Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between Thoreau and Emerson
Emerson vs. thoreau
How identities are influenced by society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between Thoreau and Emerson
Critical Response Essay Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau are two well-known American literature writers, during the nineteenth century (Baym & Levine, 2013). Interestingly enough both writers became great friends after their career paths crossed at one of Emerson’s informal meetings (Baym & Levine, 2013). Although both American writers had numerous successful publications, both Emerson and Thoreau were considerable different. On the contrary, one topic they shared perception of was the government and society. Ralph Waldo Emerson held a very strong conviction of self-reliance. In contrast, he viewed the society and government as the devil, because he visualized society as evil. Emerson spoke to his audience on the importance of being unique as God had created the human race. When one decides to conform to society or “follow the crowd” he/she are discouraging individualism. Emerson strongly believes one should follow his/her intuition, living for the future. Emerson thinks that by individuals being self-reliant the belief of “chance” could be controlled by the human race. “It is only as a man puts off from himself all external support, and stands alone, that I see him to be strong and to prevail” (Baym & Levine, 2013, p. 566). Overall, Emerson strongly believed that following society had a negative effect on …show more content…
Both men held the view that following the society/government completely was wrong. Emerson saw it as wrong because it was going against individualism, whereas Thoreau saw it as wrong because of the opposition to God’s law. Emerson shows up at the jail when Thoreau was thrown in jail after refusing to pay his taxes. Emerson did not necessarily see eye to eye with Thoreau’s approach. Overall, both agree that in certain circumstances, it is vital that one resist the pressure of the society and
Key Ideas and Details (a) What terms does Emerson use to describe society? (b) Interpret: According to Emerson, what is society’s main purpose? (c) Draw Conclusions: In what ways does Emerson believe people should be affected by the way others perceive them? a: He describes it in a conformist tone describing how they strive for consistency and are therefore cowards in their unwillingness to expand to new and unique ideas and ways of thinking.
Franklin was a deist and believed that God had no control over our lives and the decisions we make. Emerson believed that God was omnipotent and omnipresent, meaning that God is everywhere and all knowing, but that does not condone that they are all powerful. Emerson also believed that it was unnecessary for people to attend congregation because if God is all knowing then it should not matter where you are as long as you pray and give thanks to God. They both however did not attend congregation regularly later in life; Franklin because he was forced to during childhood, Emerson because he disagreed with the beliefs of the
Thoreau and Socrates start Civil Disobedience and Crito with basically the same premise. They both believe that humans are essentially moral beings. Thoreau says that people if left to their own ends will act justly, and should be treated accordingly by the law. Socrates says essentially the same thing, he says that "no one wants to commit injustice" for its own sake, many people end up doing so anyway. Socrates says that the citizens of a government have entered into an agreement to abide by its laws in exchange for protection. He also says that if one believes these laws to be unjust, one can always leave, but if one agrees to abide by the laws they have a duty to be subjected to punishment if they break these laws. Thoreau on the other hand says that it is the duty of the people not to abide by a law if they perceive it to be unjust, and if they claim to be opposed to it and nevertheless abide by it, they are a hypocrite.
Essay question: Compare and contrast the relationship between man and nature in Emerson and Thoreau.
know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my
Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord, Massachusetts on July 12, 1817 and died there peacefully on May 6, 1862. He was described by Hawthorne as "ugly as sin." He loved nature, and his constant preoccupation was exploring the woods and ponds making detailed observations of plants and creatures. Henry led a singular life, never marrying, and marching to his own drummer, as he put it. From 1845 to 1847, he lived alone in a small cabin he built by Walden Pond near Concord. He described this unique experiment in natural living in "Walden" criticizing those who "lead lives of quiet desperation" with all the trappings of customary society. His personal independence and straightforward manner was harsh to some people, and he gained very little recognition during his lifetime.
He writes, “all things real are so by so much virtue as they contain.” Emerson says that things that are unique and individual are real, so therefore people who are mere imitations of society are neither unique nor individual. This makes it impossible for them to have distinct characteristics and qualities. A person with greater self reliance, Emerson’s goal for society, is an individual who brings value to themselves and others. In his closing paragraph, Emerson drives the final point home in his case for self-reliance. “Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles.” The major goal in life is seen as being at peace with oneself, a goal nearly impossible if one is an imitation of someone else. Becoming self reliant is not so simple as making a single decision, it is a journey. Emerson provides crucial explanation and motivation for one to become self-reliant, and leaves it to the reader to take this goal upon
While Emerson never truly factored his transcendentalist ideals into his daily life, Thoreau made a point out of living out his days as a man free from society and connected to nature. In 1846, he refused to pay his poll tax to the government because he believed the war was unjust and did not want to support the government. In doing this, he showed that he remains strong in his own beliefs and will not agree with something just to conform to society. He also showcases Emerson’s philosophy on learning by forming beliefs based on his own life and morals, which were based in nature, receiving instruction from Emerson’s ideas on self-reliance, and taking action against something he believes is unjust. In an excerpt from one of Thoreau’s books, he says, “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived” (Thoreau 16). What he is saying through this is that he wants to evaluate himself in the context of nature and understand what life is like in its purest and fundamental form. He hoped to gain a knowledge of the world and explore what nature had to offer and learn from his experience. Also, Thoreau is letting his readers know that connecting with nature is essential in finding yourself and
While Emerson and Thoreau certainly have difference of opinions, they recognize the need for public discussion and discourse. Emerson declares “a foolish consistency” to be “the hobgoblin of little minds” (Emerson 367). This is shown in their essays “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience” in which they support individuality and personal expression. Despite their contrasting views of society and government, the two most prominent transcendentalists in literary history share a passionate belief in the necessity that every American must exercise their constitutional rights and make known their views even and especially if it challenges the status quo.
In “Self Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson, he promotes the importance of self reliance as an individual, and in society. Individuality to Emerson Opposed the traditional ideas of society, and to him it meant to oppose the conformity and consistency in society. He believes that the majority of people have given up their self reliance because of their fear of judgement by society. To be an individual, Emerson stresses that one has to be a risk taker, and disregard all things external.
In order to understand any comparison of the two author's one must first read and comprehend that Emerson's writing are clearly an instruction manual that Whitman adopts in order to become an outstanding poet. Emerson believes we must,
In their articles they both seek to involve and encourage their audiences to join them. Their ideal society is one where the individual and his brothers are treated as an equal. Thoreau demonstrates, “ There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all it's own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly” ( Thoreau 14). The State will not understand the potential of each individual if the State keeps overpowering the citizens. In all truth the government gains power by threats of taking away the people’s most valued possessions; but if one by one start rebelling the State as Thoreau intends, then not only will the State recognize the citizens, the individual will too. This, “we must respect effects and teach the soul. Matter of conscience and religion, And not desire of rule or benefit” (Thoreau 12). Thoreau portrays that the people should have no concern over what benefits them and what is moral. He implies that by showing one's inner strength by understanding the injustice in society, one does not contribute to the state. Likewise, King says,” one who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks the law that conscience tells him is
Thoreau and Emerson both believe that to transcend and achieve this oneness with nature, man must educate himself mentally and spiritually. While both writers recognize the importance of books and reading as a precursor to spiritual growth, they also both feel that one ca...
Emerson and Thoreau both were a good writing and study in same college and both of them uses a different technique to express their idea and thought to the people. Emerson was born in 1803-1882, he lives in Massachusetts and study in Harvard. He met words worth, Coleridge and Carlye in England in 1883 and he was known for challenging traditional thoughts after he published his first book called “Nature” which is the best expression of his transcendentalism. Thoreau was born in 1817-1862; he lived in Massachusetts and studied in Harvard same like Emerson and he became friend with Emerson in 1837. Thoreau is both romantic and naturalist. The relationship between man and nature in Emerson and Thoreau differ that the “Nature”, in which he established a new way for America’s hatchling society to regard the world. During that time American culture is highly influenced by the European culture so, Emerson through his speech he wants to suggest the real American culture and ask his citizen to preserve the essence of the real American culture, but according to the American story the world began with a single man and man is divided into several other man so that a work can be complete successfully because of increase in division among man the man no longer worked effectively with each other to get a better work. Emerson state that a true scholar must have great knowledge of nature to help in increase self-awareness. Nature helps individuals to find new ways to live in this world. He says that the relation between man and nature is interdependence and they are parallel to each other so that we can understand our soul.
The greatest difference is Thoreau disregarded what the majority thought and cared only for the thoughts of people in the right. Socrates, on the other hand, gave the impression he cared not what anybody thought. A similarity is Thoreau and Socrates followed their own drummers and were figures of nonconformity. However, Socrates believed in making change by obeying laws, not breaking them immediately. Thoreau felt there was no time like the present to act. Thoreau wrote, “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose” (Civil Disobedience 9). Thoreau did what he thought was right, even if it didn’t make him popular, since that is not the point of trying to make