Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Erving Goffman's contributions to understanding of society and social processes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Without knowing it, social order is very important in everyday life. As Elizabeth Silva says ‘social order is a key principle of living together’ (Reflections on Ordered Lives, 2009, Audio). The ordering of social life can be looked at in many ways. However, two theories stand out when looking at the making of social order, that of Erving Goffman and Michel Foucault. Both of these theories are concerned with how society is produced and, more specifically, how social order is made and remade. While the two theories aim to understand a broad picture of understanding society, they do so in very different ways. They both split the big questions down into smaller ones, Goffman looks at how an individual creates order, and Foucault looks at how discourse does. The two theories are both very different yet similar in many ways. This makes them interesting to compare and contrast, something this essay will aim to do. Erving Goffman (1959, 1971 and 1972) developed several theories that aim to understand how social order is created. His main interest was with how people’s everyday interactions connected to the creating of social order. (Silva, 2009, p.316). Michel Foucault (1972, 1977 and 1978) was also interested in the making of social order; however he focused on the people who have what he called ‘authoritative knowledge’, and the people who put this knowledge to work in social institutions. Each of these theories attempts to answer their questions, they use the evidence they gathered to make claims and develop concepts and theories to understand how order is made in society. (Silva, 2009, p.319). The questions that Goffman is concerned with are how people intuit the roles that they and others have to play, how do they know that in ... ... middle of paper ... ...order as a whole. Works Cited ‘Reflections on Ordered Lives’ (2009) DD101 Introducing the Social Sciences. [online]. Available at https://learn2.open.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/1126837/mod_label/intro/dd101_cd3_reflections_on_ordered_lives_lq.mp3 (Accessed May 2014). Silva, E.B. (2009) ‘Making Social Order’ in Taylor, S., Hinchcliffe, S., Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds), Making Social Lives. Milton Keynes, The Open University. Staples, M., Meegan, J., Jeffries, E. and Bromley S. (2012) ‘Learning Companion 2’, Introducing the Social Sciences, Milton Keynes, The Open University. The Open University (2009) DD101 Introducing the Social Sciences, ‘Online Activity 23 – Constructing a social science argument: the circuit of knowledge 4.’ [online]. Available at https://learn2.open.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/1127221/mod_resource/content/2/html/323_1.html (Accessed May 2014).
Blakeley, G., Bromley, G., Clarke, J., Raghurham, P., Silva, E. and Taylor, S. (2009) ‘Introducing the Social Sciences’ Learning Companion 1, Milton Keynes, The Open University
‘Society makes and remakes people, but society is also made and remade by the multiple connections and disconnections between people, and between people, places and things’ (Havard, 2014, p.67).
Firstly, an example of how social order is made and remade is when we look at City Road’s lollipop lady June and is evident that her fluorescent uniform and oversized lollipop stick, indicates that her role is that of a formal one (The Open University, 2017). When parents and their children cross the street, June is there to make social
There are two types of people in society, those whom question the realities endured daily and those whom go about life accepting their place in the world, not questioning it. When learning about social justice, one realized that society is not perfectly functioning like one might assume. One professor Bobbie, Harro broke down socialization into different stages of life and organized it into a cycle which exposes oppression, power, prejudice and privilege, all of which are still prominent in today whether people choose to accept it or not. Through his many stages, he discusses how oppression, power, and privilege are recreated through socialization.
Babbie, E. (2007) The Practice of Social Research. Thomson Higher Education. Belmont. (USA) Eleven Edition.
allow us to have a glimpse of social orders and the daily life of how
Throughout SOCIO 211, Professor Sanderson has repeatedly stated that the things we do every day are not natural. Instead these things are constructed by society. He has repeatedly reminded us that we don’t “see” sociology or culture and that we need to “teach ourselves how to see again.” This has been the main take home point of this class for me. I’ve never realized how much I am shaped by my friends, family, teachers, and others around me. That being said, three sociological concepts have improved my understanding of my relationship with society: socialization, gender, and family. These three concepts have been the most important to me because they all are concepts I’ve related to my everyday life, that I am influenced by, and have been molded into. These concepts have made me realize that I cannot necessarily be whoever I want to be or do whatever I want to do. Because of these three main points, I understand my roles and expectations better in life. I have noticed that I act the way I do because I have been socially constructed to do so through socialization, expectations of gender and gender roles, and by how my family has influenced my view of society.
Goffman offers the same argument on a micro-sociological level. He claims, “information about the in...
Social order derives from an interpretation of a net of relations, symbols and social codes. It creates 'a sense of how individuals all fit together in shared spaces' (Silva, 2009, p. 308), and thus relies on encoding of human behaviour in physical spaces as well as among various individuals. In any society, people must acquire knowledge of how to relate to one another and their environment. Order is then established by a normalisation and standardisation of this knowledge. This essay will examine two views on social order, applied to social sciences, and embodied in everyday life. It will compare and contrast a Canadian sociologist, Erving Goffman, and a French philosopher, Michel Foucault. Through an analysis of these two figures, the text will present different ways of looking at social ordering and individuals' place in a human society. Firstly, it will be shown how Goffman and Foucault approach the subject of social order, finding patterns of behaviour in micro and macro-social realities. Secondly, the essay will explore Goffman's and Foucault's views on underlying characteristics of social order, one drawing on performances, and the other on a reinforced adaptation. Finally, it will be argued that each theorist comments on a perception of the self, and its authenticity as a result of social ordering. In conclusion, it will be clear that order is a set of linked social structures, which cannot be reduced to one single theory.
Everyday people try to find their place in society and by doing so they look at their social status in society. This individual paper will be discussing how one is given a social status in society and having this particular status may influence one to act or behave differently then they usually do to keep up with their status. Moreover will be looking particularly at the social status I hold with the role expectations that comes with the status, look closely at status and role in more detail and further more examples of situations faced with thus status.
Giddens theorizes that structure and agency are a duality that cannot exist apart from one another. Human practices create both their consciousness and society. Because individuals make up society’s activities and structural conditions, they can choose to change it. Giddens calls this relationship between knowledge and practices the double hermeneutic. The daily routines and practices of individuals interacting with each other is what shape society. The actors have power over their actions, but the consequences are often unpredictable, allowing for change. Structure is defined by the rules and resources of society but without the human factor it cannot exist (Sociological Theory | Chapter 15 Chapter Summary, 2004). In contrast, he argues that “an actor ceases to be an agent if he or she loses the power to make a difference” (Ritzer, 2011, p 523).
The open University (2011) K218 Readings, Working with children, young people and families, Milton Keynes, The Open University
Doherty, J and Hughes, M (2009) Child Development: Theory and Practice 0-11, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd
Therefore, society evolves as an organism with various structures, which perform different distinct functions. Scholar Jennie McIntyre, who believes in this approach, addresses the society in the realms of important functions played by the distinct elements of the societal structures. The structures here include customs of a particular society, its traditions, the norms applicable in the society, and the institutions that surround a particular society (Kingsbury & Scanzoni,
To be a social being is to be human. The very existence of society can be seen as proof that the ter...