Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A six - word summary of the gift of the magi
The necklace conflict of the story
Does money bring happiness easily
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A six - word summary of the gift of the magi
Does money really make someone happy? Having money could satisfy someone for only a limited time but money can’t give the feelings or emotions that love and affection creates. Within the story, “the Necklace”, the story is about Madame Loisel which is a greedy woman that borrowed an expensive necklace and worked hard to get a new one. In the story, “Gift of the Magi”, it is about a young couple and how they deal with the challenge of buying each other gifts for Christmas with a really low budget. Does money really make someone happy? Money doesn’t make someone happy and within the two short stories it tells about two different couples and about how they’re struggles and how they surpass them and this is why they are happy not because of money …show more content…
I sold the watch to get the money to buy your combs. And now suppose you put the chops on, (O’henry 108). This demonstrates that money doesn’t make happiness because at the end of it all their love was enough. Money doesn’t make happiness in the story, The Necklace. Throughout the story, “The Necklace”, it shows that money doesn’t make happiness by stating, “Loisel explained the horrible life the needy live. She played her part, however, with sudden heroism, (Maupassant 231). Madame Loisel is saying that she has worked hard and gave up her money in a kind of heroic way and that her giving up money gave her the opportunity to learn things that she would never have to do like working two night jobs. The most valuable gift of all is love. Within the story, “Gift of the Magi” , it says another reason why money doesn’t make happiness by stating, “A mathematician or a wit would give you the wrong answer. The magi brought valuable gifts, but that was not among them, (O’henry 107). Love is the most valuable gift of all because in the text it talks about the magi bringing valuable gifts and the most valuable gift wasn’t an actual thing but it was actually love and that’s why love is the most important gift of
which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to life. With an easy explanation, it explains how having material possessions doesn’t matter, because the moments we have are more valuable.
Initially, the story of The Gift of the Magi has great examples of symbolism. The couple’s mishap with their gifts shows that they would sacrifice their prized possessions for each other. This is true love, and wise according to the magi. Readers can identify easily with the subject of love. Spending every last penny just because one were to care about someone so deeply, and wanting them to be happy.
he Power of Love Love is a powerful emotion that affects everyone at some time in their lives. According to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, love is defined as a feeling of strong and constant affection for someone(1). Love can refer to the feelings between a couple in a romantic relationship, or it can refer to the affection one would have with a friend. When love is shown, each person cares about the other. Sometimes, love can be hypnotizing, causing one to do something they would not do normally.
The Gift of the Magi by O. Henry and the Gift of the Magi - Sesame Street have many different similarities and differences that can alter the meaning and make it suitable for different audiences.
He borrowed “asking a thousand franc from one , five hundred from another” (Maupassant 3) to spend the next ten years of his and Mathilde Loisel life to repay the thirty thousand to everyone they have had borrowed from. After completing the long and dreadful ten years of hard labor Mathilde Loisel quiensidently ran into Mme.Forester to only find out that the necklace she had worn that night was fake and worthless. Being a female that has absolutely no authority over her assets and has no say what so ever in where the are placed thus meaning that she is practically worthless. Realizing all of this it is no longer astonishing that Mr.Loisel went out of his way to borrow 36 thousand francs in loans without the permission from his wife Mrs.Losiel. She understand the fact that they would have to repay these outstanding loans and had spent the next ten years of her youthfull life paying back all the money that was owed. In efforts to pay of this debt Mrs. Losiel works around the house and does her daily duties with no intensions of having control over her finances and accepts that the debt of her husbands is a debt of
According from the film, lesson Number four “Many people think that happiness comes from having more power or more money.” For example, Edward is a businessman in China who always felt happier by having a lot of money. He always uses his money on any situations he wants, and people treat him like a boss. That’s why when Hector asks Edward, “What is your happiness?” Edward said, “Money is my happiness.” It shows money is a part of life and a part of the happiness. It can buy anything you want, and it also can help you easily becomes VIP in restaurants or clubs. That’s why people want to work hard become rich. Although they are getting old, they don’t want to retire and fear any loss of money. That makes Hector writes down, “A lot of people think happiness means being richer or more important.” This statement points out what happens to the society right now. And Hector also feels it. It reflects the overuse of people with money. Further, everyone thinks money can make us feel happy and we can buy the happiness. However, does money really true to buy the happiness? That’s why the movie shows us money is important, but it is not everything. The movie tries to explain it, but it also said that without money you couldn’t be
What does money mean to you?In the Gift of the magi money buys happiness.Such as selling something of your’s to buy for another.In the story the necklace telling the truth can go along ways.Such as buying something new to replace something that didn’t cost as much.Money does buy you happiness because in the gift of the magi Della sell all her hair so she could buy Jim a gift.Also Jim sells his watch so he would be able to buy Della a gift.When in the necklace Madam's husband gives her the money to buy a nice dress that she likes.
“The Necklace” ends up to be a very ironic story as it explains why valuing the more important things in life can be very effective towards a person’s happiness. One example of the story’s irony is when she is at the party dressed as a beautiful and fancy woman. ‘She danced madly, wildly, drunk with pleasure, giving no thought to anything in the triumph of her beauty, the pride of her success…’ (pg 193). This is a form of dramatic irony because Guy explains earlier that Mme. Loisel is just a middle class woman who dreams of a wealthy life, but she is just alluding herself as a luxurious woman. Another example of irony in the story is when Madame found out that the necklace was paste. On page 196, Mme. Forestier, Ma...
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
The Most Precious Present Many times we express our love by giving presents that we can afford, but real love is shown through sacrificing to make the other person happy. This is why the couple in O. Henry’s, “The Gift of the Magi,” stay hopeful and their love remains, considering all the circumstances of financial difficulties. The theme is then inferred to be that love is shown through the sacrifices made not the possessions given. Henry supported this theme by the use of foreshadowing, internal conflict, and situational irony.
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
The Characteristics of The Necklace and button, button “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “button, button” by Richard Matheson have many similarities, as well as differences. The individual stories provide valuable lessons and entertainment for the reader. While the stories share a common theme, their respective authors provide a dissimilar point of views and characterizations. While “button, button” may not be as well written, the theme of the story complements it making for a slightly more impressing piece. Button, button and The Necklace have homogeneous ways of characterization, similar settings, but in the end, the way the stories are resolved are very diverse.
Money is probably one of the most important things in this world. Without it, life would be very hard. With it, you become economically stable making life would be easier in some ways. But the real question is, can money actually make someone physically and emotionally happy? There are many sides to this debate; some who say yes and others who say no. Though most people agree with the statement, “Money doesn’t buy happiness,” there is still a large amount of people who disagree with it. They believe that money does indeed buy happiness and that it’s the most important thing in the world. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, it’s just a matter of what you believe in and your values.
When none of us has ever come across such words and formulas, none of the great personalities has ever mentioned it, then who the hell has instilled it in our minds that money brings happiness. But among this debate one question still raises its head - What is happiness? Happiness is not actually leading a luxurious life but the luxury of living a life. Happiness is not actually about expanding your business, but it lies in expanding the horizons of life. Happiness is not having a meal in the most famous restaurant but to have it with your most beloved family. It does not lie in attending honorable parties but to attend a party with honor.
I never really thought the expression, “money can’t buy happiness”, was true. As an infant, just by observing the people around me, I observed when they would obtain money and a huge grin would spread across their face, the corners of their smile spreading from ear to ear. Whenever I would see that grin and a person’s face light up at the sight of a crisp, green bill it would make me believe that I had proved the famous expression wrong. Now that I’ve grown up and matured, my idea of that expression has changed. As of now, I am able to reflect on life more and look deeper into things and particularly into people more than I was able to do years ago. My ideas about this expression changed the most though because of the money situation my family had stumbled upon because of the failing economy. I remember being younger when the economy was doing well and waking up to twenty gifts for each of my three sisters and I. We used to believe that all of those presents, brought in because of money of course, were the best part of waking up on Christmas. Of course all of those toys and material items would make a child happy; however looking back it would only make them happy if it was given to them by somebody who bought it for them with love.