Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast nora and mrs linde in a doll's house
Compare and contrast nora and mrs linde in a doll's house
Compare and contrast between mrs. linden and nora in a doll's house
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll House and Susan Glaspell’s Trifles a crime is committed. Both Nora and Mrs. Hale committed a crime that they believed to be the right thing to do. Nora from A Doll House committed forgery, but she did it to save her husband’s life. On the other hand Mrs. Hale from Trifles withheld evidence from the sheriff, but in her mind it was the right thing to do. Both Nora and Mrs. Hale committed a crime. The only question is; was it the right thing to do? Or was it the wrong thing to do. In the plays A Doll House and Trifles a question is asked, was it the right thing to do even if it was illegal, and should the women be punished. In the play A Doll House the crime in question was committed a seven years before the time of the play. Nora’s husband was very sick and need to move to a warmer climate to save his life according to the doctors, but they did not have the money to do it. So Nora got a …show more content…
Hale. One in particular that stands out is that they both oppressed women, but that they were both victims of their time. A time where to oppress women was the norm. They both lived in a time when women had to act in a specific way, which was however their husbands wanted them to act. (Mazur) Both Nora and Mrs. Hale were both treat as like children and that their thought where puerile. They were both also laughed at. While Torvald laughs at Nora’s spend thrift ways, where as she was really trying to pay off her loan. Then the sheriff and county attorney laughed and Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters for being worried about how Mrs. Wright was going to quilt her blanket. They are also similar because try both committed their crimes to protect someone else. Where Nora did it for her husband’s life. Mrs. Hale did it for Mrs. Wright’s innocence. While Nora loved her husband or at least she thinks she did, Mrs. Hale did not love Mrs. Wright, but she did feel that they were one and the same and need
Mrs. Peters suggests that over the course, she has discovered a different aspect of herself that ties more closely to her experience as a woman than to her marriage to Mr. Peters. Mrs. Hale concludes, all women go through the same things at different times. For Mrs. Hale, Minnie Wright's murder of her husband was the ultimate rejection of her husband's identity in memory of the person Mrs. Foster used to be. The play Trifles, in the murder mystery in which the women decide to hide the evidence of the crime and thus end by aiding the murderer, the story leaves this question open of the meaning of duty and justice.... ... middle of paper ...
...ome from different worlds, yet they still share the same type of sadness and pain in their everyday lives. What Nora does is considered courageous in that time in history, where women were not treated as equals and were always looked down on and ignored. Women speaking out and taking matters into their own hands was unheard of and often risky. They want to be independent so they do what they believe is necessary to accomplish and reach their goals, so that they can once again be happy for eternity.
In “A Dollhouse,” Nora is stuck in a marriage with a rich man who has no respect for her. Nora’s husband Torvald, does not think his
In the play Trifles, written by Susan Glaspell, we observe like flies on the wall as two women discover the crimes of a peer and weigh her guilt against their own. Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale find similarities within themselves and their experiences that mirror the feelings of Mrs. Wright prior to her alleged offense. Not only are we witness to this in their words, but in the stage business that takes place as well, denoted by descriptive stage direction. In their hearts, we see them struggle throughout the play with the social constructs of gender roles, guilt, and culpability.
Mrs. Hale glances in a covert way at Mrs. Peters. Pulling herself back to the table. This is an emotional direction, not a physical one. Glaspell’s decision to present "Trifles" as a play instead of its short story original form (titled: "A Jury of Her Peers") gives the reader an opportunity to "see" the action better than usual, and therefore get a clearer understanding of the author’s meaning. Major #2: What is the significance of "preserves?
In today’s society, many women are powerful, independent, and for the most part treated equal to men, but before the 1920's women were restrained by the men. Imagine what being a woman in this era would be like. In Susan Glaspell’s play “Trifles,” she addresses the life of women in the 1900’s by examining the marital relationships among the characters, specifically between Mrs. Wright and Mr. Wright, the Sheriff and Mrs. Peters, and last Mr. Hale and Mrs. Hale. Glaspell accomplishes this by separating the husbands and wives into different rooms in the home of the Wrights, leaving the women all together in the living room and kitchen, which is where they find the crime scene evidence. The point being is that the men did not consider what the
The woman in this play is a very happy mother, who does not objectify to be a stay home wife, her life is happy and although she was faced by many obstacles before, like incurring into debt to save her husband’s life, she is a happy woman as long as she possesses the love of her children and husband. Life for Nora seems as calm as it could possibly be, but soon after the promotion of her husband and the imminent consequences such promotion will bring to Krogstad, bring a new set of complication to her life. Soon her past mistakes come to haunt her. She committed forgery, by signing in place of her deceased father, which of course is taken as leverage by Krogstad, the owner of the note she signed, in order for him to conserve his
In Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House we encounter the young and beautiful Nora on Christmas Eve. Nora Helmer seems to be a playful and affectionate young woman full of life and zeal. As the play progresses, we learn that Nora is not just a “silly girl” (Ibsen) as Torvald refers to her. She learns of the business world related to debt that she acquired by taking out a loan in order to save her beloved Torvalds life. Although Krostad’s blackmail does not change Nora’s whimsical nature it opens her eyes to her underappreciated potential. “I have been performing tricks for you, Torvald,” (Find diff quote perhaps?) she exclaims in her confrontation with Torvald. She realizes that she has been putting on a facade for
Mrs. Hale’s keen wit and patience contributes to her embodiment of The Fate sister Clotho the Spinner, which is even more evident in her correcting of Minnie Wright’s improper stitching (Russell). Mrs. Peters begins the process of investigation deeply devoted to keeping the law. She doesn’t want any disruption in the house, saying, “I don’t think we ought to touch things” (Glaspell p. 666) when Mrs. Hale began searching for clues. Upon finding the dead canary, Mrs. Peters view on the situation changes drastically, and she decides with Mrs. Hale to hide the tiny dead bird from the men. They both figure that if the dead canary was discovered, Mrs. Wright would be thought to be a mad woman, though it was likely Mr. Wright who killed it.
During the time in which the play took place society frowned upon women asserting themselves. Women were supposed to play a role in which they supported their husbands, took care of their children, and made sure everything was perfect around the house. Work, politics, and decisions were left to the males. Nora's first break from social norms was when she broke the law and decided to borrow money to pay for her husband's treatment. By doing this, she not only broke the law but she stepped away from the role society had placed on her of being ...
Many times, an antagonist is someone who has completely different views from the protagonist, which cause the friction and conflict between them. Other times, however, the two are more similar than they initially appear. One such case is that of Nora Helmer and Nils Krogstad. Initially portrayed as a social deviant, Krogstad seems to stand in the way of Nora’s perfect life. However, once the similarities between the two are seen by both her and her husband, she realizes that she too will be shunned as Krogstad is, making her look at society’s conventions in a different light. In Henrik Ipsen’s A Doll’s House, Nils Krogstad is compared to Nora Helmer in their attitudes and actions so that Nora can realize the toxicity of her marriage in order
In fact, when Mrs. Hale comments that Mrs. Wright was not one for housekeeping, Mrs. Peters replies by saying “Well, I don’t know as Wright had either.” (748). The disheveled state that the house is in, as well as the fact that Mr. Wright is characterized as a hard man who is unwilling to share his part expresses the idea that their marriage was unhappy, and in turn, Mrs. Wright could have motive to harm him. Likewise, when the men leave the women to find clothes for Mrs. Wright, the two discover more possible evidence that the men will shrug off. For example, Mrs. Hale examines some quilt work that Mrs. Wright was working on, and notices that the most recent square is very sloppy compared to the rest of the work on the quilt. Moreover, the fact that they believe she crafted it by knotting is very significant (750). This correlation times closely with Mr. Wright’s time of death, and could indicate as a stressor, which the women can pick up on. Since the men laugh at their seemingly trivial observation, they are close to solving the crime on their
A contrasting difference in the characters, are shown not in the characters themselves, but the role that they play in their marriages. These women have different relationships with their husbands. Torvald and Nora have a relationship where there is no equality. To Torvald Nora is an object. Hence, she plays the submissive role in a society where the lady plays the passive role. Her most important obligation is to please Torvald, making her role similar to a slave. He too considers himself superior to her.
In the play A Doll House, by Henrik Ibsen, Nora and Torvald’s marriage seems to have been torn apart by Krogstad’s extortion plot, but in reality their marriage would have ended even without the events in the play. Torvald’s obsession with his public appearance will eventually cause him to break the marriage. Nora’s need for an identity will ultimately cause her to leave Torvald, even without Krogstad’s plot. Lastly, the amount of deception and dishonesty between Torvald and Nora would have resulted in the same conclusion sooner or later. In this essay, I will argue that Nora and Torvald’s relationship would have ended even without Krogstad’s extortion plot.
Throughout the play, the relationships between all of it’s characters can either be seen as manipulative, deceitful, or just downright fake. Nora uses Torvald for money while keeping little secrets from him like eating macaroons behind his back, Torvald uses Nora for entrainment pleasure, and Christine uses Nora to gain a job at Torvald’s bank which causes Krogstad to lose his job. This leads to the main conflict of the story, it revolves around Nora’s forgery of the loan document she gave to Krogstad. This is a crime in a legal and moral sense; legal being that Nora had committed forgery, and moral being that she kept it secret from Torvald. Because Krogstad lost his job, he threatens to expose Nora’s secret. This conflict causes a chain reaction of manipulation as Nora attempts to do everything in her power to prevent Krogstad from exposing her. Knowing about Krogstad’s history with Christine, Nora uses her to persuade Krogstad out of his decision. The cycle of lies, deceit, and manipulation is symbolic to that of a dollhouse because even though everything in the Helmer household and the relationships of the characters seemed to be perfect at the beginning of the play, it is all