Comparing Plato, James Madison, and John Mills

557 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Plato concept of knowledge

Comparing Plato, James Madison, and John Mills

Plato, James Madison, and John Mills are all supporters of the idea that opinion must be discussed in public debate. In my own reason-based thought this idea that through silence ignorance grows louder is my own general understanding.

In Plato's The Republic he discuses the idea that there is first knowledge at the first degree. In the second degree there is opinion which is neither proven to be true or false. In the last degree is falsehood. He argues that opinion is not pure knowledge and therefore can not be pure truth. Plato goes on to say, "But surely when a man is deceived in his own mind we can fairly call his ignorance of the truth "true falsehood". For a false statement is merely some kind of representation of a state of mind, an expression consequent on it, and not the original unadulterated falsehood." This is also true for pure knowledge. The truth we believe in our own mind is true to us; it's called our opinion. This shows that in order to form pure knowledge we have to voice the truth that is in our mi...

Show More
Related

  • Aristotle And Plato's Influences On The Constitution

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the past thousands of years, many people, ideas, and cultures have help mold the Constitution into what it is today. Ideas have been taken from the ancient times, from the Romans and the Greek, and up to early American history with the Magna Carta and the House of Burgesses. In making the Constitution, the framers looked at ancient literature, and ideas from Plato and Aristotle, to more modern ideas and literature such as the works of John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu.

    Read More

  • James Madison and the Federalist Papers

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    On September 17, 1787, the Philadelphia Convention sent their new constitution to the states for ratification. The Federalists highly approved of the Constitution because it allowed for a more central and powerful government that was previously undermined under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists, however, didn’t want a powerful central government, but, instead, powerful state governments; in response to the Constitution, many Anti-Federalists began writing essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists attempt at getting states to not ratify the Constitution, many Federalists developed a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast James Madison And The Federalist Paper

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the late 1700s, it was apparent that the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation did not establish the type of government needed to keep the nation together as a nation-state. The American people needed to find a more effective way to govern themselves and this was no easy feat. Most Americans had varying political thoughts in the 18th century. The challenge because how to best take care of the masses in a fair and equitable way. In May 1787, a group of delegated appointed by the state governments met in Philadelphia for The Constitutional Convention. This group decided they could not revise the Articles of Confederation and decided to create a reasonable national system. This

    Read More

  • Madison And Jefferson's Federalist Ideas

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    From 1801-1817 there was a clear separation of the United States. The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties were in strong opposition of one another. Though the Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists, who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists, both Jefferson and Madison's presidencies highlighted Federalist ideals in many of their decisions. This included Jefferson's unconstitutional decision in purchasing the vast Louisiana territory and Madison's

    Read More

  • Comparing the Views of Plato and Abraham Lincoln on the Civil War

    1281 Words  | 3 Pages

    Comparing the Views of Plato and Abraham Lincoln on the Civil War. Lincoln believed that a system of government divided among itself was doomed to collapse; "a house divided cannot stand. " This philosophy's earliest roots are evident in Plato's masterpiece, The Republic.

    Read More

  • James Madison: The Father of The Constitution

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison was born in 1751; he was the oldest of 12 children. He was from a wealthy Virginian family. James was a small child and was not healthy or rambunctious; he spent a lot of time reading. He was married later in life to Dolley Payne Todd and had no children. Madison attended the College of New Jersey which later took the name of Princeton University; he took a liking to history and politics, that opened bigger doors for the soon to be president of the United States.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Constitution Of James Madison And Thomas Jefferson

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    The person who wrote this constitution is James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. They both wrote the constitution, someone I believed it was a girl that brought James good luck to wright the condition. Thomas was helping James with the constitution by making suges to put in the constitution. James and Thomas was working so hard on the constitution that they probably proof read it so it makes scents to them and other people. They were probably proud of themselves for finessing the constitution together and liked the way they have it.

    Read More

  • Plato's Doctrine of Recollection

    412 Words  | 1 Pages

    Since the Forms are stable and perfect, knowledge of the Forms is infallible and certain. Plato differentiates between true knowledge - knowledge of the Forms, and true opinion - claims about particulars, which can be based on empirical testing of our world as well as on our implicit knowledge of the Forms. We might claim that the sun will rise tomorrow, but do not have true knowledge of this event, since nothing in our world is fixed. The sun, for example, is continuously changing temperature and size. Similarly, while a true opinion of the Form of Virtue might lead us to act virtuously in many situations, knowledge of Virtue would lead us to act with Virtue in every situation.

    Read More

  • Plato vs. Aristotle

    350 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thirdly, Plato and Aristotle hold contrasting views on the mechanism of finding the truth. Plato relied on the ability to reason in his attempt to explain the world. He produced his ideal world based on reason since such a world lies beyond the realm of the five senses. Plato ignored his senses because he believed his senses only revealed the imperfect forms of the ordinary world.

    Read More

  • Comparing Aristotle and Plato

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    We have two great philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great men, whose ideas have not been forgotten over years. Although their thoughts of politics were similar, we find some discrepancies in their teachings. The ideas stem from Socrates to Plato to Aristotle. Plato based moral knowledge on abstract reason, while Aristotle grounded it on experience and tried to apply it more to concrete living. Both ways of life are well respected by many people today.

    Read More

  • The Republic of Plato

    1306 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plato and Aristotle were both very influential men of there time bringing vast knowledge to the world. I honestly believe that Democracy does a lot of good but it definitely has some common side effects. Out of all of Plato's significant ideas, his best was the idea of democracy opening political decisions to the majority who cannot think on behalf of the community. Aristotle on the other hand is very optimistic when it comes to democracy so it becomes a rather interesting compare and contrast between these to men.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Plato And Nietzsche

    821 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato believes that the truth comes from the forms, and is a fixed idea that cannot be changed. He suggests that the Forms are the only true objects that can provide individuals with a knowledge of the truth: they are universal and go beyond human experience. The only way to look and learn from the forms is to die because it is a journey for the souls. A person, who has lived a life of honor and shame will see the forms more closely as compared to the one who lived a life of insolence, and thus will know the greater truth depending on the life they live. However, Nietzsche comments that if the way to find the truth is to die, then basically the truth is dead, which indirectly means that truth does not exist. Nietzsche says, “The pride connected with knowing and sensing lies like a blinding fog over the eyes and senses of men, thus deceiving them concerning the value of existence. (Nietzsche: On truth and lies, pg. 53). By this he means that if we chooses to follow the already defined path, it is like fog that covers the senses and the eyes of a man, which interrupts our mental processing to be able to think differently. Since Nietzsche believes that there is no real truth he want individuals to be creative, and not consider the fixed idea as the real truth. Plato disagrees because he believes in the theory of recollection and so presumes that souls learn everything from the past experiences and forgets details over it transmission from one body to another. For Plato, remembering is like recalling the truth from our past

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle On Government

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato and Aristotle both established important ideas about politics and their government. The general idea these two men wrote about were tyranny and the rule of law. What the rule of law is stating is that no one is immune from the law, even the people who are in a position of power. The rule of law served as a safeguard against tyranny because laws just ensure that rulers don’t become more corrupt. These two philosophers explored political philosophy and even though they didn’t agree on much they’re impacts are still around the world today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Plato

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato were two of the most influential and knowledgeable ancients in our history. Their contributions and dedication to science, language and politics are immensely valued centuries later. But while the two are highly praised for their works, they viewed several subjects entirely differently, particularly education practices, and human ethics and virtue.

    Read More

  • Arguments of Plato in The Republic and Aristotle in Poetics

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mimesis, the ‘imitative representation of the real world in art and literature’ , is a form that was particularly evident within the governance of art in Ancient Greece. Although its exact interpretation does vary, it is most commonly used to describe artistic creation as a whole. The value and need for mimesis has been argued by a number of scholars including Sigmund Freud, Philip Sydney and Adam Smith, but this essay will focus on the arguments outlined by Plato in The Republic and Aristotle in Poetics, attempting to demonstrate the different features of imitation (mimesis) and what it involves for them both. In Plato’s The Republic, he discusses what imitation (mimesis) signifies to him and why he believed it was not worthy of the credit or appreciation it was so often given. In Aristotle’s Poetics on the other hand, he highlights the importance of imitation not just in art, but also in everyday life and why imitation within tragedy is necessary for human development.

    Read More

More about Comparing Plato, James Madison, and John Mills

Open Document