Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of all quiet on the western front
All quiet on the western front thorough summary
All quiet on the west front analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of all quiet on the western front
As we know it World War I was an ugly war by no means was it pretty. Lots of blood and screaming many men died. War ruined a lot of things for ordinary people and made things very hard for families. Families found one way to deal with this and it was writing poetry to express their feelings because there was no such thing as technology. The first poem i am going to talk about is “In Flanders Fields” by John Mccrae. I personally like this poem a lot and i enjoyed reading it. This poem is about these soldiers who were in war but did not make it home. They died while serving but even with them being gone, these soldiers made it clear they want everyone to move on and continue fighting against the enemy. These men knew exactly what was going to happen and fully accepted it. The second poem is called “To His Love” by Ivor Gurney. This one is about how this guy is remembering all the good times he had with his best friend but he’s dead now. They can’t finish their plans and he …show more content…
Except that one deals with only one person dying and the other poem deals with more than one soldier being dead. The fact that these two are during the same war also makes sense why they are similar in many ways. Now these two poems relate a lot to the book called “All Quiet On The Western Front”. In the book the main character baumer and his best friend plus several other classmates join the war and go through many things. When they first all got there it wasn’t very joyful like it was being talked about back at home. As time goes on baumer has to deal with death himself. See these two poems and this book go along great because it deals with hard times during war and losing loved ones. It gets really tough because you want everything to be be ok but you know that is not possible. You have to take care of yourself first. Both of those poems have deep meaning behind them and so does the
Poetry has been used for centuries as a means to explore emotions and complex ideas through language, though individuals express similar ideas in wholly different forms. One such idea that has been explored through poetry in numerous ways is that of war and the associated loss, grief, and suffering. Two noted Australian poets shown to have accomplished this are Kenneth Slessor with his work ‘Beach Burial’ and John Schumann’s ‘I Was Only Nineteen’. Both of these works examine the complexities of conflict, but with somewhat different attitudes.
Both poems are set in the past, and both fathers are manual labourers, which the poets admired as a child. Both poems indicate intense change in their fathers lives, that affected the poet in a drastic way. Role reversal between father and son is evident, and a change of emotion is present. These are some of the re-occurring themes in both poems. Both poems in effect deal with the loss of a loved one; whether it be physically or mentally.
Both poems have been written about death dying and the loss of loved ones, in a once thriving Welsh mining community. The first poem by Mike Jenkins is a reflection and remembrance by a Father who tragically and suddenly lost his son in a horrific and unfortunate disaster that happened in Aberfan in 1966, where many young lives were lost.
Many soldiers who come back from the war need to express how they feel. Many do it in the way of writing. Many soldiers die in war, but the ones who come back are just as “dead.” Many cadets come back with shell shock, amputated arms and legs, and sometimes even their friends aren’t there with them. So during World War I, there was a burst of new art and writings come from the soldiers. Many express in the way of books, poems, short stories and art itself. Most soldiers are just trying to escape. A lot of these soldiers are trying to show what war is really like, and people respond. They finally might think war might not be the answer. This is why writers use imagery, irony and structure to protest war.
the poem is pretty much saying that no matter what happens everything will be okay in the end because he knows he has his dad by his side and he is realizing that he can make his father Proud by doing so many good things in the world. so both poems have a nice determined and kind tone and mood both poems share that bravery and that they're not scared of anything no matter what life throws at them they look at everything the way
These two poems may seem like very similar poems at first glance, but when they are picked apart line for line to find the true meaning, they are much different. The underlying themes of these poems aren’t even close to one another. One poem describes a moment that changed a teenager’s life, causing him to mature in the process. The other poem describes how nature, man, and technology can hurt and better each other. By saying these poems are the same simply because they are about animals dying would be merely scratching the surface of what these poems are about.
During the years of 1914 - 1918 a series of events sparked the United States into a catastrophic war that took years to finish. A major event that America still reflects on today is World War I, also know as the “Great War”. This gruesome battle between the Allies and the Central powers lead to over thirty- eight million people died. World War I heavily impacted not only those at War, but even the individuals back home. Whether you were on the battle filed or back at the home front the war impacted everyone. The grueling events of this time period altered the emotionally stability of people in society, so much so that these thoughts needed to be expressed. This is evident in the poems of Vera Brittian and Wilfred Owens. Vera Brittian poems
The first poem that will be mentioned is “The Blessing.” This poem is about two ponies in Rochester, Minnesota. In this poem the animals are tame. The animals are tame because they are always accompanied by humans and don’t do any harm to anyone. The speaker is very peaceful in this poem which is shown by his choice of words. The terms such as kindness, and gladly. The title “A Blessing,” suggests that the author has a positive attitude and talks about happy things. Finally,
I am going to compare and contrast the two poems ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen and ‘War Photographer’ by Carol Ann Duffy. They both give a view of war. Owen gives first hand experiences he witnessed whilst fighting in World War One and where he unfortunately died one week before the war came to an end. Carol Ann Duffy may be writing about the feelings of her personal friends who were war photographers, showing some of the horrors they witnessed.
A poem which I have recently read is: “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen. The main point Wilfred Owen tries to convey in this poem is the sheer horror of war. Owen uses many techniques to show his feelings, some of which I’ll be exploring.
Both poems where written in the Anglo-Saxton era in Old English and later translated into English. As well as both poems being written in the same time period, they are both elegiac poems, meaning they are poignant and mournful.
When considering the structure of the poems, they are similar in that they are both written loosely in iambic pentameter. Also, they both have a notable structured rhyme scheme.
World War one and two. Both these wars stole many young men’s lives from them. Stole sons from their mothers. Stole brothers from their sister but also stole many innocent lives in the process. An estimated 60 million lives lost and for what? For land, for power, wealth. War is brutal, gruesome, costly and pointless. What good could possibly come from a war? The truth is without these wars, the world of literature wouldn’t be the same. These wars bought rise to names such as Rupert Brooke, Wilfred Owen, and Edward Thomas. Among all that death, destruction, and calamity; somehow great poets were born.
Overall, both poems are very strong and emotive. The fact that both of these poems are autobiographical gives us the opportunity to see what life is like in other peoples situations and how they seem to be out of passion for anything. The types of situations they go through are very different to each other but at the same time very similar.
In the first poem, the boy’s mother dies and his father sold him to do work in the chimneys while in the second poem the parents go to church to pray while their child sweeps chimneys. The primary poem has more hope and joy than the second one since the boy has a dream about heaven, God, and angels to where the boy hopes for a better life. However, the secondary poem contains more misery than the first one since the boy’s parents think that they are doing something good for their son and think their son is content but he is actually, truly miserable and has a great deal of sadness. However, in both poems the children know they are going to die since the first poem states in line 12 “…Were all of them lock’d up in coffins of black…” and in the second poem in line 7 stating “…They clothed me in the clothes of death…” indicating they knew that they were going to die young. The author also uses a different rhyming in both poems. In the first poem, the rhyming pattern is “AABB” while the second poem’s rhyming pattern is “ABAB.” Conversely, the author shows in the last stanza of the first poem that Tom no longer dreads his job while the last stanza in the second poem states how the upper class praises “God & his Priest & King,” when that is only ruining the lives of children and making them live in misery. Therefore,