Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The awakening novel movie
What was the movie awakenings about
What was the movie awakenings about
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The awakening novel movie
'"What's wrong with a man becoming intelligent and wanting to acquire knowledge and understanding of the world around him"' (pg.528). This quote comes from the Short story, Flowers for Algernon. The quote shows how all Charlie wanted was to be normal and smart, like everyone else on planet earth, and wanted to understand what was happening around him. Also to make the most out of the things around him and make himself and others proud of what he can do, but people are not understanding him. Flowers for Algernon the novel and the film Awakenings can be studied together because of their important similarities along with some notable differences regarding Lenard and Charlie, making it difficult for the reader and viewer to refrain from …show more content…
comparing and contrasting the novel and film. In the book Flowers for Algernon, is about a man named Charlie Gordon. He is the main character and the protagonist. Charlie is not normal, he has a very low I.Q. and his brain doesn't function normally like other people. He goes to see Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss at a hospital somewhere near New York, to take different kinds of tests and to see if he was eligible for a special experiment/operation, that could change him.The doctors have already done the operation on a white mouse named Algernon. Algernon was a normal, dumb mouse, but after the operation he was a smart! So then, Dr. Nemur and Strauss wanted to find a human to experiment on. Later, Charlie is chosen to be the person the doctors choose to be experimented on. After Charlie gets the surgery, he and Algernon challenged one another and become closer with one another, and Miss Kinnian came to teach Charlie. Miss Kinnian is a teacher at the Beckham College Center for Retarded Adults, who helped Charlie and he soon figured out that he loved Miss Kinnian, but later tells her he doesn't, because of what was going to happen to him. After a while, the doctors and the person who watched Algernon, see a difference in him because he wouldn't cooperate anymore and was biting, and eventually Algernon passed away. This foreshadowed Charlie's future and he knew what happened to Algernon would happen to him, so he wrote a letter to Dr. Strauss about the whole experiment and about his journey, and also how he was going away. The movie Awakenings, is about a doctor named Dr.
Sayers, he was a new doctor and worked at a mental hospital in the Bronx. The hospital he worked at had all kinds of patients with weird and different diseases or disorders. Dr. Sayers had a goal and according to the article, Bringing Statues to Life, his goals was, "To help these people breakout of their semiconscious state"(Fehlhaber). This quote explains all he wanted was to achieve this and the goal to be successful. He looked at the many different kinds of disorders and diseases, before the one had caught his eye. The disease/disorder that had caught his eye were the patients, who had the extreme version of Parkinsonism. These patients have been catatonic for decades. The article Bringing Statues to life, it explains that, "He had heard about a new experiment drug, L-Dopa, which was being used to treat patients with Parkinson's disease" (Fehlhaber), so he thought he would try it on the others with the disease. Leonard was the Dr. Sayer first patient to try the drug and the main patient he worked with. He video taped Leonard throughout the experiment and explained the disease and what was happening. During his journey, Dr. Sayers discovered that the patients would move to certain kinds of music, catching a ball or an object, or touch familiar objects. A while after using L-Dopa, they had seen a jaw dropping sight, Leonard was out of his catatonic state and was awake! So then they decided to use the drug on the other …show more content…
patients, and the same thing happened! Although the L-Dopa worked, it wasn't a permanent solution for the disease. They noticed Leonard was having body spasms and he was having troubles talking , focusing, writing, and many other signs that showed he was going back to his catatonic state. Then soon enough, the other patients were slowly returning to their original state too and eventually did. Even though this sounded like a smooth journey at first, it wasn't, Dr. Sayer had obstacles like the other doctors he worked with and all the patients at the hospital. To start with, the book Flowers for Algernon and the film Awakenings, have similarities that are important. The first example is that in the book and the film Charlie and Leonard both fall in love. A quote to support this is on page 527, when Charlie said, "I'm in love with Miss Kinnian", this quote proves that Charlie had feelings for Miss Kinnian. Also in the movie Leonard meets a woman in the lunch room and after a while they start to have feelings for each other. Regardless of what they felt, they both tell had to the woman they fell in love with that they couldn't see each other anymore or that they don't love them anymore, because of the disorder that was coming back. Another similarity is that they both return to their original state. Even though the short story doesn’t explain that Charlie had gone back to his original state, Algernon showed signs/symptoms of what would soon happen to him after the operation. For Leonard though, the drug wears off, doesn't cure the disease, and him and the other patients go back to their original, catatonic states. The last similarity between the two; even though there are more, is how Charlie and Leonard both had a condition that stopped them from being "normal". Charlie had a mental disorder, that stopped him from being thinking the same way and not being able to understand things the same way others do. Leonard goes into a catatonic state, which is caused by a rare form of Parkinson disease that stopped him from moving, talking, thinking, etc. and in general wasn't able do anything other people are able to do. It is clear from all the information provided that the two have notable similarities. However, the two have noticeable differences.
To start off, Leonard was a smart student and had friends, before he got the harsh disease that ruined his whole life. On the other hand, Charlie had the mental retardation since he was born, never really had friends, and never got to experience what it felt like to think the way everyone else did and comprehend the things surrounding him. Furthermore, in Flowers for Algernon Charlie had Algernon who had the same operation as him, that foreshadowed his fate. He explains, "Algernon died two days ago. His brain had decreased in weight, and there was a general soothing out of cerebral convolutions as well as a deepening and broadening of brain fissures. I guess that the same thing is or will soon be happening to me" (pg.533). In Awakenings, viewers were lead to believe the drug would be permanent and cure the disease. The doctors had no idea whether or not it would work, but after it had worked we were most likely convinced that L-Dopa had worked. Also the patients would stay that way forever, but sadly they just had to face the truth when the drug wore off. The third difference contrasting Flowers for Algernon and Awakenings is how after their doctors did whatever they did on them and was normals, they had different interest. Leonard wanted to explore and interact with society and nature and Charlie isolated himself the outside the world. Something to support this is that in the movie, Leonard tried to get out of the
hospital and go for a walk and he, and him and Dr. Sayers went out and explored. While Charlie isolated himself from the doctors and Miss Kinnian because he didn't want to do much, but learn about himself and think. Even with all the significant similarities, they have many differences that make them different one another. In conclusion, the book Flowers for Algernon and the film Awakenings make it difficult to hold back from differentiating the two, because of the significant similarities and noteworthy differences that can be used to study them together. Also although the two characters are different in ways, they are also similar. For example, they both had a life changing disorder, but Leonard wanted to interact with the world while he had the chance to and Charlie isolated himself. Dr. Sayer explains in the film Awakenings, ”The human spirit is more powerful that any drug, and that is what needs to be nourished with work, play, friendship, and family. These are the things that matter“.
There were many similarities between the short story “Flowers for Algernon” and the movie Awakenings. “Flowers for Algernon”, by Daniel Keyes, is about a man named Charlie, who has a very low IQ. Charlie gets an operation to make him smarter. It is a story about what happens to him during that period of time. The movie, Awakenings, directed by Penny Marshall, starring Robin Williams and Robert De Niro, is about how some people, including Leonard Lowe, the main character, developed a disease and are now catatonic. Dr. Malcolm Sayer finds a drug that seems like a miracle drug. The movie is about what happens during the time that the catatonic patients are on the drug.
trying to win her over. In contrast, the main character in The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby, is a mysterious and wealthy man who throws extravagant parties in hopes of winning back his lost love, Daisy Buchanan. Despite their differences, both characters share a common theme of longing for something they cannot have. Fitzgerald's use of characterization and symbolism in both works effectively portrays the struggles and desires of individuals during the 1920s. her.
Comparing A Worn Path by Eudora Welty and A Rose For Emily by William Faulkner
Thomas Gray, a poet from the eighteenth century, coined the phrase “Ignorance is bliss” in his poem, Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College (1742), and three centuries later, this quote is commonly used to convey the message that sometimes, being ignorant of the truth can cause happiness, and knowledge can actually can be the source of pain or sadness. However, in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, this phrase is taken very literally, and knowledge is feared to the extent where books are considered illegal. Throughout The Hearth and the Salamander, Guy Montag, the main character, experiences a drastic change wherein he begins to realize that there is power in knowledge, and that this intelligence has the potential to be worth more than the so-called “bliss” that ignorance can bring.
In the novel 'Of Mice and Men', by John Stienbeck, a mentally challenged man, Lennie, loses his innocence and his dream, of owning his own ranch with rabbits, when he accidentally breaks a woman's neck. In the novel 'Flowers or Algernon', by Daniel Keyes, another mentally challenged man, Charlie, loses his innocence and dreams, of being like everyone else, when, through the aid of an operation, realizes people were making fun of him rather than being his friends. Although, in both cases innocence and dreams were the loss, their innocence was also the underlying cause of the loss. Lennie is a very loveable character, who has hope and dreams. He wants to live on a ranch with George and raise rabbits. He looks at his plans as reachable even when it seems impossible because after he kills Curleys wife, Lennie still thinks he can have a ranch and rabbits, with the assurance of George. Although Lennie never reaches his dream, he dies with the thought of achievement. Charlie on the other hand, has dreams of being smart just like everyone else. He tries very hard in school and when offered the chance of having an operation to make him 'smart', he jumps at the opportunity. Although his teacher influences him, she had little impact. Unlike Lennie, Charlie reaches his dream but ends up broken hearted when his dream doesn't last.
As his journey to enlightenment comes to an end, like the prisoner, Montag attains the final stage of enlightenment, depicted by Granger. Montag successfully outruns the authorities and winds up in a forest outside of the city. He soon meets Granger, the leader of a group of people that memorize books. Granger discloses his group’s purpose to Montag and invites him to join them on their mission. He voices that “ ‘we were not important, we mustn’t be pedants; we were not to feel superior to anyone else in the world. We’re nothing more than dust jackets for books, of no significance otherwise. But that’s the wonderful thing about man; he never gets so discouraged or disgusted that he gives up doing it all over again, because he knows very well
In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner both main characters are portrayed as irrational and are isolated from reality. The narrator in “The Tell-Tale Heart” murders an elderly man, as he is fearful of the man’s eye. Emily Grierson in “A Rose for Emily” lives secluded from society, until she marries a man, Homer. She ultimately kills Homer in his bed and leaves his body to decompose for many years. Both the narrator in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” and Emily Grierson in William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” deny reality so vehemently that they isolate themselves from reality. Their isolation and denial of reality cause both to commit murder.
The movie “Awakenings” is a touching movie with a touching plot line and characterization. The movie tries to show how one doctor will do anything to help people who have not experienced life in any regards. “Awakenings” helps us understand why we must be willing to challenge conventional wisdom to help those in need. This movie is an inspiring story about a doctor willing to push the limits, it is best examined through the plot line, the characterization, and some of the drawbacks of the movie Awakenings.
The plot of both the novel and film version of Flowers for Algernon share common similarities. They both feature a retarded middle-aged man, Charlie Gordon, who receives an operation to heighten his intelligence. Charlie’s IQ eventually surpasses human normalcy to reveal that the experiment did prove successful. In both the film and novel, Charlie became even more intelligent than the professors who worked with him. In the film, Dr. Strauss was embarrassed to reveal that Charlie was smarter than him. That played a milestone event in Charlie’s identification of himself. Slowly his intelligence began to decrease and he eventually returned to his original state of mind. Throughout the story, Charlie encountered many different emotions that he had never experienced before because he didn’t have the common knowledge to understand them. The episode when he was at the nightclub with his co-workers gave him the opportunity to experience betrayal and anger. “I never knew before that Joe and Frank and the others liked to have me around just to make fun of me” (Keyes 30). The plot for both versions also carefully depicted Charlie’s psychological traumas that he suffered after his operation. These outbursts were often caused by romantic anxiety and the painful memories he would recall. Whenever Charlie got intimate with Alice he would tend to get extremely nervous or have a hallucination, causing him to ruin the moment. “I dropped a fork, and when I tried to retrieve it, I knocked over a glass of water and spilled it on her dress” (56). One of Charlie’s most painful memories was the one about the locket incident. Both versions did a great job of emphasizing this particular moment. “His clothes are torn, his nose is bleeding and one of his teeth is broken” (38). These flashbacks occurred many times in the novel yet the f...
The story written by John Steinbeck called “The Chrysanthemums” could be named “The Story of an Afternoon” because of the time range it took the tragedy to occur is around the time of a few hours. John Steinbeck’s “The Chrysanthemums” is similar to Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” in the sense of tragic, irony, happening to women in a small amount of time. In both stories women are bamboozled by men, they become misguided and gain a desire. Aiming to achieve the desire causes them to see a false reality and in ruination.
The heroine, Mrs. P, has some carries some characteristics parallel to Louise Mallard in “Hour.” The women of her time are limited by cultural convention. Yet, Mrs. P, (like Louise) begins to experience a new freedom of imagination, a zest for life , in the immediate absence of her husband. She realizes, through interior monologues, that she has been held back, that her station in life cannot and will not afford her the kind of freedom to explore freely and openly the emotions that are as much a part of her as they are not a part of Leonce. Here is a primary irony.
He then met Paula for the last time telling her that they can no longer meet again due to his disease. Not in a short while, Leonard had a full body spasm and he asked Dr. Sayer to have him filmed so that he can be able to contribute for the researches to cure people with the same disease. The other patients who also took the L-Dopa went to their catatonic sate once again. It was then realized by Dr. Sayer that the L-Dopa no matter how high the dosage they give would not awaken the patients once again. He then discussed to the other donors, doctors and staffs that the awakening was only temporary. He also explained to them that life must be appreciated and live to the fullest. Dr. Sayer he believed that Leonard helped him realize many things and give him confidence to finally ask Eleanor, for a cup of coffee. The movie deals with how catatonic patients awaken from heir states and make Dr. Sayer realize that there is life within them and the patients still have an inside voice. According to Dr. Malcolm Sayer there were temporary and short awakening from the patients but it would never be the same as the awakening in
Historically, women have been treated as second class citizens. The Napoleonic Code stated that women were controlled by their husbands and cannot freely do their own will without the authority of their husband. This paper shows how this is evident in the "Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and " A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner. In both stories, the use of literary elements such as foreshadowing, symbolism, and significant meaning of the titles are essential in bringing the reader to an unexpected and ironic conclusion.
In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily,” and Sherwood Anderson’s “Hands,” both authors present main characters who isolate themselves after they are treated as objects of desire. In Faulkner’s work, Miss Emily is an outsider because she is dehumanized after becoming a victim of incest. Similarly, in Anderson’s work, Wing Biddlebadum is also dehumanized when he is beaten up by the town’s people after being accused of child molestation. In this way, both characters are outsiders in their haven because they are deprived of humane treatment.
He explains how our minds are conditioned from as early as little kids by books, teachers, parents and the society around us. Our minds, attitudes and prejudices are established since early childhood and going beyond our own borders frightens us. We are frightened of what our parents would say, what the society will. This way of thinking put barriers which prevent you from going beyond and become truly free. He explains that while one is young, he or she is easily conditioned, shaped and forced into a pattern and unconsciously one gets caught in imitation.