Trickster tales
“Don't be upset master”! This is what master car says in “Master cat” when the master finds out that all his dad leaves him after dying was a cat. Shorty after finding out that the cat can talk the cat says he can help the poor miller's son. The cat is very sneaky and tricks the king in believing that the poor miller’s son is a wealthy man so he can marry the king's daughter and inherit wealth and royalty. Master cat from “Master cat” has many similarities and has many differences of another folk tale “How stories came to Earth”.
In “Master cat” and “How stories came to Earth”, has many similarities. There are many similarities in these two stories. The first thing these stories having common is that these stories are for young children. These stories are folk tales that are made for telling younger children as a tradition. Another similarity is that they both show anthropomorphism, both main characters have human characters and both animals can walk and talk. My final similarity is that both
…show more content…
“How stores came to earth” the main character benefited society, because he learned all the stories and read them to everyone in the world. But in “Master Cat” he only benefited himself and his master, because he had to lie, threatening and even killed a ogre just for him and his master to be wealthy living in royalty. Another difference is that “Master Cat” was a fairy tale when “How stories came to Earth” is a folk tale. The difference between that is that a fairy tale is mostly traditional with make believe characters, when a folk tale is something that is more believable. My final difference between the two stories is there attitudes, Master cat would lie and be more sneaky when the spider in “How Stories came to Earth” when capturing the animals he was honest and even called them names but when he tricked them he was honest that he was taking them to the
In both texts "The Unfortunate Fireflies" a fiction article by Clara Dillingham Pierson and "The Discontented Rock" an Iroquois tale by Frances Jenkins Olcott, both characters believed something about themselves that is not true.Both characters believed on something that is slightly similar and slightly different. But, then learned their lesson and the characters changed.
Here are the flashbacks and foreshadowing. One of the similarities is they both had to do with animals and their parents telling them something. The other is that they have flashbacks of animals. Those are the similarities with flashbacks and foreshadowing.
In both stories, someone is being hunted. The hunters decide that they are going to try and hunt humans so the hunters tell the huntees that that is what they are going to do and the huntees have to try and figure out how to get away. Another similarity between the book and the episode is that they have the same type of setting.
Some similarities are obviously that they are both slaves who are trying to escape their misery. The characters also have a good relationship with their fathers because they taught them how to care for themselves and what to do when they need
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
The stories may be derived from different periods and diverse countries however both characters of the stories showed similarity in character. The appearance of both characters, Tartuffe and the Monkey...
To begin with, I will begin with a brief summary of both stories in order to better
Campbell recognized these similarities and states.... ... middle of paper ... ... Their single God creates a firmament, luminaries, dry land, and the people that inhabit that land. Chinese and Egyptian mythology also share an uncanny amount of coincidences, such as the presence of a dog-headed god, or the creation of Earth and the heavens from a cosmic egg.
both stories shared similar ending and moral which is receiving enlightenment in first hand. "The
Just look at two creation stories side-by-side and you should easily see their similarities. Perhaps the easiest way to do this would be to take one unknown creation story and compare it to one from one’s own culture. Below is an example of a Mongolian creation myth:
These two films are not only similar on these surface levels, but also in their narrative structure and intent as well. Dorothy and Alice, both find themselves trapped in a world of their own fantasy, but with no context on how to navigate their way home. They are then lead by an array of strange characters who guide them on their journey. Dorothy meets the scarecrow, the tin man, the cowardly lion, and so on. While Alice crosses paths with the white rabbit, the cheshire cat, the mad hatter, and so on. With the assistance of their companions, both heroines maneuver their way through the challenges each fantasy presents. Perhaps the biggest similarity these films share narratively, is the underlying emphasis on empathy and perspective. Both
The common elements in the two stories are the wolf, Little Red (Riding Hood/Cap), her grandmother, and her mother. The beginnings of the stories are also similar: Little Red?s mother sends her to grandmother?s house because the grandmother is ill. Both stories mention that Little Red is personable, cute, and sweet. This is something that, on initial inspection, seems irrelevant but holds a deeper meaning for the symbolism behind the story. In both stories, the wolf, wandering through the woods, comes on Little Red and asks where she is going. When Little Red responds that she is going to visit her sick grandmother, the wolf distracts her with the suggestion that she should pick some flowers so that he can get to her grandmother?s house first. The wolf arrives at Little Red?s grandmother?s house before Little Red and disguises his voice in order to be let in. When he is let into the house, he promptly devours the grandmother and disguises himself in her clothes in order to eat Little Red as well. At this point, the two narratives diverge.
I have a love for cats. Ever since I was a teenager I always wished for a cat of my own. When I moved in a three story apartment in California, the Manager of the complex said that cats were allowed in the units. I mentioned to my Aunt at the time that I was searching in the newspapers under advertisements for cats wanted. One cool breezy evening, my Aunt called me and said that a friend of her's named Judy had a cat named Katie who did not get along with her other two cats. So I agreed to meet with Judy to see if I'd love to adopt Katie.
The biggest similarity between the two stories is the notion of moral decline; the beings start off as peaceful things that don’t need homes, food or anything. As time goes on they need those things and more. After a while they start stealing from each other and eventually hurt each other.