Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between spirituality and happiness
Relationship between spirituality and happiness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between spirituality and happiness
To be godly means to be happy with one’s identity. Many of us spend so much time trying to underline what the ultimate good and happiness that the general public are trying to achieve, we tend to forget that the point of going on that journey to find ultimate happiness is for ourselves. We also forget that we have different level of contentments and that there are different ways to be content. Jermone’s Letters, Augustine’s Confession, Petarach’s Secretum, Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy, and the Anglo-Saxon’s Beowulf all share essentially the search for happiness; what differs is how each of these philosophers think is the best way to approach true happiness, all according to how one identify one’s self and one’s beliefs.
In Jerome’s letters, being godly is following God’s guideline. To be happy is to submit the self under the authority of a higher being and the being’s rules such as being chaste and acting chaste. There is no such thing as happiness on Earth because it is just material and temporal happiness. The only way to true happiness is to transcend away from the body that entraps the soul. What is so disturbing about Jermone’s idea of what true happiness is that there is not much human experiences around what he calls happiness and I want to know what it takes to feel ultimate happiness and to know how it differs from
…show more content…
temporal happiness. God is essence the self.
So we have to find happiness within our self in order to transcend. We have to find happiness and God by finding ourselves first. Augustine’s idea of what is happiness exactly is different from Jerome’s idea. Rather than aiming for type of happiness that we do not even know how to describe, we should aim for temporal happiness and/or material happiness because material happiness is a small factor of temporal happiness. His philosophy is to be happy by doing what one wants and desire to do that is morally and ethically correct. Only through this way will we achieve the highest form of happiness that we know
of. The only flaw Petrarch sees in the Confessions is that St. Augustine zooms in and emphasize that we need to find ourselves to be happy because God is essentially the self. However, St. Augustine undervalued the journey to find the self and that is why writing Secretum in a dialogue format is so important. It allows both views to be portrayed and shows how one view builds off of the other view. Petrarch emphasizes the importance of the search for happiness rather than simply just wanting to be happy. One often cannot simply be happy just because he/she wants to be; there has to be some effort put into it like doing certain things and aiming for certain things to be happy. This involves interaction between a community and the abundance of assets, activities, and more within that community. To be happy in this case is essentially just for the purpose of the self, but in order to achieve that, there has to interaction between the self and the environment surrounding it. This is refuted by Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy to an extent and built on by Beowulf. In Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy, being content is believing that there is a greater purpose behind one’s fortune whether it is good or bad. The search for happiness does not necessarily have to through actual interaction. Boethius made an argument within his head between Lady Philosophy and him. This shows that, yes interaction is important, but imagining such conversation is also more than adequate to do the same thing. It allows the self to argue and reason out questions rather than leaving the self with more and more unanswered questions. Consolation of Philosophy distinguish the mind and the soul as two separate entities in this case Beowulf goes deeper into Petrarch’s idea of being happy requires actions. Being happy in this epic tale is identifying with groups and tribes through bonds and relationships. To be a hero and make his people and his allies happy, Beowulf’s objective is to help everyone on his team achieve this state of feeling godly by removing evilness. The concept of happiness in Beowulf is essentially similar to the domino effect; he will feel contentment if his people are happy. In Beowulf, one must put in the effort and do what it takes to be happy in order to feel happy like the idea behind Secretum. If he stick his mind to remove evilness, then “there’s nothing [he] wish for that won’t be [his] if [he] win through alive (Beowulf). Being happy with one’s identity allows one to be godly. Many spend so much time trying to search for what the ultimate good and happiness that the everyone else are trying to achieve, many of us often forget that the point of going on that journey to find ultimate happiness is for themselves. There are different level of contentments and that there are different ways to be content. Jermone’s Letters, Augustine’s Confession, Petarach’s Secretum, Boethius’s Consolation of Philosophy, and the Anglo-Saxon’s Beowulf all share essentially the goal to search for happiness; what is different is how each of these philosophers think is the best way to approach true happiness, all according to how one identify one’s self and one’s beliefs.
to land he managed to kill nine sea monsters with his bare hands and still
While the classic battle between good and evil forces is a major theme of the medieval epic Beowulf, one may question whether these good and evil forces are as black and white as they appear. Scholars such as Herbert G. Wright claim that “the dragon, like the giant Grendel, is an enemy of mankind, and the audience of Beowulf can have entertained no sympathy for either the one or the other” (Wright, 4). However, other scholars such as Andy Orchard disagree with this claim, and believe that there is “something deeply human about the ‘monsters’” (Orchard, 29). While Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon are indeed portrayed as evil and violent foes, there are parts within Beowulf that can also lead a reader to believe that the “monsters” may not be so monstrous after all. In fact, the author of Beowulf represents the “monsters” within the poem with a degree of moral ambivalence. This ambivalence ultimately evokes traces of sympathy in the reader for the plight of these “monster” figures, and blurs the fine line between good and evil within the poem.
Augustine characterizes the happy Christian ruler in Book V Chapter 24 of City of God. In order for rulers to be truly happy, they must first be Christian and put everything to serving God (V.24, p.220). Christianity
In book III of The Consolation of Philosophy, Boethius establishes the fact that God is the world's helmsman, the divine reason, the supreme good, the origin of all things. He demonstrates that God is omnipotent and omniscient. Nothing more superior can even be conceived of. Through the concept of unity, through which things basically become good, Boethius shows that God and happiness are one, the divine goodness. He concludes, "God is the essence of happiness." (70)
“It doesn’t take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle,” Norman Schwarzkopf. In the epic poem, Beowulf, an epic hero from Geats travels far out of his way to help the Danes with their fight against the nasty Grendel. However, in the story Beowulf encounters three monsters that he takes into his own hands and defeats them all. In doing so, Beowulf is rewarded greatly and becomes king and is looked up to by all. In his last battle, Beowulf defeats the dragon but dies soon afterwards, he is given an honorable burial. This poem was told throughout the era of the Vikings and was later written down as the first actually hard copy of the story. It was Burton
Anticipation of catastrophe, doom, gloom are present in Beowulf rom beginning to end, even in the better half of the poem, Part I. Perhaps this is part of what makes it an elegy – the repeated injection of sorrow and lamentation into every episode.
Christian faith adamantly states that the belief in one God will set you on the path to inner peace and true happiness. Christians, Ancius Boethius and Susan C. Stark, agree that the acceptance of God and his teachings is the only way to achieve peace and happiness. Boethius writes about his own wavering path to happiness in The Consolations of Philosophy. Lady philosophy, like Jesus, teaches Boethius what the true “goods” of the world are, that God has complete control and knowledge, evil has no real substance and ultimately, that through God, he can attain true happiness. Susan C. stark parallels these teachings in her article, Where peace comes from. The many interrelating ideas of Boethius and Stark’s works shed light on the Christian values, teaching and essentially, the path to happiness.
Simply defined, happiness is the state of being happy. But, what exactly does it mean to “be happy?” Repeatedly, many philosophers and ideologists have proposed ideas about what happiness means and how one attains happiness. In this paper, I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of happiness is driven more in the eye of ethics than John Stuart Mill. First, looking at Mill’s unprincipled version of happiness, I will criticize the imperfections of his definition in relation to ethics. Next, I plan to identify Aristotle’s core values for happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness comes from virtue, whereas Mill believes happiness comes from pleasure and the absence of pain. Ethics are the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior which are driven by virtues - good traits of character. Thus, Aristotle focuses on three things, which I will outline in order to answer the question, “what does it mean to live a good life?” The first of which is the number one good in life is happiness. Secondly, there is a difference between moral virtues and intellectual virtues and lastly, leading a good life is a state of character. Personally and widely accepted, happiness is believed to be a true defining factor on leading a well intentioned, rational, and satisfactory life. However, it is important to note the ways in which one achieves their happiness, through the people and experiences to reach that state of being. In consequence, Aristotle’s focus on happiness presents a more arguable notion of “good character” and “rational.”
To begin, happiness is viewed as the ultimate goal in the life of an individual and highest good, Aquinas believes that no human can achieve higher wisdom and happiness during their time on earth due to the fact that man’s ultimate happiness would only be achieved by passing on and being in the presence of the lord, or as he terms it: “Along with natural happiness, there is a supernatural happiness of comping to “see God as he is”. (P.77) by living a just and moral life, we will eventually know true happiness in the next life. In fact, he goes on to argue that our happiness during life is bound by what God reveals to living souls, and thus, drastically limited. While our human faculties provide some happiness, only in our heavenly vessels will
Both Plato and Augustine offer unusual conceptions of what one must acquire to live a truly happy life. While the conventional view of happiness normally pertains to wealth, financial stability, and material possessions, Plato and Augustine suggest that true happiness is rooted in something independent of objects or people. Though dissimilar in their notions of that actual root, each respective philosophy views the attaining of that happiness as a path, a direction. Plato’s philosophy revolves around the attainment of eternal knowledge and achieving a metaphysical balance. Augustine also emphasizes one’s knowing the eternal, though his focus is upon living in humility before God. Both assert that human beings possess a natural desire for true happiness, and it is only through a path to something interminable that they will satisfy this desire.
Further, Aristotle parallels the highest good with happiness: “As far as its name goes, most people virtually agree [about what the good is] … (and) call it happiness”(1.4.1095a17-19). In order for happiness to fit Aristotle’s definition of the good it must be “unconditionally complete” meaning “choiceworthy in itself”(1.7.1097a34) and “self-sufficient” meaning “lacking nothing”(1.7.1097b15). To be the highest good happiness will need to be the “mos...
In the Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III, Chapters 27 to 37, Thomas Aquinas in a very systematic fashion describes various pursuits of mankind that although they may be pleasurable they fail to meet the ultimate definition of happiness of which Aquinas speaks. He describes these various pursuits and then explains why they fail to meet the criteria required to be true happiness. To Aquinas the ultimate and most desirable kind of happiness is that which is found in the knowledge of God. These various pursuits’ progress from our most instinctive nature and progress towards more reason based assertions and pursuits.
Beowulf is one of the oldest, most renown poems from between the 7th and 10th century. The author is unknown, however, in the 21st century students from all over still read and study this epic poem about a magnanimous man named, Beowulf. Beowulf is a man of unrivaled strength and courage. With great strength and courage in the 7th century comes great rewards and acknowledgments. But, with this famous stature at times comes intense pride and boastfulness. Beowulf exemplifies such pride all throughout his adventures as a great savior. As readers, we begin to ask ourselves whether or not this pride that Beowulf embodies is an asset to him or a tragic flaw. At times within the poem, Beowulf’s pride achieves him astonishing accomplishments, but,
Happiness is the ultimate goal for everyone in life. Aristotle's definition of " happiness is happiness is the activity of the soul in accord with perfect virtue. To become a better person, we must practice virtuous acts regularly. After a while, these acts will become a habit and so the virtuous acts. part of our every day life and the person will be leading a virtuous life.
Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...