Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexism and gender
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-Mark” unfolds during the nineteenth century; a time when women had rights unequal to those of men, and were also treated as property without value by their husbands. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s narrative offers a negative portrayal of how men in these patriarchal societies take advantage of the women. “The Birth-Mark” portrays Aylmer and Georgiana in a negative light when Georgiana resembles the patriarchal “good girl,” and surrenders herself to her husband. Readers can distinguish that Aylmer’s obsession to perfect Georgiana mirrors a sexist society where men are unable to accept women as equal or as more than an object.
Aylmer’s vision of perfecting Georgiana reflects the patriarchal image of women, who are reduced to nothing more than objects. Meanwhile, Aylmer’s main focus is himself. He objectifies Georgiana, causing her to become the very picture of a patriarchal “good girl.” Tyson states that such women are “not viewed as independent human beings with their own goals, needs, and desires” (142). Aylmer treats her as someone who should worship him and satisfy his passion for perfection. He treats her as a one-dimensional person, who has no desires of her own. He does this when he fails to consider Georgiana’s desire to keep her birthmark. He tells her
…show more content…
that her birthmark will be removed, reducing Georgiana’s worth based on her appearance. The birthmark becomes the central focus for Aylmer’s goals which demonstrates the importance of physical appearance in the patriarchal society. Furthermore, Aylmer initially marries Georgiana because she is beautiful and mesmerizing to his eyes. The narrator says that he “[persuaded] a beautiful woman to become his wife,” (Hawthorne 211) implying that her inner personality was not as significant as her outer appearance. He objectifies her as being a prize he won through persuasion, a prize which he displays in his home. Through this thought, he is objectifying because it appears as if she is a commodity of his, and there is nothing more than Georgiana’s beauty. Now that he’s won her, he starts to analyze her by focusing on her imperfections. That is, after they were married, Aylmer becomes obsessed with the hand-shaped birthmark on Georgiana’s left cheek. Aylmer contests that she has “[come] so nearly perfect from the hand of Nature, that this slightest possible defect, which [they] hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks [him], as being the visible mark of earthly imperfection” (Hawthorne 212). To him, the birthmark ruins her whole complexity no matter how beautiful she truly is. The birthmark symbolizes nature and its imperfections and Aylmer plans to fix this defect of hers that nature has bestowed. Georgiana’s birthmark symbolizes the patriarchal image of women during the nineteenth century because such women were to be attractive and good-looking. Over time, the birthmark becomes a sacrifice that Aylmer makes.
He sacrifices his marriage in mortal life, with Georgiana, in order to not only perfect her, but to achieve superficial happiness for his “love of science” (Hawthorne 212). She becomes a scientific object to him that he will experiment on in the continual effort to perfect her. Aylmer is concerned with achieving the creation of immortality by conducting a potion that will perfect his wife. His ego reflects his superficiality and omniscience to achieve the unachievable. Aylmer fails to see past his own aspirations; he fails to realize how much he’s lost from what he’s gained when the outcome results in Georgiana’s
death. Aylmer affects Georgiana’s self-image, causing her to abandon her sense of self and to succumb to Aylmer’s desires. Georgiana fulfills her patriarchal gender role “in every way” because she is “fragile, [and] submissive” (Tyson 144).Georgiana is overwhelmed by Aylmer’s stare and commentary, wherein he makes her his project of perfection. When Georgiana and Aylmer sit together, “his eyes wandered stealthily to her cheek, and beheld, flickering with the blaze of the wood-fire, the spectral hand that wrote mortality where he would fain have worshipped,” and, through, this she “learned to shudder at his gaze” (Hawthorne 214). Georgiana cannot stand the disgrace she brought to Aylmer, so she starts to wither inside. She wants the acceptance that she thought her husband gave her before they married. Georgiana used to see her birthmark as a unique beauty, but, now, “Whenever she dared to look into the mirror, she beheld herself pale as a white rose [,] with the crimson birth-mark stamped upon her cheek. Not even Aylmer now hated it [as] much as she” (Hawthorne 220). She has lost her self-worth and her self-esteem because of Aylmer’s verbal abuse towards her birthmark. Her only desire is Aylmer’s obsession to dispose of it, because she has learned to hate it as much as he. Georgiana exclaims that “—life is a burden which I would fling down with joy. Either remove this dreadful hand, or take my wretched life! You have deep science (Hawthorne 215). Georgiana’s willingness to give up her birthmark characterizes her as a woman who was not only fragile, but as a woman who did not have much self-worth originally. If she had a more stable sense of self, she would not have crumbled as quickly. The relationship between Aylmer and Georgiana displays a sexist society where women are treated as if they are inferior to men, where women like Georgiana will always be at a disadvantage because they submit to traditional gender roles. She acts as any wife during this century would act and puts her full trust in her husband. In this effort she is willing to give up her own life in response to her husband’s happiness. She acts as if she is inferior to Aylmer because she complies with his decision to remove her birthmark. This idea emulates the sexist belief of individuals “—which cast men as decision makers and women as dutiful followers” and additionally parallels to the idea that “men’s innate superiority dictates that they should be in charge” (Tyson 143). Aylmer pushes Georgiana to let him determine the removal of her birthmark because he is her husband and his decisions dictate her own. He also makes her feel less intelligent when she questions his reason for trying to possess such power. He disregards the question, and answers saying: “O, do not tremble, my love, I would not wrong either you or myself by working such inharmonious effects upon our lives; but I would have you consider how trifling, in comparison, is the skill requisite to remove this little hand” (Hawthorne 218). In his mind, he has enough knowledge and sense of what he’s doing, and he cannot see how it could possibly fail. Once more this proves the nature that women such as Georgiana, are essentially inferior to men such as Aylmer. In brief, readers can grasp that Aylmer’s obsession with perfecting Georgiana imitates the patriarchal society of the nineteenth century. Georgiana is obedient to Aylmer, so she surrenders herself to his “goals, needs, and desires.” Georgiana acts as the patriarchal “good girl” and portrays women as unequal objects to men in society. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birth-Mark” presents the negative depiction of men and women in the patriarchal society. It illustrates that perfecting imperfections are impossible unless sacrifices are made; Aylmer sacrifices Georgiana for his success in science and happiness with her, while Georgiana selflessly sacrifices herself for Aylmer’s happiness. As readers can see, his love for her is inferior to his passion for science.
In the eighteenth century, the process of choosing a husband and marrying was not always beneficial to the woman. A myriad of factors prevented women from marrying a man that she herself loved. Additionally, the men that women in the eighteenth century did end up with certainly had the potential to be abusive. The attitudes of Charlotte Lennox and Anna Williams toward women’s desire for male companionship, as well as the politics of sexuality, are very different. Although both Charlotte Lennox and Anna Williams express a desire for men in their poetry, Charlotte Lennox views the implications of this desire differently than Anna Williams.
The attempted removal of Georgiana’s birthmark by Aylmer signifies a desire to conquer nature and reveals a hidden quality within Aylmer. The first instance in which the reader sees Aylmer trying to conquer or control nature is subtle, it is near the beginning of the story and the narrator says “[Aylmer] persuaded a beautiful woman to become his wife” (211). The common belief is that love occurs naturally and cannot be forced. It seems as though the narrator chooses to state that Aylmer persuaded his wife, rather than fell in love with her, in order to indicate early on in the text Aylmer’s tendencies toward manipulating nature. Later in the
Society continually places restrictive standards on the female gender not only fifty years ago, but in today’s society as well. While many women have overcome many unfair prejudices and oppressions in the last fifty or so years, late nineteenth and early twentieth century women were forced to deal with a less understanding culture. In its various formulations, patriarchy posits men's traits and/or intentions as the cause of women's oppression. This way of thinking diverts attention from theorizing the social relations that place women in a disadvantageous position in every sphere of life and channels it towards men as the cause of women's oppression (Gimenez). Different people had many ways of voicing their opinions concerning gender inequalities amound women, including expressing their voices and opinions through their literature. By writing stories such as Daisy Miller and The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Henry James let readers understand and develop their own ideas on such a serious topic that took a major toll in American History. In this essay, I am going to compare Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” to James’ “Daisy Miller” as portraits of American women in peril and also the men that had a great influence.
“The Birth Mark” is a story of an elusive search for perfection when an alchemist named Aylmer who is committed to his work, and is married to a beautiful woman named Georgiana, attempts to remove his wife’s birthmark. Aylmer brings up the topic of her birthmark soon after their marriage and says that she would be perfect if it were removed. This statement completely destroys Georgiana’s self-image, and now believes that she is ugly since her husband believes the same. Georgiana is so devoted to her husband that she views herself utterly through his vision of
When Aylmer tells Georgiana that her so called “beauty” mark is in fact an “earthly imperfection”, she is immediately affected and overcome with a thought that had never occurred to her in all her life. Having always been told that the mark upon her face was that of beauty, she was angered and appalled shouting
In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s bodies of work, Gilman highlights scenarios exploring traditional interrelations between man and woman while subtexting the necessity for a reevaluation of the paradigms governing these relations. In both of Gilman’s short stories, “The Yellow Wallpaper” and “Turned”, women are victimized, subjected and mistreated. Men controlled and enslaved their wives because they saw them as their property. A marriage was male-dominated and women’s lives were dedicated to welfare of home and family in perseverance of social stability. Women are expected to always be cheerful and good-humored. Respectively, the narrator and Mrs. Marroner are subjugated by their husbands in a society in which a relationship dominated by the male is expected.
When studying gender roles in history, one will find that females are often depicted in similar ways no matter the era or region of study. Even when comparing the industrialized, early, twentieth century to today’s progressive era, there are striking similarities between female roles. We can see that over the course of the twentieth century, the qualities of loyalty and honesty have decreased in marriages due to the treatment of the two main female roles as depicted literature. The first was the role of the wife. The wife was often portrayed as a housekeeper and a nanny. Dull in appearance, there was no aesthetic beauty to this typical female. The other main role was the “other woman.” The more mysterious and promiscuous character, this woman portrayed the other part of the female population. Both of these types of characters are composites that portrayed the average, disposable female while how they were treated conveyed the general handling of females in the early, twentieth century.
During the portion of the rising action we discover what type of man Aylmer is. He is a man of science, and held with high regards by other scientists. His love for science is first priority; anything else means nothing compared to his studies.Even though he decided to search for a wife, he does so with hardly any enthusiasm, “ He had left his laboratory to the care of his assistant, cleared his fine countenance from the furnace smoke, washed the stain of acids from his fingers and persuaded a beautiful women to become his wife.” Two points are brought up; first he leaves his assistant in the lab with all the dirty work to be done, while Aylmer cleans himself up and just decides he needs a wife, pointing out that Aminadab, although only an assistant, has a great deal of responsibility. Second due, to his non chalante attitude towards finding a woman, we find that he wonders if he could love a woman more than his science, “ His love for his young wife might prove the stronger of the two; but it could only be by intertwining itself with his love of science and uniting the strength of the latter of his own.” Right then we see he could not marry and be truly in love unless he could some how combine it with his science.
History has underrepresented females throughout countless centuries. In contrast, Hawthorne allows them to take on essential roles in “Young Goodman Brown,” “The Minister’s Black Veil,” “and “The Birthmark.” The way he presents them distinguishes his stories from others at his time. He proves all of his female characters almost flawless, deeply connects the male protagonists to them, and uses them to reveal the males’ hidden sides.
that leaves the successes of his laboratory to find the perfect wife. His pursuit finds her and blindly he does not take notice any of nature?s flaws that Georgiana has. However, Aylmer ideology of perfection consumes him once he discovers the birthmark. All of his attention is on this small mark that is unchanged when there is a shift in her emotions. His next question gives foresight into the depths of Aylmer?s pursuit to rid this small imperfection. Aylmer asks Georgian, his wife, "has it never occurred to you that the mark upon your cheek might be removed?" He continues to say the mark makes her imperfect: ?No, dearest Georgiana, you came so nearly perfect from the hand of Nature that this slightest possible defect, which we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me, as being the visible mark of earthly
Throughout time women have been written as the lesser sex, weaker, secondary characters. They are portrayed as dumb, stupid, and nothing more than their fading beauty. They are written as if they need to be saved or helped because they cannot help themselves. Women, such as Daisy Buchanan who believes all a woman can be is a “beautiful little fool”, Mrs Mallard who quite died when she lost her freedom from her husband, Eliza Perkins who rights the main character a woman who is a mental health patient who happens to be a woman being locked up by her husband, and then Carlos Andres Gomez who recognizes the sexism problem and wants to change it. Women in The Great Gatsby, “The Story of an Hour,” “The Yellow Wall Paper” and the poem “When” are oppressed because the fundamental concept of equality that America is based on undermines gender equality.
Largely throughout the history of the United States of America, women have been intimately oppressed by their spouses in collusion with a patriarchal society. The Realist literary period saw no exception to this oppression of women. The Realist period, which lasted approximately from 1865-1910, involved many injustices on women, women’s rights, and equality. Males were supreme to females throughout this period, and women were denied many basic freedoms, including the right to vote. Women were regarded as frail, unequal, and inferior. However, the marginalization of women in this period did not go without protest. Women began to have an active voice on issues pertaining to their own rights as the end of the Realist period neared. Headways into women’s rights were made in this period around the turn of the century. “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gillman chronicles the oppression and deteriorating sanity of Jane, who is being confined in a room by her physician and husband. This story is critical in telling of the oppression and subordination of women to their husbands throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin depicts a frail woman, who dies after a fright from her husband, who she believed was dead. The Awakening by Kate Chopin details the life of Edna Pontellier, who seeks individualism and life away from the control of men. Edna Pontellier assists in representing the audible and vociferous women’s rights movement that arose towards the end of the 19th century. American women in the Realist literary period encountered three elements that defined their societal status: oppression, inequality, and activism.
Charlotte Bront’s Jane Eyre entails a social criticism of the oppressive social ideas and practices of nineteenth-century Victorian society. The presentation of male and female relationships emphasizes men’s dominance and perceived superiority over women. Jane Eyre is a reflection of Bront’s own observation on gender roles of the Victorian era, from the vantage point of her position as governess, much like Jane’s. Margaret Atwood’s novel was written during a period of conservative revival in the West partly fueled by a strong, well-organized movement of religious conservatives who criticized ‘the excesses of the sexual revolution.’ Where Bront’s Jane Eyre is a clear depiction of the subjugation of women by men in nineteenth-century Western culture, Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale explores the consequences of a reversal of women’s rights by men.
In the Victorian Era of mid nineteen to early twentieth century, a woman’s role in society remained to be in the household, away from the business and cares of men. The feminine side is portrayed as negative, powerless, and lacking (Kileen 49). Society discouraged women from having power in society and neglecting women represented normal in the eyes of most men and women. However, Victorian novels such as The Picture of Dorian Gray illustrate the consequences of disregarding women. In Oscar Wilde’s only novel, the lack of importance surrounding the female characters and their careless treatment from men results in the selfishness of the male characters exemplified through Dorian Gray’s acts of evil.
“Girls wear jeans and cut their hair short and wear shirts and boots because it is okay to be a boy; for a girl it is like promotion. But for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, according to you, because secretly you believe that being a girl is degrading” (McEwan 55-56). Throughout the history of literature women have been viewed as inferior to men, but as time has progressed the idealistic views of how women perceive themselves has changed. In earlier literature women took the role of being the “housewife” or the household caretaker for the family while the men provided for the family. Women were hardly mentioned in the workforce and always held a spot under their husband’s wing. Women were viewed as a calm and caring character in many stories, poems, and novels in the early time period of literature. During the early time period of literature, women who opposed the common role were often times put to shame or viewed as rebels. As literature progresses through the decades and centuries, very little, but noticeable change begins to appear in perspective to the common role of women. Women were more often seen as a main character in a story setting as the literary period advanced. Around the nineteenth century women were beginning to break away from the social norms of society. Society had created a subservient role for women, which did not allow women to stand up for what they believe in. As the role of women in literature evolves, so does their views on the workforce environment and their own independence. Throughout the history of the world, British, and American literature, women have evolved to become more independent, self-reliant, and have learned to emphasize their self-worth.