then you won’t live a good life but it’s not true. You can lack money and yet still live a perfect, happy life.