Compare And Contrast Traveling Through The Dark And Woodchucks

838 Words2 Pages

The poem, “Traveling through the Dark” by William Stafford, offers readers a story about a tragic, but common encounter between man and animal. The speaker of the poem is faced with a difficult decision when he discovers a dead deer in the road. “Woodchucks,” by Maxine Kumin, also presents the audience with a poem about humans and animals; however, her poem takes a darker approach on the subject. The speaker is trying to eradicate all of the woodchucks from his garden. In the two poems, tone, imagery, personification, and allusion, are used in order to reveal the intricate relationship between humans and animals.
The speaker’s tone at the beginning of “Traveling through the Dark” is one of detachment; however, the speaker adopts a more sympathetic tone later in the poem. The speaker’s objectivity …show more content…

The tactile and visual imagery the speaker uses to describe the dead doe -“large in belly”, “my fingers touching her side”, and “her side was still warm”- presents the doe in a way that is considerate and dignifying. It is obvious the speaker is genuinely saddened about passing of the deer; the speaker’s sympathy heightens when he realizes that there is fawn inside the belly of the doe. The speaker of “Woodchucks,” on the other hand, does not have same regard for animal life as the speaker of “Traveling through the Dark” does. The visual imagery the speaker of “Woodchucks” uses to describe his killing spree of the woodchucks in the yard is very appalling: “She flipflopped in the air and fell…” Both poems address the moral dilemma man sometime has to face when he comes into contact with nature. The narrator in “Traveling through the Dark” feels like he has an ethical responsibility to the deer and nature; in contrast, the speaker of “Woodchucks” does not have any qualms about executing animals that he considers to be

More about Compare And Contrast Traveling Through The Dark And Woodchucks

Open Document