Leo and Himmler A person’s life can be influenced immensely by the suffocation of parent’s, and other mentors, who brainwash youth into a uniform lifestyle which lacks individuality, and creates violence. In Susan Griffin’s book “Our Secret”, she effectively compares and contrasts Leo and Himmler to her reader by describing actions that took place in both character's childhood, teenage years , and adulthood, to aid her reader in understanding acceptance, as well as change in the course of a life. Leo and Himmler had mentors who raised them in a militaristic fashion, which lead them into a future of violence and cruelty. Griffin states that “In time we forget our earliest selves and replace that memory with …show more content…
the image we have constructed at the bidding of others” which is proven by both characters (305). For Himmler, it was his father who had the largest impact on his life, caused predominantly by the journals which he was forced to keep. The journal entries he wrote were supervised by his father, and Griffin explained “One simply has to imagine Gebhard standing behind Heinrich and tapping his foot”, and added “He does not write his feelings” which illuminated the lack of individuality, and the stiffness of his father’s image. His father was always watching over every move Himmler made, and if it wasn’t the way his father liked it, then he would be scolded, and punished. Later on in the book the effects from his father's treatment is shown when Griffin explains “His thoughts were like paralyzed limbs, immobile” (303). Griffin is comparing Himmler’s thoughts to paralyzed limbs, to emphasize the result of his father's influence, which led Himmler into a state of hypnosis, as well as shaped him into a living puppet controlled by his father. In comparison to Himmler’s upbringing, Leo’s influence was his brother. Leo’s brother was “forced out of the house” by their father’s strict rules and when disobeyed, there was no hesitation towards beatings (336). Leo always looked up to his brother as a “hero”, and his stories of “How he had tortured woman”, had been taken into himself, which supports the authors claim that those we look up to can control our views (336). In their youth, both characters experience a father figure which the author uses in her advantage in order to correlate their lives, as well as to aid the reader to understand the origins of both Himmler and Leo’s violent, and psychotic careers later on in life. Himmler and Leo's youth, and the effects of their mentors teaching styles, is shown later on in their teenage life.
Himmler for instance shows signs of being brainwashed by his father when Griffin states “a day arrives when he believes the image he has made of himself in his diaries is true” (306). Also in a photograph taken in 1917, Griffin says the look on Himmler’s face “has become harder, and his smile, though faint like his mother’s smile, has gained a new quality, harsh and stiff like the little collar he wears”. This proves that later on in life the traits from Himmler's father has been carried down to him, and he’s turned into a harsh and violent man whose career as a soldier shows his thirst for bloodshed, hence the collar. After the war ended Himmler has no purpose so he found a new figure to look up to, and Griffin explains that he “Followed Hitler with unwavering loyalty”. Hitler being the new leader of Germany, in that time, was held responsible for the killings on millions of Jews, and because the way Himmler was raised, he had taken a liking to Hitler's ideas and what he standed for, so he started working for him in the SS or Schutzstaffel institution. Later on in his career, the violence increases, and his job is to compile Jews into “temporary camps” when prisons become over populated (317). This shows the reader how Hitler is now affecting his actions, and another example of this is when Himmler addresses homosexuality in a speech that “Germany forebears knew what to do with homosexuals. They drown them in bogs…”’This is not punishment he argues, but’ “the extermination of unnatural existence.” This helps the reader understand the exponential growth of Himmler's violence, and see the trend associated between Leo and Himmler’s period of realization that they're both gay, and the origins of this. In comparison to Himmler's actions, Leo also showed violence later on in life that shows the trend between the characters upbringings. The way
Leo’s life unraveled is shown when Griffin explained “..he did not know how to be an ordinary boy among boys. He became a street fighter.” His brother whose violence he admired, had become a part of Leo, and the effects of this are clear once he started high school (339). Specifically Leo targeted homosexuals, and they “devised a trap” for them in order to successfully execute these acts of violence. Himmler and Leo, both carried the violence of their mentors, into their teenage lives, and both targeted the homosexuals, in order to camouflage the secrets they both held inside of them. In their adult lives is when both characters come to the realization of their inner self.
The essay begins with Griffin across the room from a woman called Laura. Griffin recalls the lady taking on an identity from long ago: “As she speaks the space between us grows larger. She has entered her past. She is speaking of her childhood.” (Griffin 233) Griffin then begins to document memories told from the lady about her family, and specifically her father. Her father was a German soldier from around the same time as Himmler. Griffin carefully weaves the story of Laura with her own comments and metaphors from her unique writing style.
Himmler thought homosexuals, just like Jews, were weak, decadent and unpatriotic. And he strongly believed their existence threatened the German folk community, mainly because they did not procreate, Himmler was in fact the one who had all German males convicted of homosexual crimes transferred from prison straight into concentration camps. That is when the badges came to action, Jews were forced to wear the yellow Star of David and homosexuals, rapists, etc were forced to wear the Pink Triangle. From 1933-1944 between 50,000 and 63,000 men were convicted on charges of homosexuality alone. By 1935 every gay German knew that if he was caught, he risked being shipped to a concentration camp. Now, gays were not as easily identified as Jews and gypsies, Many survived the Third Reich undetected.
Throughout the memoir, Wiesel demonstrates how oppression and dehumanization can affect one’s identity by describing the actions of the Nazis and how it changed the Jewish people’s outlook on life. Wiesel’s identity transformed dramatically throughout the narrative. “How old he had grown the night before! His body was completely twisted, shriveled up into itself. His eyes were petrified, his lips withered, decayed.
In John Connolly’s novel, The Book of Lost Things, he writes, “for in every adult there dwells the child that was, and in every child there lies the adult that will be”. Does one’s childhood truly have an effect on the person one someday becomes? In Jeannette Walls’ memoir The Glass Castle and Khaled Hosseini’s novel The Kite Runner, this question is tackled through the recounting of Jeannette and Amir’s childhoods from the perspectives of their older, more developed selves. In the novels, an emphasis is placed on the dynamics of the relationships Jeannette and Amir have with their fathers while growing up, and the effects that these relations have on the people they each become. The environment to which they are both exposed as children is also described, and proves to have an influence on the characteristics of Jeannette and Amir’s adult personalities. Finally, through the journeys of other people in Jeannette and Amir’s lives, it is demonstrated that the sustainment of traumatic experiences as a child also has a large influence on the development of one’s character while become an adult. Therefore, through the analysis of the effects of these factors on various characters’ development, it is proven that the experiences and realities that one endures as a child ultimately shape one’s identity in the future.
Through segregation, loss of identity, and abuse, Wiesel and the prisoners around him devolve from civilized human beings into savage animals. The yellow stars begin separation from society, followed by ghettos and transports. Nakedness and haircuts, then new names, remove each prisoner’s identity, and physical abuse in the form of malnourishment, night marches, and physical beatings wear down prisoners. By the end of Night, the prisoners are ferocious from the experiences under German rule and, as Avni puts it, “a living dead, unfit for life” (Avni 129). Prisoners not only revert to animal instincts, but experience such mental trauma that normal life with other people may be years away.
In Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents and Primo Levi’s Survival in Auschwitz, both authors explore the source of human violence and aggression. Sigmund Freud’s book reacts to the state of Europe after World War I, while Primo Levi’s narrative is a first-hand account of his experiences during World War II. International and domestic tensions are high when both works are written; Sigmund Freud adopts a pessimistic tone throughout the work, while Primo Levi evolves from a despairing approach to a more optimistic view during his time at Auschwitz. To Sigmund Freud, savagery comes from the natural state of human beings, while Primo Levi infers violence is rooted in individual’s humanity being stripped away is.
Griffin spends a good portion of “Our Secret” writing about Himmler’s childhood. It is through his family’s history and child-rearing practices that she hopes to find answers. When Himmler is just ten years old he is told by his father that “his childhood is over now” (236). Himmler has to take himself seriously now and obey his father’s watchful eye. Everything Heinrich does from that point on is directly meant to influence his future and who he will become. This is a choice the society he is born into makes for him, he has no choice. Gebhard, Himmler’s father, is extremely overbearing and controlling of Himmler. Like many Germans of the time, he follows the advice of German child-rearing experts: “Crush the will. . .Establish dominance. Permit no disobedience. Suppress everything in the child” (237). German parents are taught that children “should be permeated by the impossibility from lock...
It is a miracle that Lobel and her brother survived on their own in this world that any adult would find unbearable. Indeed, and appropriately, there are no pretty pictures here, and adults choosing to share this story with younger readers should make themselves readily available for explanations and comforting words. (The camps are full of excrement and death, all faithfully recorded in direct, unsparing language.) But this is a story that must be told, from the shocking beginning when a young girl watches the Nazis march into Krakow, to the final words of Lobel's epilogue: "My life has been good. I want more." (Ages 10 to 16) --Brangien Davis
During the Holocaust, around six million Jews were murdered due to Hitler’s plan to rid Germany of “heterogeneous people” in Germany, as stated in the novel, Life and Death in the Third Reich by Peter Fritzsche. Shortly following a period of suffering, Hitler began leading Germany in 1930 to start the period of his rule, the Third Reich. Over time, his power and support from the country increased until he had full control over his people. Starting from saying “Heil Hitler!” the people of the German empire were cleverly forced into following Hitler through terror and threat. He had a group of leaders, the SS, who were Nazis that willingly took any task given, including the mass murder of millions of Jews due to his belief that they were enemies to Germany. German citizens were talked into participating or believing in the most extreme of things, like violent pogroms, deportations, attacks, and executions. Through the novel’s perspicacity of the Third Reich, readers can see how Hitler’s reign was a controversial time period summed up by courage, extremity, and most important of all, loyalty.
This fact is evident in The Light We Cannot See, and shown during a physical training exercise at the academy where the cadets are able to choose the weakest boy and then chase him down: “ . . . the pack draws closer and Werner feels annoyed. Why couldn’t Ernest be faster?” (170). When Werner pities the weak runner, he experiences inner turmoil because he realizes that whom he truly is, is not whom the Nazis expect him to be. He then realizes that if he is to succeed in the academy, he must give up the right to think for himself completely and become someone who is not only accustomed to the brutal environment, but encourages it. Also, when Fredrick develops a brain injury from an attack planned by upperclassmen, Werner is unable to bear seeing his friend in that condition and begins to search for his old bird collection book: “Werner lifts the flaps of boxes, peering in. ‘Surely it’s around here.’” (296). Werner becomes desperate to find the book because he believes that if he shows Fredrick a part of his past, he will be able to recover and therefore Werner will be able to avoid the fact that his lack of involvement is one of the reasons for his friend’s injury. However Fredrick remains the same, and he becomes a permanent reminder of the Hitler Youth’s brutality, as well as helps Werner realize that in the
Karl Stern is an artistic, lanky, beat up, Jewish fourteen year-old boy whose only refuge is drawing cartoons for his younger sister and himself. All that changes in an instant when he meets the boxer, Max Schmeling in his father’s art gallery. In exchange for a painting, Karl will receive lessons from the world renowned fighter and national German hero. Suddenly he has a purpose: train to become a boxing legend. As the years go by and he gets stronger, both physically and emotionally, so does the hatred for the Jews in Germany. This new generation of anti-Semitism starts when Karl gets expelled from school and grows until his family is forced to live in Mr. Stern’s gallery. Though the Stern’s have never set foot into a synagogue and do not consider themselves “Jewish”, they are still subjects to this kind of anti-Semitism. They try to make the best of it, but Karl can see how much it affects his family. His mother is getting moodier by the day, his sister, Hildy, hates herself because of her dark hair and “Jewish” nose and his father is printing illegal documents for some secret buyers. On Kristallnacht the gallery is broken into and the family is torn apart. Karl must now comfort his sister and search for his injured father and his mother. With the help of some of exceptional people, he manages to get over these many obstacles and make his way to America.
Although our past is a part of who we are nowadays, we will never be happy if we can never let go of the painful feeling attached to our suffering. In addition, “suffering pulls us farther away from other human beings. It builds a wall made of cries and contempt to separate us” (Wiesel 96). We should not be afraid to let go of our haunting past and grow closer to others because “man carries his fiercest enemy within himself. Hell isn’t others. It’s ourselves” (Wiesel 15). The wise advice this book gives its audience is one reason it won a Nobel Peace Prize. The books are also part of a very famous Holocaust trilogy, which is one reason it has been so widely read. In addition, it blends everyday stories with Holocaust stories.Therefore, readers are very compassionate towards the narrator and readers create a bond with this character due to his hardships and the similarities he shares with us. Lastly, Day speaks to the needs of the human spirit by intertwining a love story. Readers wonder if his girlfriend will change his attitude towards life because he tells the doctor, “I love Kathleen. I love her with all my heart. And how can one love if at the same time one doesn’t care about life” (Wiesel
Bartoletti, Susan Campbell. Hitler Youth [growing up in Hitler's Shadow]. New York: Random House/Listening Library, 2006. Print.
Director Mark Herman presents a narrative film that attests to the brutal, thought-provoking Nazi regime, in war-torn Europe. It is obvious that with Herman’s relatively clean representation of this era, he felt it was most important to resonate with the audience in a profound and philosophical manner rather than in a ruthlessness infuriating way. Despite scenes that are more graphic than others, the films objective was not to recap on the awful brutality that took place in camps such as the one in the movie. The audience’s focus was meant to be on the experience and life of a fun-loving German boy named Bruno. Surrounding this eight-year-old boy was conspicuous Nazi influences. Bruno is just an example of a young child among many others oblivious of buildings draped in flags, and Jewis...
Adolf Hitler (the Führer or leader of the Nazi party) “believed that a person's characteristics, attitudes, abilities, and behavior were determined by his or her so-called racial make-up.” He thought that those “inherited characteristics (did not only affect) outward appearance and physical structure”, but also determined a person’s physical, emotional/social, and mental state. Besides these ideas, the Nazi’s believed tha...