Comparing Hand Shadows 'And Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad'

1021 Words3 Pages

Growing up, children need love and support coming from family members and friends. The poems “Hand Shadows,” by Mary Cornish and “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad,” by Jan Heller Levi, illustrate the love a father gives to his children and show how the differently children react to it. When comparing and contrasting the two poems, both show the underrated bond between a father and child, from the child’s point of view, and how drastically different the child can perceive the relationship.
Both “Hand Shadows,” by Mary Cornish and “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad,” by Jan Heller are written from the child’s point of view. Based only off of the title “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad,” the reader is able to conclude that the poem is meant to be from the viewpoint of a son …show more content…

The poem “Hand Shadows” is set in the shorter time frame and ends on the same night as it started. Because of this shorter time frame, this camping poem between a father and his child could potentially be based off of a true story. The author, Mary Cornish, could’ve based this off of a true memory of a childhood camping trip with her father that brought the two closer together.
The poem “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad,” started off the first two stanzas, with a flashback to a child remembering watching her father swimming. At the start of the third stanza the speaker says, “I think of how different things might have been” (9). The words “might have been” show that she is thinking into the past and even more specifically, about growing up with her father.
Throughout the two poems there were many examples of literary terms, but the three that stood out the most to me were personification, symbolism, and metaphors. In “Hand Shadows,” the author uses personification when describing the shadow animals to allow the reader to picture them more clearly, the outside of the tent, and the stars in the sky. She describes the new stars as being “born” …show more content…

Cornish uses five very different animals for her choice of shadow puppets. Starting with the alligator who “... feigning sleep along the canvas wall leapt up / and snapped its jaws” (4-5). Children can be snippy and moody at times and even bite. The next animal in the poem was the swan with “... its perfect neck and drop / a fingered beak toward that shadowed head / to lightly preen [her] father's feathered hair…” (6-8). The swan symbolizes the child’s innocence and peacefulness. The first animal that was listed in the poem was the horse who “bucked” (3). When something or someone bucks, they oppose or resist, so the horse represents a child’s stubbornness. An example of a child bucking something is when his or her parents tell them it’s time to go to bed and they resist. The fourth animal who was listed was the skunk who “shuffled in the woods” (9). The skunk represents a child's adventurous qualities, being that the skunk was the only animal who was outside of the tent. The final animal(s) that were listed at the end of the poem were the two birds who “flew one following the other” (14). The two birds in the end symbolize the child and her father and how the child now wants to follow his father’s example and views him as a role model. Symbolism is used in “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad” as well, but it’s not as in such a positive way. In “Not Bad, Dad, Not Bad,” the “...icy ocean between

Open Document