The perception of beauty has changed these past few centuries, but warping stereotypes does not eliminate them. Current media shows such through films like Frankenstein and The Village, which show how monsters are portrayed. Cosmetics allow consumers to conceal unwanted facial or body features. Although viewpoints and tones are different in "Lusus Naturae" and "My mistress’ eyes", they both show humanity’s perspectives on beauty.
"Lusus Naturae" takes a depressing route as it creates empathy in first person narration, while “My mistress’ eyes” portrays a more optimistic connotation. As seen typically in a family, “Ps and Rs in it meant nothing to us” (Atwood 225). The narrator’s family does not care about the ingredients inside the medicine,
…show more content…
they just want to fix their daughter. The narrator’s mother contrasts the narrator’s past body with her current one, but the narrator takes the sentence out of context. The grandmother believes that her granddaughter is a result of a family curse. The amount of love from the narrator's family is distressing. The narrator’s family is not trying to make the narrator feel better about herself, but they are making her worse. The narrator leaves her family alone after they faked her death, which brings a tone of loneliness. Half-way through the story, many of the narrator’s relatives die while she was presumed dead, which creates a shift to despair. "My mistress’ eyes" contrasts with, “I think my love as rare” (Shakespeare 891). The speaker does list negative traits about his wife before his positive statement, but he only cares about inner beauty. The speaker is glad that he is able to enjoy love that some people are not able to experience. However, the irony is shown as marriage was established easily around Shakespeare’s time period (1609). There is a short spark of optimism in "Lusus Naturae", but it only ends in a tragedy as the narrator dies. She hopes to be reborn as a beautiful angel in the afterlife. The ending of "My mistress’ eyes" shows the climax and conclusion of the story. The speaker compares his mistress to other females, only to fail in finding similarities. In the end, there is not doubt that "Lusus Naturae" has a negative and empathetic connotation, while "My mistress’ eyes" is the complete opposite. Both literary pieces present the reality of stereotypical views of beauty. In "My mistress’ eyes", As most people would argue against, “I grant I never saw a goddess go” (Shakespeare 891). The narrator's statements summarizes the previous stanzas, which shows that even the speaker acknowledges traditional views. Even so, he tends to ignore them as he makes his own judgments of one’s characteristics, not just from beauty. Lust was a big deal around the 16th century, and Shakespeare wanted to make sure that his viewers can differentiate love from lust. His 130th Sonnet executes such theme well as men were focused on having sex, compared to actually getting to know their spouse. As assumptions are made, “no man would pollute me” (Atwood 226). The priest assumed that no man would be attracted to the narrator. A priest represents the highest of the upper classes and he is well respected, but he disappoints the narrator while believing he is doing the right thing. The priest sees a virgin as a very holy person, but the narrator still wants to experience love, even a little at least. Lust is also perceived in "Lusus Naturae" through the narrator’s ambition to get attached to any male. Aesthetic plastic surgery has been used to improve anyone’s features since World War II (Gersdorff 1). Since then, such cosmetics are used to cover any unwanted traits, as people assume that they will become like the characters in the literary pieces. It is really easy to access, especially in a mall where advertisement takes place. "Lusus Naturae" portrays ugliness in an extreme way, compared to "My mistress’ eyes".
As stated in the title, "Lusus Naturae" is a hyperbole of how the narrator does not meet society’s expectations of beauty. The doctor says that “she’ll want to drink chicken blood” (Atwood 225). The doctor is treating the narrator as an inhuman being, and no family member questions him about it. Also, a doctor is a part of the middle-class society, so he should be more understanding of the narrator’s situation since he has his own children take care of. Furthermore, Atwood creates a monster through the use of unique verbs and adjectives in diction. The narrator even knows that she has red-nailed hands,which shows her acknowledgment as a freak. The narrator performs questionable actions, such as biting a guy’s neck, which really brings out the monster in her. A village mob going after a strange creature is a stereotype in itself. The speaker in "My mistress’ eyes" states “no such roses see I in her cheeks” (Shakespeare 891). The speaker does look for characteristics that define beauty, but he gets only natural traits. He never exaggerates any of the horrible attributes. He is basically saying that she is not beautiful, but she is not ugly either. The speaker does at one point state that his mistress has awful, sounding voice that he rather listen to than music. The speaker does not compare beauty at this point, but he goes further into other physical traits. Regardless, the speaker puts such quality in the unpleasant category. Writing the piece as a Sonnet merits a joyful tone in itself. The pathway chosen by "Lusus Naturae" had a more lasting impact compared to "My mistress’ eyes", as it had a more intense
focus. With the advent of makeup and other beauty products, the discussed literary pieces question whether people should worry about how they look or not. Current media and cosmetics influence how both females and males adjust to their surroundings. Peoples’ stereotypes on beauty are portrayed in "Lusus Naturae" and "My mistress’ eyes" with different tones and connotations.
The concept of beauty is a subject society speaks on through many channels. Social media plays a tremendous role in how society measures beauty and how to achieve these impossible standards. People from all walks of life have become obsessed with the idea of beauty and achieving the highest level it. In many cases, those who do not meet societal views of what is “beautiful” can become very resentful to these predisposed notions of beauty. David Akst in his writing “What Meets the Eye”, is bitter toward women and their ongoing obsession with beauty.
Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth. How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. New York: William Morrow, 1991.
This fictional story, Lusus Laturae, is written by Margaret Atwood. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the origin of the Lusus Naturae is from Latin and the meaning is “freak of nature.” That is direct enough to assume the story is about a monster figure that will be a symbol of the story. According to the book “Freak of Nature,” the history of freak of nature to scientists and philosophers is an unfortunate, grotesque creature because it is odd or abnormal such as a conjoined twin which has two heads and shared a body (Blumberg 5). The criterion of being odd or abnormal starts from the visual difference seen by people. In the story, through the narration and point of view, character, symbol and figurative language, plot, and setting, it is revealed that the society and even the family ostracizes the protagonist who is defined as a monster due to her different appearance from others.
In conclusion, in Lusus Naturae we see what it is like to be deemed a monster by both your family and community through the eyes of a young girl afflicted with a condition that makes her appearance look monstrous. We see how the Narrator’s family and community treats her because of her family’s shame and the community’s ignorance of her being a human being with feelings. Lusus Naturae allows us to see that it is not wise to judge a book by its cover or a “monster” by its
The speaker uses metaphors to describe his mistress’ eyes to being like the sun; her lips being red as coral; cheeks like roses; breast white as snow; and her voices sounding like music. In the first few lines of the sonnet, the speaker view and tells of his mistress as being ugly, as if he was not attracted to her. He give...
Because young girls and women around the world are beginning to alter themselves to fit a certain mold, people are starting to realize that a pretty face and one’s youth is a factor that has been hurting the world for many years. So much so that a person is willing to kill to obtain beauty. This is truly and amazing yet sickening fact and the more we emphasize on one’s appearance the more catastrophes like this will happen.
Much like "Lady Lilith," "Lilith" celebrates the pleasures of physicality. As an enchantress, she "draws men to watch the bright web she can weave," but she does not invite them to be mere voyeurs of her charms (line 7). Instead, she invites them to her and then ensnares them in her "web" of physical beauty, ultimately causing their death (line 8).
“Looks don’t matter; beauty is only skin-deep” (Godfrey, 2013). We hear these sayings all the time, yet we live in a society that seems to constantly contradict this idea (Godfrey, 2013). If looks don’t matter, why is every woman in magazines photoshopped? If looks don’t matter, why are women constantly harming their bodies because they are unhappy with how they look and just want to fit in (Godfrey, 2013)? The unrealistic standard of beauty that women are bombarded with everyday gives them a goal that is impossible (Godfrey, 2013). Sociocultural standard of feminine beauty is presented in almost all forms of popular media, forcing women with images that portray what is considered to be the ideal body (Serdar). A majority of the models
In the photo of Alba’s face, you cannot see her skin pores, or any lines that may appear on her face. In the film Killing Us Softly 3, Jean Killbourne defines these features of computer-generated photography remove any human elements to remove any blemishes that might be seen on Michelle Pfeiffer’s face (5:22). This type of facial manipulation defines the deification of women through the lens of patriarchal expectations of how women are supposed to appear in real life: “Soon, we won’t need real models and the ideal image will be more impossible than ever before….that we can look like this if we just try hard enough” (5:54). These approaches to photographic editing define the way that Jessica Alba also appears almost “beyond natural” as she gazes into the camera with a perfect face, and without any acne, skin pores, and aging lines. “This ideal image does affect women with self-esteem, and it also influences how men feel about the real women that they are with” (6:25). Killbourne effectively defines the important aspects of feminist perspectives on the objectification of women, which are exposed in this Revlon ad, but more importantly, it shows how difficult this type of propagandistic beauty can be for women as they try to emulate this form of perfection by buying make-up
"My Mistress' Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun" uses comparisons to express Shakespeare's idea of love as opposed to lust. A lustful man would focus on a woman's pleasing physical characteristics, such as white breasts, beautiful hair, red lips, and fragrant breath; however, Shakespeare's mistress possesses none of these great characteristics. Shakespeare, instead, uses metaphors to express her physical shortcomings. "Coral is far more red than her lips' red" (line 2) describes his mistress' faded lips. "If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head" (line 4) shows the coarse, unkempt and dark color of her hair. "
Many people today feel like their faces are hideous, and the same can be said for Georgina from “The Birthmark”. Almost any- physical attribute can be considered ugly to oneself, and to others, depending on what the others
This poem speaks of a love that is truer than denoting a woman's physical perfection or her "angelic voice." As those traits are all ones that will fade with time, Shakespeare exclaims his true love by revealing her personality traits that caused his love. Shakespeare suggests that the eyes of the woman he loves are not twinkling like the sun: "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun" (1). Her hair is compared to a wire: "If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head" (3). These negative comparisons may sound almost unloving, however, Shakespeare proves that the mistress outdistances any goddess. This shows that the poet appreciates her human beauties unlike a Petrarchan sonnet that stresses a woman's cheek as red a rose or her face white as snow. Straying away from the dazzling rhetoric, this Shakespearean poem projects a humane and friendly impression and elicits laughter while expressing a truer love. A Petrarchan sonnet states that love must never change; this poem offers a more genuine expression of love by describing a natural woman.
The concept of beauty during the Middle Ages consisted of the idea that beauty was directly correlated to spirituality. In other words, a person was judged as either good or bad based on their outer appearance, as well as their standing in society. Therefore, executions of beauty manifested in the arts was limited to only a certain class of individuals and was more determined by what a person’s status was in society. In addition, artwork of people was made to be mostly concentrated on the countenance, with artificially smooth skin, intentionally showing no sign of blemish or flaw unless by accident. A shift occurred during the Italian Renaissance, the human body in its entirety was celebrated among the masses and could be considered beautiful
One of the physical attributes, in the first quatrain, that he mentions is his “mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun,” meaning she has no ‘twinkle’ in her eyes. In the first quatrain, he also speaks of coral as being “far more red” than the lips of his mistress; this is a use of imagery to show her non-beauty. He also recognizes that there are “no such roses” on her cheeks in the second quatra...
For countless ages, people have never stop pursuing the characteristic and definition of beauty. It is the power of beauty that makes something attractive to the others. One of the greatest writers in English language, William Shakespeare (1598) said 'Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye'. Although inner beauty is undeniably important, but does it still weigh much in this current society? If it does, how do people judge an individual when first met? Halo effect experiments had shown us that physical beauty plays a significant role in judging a person (Dean.J., 2007 ). Cognitive bias exists where our overall impression give influence to what people think about our character. Perception of “What is beautiful is good” is not something new. As the role of physical beauty expands, people start to investigate the causes which include genetics, facial proportions and symmetrical effects. It has become a trend for people to invest in the process of enhancing their physical beauty. For