Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A short essay on michelangelo
A short essay on michelangelo
How did michelangelo impact the renaissance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A short essay on michelangelo
Who is to be chosen to paint arguably one of the most glorifying and absolutely stunning Fresca paintings of all time; Michelangelo or Raphael? It is easy to make this choice now because we know that officially Michelangelo was the one who created the painting. But what if his counterpart Raphael was actually the one decided to construct this masterpiece instead?
Michelangelo is an Italian artist who specialized in sculpting. A Renaissance man, Michelangelo is known as “one of the greatest artist of his time, and maybe even one of the greatest artists to live.” At the time that he was chosen to paint the Sistine Chapel, his most well known works were The Pietà and David, two sculptures. Even though two of Michelangelo’s best works at this
…show more content…
time were sculptures, they really showed his individuality and artistic skill. For example, in La Bella Mano: Michelangelo, it states, “The Pietà is an early example of Michelangelo’s self conscious display of his craft and his skilled hand (http://www.jstor.org/).” Simply put, even though Michelangelo was only known for his sculptures at this time, he had the capabilities and the skills to create an astounding Fresca painting in the Sistine Chapel. Michelangelo’s counterpart, Raphael, was also an Italian painter. It was well known that Raphael was also an extremely productive and busy man. Many people claim to enjoy Raphael’s works because of its clarity and smoothness that it portrays. Raphael was one of the best and most glorious artists of his time. He was one of those guys who was just so immensely gifted, he could do it all. He could paint, he could do fresca’s, and he could even do oil paintings. But everyone has their rival, and for Raphael, his biggest rival was the upstart young gun, Michelangelo. Now the looming question, how did these two artists come into interaction with Pope Julius II? Michelangelo was actually contacted by Pope Julius II to start designing and sculpting his marble tomb for when he passed on. So Michelangelo went and purchased multiple tons of marble to complete this challenging proposition. However, once he got all of this marble back to his workshop, the Pope came to him with another task, to paint the Sistine Chapel. Michelangelo was furious. He was losing funding for the tomb project as it is and he just went and spent all this money and time to get the marble for the Pope and he decides he doesn't even want him to complete this project? Instead he wants him to paint a ceiling when he doesn't even paint? But Julius said that he could return to the tomb once this project was completed. So Michelangelo reluctantly agreed mostly due to the fact that he needed the paycheck and money from doing this project for the Pope. So in the end, Michelangelo accepted the Pope’s offer to paint the Sistine Chapel was because he needed to fulfill his monetary needs, not necessarily because he wanted to create a beautiful piece of art. Raphael came into contact with Pope Julius differently.
Raphael was approached by the Pope to do some designing and artwork in the Papal Apartments within the Vatican. So both Raphael and Michelangelo were approached by the Pope to do some sort of artwork for him. However, due to the rise of Michelangelo, Raphael felt very threatened. He convinced the Pope to have Michelangelo construct the Sistine Chapel in hopes that he would miserably fail or give up in rage and thus diminishing his credibility and embarrass him. But his devised plot caused the exact opposite to occur. Michelangelo took on this challenge and blew it out of the water becoming one of the most well known artists the world has ever …show more content…
known. Over the years there has been great discussion and debate over who was the most appealing of the two artists; Michelangelo and Raphael.
Personally, I find Michelangelo’s artwork and sculptures more appealing than Raphael’s. On pages 159 and 139 of Ross King’s book about Michelangelo, it shows some sketches drawn out by Michelangelo himself versus sketches by Raphael on pages 115 and 116. I think that Michelangelo’s sketches appeal to myself and the public more because they show a more masculine style and are very prominent in the facial structures. Like on Pg 159 it shows a sketch of a man on a roman sarcophagus and I really enjoyed it because of the masculine features, the muscles, the facial construction and just how overall it portrays the strength of the male persona in life. It is a very similar masculinity we see in Michelangelo’s version of David that we looked at in the powerpoint in class. The big muscles and strong bold pose is what I believe we as an audience want to see. Contra to Raphael’s sketch on Pg 115. The people portrayed in this scene just look different to me. They aren't as prominent and not necessarily defined in a muscular sense but in a overall body feature sense, the features of the body aren't as specifically portrayed as I think they should be. To me, in Raphael’s sketches, the men he draws seem extremely light and feminine to me. In my opinion I prefer the more masculine and strong personas drawn by Michelangelo versus the more soft and ladylike
sketches from Raphael at least the ones shown in King’s book. My favorite quote in King’s book is actually the very first sentence of the Epilogue when it states, “Michelangelo would actually live another 51 years after completing the Sistine Chapel, creating many more masterpieces in both paint and marble during the course of his long career.” This is my favorite quote because it shows how the Sistine Chapel project really opened up Michelangelo’s options and expanded his options from just doing sculptures. I like the story behind it of how Raphael thought he could essentially “trick” Michelangelo into taking on the Sistine Chapel hoping that he would inevitably fail and become a laughing stock of the art world, but instead Michelangelo only used that to skyrocket his career and become a more well rounded artist. So in the end, I would probably end up choosing Michelangelo to produce the artwork in the Sistine Chapel. He has already proven that he is a very skilled sculptor and sketcher that it was only a small change to Fresca painting. Although he had trouble at first, he proved that he was the right man for the job. I think Michelangelo is the right choice because we as men like to think of ourselves as tough, bold and masculine and that is exactly how Michelangelo portrayed us. He is a very talented and promising young artist who went above and beyond Pope Julius’s expectations.
Botticelli’s figures, in contrast, are elegance that similar with the classical ancient Greek sculpture. Moreover, Raphael’s colors and lines are closer to reality than Botticelli. Raphael’s colors are vibrant while Botticelli using the brighter colors which create the sense of holy and sacred. Raphael’s contour lines are softer and his shadowing is gradual changing, but Botticelli’s lines are sharp and bold obviously that the figures look like
The sistine Chapel and mainly the Creation of Adam fresco are treasures to the world of art, Michelangelo the creator brought his discipline of sculpting into painting the frescoes and the human silhouette.
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio was broadly delicate when it came to issues of aesthetic creativity: he debilitated both the painter Guido Reni and craftsman and biographer Giovanni Baglione for replicating his style. Regardless of his earnest attempts to secure his particular style, be that as it may, Caravaggio wound up noticeably a standout amongst the most generally imitated craftsmen ever.
The pieces of art I will be comparing and contrasting are the three statues of David, by Donatello (Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi), Michelangelo (Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni), and Bernini (Gian Lorenzo Bernini). The statues are modeled after the biblical David, who was destined to become the second king of Israel. Also most famously known as the slayer of the Philistine giant Goliath with a stone and a sling. The sculptures are all based on the same biblical hero, but differ from one another. Each David is unique in its own certain way.
While both the Madonna of the Meadow and Venus of Urbino are spectacular works of art, each differs and is similar in many ways. At first glance, Titian’s Venus of Urbino catches your eye because of the gold tones that Titian incorporated into his painting. Titian’s painting also has a shine to it, that Raphael’s painting does not. Raphael’s painting uses softer hues that play well with his incorporation of infants and the softness and subtle idea of the meadow. Nudity is an aspect that can be noted in both paintings, yet a sense of class is still associated with the painting as well.
Ross King, in my opinion, does a sensational job of detailing Michelangelo and his work. He gives incredible detail into the artist's personal life and relationships, as well as his views on everything from politics and war to love and family. In the book King takes a narrative approach that produces a beautifully written story with a magnitude of historical information. He really takes his readers into the life of Michelangelo and into the sixteenth century.
5).17 This fresco was painted between 1509 and 1511 and is located in the Stanza della Segnatura (one of four in Raphael’s Rooms) in Vatican City. Known as one of the most prominent masterpieces that were created during the Renaissance, this painting represents a total of twenty-one diverse figures in deep conversation, work or amusement as they share ideas, talent and philosophies. In his painting, Raphael incorporated his view on education as such an important aspect of human life. Through doing so, he utilised both the subject matter and the style of
Leonardo Da Vinci was opposed to his art even though he was a fellow florentine artist (Biography.com Editor,1). Da Vinci was challenged by Michelangelo; MIchelangelo was young enough to be Da Vinci’s son, so he did not like that someone younger than him was receiving more attention than him. After Michelangelo painted the the Sistine Chapel and “Creation of Adam”, rival Raphael changed his style of painting(Biography.com Editors, 1). Michelangelo was aggravated with Raphael, because Raphael was presenting work that displayed major similarities to Michelangelo’s (Unknown, 1). While Michelangelo was painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling Raphael was attempting to draw eyes for his painting on the papal apartments, which was obvious inspired by Michelangelo’s work. While Da Vinci was just jealous of Michelangelo’s talent, Raphael copied the creative style of
In April 1508 Pope Julius II hired Michelangelo to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel (McNeese 87). The Sistine Chapel was where major papal ceremonies took place (Summers 11). Although Julius II just wanted Michelangelo to paint the ceiling of the chapel Michelangelo had bigger ideas. By 1513, Michelangelo had around 340 figures on the ceiling of the chapel.
The Biblical Story of David, a young Israeli shepherd boy who slayed the Philistine giant, Goliath has been artistically portrayed in many different ways throughout the centuries. During the Baroque and Renaissance eras, three famous artists sculpted their own interpretation of what the Israelite King may have looked like. These men were Gianlorenzo Bernini, Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni and Donato Di Niccolo di Betto Bardi, otherwise known as Donatello.
Michelangelo Buonarroti is one of the greatest artists of the Renaissance times, as well as one of the greatest of all time. He did was a painter, a sculptor as well as an architect, excelling in all areas from a young age. Michelangelo’s art was a symbol of the Florence people’s cultural and political power and superiority. Michelangelo thought of himself as a divine being, meaning he thought he was perfection and no one could ever compare. To this day through, in terms of his art, this may hold some truth depending mostly on opinion. He created some of the most magnificent, and most sought after pieces of all time. Some of them are still around today for us to witness including Michelangelo’s Pieta, and one of his most famous Michelangelo’s David.
As we read through the third chapter of "The Last Judgment and The Critics" from Bernadine Barnes's Michelangelo's Last Judgment - The Renaissance Response, it is striking to see the two completely opposite views on the fresco by the sixteenth century critics, where " those who approved of it saw it as the height of Renaissance art; those who disapproved saw it as an unsuitable use of art" and that "it was censured as the work of an arrogant man, and it was justified as a work that made celestial figures more beautiful than natural" (71). The Last Judgment dealt with an especially evocative subject, and Michelangelo engaged viewers by creating highly imaginative scenes tempering fear with hope and by referring to contemporary events. The painting's original, elite audience--the papal court and a handful of distinguished lay persons--was sophisticated about art and poetry, almost exclusively male, and orthodox in its religious beliefs. That audience later broadened and included artists allowed into the Chapel to copy Michelangelo's work. These artists helped to create another, less sophisticated audience; one that knew the fresco only through reproductions and written descriptions.
As time went on Michelangelo goes on the create some of the best Statues and paintings known to man today. Aside from his “artistic” life Michelangelo was also an architect and a poet, he designed buildings such as the Laurentian Library and the Medici Chapel, but his biggest accomplishment came in 1546, became the head architect of Peter’s Basilica. For him when it came it poetry, he wrote over 300 poems that have come to be known as “Michelangelo's sonnets,” which are still read by people to this day. Even Though, he is known for his memorable sculptures and paintings, Michelangelo did not have the best personality. He was short-tempered, so he did not really work well with others, when Michelangelo painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, he fired all of his workers, because he wanted everything to the peak of perfection. A lot Michelangelo’s works did remain unfinished, but the ones that he did complete are still some of the best in history; from Pieta, David, The Last Judgement, to the ceiling
Michelangelo di Ludovico Buonarroti Simoni was a painter, sculptor, architect, and poet. He was born on March 6, 1475 in, Caprese, Italy. He was the 2nd born of five sons. He passed away at the age of 88 years old on February 18th, 1564. He was one of the most famous Italian Renaissance artist. He became an apprentice to a painter before studying sculpture gardens of the power in the Medici family. Michelangelo had several works in his time. His most popular sculptures were “Pieta” and “David” Some of his painting are “Sistine Chapel” and “Last Judgment” The pieta painting had showed the “Virgin Mary holding of her son Jesus after he
Michelangelo and Caravaggio at some point in history were the most famous artists in Rome, Italy. Michelangelo a prominent architect, poet, sculptor, and painter found his success in Italy during the High Renaissance period (1490-1527). While Caravaggio was the most popular painter in Rome and spearheaded the Baroque period (1650-1750). Artists like Caravaggio in the Baroque period turned to a powerful and dramatic realism, intensified by bold contrasts of light and dark. Michelangelo’s reputation as a painter fluctuated during the High Renaissance, but his devotion to his art and his genius undoubtedly influenced artists such as Caravaggio during the Baroque Period. However, each artist had incredibly different styles, and utilized different mediums in their most popular works of art. Despite that there are also many similarities which indicate Michaelangelo’s heavy influences on Caravaggio and Baroque Period art. The comparison will be between Michelangelo, Ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Vatican City, Rome, Fresco. c. 1508-1512 and Caravaggio, Calling of St. Matthew, Contarelli Chapel, San Luigi dei Francesi, Rome, Oil