Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on Shakespeare's love in poems
Sonnet 116 analysis
Sonnet 116 analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on Shakespeare's love in poems
Compare the way in which these poets convey their attitudes to love
and relationships. How is this affected by the era in which they
lived?
The two poems I am comparing are 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew
Marvell. Coy can be translated into modern language as Shy. The whole
poem is persuasive and is trying to get the lady to sleep with him,
but because she is shy she wont. Marvell lived in the 17th century
from 1621-1678. The poem in contrast is 'Sonnet 116' by William
Shakespeare who also wrote this poem in the 17th century and he lived
from 1564-1616. This poem is about the strength of love.
Marvell was a metaphysical poet, which means he used extensive
metaphors throughout his poems, as if he is playing with language. On
the other hand Shakespeare wrote in sonnets and has a more sincere
approach to writing.
The poems are both similar in 'meaning' because love I the base of
these two poems. I will be exploring the meaning, which is most
difficult to find without deep thought. Marvell's poem is split into
three parts, the first is speculating about love and if they had all
the time this is what they would do. If they had plentiful time her
shyness wouldn't matter, (but using the unique style Marvell has
acquired), he is almost saying it is a crime to be shy because they
have little time. He says he would spend 200 years adoring each breast
and 100 years gazing upon her forehead. With all the time the world
has he tells us they would visit the Indian Gange's side, because they
had all the world to explore with unlimited time.
Shakespeare is in contrast to this to Marvell as he is saying they
have enough time to do what they like. In the opening line 'Let me not
to the marriage of true minds', he ...
... middle of paper ...
...artnership ripping up their time and pleasure with
'rough strife'. Meaning they must be very fast and strong to make use
of the time they have. Marvell is writing very aggressively.
Shakespeare is again writing in complete opposite to Marvell, he says
love does not change 'in brief hours or weeks'. Love 'bears it out
even to the edge of doom' meaning love lat beyond people's lifetimes,
to the ends of eternity. Shakespeare then ends and concludes his poem
with a rhyming couplet. If Shakespeare's thoughts about love are
false, then he says he has never written anything, therefore he cannot
be wrong.
Marvell then writes that they are going to be so fast that the sun
will have to catch up, we see the couple hand in hand with a huge
burning ball chasing them.
Shakespeare is basically saying love is more powerful than time and
Marvell the exact opposite.
As Edgar Allan Poe once stated, “I would define, in brief the poetry of words as the rhythmical creation of beauty.” The two poems, “Birthday,” and “The Secret Life of Books” use different diction, theme, and perspective to give them a unique identity. Each author uses different literary devices to portray a different meaning.
The tone of “To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time” and “To His Coy Mistress” are different. In Herrick’s poem, his tone is relaxed. For instance when he writes, “Gather ye rosebuds while ye may, /Old times is still a-flying,” his word choice has a very relaxed and casual tone. His attitude reflects the relaxed tone in his poem. In Marvell’s poem, his tone is serious. Marvell’s purpose is to persuade his mistress to have sex with him. He tries to lure her in when saying, “Had we but World enough, and Time.” He starts out very seriously, in attempt to convince his mistress. The relaxed tone of “To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time” and serious tone of “To His Coy Mistress” point out the difference in the way the writers feel about their characters.
The next time they meet is a couple of years after they saw each other at the airpo...
Attitudes Towards Love in Pre-1900 and 1990's Poetry “The Despairing Lover” written by William Walsh was written pre 1900 whilst the second poem “I Wouldn’t Thank you for a Valentine” by Liz Lockhead was written in the 1990’s. These poems are almost a century apart. Attitude towards love changes over time and these poems represent this. I Wouldn’t Thank you for a Valentine is about how people think about Valentine’s Day in the 1990’s, while The Despairing Lover is showing what people think and how important they see love in the 1990’s.
A sonnet is a fixed patterned poem that expresses a single, complete thought or idea. Sonnet comes from the Italian word “sonetto”, which means “little song”. Poem, on the other hand, is English writing that has figurative language, and written in separate lines that usually have a repeated rhyme, but don’t all the time. The main and interesting thing is that these two poems or sonnets admire and compare the beauty of a specific woman, with tone, repetition, imagery, and sense of sound.
In Andrew Marvell's poem "To His Coy Mistress," he's arguing for affection. The object of the speaker's desire wants to wait and take the relationship slow, while the speaker pushes for instant gratification. This persuasive poem makes the point that time waits for no one and it's foolish for two lovers to postpone a physical relationship.
First Love is about a shy guy who apparently has seen a girl to which
Exploring Different Types of Love in Three Poems: A Woman to Her Lover, When We Two Parted and First Love
When he writes "And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare as any she, belied with false compare." (lines 13-14) in the final couplet, one responds with an enlightened appreciation, making them understand Shakespeare's message that true love consists of something deeper than physical beauty. Shakespeare expresses his ideas in a wonderful fashion. Not only does he express himself through direct interpretation of his sonnet, but also through the levels at which he styled and produced it. One cannot help but appreciate his message of true love over lust, along with his creative criticism of Petrarchan sonnets.
This poem speaks of a love that is truer than denoting a woman's physical perfection or her "angelic voice." As those traits are all ones that will fade with time, Shakespeare exclaims his true love by revealing her personality traits that caused his love. Shakespeare suggests that the eyes of the woman he loves are not twinkling like the sun: "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun" (1). Her hair is compared to a wire: "If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head" (3). These negative comparisons may sound almost unloving, however, Shakespeare proves that the mistress outdistances any goddess. This shows that the poet appreciates her human beauties unlike a Petrarchan sonnet that stresses a woman's cheek as red a rose or her face white as snow. Straying away from the dazzling rhetoric, this Shakespearean poem projects a humane and friendly impression and elicits laughter while expressing a truer love. A Petrarchan sonnet states that love must never change; this poem offers a more genuine expression of love by describing a natural woman.
Exploring Love Attitudes in Poetry Introduction: The poems that I have chosen are: 'To his coy mistress' by Andrew Marvell. ' Sonnets 18 by William Shakespeare, and 'To the virgins, to make much of time' by Robert Herrick. All the above poems are poems about the subject of love. Each poem is very passionate and complex in nature when you initially read it for the first time and consequently they have stood the test of time and lasted hundreds of years. This portrays a conclusion to what some poets say because they express how the poems will last forever.
Compare the way in which poets create a threatening or menacing atmosphere in four poems. Write about Salome by Carol Ann Duffy and compare it with one poem from Simon Armitage and two from the pre 1914 bank. The poem ‘Salome’, by Carol Ann Duffy, is written in the first person, seemingly from the perspective of a woman given indicators such as the fact that the person has been involved intimately with a man; ‘the reddish beard’. The first three lines of the poem, all of which uses enjambment, only come to make sense as the poem is read, meaningless on their own. Carol Ann Duffy then immediately establishes an ominous ambience to the poem with the line ‘woke up…head…beside me’.
From the works of William Shakespeare and Edmund Spenser it is clear that some similarities are apparent, however the two poets encompass different writing styles, as well as different topics that relate to each other in their own unique ways. In Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 18” and Spenser’s “Sonnet 75”, both poets speak of love in terms of feelings and actions by using different expressive views, allowing the similar topics to contain clear distinctions. Although Edmund Spenser’s “Sonnet 75” and William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 18” relate in the sense that love is genuine and everlasting, Spenser suggests love more optimistically, whereas Shakespeare focuses on expressing the beauty and stability of love.
He also tells the reader that he is 'deep in love' when in fact he
Shakespeare’s sonnets include love, the danger of lust and love, difference between real beauty and clichéd beauty, the significance of time, life and death and other natural symbols such as, star, weather and so on. Among the sonnets, I found two sonnets are more interesting that show Shakespeare’s love for his addressee. The first sonnet is about the handsome young man, where William Shakespeare elucidated about his boundless love for him and that is sonnet 116. The poem explains about the lovers who have come to each other freely and entered into a relationship based on trust and understanding. The first four lines reveal the poet’s love towards his lover that is constant and strong and will not change if there any alternation comes. Next four lines explain about his love which is not breakable or shaken by the storm and that love can guide others as an example of true love but that extent of love cannot be measured or calculated. The remaining lines of the third quatrain refer the natural love which can’t be affected by anything throughout the time (it can also mean to death). In the last couplet, if